Ensure that errors in `frame variable` are reflected in result object.
The statistics for `frame variable` show invocations as being successful, even
when executing one of the error paths.
This change replaces `result.GetErrorStream()` with `result.AppendError()`,
which also sets the status to `eReturnStatusFailed`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116788
(cherry picked from commit 2c7d10c412)
It was being used only in some very old tests (which pass even without
it) and its implementation is highly questionable.
These days we have different mechanisms for requesting a build with a
particular kind of c++ library (USE_LIB(STD)CPP in the makefile).
Split TestCxxChar8_t into two parts: one that check reading variables
without a process and another part with. This allows us to skip the
former on Apple Silicon, where lack of support for chained fix-ups
causes the test to fail.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114819
LLDB uses mangled name to construct a fully qualified name for global
variables. Sometimes DW_TAG_linkage_name attribute is missing from
debug info, so LLDB has to rely on parent entries to construct the
fully qualified name.
Currently, the fallback is handled when the parent DW_TAG is either
DW_TAG_compiled_unit or DW_TAG_partial_unit, which may not work well
for global constants in namespaces. For example:
namespace ns {
const int x = 10;
}
may produce the following debug info:
<1><2a>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_namespace)
<2b> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0x5e): ns
<2><2f>: Abbrev Number: 3 (DW_TAG_variable)
<30> DW_AT_name : (indirect string, offset: 0x61): x
<34> DW_AT_type : <0x3c>
<38> DW_AT_decl_file : 1
<39> DW_AT_decl_line : 2
<3a> DW_AT_const_value : 10
Since the fallback didn't handle the case when parent tag is
DW_TAG_namespace, LLDB wasn't able to match the variable by its fully
qualified name "ns::x". This change fixes this by additional check
if the parent is a DW_TAG_namespace.
Reviewed By: werat, clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112147
The StringPrinter class was using a Process instance to read memory.
This automatically prevented it from working before starting the
program.
This patch changes the class to use the Target object for reading
memory, as targets are always available. This required moving
ReadStringFromMemory from Process to Target.
This is sufficient to make frame/target variable work, but further
changes are necessary for the expression evaluator. Preliminary analysis
indicates the failures are due to the expression result ValueObjects
failing to provide an address, presumably because we're operating on
file addresses before starting. I haven't looked into what would it take
to make that work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113098
The value type can be a typedef of a reference (e.g. `typedef int& myint`).
In this case `GetQualType(type)` will return `clang::Typedef`, which cannot
be casted to `clang::ReferenceType`.
Fix a regression introduced in https://reviews.llvm.org/D103532.
Reviewed By: teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113673
This reverts commit 3bf96b0329.
It causes crashes as reported in PR52257 and a few other places. A reproducer is bundled with this commit to verify any fix forward. The original test is left in place, but marked XFAIL as it now produces the wrong result.
Reviewed By: teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113449
Currently calling SBType::IsTypeComplete returns true for record types if and
only if the underlying record in our internal Clang AST has a definition.
The function however doesn't actually force the loading of any external
definition from debug info, so it currently can return false even if the type is
actually defined in a program's debug info but LLDB hasn't lazily created the
definition yet.
This patch changes the behaviour to always load the definition first so that
IsTypeComplete now consistently returns true if there is a definition in the
module/target.
The motivation for this patch is twofold:
* The API is now arguably more useful for the user which don't know or care
about the internal lazy loading mechanism of LLDB.
* With D101950 there is no longer a good way to ask a Decl for a definition
without automatically pulling in a definition from the ExternalASTSource. The
current behaviour doesn't seem useful enough to justify the necessary
workarounds to preserve it for a time after D101950.
Note that there was a test that used this API to test lazy loading of debug info
but that has been replaced with TestLazyLoading by now (which just dumps the
internal Clang AST state instead).
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112615
`DWARFASTParserClang::ParseSingleMember` turns DWARF DIEs that describe
struct/class members into their respective Clang representation (e.g.,
clang::FieldDecl). It also updates a record of where the last field
started/ended so that we can speculatively fill any holes between a field and a
bitfield with unnamed bitfield padding.
Right now we are completely ignoring 'artificial' members when parsing the DWARF
of a struct/class. The only artificial member that seems to be emitted in
practice for C/C++ seems to be the vtable pointer.
