Currently most of the test files have a separate dwarf and a separate
dsym test with almost identical content (only the build step is
different). With adding dwo symbol file handling to the test suit it
would increase this to a 3-way duplication. The purpose of this change
is to eliminate this redundancy with generating 2 test case (one dwarf
and one dsym) for each test function specified (dwo handling will be
added at a later commit).
Main design goals:
* There should be no boilerplate code in each test file to support the
multiple debug info in most of the tests (custom scenarios are
acceptable in special cases) so adding a new test case is easier and
we can't miss one of the debug info type.
* In case of a test failure, the debug symbols used during the test run
have to be cleanly visible from the output of dotest.py to make
debugging easier both from build bot logs and from local test runs
* Each test case should have a unique, fully qualified name so we can
run exactly 1 test with "-f <test-case>.<test-function>" syntax
* Test output should be grouped based on test files the same way as it
happens now (displaying dwarf/dsym results separately isn't
preferable)
Proposed solution (main logic in lldbtest.py, rest of them are test
cases fixed up for the new style):
* Have only 1 test fuction in the test files what will run for all
debug info separately and this test function should call just
"self.build(...)" to build an inferior with the right debug info
* When a class is created by python (the class object, not the class
instance), we will generate a new test method for each debug info
format in the test class with the name "<test-function>_<debug-info>"
and remove the original test method. This way unittest2 see multiple
test methods (1 for each debug info, pretty much as of now) and will
handle the test selection and the failure reporting correctly (the
debug info will be visible from the end of the test name)
* Add new annotation @no_debug_info_test to disable the generation of
multiple tests for each debug info format when the test don't have an
inferior
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13028
llvm-svn: 248883
Adds @skipIfPlatform and @skipUnlessPlatform decorators which will skip if /
unless the target platform is in the provided platform list.
Test Plan:
ninja check-lldb shows no regressions.
When running cross platform, tests which cannot run on the target platform are
skipped.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8665
llvm-svn: 233547
Summary:
There was a race condition regarding the output of the inferior process. The reading of the
output is performed on a separate thread, and there was no guarantee that the output will get
eventually consumed. Because of that, it was happening that calling Process::GetSTDOUT was not
returning anything even though the process was terminated and would definitely not produce any
further output. This was usually happening only under very heavy system load, but it can be
reproduced by placing an usleep in the stdio thread (Process::STDIOReadThreadBytesReceived).
This patch addresses this by adding synchronization capabilities to the Communication thread.
After calling Communication::SynchronizeWithReadThread one can be sure that all pending input has
been processed by the read thread. This function is then called after every public event which
stops the process to obtain the entire process output.
Test Plan: TestProcessIO.py should now succeed every time instead of flaking in and out.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8246
llvm-svn: 232023
Fixed test case to copy redirected stdout/stderr files from remote
target to host
llgs wasn't bothering to put the pty master file handle in the right
place if stdout/stderr were redirected to a file. It is still needed
for stdin.
Corrected some log message text
llvm-svn: 229141
We want to forward stdin when stdio is not disabled and when we're not
redirecting stdin from a file.
renamed m_stdio_disable to m_stdin_forward and inverted value because
that's what we want to remember.
There was previously a bug that if you redirected stdin from a file,
stdout and stderr would also be redirected to /dev/null
Adds support for remote target to TestProcessIO.py
Fixes ProcessIOTestCase.test_stdin_redirection_with_dwarf for remote
Linux targets
llvm-svn: 228744
These methods are difficult / impossible to implement in a way
that is semantically equivalent to the expectations set by LLDB
for using them. In the future, we should find an alternative
strategy (for example, i/o redirection) for achieving similar
functionality, and hopefully deprecate these APIs someday.
llvm-svn: 222775
The main issue was if you didn't specify all three (stdin/out/err), you would get file actions added to the launch that would always use the pseudo terminal. This is now fixed.
Also fixed the test suite test that handles IO to test redirecting things individually and all together and in other combinations to make sure we don't regress.
<rdar://problem/18638226>
llvm-svn: 219711
This has led to many test suite failures because of copy and paste where new test cases were based off of other test cases and the "mydir" variable wasn't updated.
Now you can call your superclasses "compute_mydir()" function with "__file__" as the sole argument and the relative path will be computed for you.
llvm-svn: 196985
- rework the way SBDebugger.SetAsync() is used to avoid side effects (reset original value at TearDownHook)
- refactor expectedFailureClang (and add expectedFailureGcc decorator)
- mark TestChangeValueAPI.py as expectedFailureGcc due to PR-15039
llvm-svn: 175523
SBProcess.GetSTDERR() not getting stderr of the launched process
Since we are launch the inferior with:
process = target.LaunchSimple(None, None, os.getcwd())
i.e., without specifying stdin/out/err. A pseudo terminal is used for
handling the process I/O, and we are satisfied once the expected output
appears in process.GetSTDOUT().
llvm-svn: 147983
so that we can do Python scripting like this:
target = self.dbg.CreateTarget(self.exe)
self.dbg.SetAsync(True)
process = target.LaunchSimple(None, None, os.getcwd())
process.PutSTDIN("Line 1 Entered.\n")
process.PutSTDIN("Line 2 Entered.\n")
process.PutSTDIN("Line 3 Entered.\n")
Add TestProcessIO.py to exercise the process IO API: PutSTDIN()/GetSTDOUT()/GetSTDERR().
llvm-svn: 145282
Tamas Berghammer