Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Yang Fan fbee4a0c79 [C++20] [P1825] More implicit moves
Implement all of P1825R0:

- implicitly movable entity can be an rvalue reference to non-volatile
    automatic object.
- operand of throw-expression can be a function or catch-clause parameter
    (support for function parameter has already been implemented).
- in the first overload resolution, the selected function no need to be
    a constructor.
- in the first overload resolution, the first parameter of the selected
    function no need to be an rvalue reference to the object's type.

This patch also removes the diagnostic `-Wreturn-std-move-in-c++11`.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88220
2021-02-16 17:24:20 -05:00
Yang Fan 74f93bc373
[Sema] Fix deleted function problem in implicitly movable test
In implicitly movable test, a two-stage overload resolution is performed.
If the first overload resolution selects a deleted function, Clang directly
performs the second overload resolution, without checking whether the
deleted function matches the additional criteria.

This patch fixes the above problem.

Reviewed By: Quuxplusone

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92936
2021-01-06 10:05:40 +08:00
Yang Fan e43b3d1f5e
Revert "[Sema] Fix deleted function problem in implicitly movable test"
This reverts commit 89b0972a
2021-01-04 17:21:19 +08:00
Yang Fan 89b0972aa2 [Sema] Fix deleted function problem in implicitly movable test
In implicitly movable test, a two-stage overload resolution is performed.
If the first overload resolution selects a deleted function, Clang directly
performs the second overload resolution, without checking whether the
deleted function matches the additional criteria.

This patch fixes the above problem.

Reviewed By: Quuxplusone

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92936
2021-01-01 15:47:49 +08:00
Yang Fan 703038b35a [Sema] Fix volatile check when testing if a return object can be implicitly moved
In C++11 standard, to become implicitly movable, the expression in return
statement should be a non-volatile automatic object. CWG1579 changed the rule
to require that the expression only needs to be an automatic object. C++14
standard and C++17 standard kept this rule unchanged. C++20 standard changed
the rule back to require the expression be a non-volatile automatic object.
This should be a typo in standards, and VD should be non-volatile.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88295
2020-11-10 15:11:07 -05:00