By completely skipping both the Clang AST node creation and the updating of the
last-field record, we essentially leave a hole in our layout with the size of
our artificial member. If the next member is a bitfield we then speculatively
fill the hole with an unnamed bitfield. During CodeGen Clang inserts an
artificial vtable pointer into the layout again which now occupies the same
offset as the unnamed bitfield. This later brings down Clang's
`CGRecordLowering::insertPadding` when it checks that none of the fields of the
generated record layout overlap.
Note that this is not a Clang bug. We explicitly set the offset of our fields in
LLDB and overwrite whatever Clang makes up.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112697
* clang-format test source.
* Removed the dead setup code.
* Using expect_expr etc. instead of raw expect.
* Slightly expanded with tests for vtable pointers (which mostly just crash atm.)
* Removed some other minor test guideline problems.
Based on post-commit review discussion on
2bd8493847 with Richard Smith.
Other uses of forcing HasEmptyPlaceHolder to false seem OK to me -
they're all around pointer/reference types where the pointer/reference
token will appear at the rightmost side of the left side of the type
name, so they make nested types (eg: the "int" in "int *") behave as
though there is a non-empty placeholder (because the "*" is essentially
the placeholder as far as the "int" is concerned).
This was originally committed in 277623f4d5
Reverted in f9ad1d1c77 due to breakages
outside of clang - lldb seems to have some strange/strong dependence on
"char [N]" versus "char[N]" when printing strings (not due to that name
appearing in DWARF, but probably due to using clang to stringify type
names) that'll need to be addressed, plus a few other odds and ends in
other subprojects (clang-tools-extra, compiler-rt, etc).
Just regrouping the checks for the same typedef together and also giving the
different typedefs unique names. We might want to have a second test with
identical names to see how LLDB handle the potential name conflict, but that
should be a separate test and not part of the main typedef test.
Also this test is actually unintentionally passing. LLDB can't lookup typedefs
in a struct/class scope, but in the test the check passes as the local variable
in the expression evaluation scope pulls in the typedef. I added a second check
that makes it clear that this is not working right now.
This feature doesn't seem to have any dedicated test. Instead some random tests
(e.g. the bitfield tests) are declaring function-local classes for some reason.
This adds a dedicated test so we can clean up those other tests.
Also add FIXME's for some basic stuff that doesn't work. The first FIXME is a
good beginner bug which just requires prepending the function name (in case we
decide to fix it instead of documenting this behaviour). The second FIXME is
caused by LLDB searching for definitions by name (which also seems to miss the
function name so there is a conflict with the outer type).
Some more things that should be tested (and might not work):
* Local classes with member functions with local classes.
* Classes in different functions with same name.
* Classes with the same name in different TUs with internal linkage functions of
the same name.
* Empty classes are parsed by the DWARF parser in a fast path, so that requires
dedicated tests.
* Repeat some of the tested logic for C.
Summary:
In the spirit of https://reviews.llvm.org/D70846, we only return functions with
matching mangled name from Apple/DebugNamesDWARFIndex::GetFunction if
eFunctionNameTypeFull is requested.
This speeds up lookup in the presence of large amount of class methods of the
same name (a typical examples would be constructors of templates with many
instantiations or overloaded operators).
Reviewers: labath, teemperor
Reviewed By: labath, teemperor
Subscribers: aprantl, arphaman, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73191
C doesn't allow empty structs but Clang/GCC support them and give them a size of 0.
LLDB implements this by checking the tag kind and if it's `DW_TAG_structure_type` then
we give it a size of 0 via an empty external RecordLayout. This is done because our
internal TypeSystem is always in C++ mode (which means we would give them a size
of 1).
The current check for when we have this special case is currently too lax as types with
`DW_TAG_structure_type` can also occur in C++ with types defined using the `struct`
keyword. This means that in a C++ program with `struct Empty{};`, LLDB would return
`0` for `sizeof(Empty)` even though the correct size is 1.
This patch removes this special case and replaces it with a generic approach that just
assigns empty structs the byte_size as specified in DWARF. The GCC/Clang special
case is handles as they both emit an explicit `DW_AT_byte_size` of 0. And if another
compiler decides to use a different byte size for this case then this should also be
handled by the same code as long as that information is provided via `DW_AT_byte_size`.
Reviewed By: werat, shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105471
DWARF doesn't describe templates itself but only actual template instantiations.
Because of that LLDB has to infer the parameters of the class template
declarations from the actual instantiations when creating the internal Clang AST
from debug info
Because there is no dedicated DIE for the class template, LLDB also creates the
`ClassTemplateDecl` implicitly when parsing a template instantiation. To avoid
creating one ClassTemplateDecls for every instantiation,
`TypeSystemClang::CreateClassTemplateDecl` will check if there is already a
`ClassTemplateDecl` in the requested `DeclContext` and will reuse a found
fitting declaration.
