Currently most of the test files have a separate dwarf and a separate
dsym test with almost identical content (only the build step is
different). With adding dwo symbol file handling to the test suit it
would increase this to a 3-way duplication. The purpose of this change
is to eliminate this redundancy with generating 2 test case (one dwarf
and one dsym) for each test function specified (dwo handling will be
added at a later commit).
Main design goals:
* There should be no boilerplate code in each test file to support the
multiple debug info in most of the tests (custom scenarios are
acceptable in special cases) so adding a new test case is easier and
we can't miss one of the debug info type.
* In case of a test failure, the debug symbols used during the test run
have to be cleanly visible from the output of dotest.py to make
debugging easier both from build bot logs and from local test runs
* Each test case should have a unique, fully qualified name so we can
run exactly 1 test with "-f <test-case>.<test-function>" syntax
* Test output should be grouped based on test files the same way as it
happens now (displaying dwarf/dsym results separately isn't
preferable)
Proposed solution (main logic in lldbtest.py, rest of them are test
cases fixed up for the new style):
* Have only 1 test fuction in the test files what will run for all
debug info separately and this test function should call just
"self.build(...)" to build an inferior with the right debug info
* When a class is created by python (the class object, not the class
instance), we will generate a new test method for each debug info
format in the test class with the name "<test-function>_<debug-info>"
and remove the original test method. This way unittest2 see multiple
test methods (1 for each debug info, pretty much as of now) and will
handle the test selection and the failure reporting correctly (the
debug info will be visible from the end of the test name)
* Add new annotation @no_debug_info_test to disable the generation of
multiple tests for each debug info format when the test don't have an
inferior
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13028
llvm-svn: 248883
Adds @skipIfPlatform and @skipUnlessPlatform decorators which will skip if /
unless the target platform is in the provided platform list.
Test Plan:
ninja check-lldb shows no regressions.
When running cross platform, tests which cannot run on the target platform are
skipped.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8665
llvm-svn: 233547
This has led to many test suite failures because of copy and paste where new test cases were based off of other test cases and the "mydir" variable wasn't updated.
Now you can call your superclasses "compute_mydir()" function with "__file__" as the sole argument and the relative path will be computed for you.
llvm-svn: 196985
This test is incorrect as functions that return lldb.SBThread objects never return None, they just return lldb.SBThread objects that contain invalid opaque classes.
llvm-svn: 177416
Add code to test case to create an evil linked list with:
task_evil -> task_2 -> task_3 -> task_evil ...
and to check that the linked list iterator only iterates 3 times.
llvm-svn: 137291
where an empty linked list is represented as a value object with a NULL value, instead of a special value
object which 'points' to NULL.
Also modifies the test case to comply.
rdar://problem/9933692
llvm-svn: 137289
end of list test function as __eol_test__.
The simple example can be reduced to:
for t in task_head.linked_list_iter('next'):
print t
Modify the test program to exercise the API for both cases: supplying or not
supplying an end of list test function.
llvm-svn: 136144
too complex in the test case. We can just simply test that the SBValue object
is a valid object and it does not correspond to a null pointer in order to say
that EOL has not been reached.
Modify the test case and the lldb.py docstring to have a more compact test
function.
llvm-svn: 136123
to iterate through an SBValue instance by treating it as the head of a linked
list. API program must provide two args to the linked_list_iter() method:
the first being the child member name which points to the next item on the list
and the second being a Python function which an SBValue (for the next item) and
returns True if end of list is reached, otherwise it returns False.
For example, suppose we have the following sample program.
#include <stdio.h>
class Task {
public:
int id;
Task *next;
Task(int i, Task *n):
id(i),
next(n)
{}
};
int main (int argc, char const *argv[])
{
Task *task_head = new Task(-1, NULL);
Task *task1 = new Task(1, NULL);
Task *task2 = new Task(2, NULL);
Task *task3 = new Task(3, NULL); // Orphaned.
Task *task4 = new Task(4, NULL);
Task *task5 = new Task(5, NULL);
task_head->next = task1;
task1->next = task2;
task2->next = task4;
task4->next = task5;
int total = 0; // Break at this line
Task *t = task_head;
while (t != NULL) {
if (t->id >= 0)
++total;
t = t->next;
}
printf("We have a total number of %d tasks\n", total);
return 0;
}
The test program produces the following output while exercising the linked_list_iter() SBVAlue API:
task_head:
TypeName -> Task *
ByteSize -> 8
NumChildren -> 2
Value -> 0x0000000106400380
ValueType -> local_variable
Summary -> None
IsPointerType -> True
Location -> 0x00007fff65f06e60
(Task *) next = 0x0000000106400390
(int) id = 1
(Task *) next = 0x00000001064003a0
(Task *) next = 0x00000001064003a0
(int) id = 2
(Task *) next = 0x00000001064003c0
(Task *) next = 0x00000001064003c0
(int) id = 4
(Task *) next = 0x00000001064003d0
(Task *) next = 0x00000001064003d0
(int) id = 5
(Task *) next = 0x0000000000000000
llvm-svn: 135938
Tamas Berghammer