Commit Graph

12 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tamas Berghammer c8fd130a2c Merge dwarf and dsym tests
Currently most of the test files have a separate dwarf and a separate
dsym test with almost identical content (only the build step is
different). With adding dwo symbol file handling to the test suit it
would increase this to a 3-way duplication. The purpose of this change
is to eliminate this redundancy with generating 2 test case (one dwarf
and one dsym) for each test function specified (dwo handling will be
added at a later commit).

Main design goals:
* There should be no boilerplate code in each test file to support the
  multiple debug info in most of the tests (custom scenarios are
  acceptable in special cases) so adding a new test case is easier and
  we can't miss one of the debug info type.
* In case of a test failure, the debug symbols used during the test run
  have to be cleanly visible from the output of dotest.py to make
  debugging easier both from build bot logs and from local test runs
* Each test case should have a unique, fully qualified name so we can
  run exactly 1 test with "-f <test-case>.<test-function>" syntax
* Test output should be grouped based on test files the same way as it
  happens now (displaying dwarf/dsym results separately isn't
  preferable)

Proposed solution (main logic in lldbtest.py, rest of them are test
cases fixed up for the new style):
* Have only 1 test fuction in the test files what will run for all
  debug info separately and this test function should call just
  "self.build(...)" to build an inferior with the right debug info
* When a class is created by python (the class object, not the class
  instance), we will generate a new test method for each debug info
  format in the test class with the name "<test-function>_<debug-info>"
  and remove the original test method. This way unittest2 see multiple
  test methods (1 for each debug info, pretty much as of now) and will
  handle the test selection and the failure reporting correctly (the
  debug info will be visible from the end of the test name)
* Add new annotation @no_debug_info_test to disable the generation of
  multiple tests for each debug info format when the test don't have an
  inferior

Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13028

llvm-svn: 248883
2015-09-30 10:12:40 +00:00
Ed Maste 6724f3ba7c Remove expectedFailureFreeBSD from passing test
HelloWorldTestCase::test_with_dwarf_and_process_launch_api passes
consistently for me and for John Wolfe.

llvm.org/pr21620

llvm-svn: 248269
2015-09-22 13:27:26 +00:00
Sean Callanan 05834cd2ad Reversed r238363, because the message is inconsistent
with all the other assertion messages.

llvm-svn: 241212
2015-07-01 23:56:30 +00:00
Siva Chandra 3154aa23f3 [TestBase.runCmd] Better error message when runCmd fails.
Summary:
Before:
    AssertionError: False is not True : Process is launched successfully

After:
    AssertionError: False is not True : Command 'run a.out' failed.
    >>> error: invalid target, create a target using the 'target create' command
    >>> Process could not be launched successfully

Reviewers: clayborg

Reviewed By: clayborg

Subscribers: lldb-commits, vharron

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9948

llvm-svn: 238363
2015-05-27 22:27:41 +00:00
Vince Harron 3d2979ee2f Enabled a bunch of tests on Linux
Removed expectedFailureLinux from failures that I was unable to
reproduce, updated and improved some other comments near XFAIL tests

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8676

llvm-svn: 233716
2015-03-31 17:44:37 +00:00
Robert Flack 13c7ad9cd2 Replace sys.platform skips in tests with @skip decorators which check against remote platform.
Adds @skipIfPlatform and @skipUnlessPlatform decorators which will skip if /
unless the target platform is in the provided platform list.

Test Plan:
ninja check-lldb shows no regressions.
When running cross platform, tests which cannot run on the target platform are
skipped.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8665

llvm-svn: 233547
2015-03-30 14:12:17 +00:00
Robert Flack 666a986839 Don't clobber CFLAGS_EXTRAS in tests.
To run tests against a different target platform many extra compiler flags are
needed to specify sysroot, include dirs, etc. The environment variable
CFLAGS_EXTRAS seems suited for this purpose except that several Makefiles
clobber the current flags. This change modifies all of these to add to
CFLAGS_EXTRAS instead.

Test Plan:
Verify no regressions in ninja check-lldb.
Run tests using CFLAGS_EXTRAS to specify cross compilation flags for a different
target running lldb-server platform.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8559

llvm-svn: 233066
2015-03-24 12:41:20 +00:00
Ilia K d4ec5a70ea Improve ValueObject::GetValueDidChange test; Add a comment for it
Summary: This patch adds a few comments for GetValueDidChange and contains improvements for TestValueVarUpdate.py test which checks ValueObject::GetValueDidChange for complex types.

Reviewers: zturner, granata.enrico, clayborg

Reviewed By: clayborg

Subscribers: jingham, lldb-commits, granata.enrico, zturner, clayborg

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8103

llvm-svn: 231526
2015-03-06 22:35:08 +00:00
Siva Chandra 51aba6ffa9 Mark 9 lldb unit tests for ubuntu as XFAIL.
The following lldb unit tests fail check-lldb on ubuntu:

TestDataFormatterStdMap.py
TestDataFormatterStdVBool.py
TestDataFormatterStdVector.py
TestDataFormatterSynthVal.py
TestEvents.py
TestInitializerList.py
TestMemoryHistory.py
TestReportData.py
TestValueVarUpdate.py

These unit test failures are for non-core functionality. The intent is to
reduce the check-lldb FAILS to core functionality FAILS and then circle
back later and fix these FAILS at a later date.

llvm-svn: 222608
2014-11-22 05:55:00 +00:00
Ed Maste 55f410bf16 Add decorator for FreeBSD failure
llvm.org/pr21620

llvm-svn: 222442
2014-11-20 18:56:11 +00:00
Shawn Best 590e943a81 Add -std=c99 for building the test case of TestValueVarUpdate - for Siva Chandra : http://reviews.llvm.org/D6201
llvm-svn: 221694
2014-11-11 17:45:00 +00:00
Enrico Granata 0eb0ec298c Fix a problem where ValueObjectVariable was not correctly setting its 'has value changed' flag for scalar valued variables. This fixes rdar://17851144
llvm-svn: 221298
2014-11-04 21:28:50 +00:00