The logic that checks if a found class template fits to an instantiation is
currently just comparing the name of the template. So right now we map
`template<typename T> struct S;` to an instantiation with the values `S<1, 2,
3>` even though they clearly don't belong together.
This causes crashes later on when for example the Itanium mangler's
`TemplateArgManglingInfo::needExactType` method tries to find fitting the class
template parameter that fits to an instantiation value. In the example above it
will try to find the parameter for the value `2` but will just trigger a
boundary check when retrieving the parameter with index 1 from the class
template.
There are two ways we can end up with an instantiation that doesn't fit to a
class template with the same name:
1. We have two TUs with two templates that have the same name and internal
linkage.
2. A forward declared template instantiation is emitted by GCC and Clang
without an empty list of parameter values.
This patch makes the check for whether a class template declaration can be
reused more sophisticated by also comparing whether the parameter values can fit
to the found class template. If we can't find a fitting class template we
justcreate a second class template with the fitting parameters.
Fixes rdar://76592821
Reviewed By: kastiglione
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100662
Both tests are passing for GCC>8 on Linux so let's mark them as passing.
TestCPPAuto was originally disabled due to "an problem with debug info generation"
in ea35dbeff2 .
TestClassTemplateParameterPack was disabled without explanation in
0f01fb39e3 .
This reverts commit 00764c36ed and the
follow up d2223c7a49.
The original patch broke that one could use static member variables while
inside a static member functions without having a running target. It seems that
LLDB currently requires that static variables are only found via the global
variable lookup so that they can get materialized and mapped to the argument
struct of the expression.
After 00764c36ed static variables of the current
class could be found via Clang's lookup which LLDB isn't observing. This
resulting in expressions actually containing these variables as normal
globals that can't be rewritten to a member of the argument struct.
More specifically, in the test TestCPPThis, the expression
`expr --j false -- s_a` is now only passing if we have a runnable target.
I'll revert the patch as the possible fixes aren't trivial and it degrades
the debugging experience more than the issue that the revert patch addressed.
The underlying bug can be reproduced before/after this patch by stopping
in `TestCPPThis` main function and running: `e -j false -- my_a; A<int>::s_a`.
The `my_a` will pull in the `A<int>` class and the second expression will
be resolved by Clang on its own (which causes LLDB to not materialize the
static variable).
Note: A workaround is to just do `::s_a` which will force LLDB to take the global
variable lookup.
When checking for type properties we usually want to strip all kind of type
sugar from the type. For example, sugar like Clang's ElaboratedType or typedefs
rarely influence the fundamental behaviour of a type such as its byte size.
However we always need to preserve type sugar for everything else as it does
matter for users that their variable of type `size_t` instead of `unsigned long`
for example.
This patch fixes one such bug when trying to use the SBValue API to dereference
a type.
Reviewed By: werat, shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103532
This was originally failed because of llvm.org/pr21765 which describes that
LLDB can't call a debugee's functions, but I removed the (unnecessary)
function call in the rewrite. It seems that the actual bug here is that we
can't lookup static members at all, so let's X-FAIL the test for the right
reason.
Clang adds a Decl in two phases to a DeclContext. First it adds it invisible and
then it makes it visible (which will add it to the lookup data structures). It's
important that we can't do lookups into the DeclContext we are currently adding
the Decl to during this process as once the Decl has been added, any lookup will
automatically build a new lookup map and add the added Decl to it. The second
step would then add the Decl a second time to the lookup which will lead to
weird errors later one. I made adding a Decl twice to a lookup an assertion
error in D84827.
In the first step Clang also does some computations on the added Decl if it's
for example a FieldDecl that is added to a RecordDecl.
One of these computations is checking if the FieldDecl is of a record type
and the record type has a deleted constexpr destructor which will delete
the constexpr destructor of the record that got the FieldDecl.
This can lead to a bug with the way we implement MinimalImport in LLDB
and the following code:
```
struct Outer {
typedef int HookToOuter;
struct NestedClass {
HookToOuter RefToOuter;
} NestedClassMember; // We are adding this.
};
```
1. We just imported `Outer` minimally so far.
2. We are now asked to add `NestedClassMember` as a FieldDecl.
3. We import `NestedClass` minimally.
4. We add `NestedClassMember` and clang does a lookup for a constexpr dtor in
`NestedClass`. `NestedClassMember` hasn't been added to the lookup.
