This patch adds the ability to specify via tablegen which processor resources
are load/store queue resources.
A new tablegen class named MemoryQueue can be optionally used to mark resources
that model load/store queues. Information about the load/store queue is
collected at 'CodeGenSchedule' stage, and analyzed by the 'SubtargetEmitter' to
initialize two new fields in struct MCExtraProcessorInfo named `LoadQueueID` and
`StoreQueueID`. Those two fields are identifiers for buffered resources used to
describe the load queue and the store queue.
Field `BufferSize` is interpreted as the number of entries in the queue, while
the number of units is a throughput indicator (i.e. number of available pickers
for loads/stores).
At construction time, LSUnit in llvm-mca checks for the presence of extra
processor information (i.e. MCExtraProcessorInfo) in the scheduling model. If
that information is available, and fields LoadQueueID and StoreQueueID are set
to a value different than zero (i.e. the invalid processor resource index), then
LSUnit initializes its LoadQueue/StoreQueue based on the BufferSize value
declared by the two processor resources.
With this patch, we more accurately track dynamic dispatch stalls caused by the
lack of LS tokens (i.e. load/store queue full). This is also shown by the
differences in two BdVer2 tests. Stalls that were previously classified as
generic SCHEDULER FULL stalls, are not correctly classified either as "load
queue full" or "store queue full".
About the differences in the -scheduler-stats view: those differences are
expected, because entries in the load/store queue are not released at
instruction issue stage. Instead, those are released at instruction executed
stage. This is the main reason why for the modified tests, the load/store
queues gets full before PdEx is full.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54957
llvm-svn: 347857
This change is in preparation for a patch that fixes PR36666.
llvm-mca currently doesn't know if a buffered processor resource describes a
load or store queue. So, any dynamic dispatch stall caused by the lack of
load/store queue entries is normally reported as a generic SCHEDULER stall. See for
example the -dispatch-stats output from the two tests modified by this patch.
In future, processor models will be able to tag processor resources that are
used to describe load/store queues. That information would then be used by
llvm-mca to correctly classify dynamic dispatch stalls caused by the lack of
tokens in the LS.
llvm-svn: 347662
RetireControlUnitStatistics now reports extra information about the ROB and the
avg/maximum number of entries consumed over the entire simulation.
Example:
Retire Control Unit - number of cycles where we saw N instructions retired:
[# retired], [# cycles]
0, 109 (17.9%)
1, 102 (16.7%)
2, 399 (65.4%)
Total ROB Entries: 64
Max Used ROB Entries: 35 ( 54.7% )
Average Used ROB Entries per cy: 32 ( 50.0% )
Documentation in llvm/docs/CommandGuide/llvmn-mca.rst has been updated to
reflect this change.
llvm-svn: 347493
This patch fixes an invalid memory read introduced by r346487.
Before this patch, partial register write had to query the latency of the
dependent full register write by calling a method on the full write descriptor.
However, if the full write is from an already retired instruction, chances are
that the EntryStage already reclaimed its memory.
In some parial register write tests, valgrind was reporting an invalid
memory read.
This change fixes the invalid memory access problem. Writes are now responsible
for tracking dependent partial register writes, and notify them in the event of
instruction issued.
That means, partial register writes no longer need to query their associated
full write to check when they are ready to execute.
Added test X86/BtVer2/partial-reg-update-7.s
llvm-svn: 347459
When looking at the tests committed by Roman at r346587, I noticed that numbers
reported by the resource pressure for PdAGU01 were wrong.
In particular, according to the aut-generated CHECK lines in tests
memcpy-like-test.s and store-throughput.s, resource pressure for PdAGU01
was not uniformly distributed among the two AGEN pipes.
It turns out that the reason why pressure was not correctly distributed, was
because the "resource selection strategy" object associated with PdAGU01 was not
correctly updated on the event of AGEN pipe used.
As a result, llvm-mca was not simulating a round-robin pipeline allocation for
PdAGU01. Instead, PdAGU1 was always prioritized over PdAGU0.
