This patch authored by Eric Niebler.
Many methods on the Sema class (e.g. ConvertPropertyForRValue) take Expr
pointers as in/out parameters (Expr *&). This is especially true for the
routines that apply implicit conversions to nodes in-place. This design is
workable only as long as those conversions cannot fail. If they are allowed
to fail, they need a way to report their failures. The typical way of doing
this in clang is to use an ExprResult, which has an extra bit to signal a
valid/invalid state. Returning ExprResult is de riguour elsewhere in the Sema
interface. We suggest changing the Expr *& parameters in the Sema interface
to ExprResult &. This increases interface consistency and maintainability.
This interface change is important for work supporting MS-style C++
properties. For reasons explained here
<http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2011-February/013180.html>,
seemingly trivial operations like rvalue/lvalue conversions that formerly
could not fail now can. (The reason is that given the semantics of the
feature, getter/setter method lookup cannot happen until the point of use, at
which point it may be found that the method does not exist, or it may have the
wrong type, or overload resolution may fail, or it may be inaccessible.)
llvm-svn: 129143
- BlockDeclRefExprs always store VarDecls
- BDREs no longer store copy expressions
- BlockDecls now store a list of captured variables, information about
how they're captured, and a copy expression if necessary
With that in hand, change IR generation to use the captures data in
blocks instead of walking the block independently.
Additionally, optimize block layout by emitting fields in descending
alignment order, with a heuristic for filling in words when alignment
of the end of the block header is insufficient for the most aligned
field.
llvm-svn: 125005
error: no super class declared in @interface for 'XXX'
to be:
error: 'X' cannot use 'super' because it is a root class
The latter explains what the user actually did wrong.
Fixes: <rdar://problem/8904409>
llvm-svn: 124074
complete. However, if it returns a reference type, don't require the
type it refers to to be complete. Fixes <rdar://problem/8807070>.
llvm-svn: 123214
unknown type and there is a possibility that
at runtime method is resolved to a deprecated or
unavailable method. Addreses // rdar://8769853
llvm-svn: 122294
not actually frequently used, because ImpCastExprToType only creates a node
if the types differ. So explicitly create an ICE in the lvalue-to-rvalue
conversion code in DefaultFunctionArrayLvalueConversion() as well as several
other new places, and consistently deal with the consequences throughout the
compiler.
In addition, introduce a new cast kind for loading an ObjCProperty l-value,
and make sure we emit those nodes whenever an ObjCProperty l-value appears
that's not on the LHS of an assignment operator.
This breaks a couple of rewriter tests, which I've x-failed until future
development occurs on the rewriter.
Ted Kremenek kindly contributed the analyzer workarounds in this patch.
llvm-svn: 120890
store it on the expression node. Also store an "object kind",
which distinguishes ordinary "addressed" l-values (like
variable references and pointer dereferences) and bitfield,
@property, and vector-component l-values.
Currently we're not using these for much, but I aim to switch
pretty much everything calculating l-valueness over to them.
For now they shouldn't necessarily be trusted.
llvm-svn: 119685
identifiers to determine good typo-correction candidates. Once we've
identified those candidates, we perform name lookup on each of them
and the consider the results.
This optimization makes typo correction > 2x faster on a benchmark
example using a single typo (NSstring) in a tiny file that includes
Cocoa.h from a precompiled header, since we are deserializing far less
information now during typo correction.
There is a semantic change here, which is interesting. The presence of
a similarly-named entity that is not visible can now affect typo
correction. This is both good (you won't get weird corrections if the
thing you wanted isn't in scope) and bad (you won't get good
corrections if there is a similarly-named-but-completely-unrelated
thing). Time will tell whether it was a good choice or not.
llvm-svn: 116528
sends. These are far trickier than instance messages, because we
typically have something like
NSArray alloc]
where it appears to be a declaration of a variable named "alloc" up
until we see the ']' (or a ':'), and at that point we can't backtrace.
So, we use a combination of syntactic and semantic disambiguation to
treat this as a message send only when the type is an Objective-C type
and it has the syntax of a class message send (which would otherwise
be ill-formed).
llvm-svn: 114057
narrow, almost useless case where we're inside a parenthesized
expression, e.g.,
(NSArray alloc])
The solution to the general case still eludes me.
llvm-svn: 114039
part of parser recovery. For example, given:
a method1:arg];
we detect after parsing the expression "a" that we have the start of a
message send expression. We pretend we've seen a '[' prior to the a,
then parse the remainder as a message send. We'll then give a
diagnostic+fix-it such as:
fixit-objc-message.m:17:3: error: missing '[' at start of message
send expression
a method1:arg];
^
[
The algorithm here is very simple, and always assumes that the open
bracket goes at the beginning of the message send. It also only works
for non-super instance message sends at this time.
llvm-svn: 113968
One who seeks the Tao unlearns something new every day.
Less and less remains until you arrive at non-action.
When you arrive at non-action,
nothing will be left undone.
llvm-svn: 112244
Fariborz Jahanian