5. The lookup into `NestedClass` will now load the members of `NestedClass`.
6. We try to import the type of `RefToOuter` which will try to import the `HookToOuter` typedef.
7. We import the typedef and while importing we check for conflicts in `Outer` via a lookup.
8. The lookup into `Outer` will cause the invisible `NestedClassMember` to be added to the lookup.
9. We continue normally until we get back to the `addDecl` call in step 2.
10. We now add `NestedClassMember` to the lookup even though we already did that in step 8.
The fix here is disabling the minimal import for RecordTypes from FieldDecls. We
actually already did this, but so far we only force the definition of the type
to be imported *after* we imported the FieldDecl. This just moves that code
*before* we import the FieldDecl so prevent the issue above.
Reviewed By: shafik, aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102993
It's not clear why the whole test got disabled, but the linked bug report
has since been fixed and the only part of it that still fails is the test
for the too permissive lookup. This re-enables the test, rewrites it to use
the modern test functions we have and splits the failing part into its
own test that we can skip without disabling the rest.
`bool` is considered to be unsigned according to `std::is_unsigned<bool>::value` (and `Type::GetTypeInfo`). Encoding it as signed int works fine for normal variables and fields, but breaks when reading the values of boolean bitfields. If the field is declared as `bool b : 1` and has a value of `0b1`, the call to `SBValue::GetValueAsSigned()` will return `-1`.
Reviewed By: teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102685
The test added in D100977 is failing to compile on these platforms. This seems
to be caused by GCC, MSVC and Clang@Windows rejecting the code because
`ToLayout` isn't complete when pointer_to_member_member is declared (even though
that seems to be valid code).
This also reverts the test changes in the lazy-loading test from D100977 as
that failed for the same reason.
At the moment the expression parser doesn't support evaluating expressions in
static member functions and just pretends the expression is evaluated within a
non-member function. This causes that all static members are inaccessible when
doing unqualified name lookup.
This patch adds support for evaluating in static member functions. It
essentially just does the same setup as what LLDB is already doing for
non-static member functions (i.e., wrapping the expression in a fake member
function) with the difference that we now mark the wrapping function as static
(to prevent access to non-static members).
Reviewed By: shafik, jarin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81550
When LLDB's DWARF parser is parsing the member DIEs of a struct/class it
currently fully resolves the types of static member variables in a class before
adding the respective `VarDecl` to the record.
For record types fully resolving the type will also parse the member DIEs of the
respective class. The other way of resolving is just 'forward' resolving the type
which will try to load only the minimum amount of information about the type
(for records that would only be the name/kind of the type). Usually we always
resolve types on-demand so it's rarely useful to speculatively fully resolve
them on the first use.
This patch changes makes that we only 'forward' resolve the types of static
members. This solves the fact that LLDB unnecessarily loads debug information
to parse the type if it's maybe not needed later and it also avoids a crash where
the parsed type might in turn reference the surrounding class that is currently
being parsed.
The new test case demonstrates the crash that might happen. The crash happens
with the following steps:
1. We parse class `ToLayout` and it's members.
2. We parse the static class member and fully resolve its type
(`DependsOnParam2<ToLayout>`).
3. That type has a non-static class member `DependsOnParam1<ToLayout>` for which
LLDB will try to calculate the size.
4. The layout (and size)`DependsOnParam1<ToLayout>` turns depends on the
`ToLayout` size/layout.
5. Clang will calculate the record layout/size for `ToLayout` even though we are
currently parsing it and it's missing it's non-static member.
The created is missing the offset for the yet unparsed non-static member. If we
later try to get the offset we end up hitting different asserts. Most common is
the one in `TypeSystemClang::DumpValue` where it checks that the record layout
has offsets for the current FieldDecl.
```
assert(field_idx < record_layout.getFieldCount());
```
Fixed rdar://67910011
Reviewed By: shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100180
Right now when running `expr --top-level -- void foo() {}`, LLDB just prints a cryptic
`error: Couldn't find $__lldb_expr() in the module` error. The reason for that is
that if we don't have a running process, we try to set our execution policy to always use the
IR interpreter (ExecutionPolicyNever) which works even without a process. However
that code didn't consider the special ExecutionPolicyTopLevel which we use for
top-level expressions. By changing the execution policy to ExecutionPolicyNever,
LLDB thinks we're actually trying to interpret a normal expression inside our
`$__lldb_expr` function and then fails when looking for it.
This just adds an exception for top-level expressions to that code and a bunch of tests.
Reviewed By: shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91723
Dave Lee