This patch fixes the issue; now processor resource strategy objects for
resources declaring multiple units, are correctly notified in the event of
"resource used".
llvm-svn: 346650
There are two AGU units, and per 1cy, there can be either two loads,
or a load and a store; but not two stores, or two loads and a store.
Additionally, loads shouldn't affect the store scheduler and vice versa.
(but *should* affect the PdEX scheduler.)
Required rL346545.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39465
llvm-svn: 346587
As noted by Andrea Di Biagio in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39465
both the loads and stores occupy both the store and load queues.
This is clearly wrong.
llvm-svn: 346425
During review it was noted that while it appears that
the Piledriver can do two [consecutive] loads per cycle,
it can only do one store per cycle. It was suggested
that the sched model incorrectly models that,
but it was opted to fix this afterwards.
These tests show that the two consecutive loads are
modelled correctly, and one consecutive stores is not
modelled incorrectly. Unless i'm missing the point.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39465
llvm-svn: 346404
This patch teaches view RegisterFileStatistics how to report events for
optimizable register moves.
For each processor register file, view RegisterFileStatistics reports the
following extra information:
- Number of optimizable register moves
- Number of register moves eliminated
- Number of zero moves (i.e. register moves that propagate a zero)
- Max Number of moves eliminated per cycle.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53976
llvm-svn: 345865
Adding the baseline tests in a preparatory NFC commit,
so that the actual commit shows the *diff*.
Yes, i'm aware that a few of these codegen-based sched tests
are testing wrong instructions, i will fix that afterwards.
For https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345462
Summary:
This renames the IsParsingMSInlineAsm member variable of AsmLexer to
LexMasmIntegers and moves it up to MCAsmLexer. This is the only behavior
controlled by that variable. I added a public setter, so that it can be
set from outside or from the llvm-mc command line. We may need to
arrange things so that users can get this behavior from clang, but
that's future work.
I also put additional hex literal lexing functionality under this flag
to fix PR32973. It appears that this hex literal parsing wasn't intended
to be enabled in non-masm-style blocks.
Now, masm integers (0b1101 and 0ABCh) work in __asm blocks from clang,
but 0b label references work when using .intel_syntax in standalone .s
files.
However, 0b label references will *not* work from __asm blocks in clang.
They will work from GCC inline asm blocks, which it sounds like is
important for Crypto++ as mentioned in PR36144.
Essentially, we only lex masm literals for inline asm blobs that use
intel syntax. If the .intel_syntax directive is used inside a gnu-style
inline asm statement, masm literals will not be lexed, which is
compatible with gas and llvm-mc standalone .s assembly.
This fixes PR36144 and PR32973.
Reviewers: Gerolf, avt77
Subscribers: eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53535
llvm-svn: 345189
This patch adds the ability to identify instructions that are "move elimination
candidates". It also allows scheduling models to describe processor register
files that allow move elimination.
A move elimination candidate is an instruction that can be eliminated at
register renaming stage.
Each subtarget can specify which instructions are move elimination candidates
with the help of tablegen class "IsOptimizableRegisterMove" (see
llvm/Target/TargetInstrPredicate.td).
For example, on X86, BtVer2 allows both GPR and MMX/SSE moves to be eliminated.
The definition of 'IsOptimizableRegisterMove' for BtVer2 looks like this:
```
def : IsOptimizableRegisterMove<[
InstructionEquivalenceClass<[
// GPR variants.
MOV32rr, MOV64rr,
// MMX variants.
MMX_MOVQ64rr,
// SSE variants.
MOVAPSrr, MOVUPSrr,
MOVAPDrr, MOVUPDrr,
MOVDQArr, MOVDQUrr,
// AVX variants.
VMOVAPSrr, VMOVUPSrr,
VMOVAPDrr, VMOVUPDrr,
VMOVDQArr, VMOVDQUrr
], CheckNot<CheckSameRegOperand<0, 1>> >
]>;
```
Definitions of IsOptimizableRegisterMove from processor models of a same
Target are processed by the SubtargetEmitter to auto-generate a target-specific
override for each of the following predicate methods:
```
bool TargetSubtargetInfo::isOptimizableRegisterMove(const MachineInstr *MI)
const;
bool MCInstrAnalysis::isOptimizableRegisterMove(const MCInst &MI, unsigned
CPUID) const;
```
By default, those methods return false (i.e. conservatively assume that there
are no move elimination candidates).
