dependent until it's been converted to match its parameter.
The type of a non-type template parameter can in general affect whether
the template argument is dependent.
Note that this is not always possible. For template arguments that name
static local variables in templates, the type of the template parameter
affects whether the argument is dependent, so the query is imprecise
until we know the parameter type. For example, in:
template<typename T> void f() {
static const int n = 5;
typename T::template X<n> x;
}
... we don't know whether 'n' is dependent until we know whether the
corresponding template parameter is of type 'int' or 'const int&'.
The `assumes` directive is an OpenMP 5.1 feature that allows the user to
provide assumptions to the optimizer. Assumptions can refer to
directives (`absent` and `contains` clauses), expressions (`holds`
clause), or generic properties (`no_openmp_routines`, `ext_ABCD`, ...).
The `assumes` spelling is used for assumptions in the global scope while
`assume` is used for executable contexts with an associated structured
block.
This patch only implements the global spellings. While clauses with
arguments are "accepted" by the parser, they will simply be ignored for
now. The implementation lowers the assumptions directly to the
`AssumptionAttr`.
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91980
The `assumes` directive is an OpenMP 5.1 feature that allows the user to
provide assumptions to the optimizer. Assumptions can refer to
directives (`absent` and `contains` clauses), expressions (`holds`
clause), or generic properties (`no_openmp_routines`, `ext_ABCD`, ...).
The `assumes` spelling is used for assumptions in the global scope while
`assume` is used for executable contexts with an associated structured
block.
This patch only implements the global spellings. While clauses with
arguments are "accepted" by the parser, they will simply be ignored for
now. The implementation lowers the assumptions directly to the
`AssumptionAttr`.
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91980
Currently we have a diagnostic that catches the other storage class specifies for the range based for loop declaration but we miss the thread_local case. This changes adds a diagnostic for that case as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92671
552c6c2 removed support for promoting VLAs to constant arrays when the bounds
isn't an ICE, since this can result in miscompiling a conforming program that
assumes that the array is a VLA. Promoting VLAs for fields is still supported,
since clang doesn't support VLAs in fields, so no conforming program could have
a field VLA.
This change is really disruptive, so this commit carves out two more cases
where we promote VLAs which can't miscompile a conforming program:
- When the VLA appears in an ivar -- this seems like a corollary to the field thing
- When the VLA has an initializer -- VLAs can't have an initializer
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90871
Fix bogus diagnostics that would get confused and think a "no viable
fuctions" case was an "undeclared identifiers" case, resulting in an
incorrect diagnostic preceding the correct one. Use overload resolution
to determine which function we should select when we can find call
candidates from a dependent base class. Make the diagnostics for a call
that could call a function from a dependent base class more specific,
and use a different diagnostic message for the case where the call
target is instead declared later in the same class. Plus some minor
diagnostic wording improvements.
caller.
This function did not satisfy its documented contract: it only
considered the first lookup result on each base path, not all lookup
results. It also performed unnecessary memory allocations.
This change results in a minor change to our representation: we now
include overridden methods that are found by any derived-to-base path
(not involving another override) in the list of overridden methods for a
function, rather than filtering out functions from bases that are both
direct virtual bases and indirect virtual bases for which the indirect
virtual base path contains another override for the function. (That
filtering rule is part of the class-scope name lookup rules, and doesn't
really have much to do with enumerating overridden methods.) The users
of the list of overridden methods do not appear to rely on this
filtering having happened, and it's simpler to not do it.
The restriction on pointer-to-pointer kernel arguments has been
relaxed in OpenCL 2.0. Apply the same address space restrictions for
pointer argument types to the inner pointer types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92091
Similar to Windows Itanium, PS4 is also an Itanium C++ ABI variant
which shares the goal of semantic compatibility with Microsoft C++
code that uses dllimport/export.
This change introduces a new function to determine from the triple
if an environment aims for compatibility with MS C++ code w.r.t to
these attributes and guards the relevant code paths using that
function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90299
Reviewed by aaron.ballman, rsmith, wchilders
Highlights of review:
- avoid specifying an underlying type (unless such an enum is stored (or part of an abi?))
- avoid using enums as bit-fields, preferring unsigned bit-fields that we static_cast enumerators to. (MS's abi laysout enum bit-fields differently).
- clang-format, clang-format, clang-format.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D91035
Thank you!
For dllexported default constructors with default arguments, we export
default constructor closures which pass in the default args. (See D8331
for a good explanation.)
For templates, that means those default args must be instantiated even
if the function isn't called. That is done by the
InstantiateDefaultCtorDefaultArgs() function, but it wasn't done for
explicit specializations, causing asserts (see bug).
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91089
Since these are scoped enumerators, they have to be prefixed by DeclaratorContext, so lets remove Context from the name, and return some characters to the multiverse.
Patch was reviewed here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91011
Thank you to aaron, bruno, wyatt and barry for indulging me.
The use of the new types introduced for PowerPC MMA instructions needs to be restricted.
We add a PowerPC function checking that the given type is valid in a context in which we don't allow MMA types.
This function is called from various places in Sema where we want to prevent the use of these types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82035
friends.
When determining whether a function has a template instantiation
pattern, look for other declarations of that function that were
instantiated from a friend function definition, rather than assuming
that checking for member specialization information on whichever
declaration name lookup found will be sufficient.
classes into the enclosing block scope.