Tablegen class RegisterFile has been extended with the following information:
- The set of register classes that allow move elimination.
- Maxium number of moves that can be eliminated every cycle.
- Whether move elimination is restricted to moves from registers that are
known to be zero.
This patch is structured in three part:
A first part (which is mostly boilerplate) adds the new
'isOptimizableRegisterMove' target hooks, and extends existing register file
descriptors in MC by introducing new fields to describe properties related to
move elimination.
A second part, uses the new tablegen constructs to describe move elimination in
the BtVer2 scheduling model.
A third part, teaches llm-mca how to query the new 'isOptimizableRegisterMove'
hook to mark instructions that are candidates for move elimination. It also
teaches class RegisterFile how to describe constraints on move elimination at
PRF granularity.
llvm-mca tests for btver2 show differences before/after this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53134
llvm-svn: 344334
These should test all the optimizable moves on Jaguar.
A follow-up patch will teach how to recognize these optimizable register moves.
llvm-svn: 344144
Currently we hardcode instructions with ReadAfterLd if the register operands don't need to be available until the folded load has completed. This doesn't take into account the different load latencies of different memory operands (PR36957).
This patch adds a ReadAfterFold def into X86FoldableSchedWrite to replace ReadAfterLd, allowing us to specify the load latency at a scheduler class level.
I've added ReadAfterVec*Ld classes that match the XMM/Scl, XMM and YMM/ZMM WriteVecLoad classes that we currently use, we can tweak these values in future patches once this infrastructure is in place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52886
llvm-svn: 343868
This patch teaches class RegisterFile how to analyze register writes from
instructions that are move elimination candidates.
In particular, it teaches it how to check if a move can be effectively eliminated
by the underlying PRF, and (if necessary) how to perform move elimination.
The long term goal is to allow processor models to describe instructions that
are valid move elimination candidates.
The idea is to let register file definitions in tablegen declare if/when moves
can be eliminated.
This patch is a non functional change.
The logic that performs move elimination is currently disabled. A future patch
will add support for move elimination in the processor models, and enable this
new code path.
llvm-svn: 343691
I was expecting this to be a nfc but Silvermont seems to be setup a little differently:
// A folded store needs a cycle on MEC_RSV for the store data, but it does not need an extra port cycle to recompute the address.
def : WriteRes<WriteRMW, [SLM_MEC_RSV]>;
So moving from WriteStore to WriteRMW reduces predicted port pressure, confirmed by @craig.topper that this is correct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52740
llvm-svn: 343670
This patch adds another variant class to identify zero-idiom VPERM2F128rr
instructions.
On Jaguar, a VPERM wih bit 3 and 7 of the mask set, is a zero-idiom.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52663
llvm-svn: 343452
Summary:
While looking at PR35606, I found out that the scheduling info is incorrect.
One can check that it's really a P5+P6 and not a 2*P56 with:
echo -e 'vzeroall\nvandps %xmm1, %xmm2, %xmm3' | ./bin/llvm-exegesis -mode=uops -snippets-file=-
(vandps executes on P5 only)
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52541
llvm-svn: 343447
We don't correctly model the latency and resource usage information for
zero-idiom VPERM2F128rr on Jaguar.
This is demonstrated by the incorrect numbers in the resource pressure view, and
the timeline view.
A follow up patch will fix this problem.
llvm-svn: 343346
If any prefixes have been specified on the RUN lines that do not end up
ever actually getting printed, raise an Error. This is either an
indication that the run lines just need cleaning up, or that something
is more fundamentally wrong with the test.
Also raise an Error if there are any blocks which cannot be checked
because they are not uniquely covered by a prefix.
Fixed up a couple of tests where the extra checking flagged up issues.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48276
llvm-svn: 343332
Insert empty blocks to cause the positions of matching blocks to match
across lists where possible so that later stages of the algorithm can
actually identify them as being identical.
Regenerated all tests with this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52560
llvm-svn: 343331
Simon Pilgrim