We weren't properly detecting whether the name would be injected into a
block scope in the case where it was lexically declared in a local
class.
Instead of framing the interface around whether the variable is an ICE
(which is only interesting in C++98), primarily track whether the
initializer is a constant initializer (which is interesting in all C++
language modes).
No functionality change intended.
for which it matters.
This is a step towards separating checking for a constant initializer
(in which std::is_constant_evaluated returns true) and any other
evaluation of a variable initializer (in which it returns false).
Old GCC used to aggressively fold VLAs to constant-bound arrays at block
scope in GNU mode. That's non-conforming, and more modern versions of
GCC only do this at file scope. Update Clang to do the same.
Also promote the warning for this from off-by-default to on-by-default
in all cases; more recent versions of GCC likewise warn on this by
default.
This is still slightly more permissive than GCC, as pointed out in
PR44406, as we still fold VLAs to constant arrays in structs, but that
seems justifiable given that we don't support VLA-in-struct (and don't
intend to ever support it), but GCC does.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89523
folding to not constant folding.
Constant folding of ICEs is done as a GCC compatibility measure, but new
code was picking it up, presumably by accident, due to the bad default.
While here, also switch the flag from a bool to an enum to make it more
obvious what it means at call sites. This highlighted a couple of places
where our behavior is different between C++11 and C++14 due to switching
from checking for an ICE to checking for a converted constant
expression (where there is no 'fold' codepath).
This happens in glibc's headers. It's important that we recognize these
functions so that we can mark them as returns_twice.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88518
The current C++ grammar allows an anonymous bit-field with an attribute,
but this is ambiguous (the attribute in that case could appertain to the
type instead of the bit-field). The current thinking in the Core Working
Group is that it's better to disallow attributes in that position at the
grammar level so that the ambiguity resolves in favor of applying to the
type.
During discussions about the behavior of the attribute, the Core Working
Group also felt it was better to disallow anonymous bit-fields from
specifying a default member initializer.
This implements both sets of related grammar changes.
This code never actually did anything in the implementation.
`mergeDeclAttribute` is declared as `static`, and referenced exactly
once in the file: from `Sema::mergeDeclAttributes`.
`Sema::mergeDeclAttributes` sets `LocalAMK` to `AMK_None`. If the
attribute is `DeprecatedAttr`, `UnavailableAttr`, or `AvailabilityAttr`
then the `LocalAMK` is updated. However, because we are dealing with a
`SwiftNameDeclAttr` here, `LocalAMK` remains `AMK_None`. This is then
passed to the function which will as a result pass the value of
`AMK_None == AMK_Override` aka `false`. Simply propagate the value
through and erase the dead codepath.
Thanks to Aaron Ballman for flagging the use of the availability merge
kind here leading to this simplification!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88263
Reviewed By: Aaron Ballman
This introduces the new `swift_name` attribute that allows annotating
APIs with an alternate spelling for Swift. This is used as part of the
importing mechanism to allow interfaces to be imported with a new name
into Swift. It takes a parameter which is the Swift function name.
This parameter is validated to check if it matches the possible
transformed signature in Swift.
This is based on the work of the original changes in
8afaf3aad2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87534
Reviewed By: Aaron Ballman, Dmitri Gribenko
In case further such cases appear in the future we've got a generic function to add them to.
Additionally changed the ObjC special case to check the language and the identifier builtin ID instead of the name.
Addresses the cleanup suggestion from D87917.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87983
objc_super is special and needs LookupPredefedObjCSuperType() called before performing builtin type comparisons.
This fixes an error when compiling macOS headers. A test is added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87917
Instead of relying on whether a certain identifier is a builtin, introduce BuiltinAttr to specify a declaration as having builtin semantics.
This fixes incompatible redeclarations of builtins, as reverting the identifier as being builtin due to one incompatible redeclaration would have broken rest of the builtin calls.
Mostly-compatible redeclarations of builtins also no longer have builtin semantics. They don't call the builtin nor inherit their attributes.
A long-standing FIXME regarding builtins inside a namespace enclosed in extern "C" not being recognized is also addressed.
Due to the more correct handling attributes for builtin functions are added in more places, resulting in more useful warnings.
Tests are updated to reflect that.
Intrinsics without an inline definition in intrin.h had `inline` and `static` removed as they had no effect and caused them to no longer be recognized as builtins otherwise.
A pthread_create() related test is XFAIL-ed, as it relied on it being recognized as a builtin based on its name.
The builtin declaration syntax is too restrictive and doesn't allow custom structs, function pointers, etc.
It seems to be the only case and fixing this would require reworking the current builtin syntax, so this seems acceptable.
Fixes PR45410.
Reviewed By: rsmith, yutsumi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77491
In CUDA/HIP a function may become implicit host device function by
pragma or constexpr. A host device function is checked in both
host and device compilation. However it may be emitted only
on host or device side, therefore the diagnostics should be
deferred until it is known to be emitted.
Currently clang is only able to defer certain diagnostics. This causes
false alarms and limits the usefulness of host device functions.
This patch lets clang defer all overloading resolution diagnostics for host device functions.
An option -fgpu-defer-diag is added to control this behavior. By default
it is off.
It is NFC for other languages.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84364
Thorsten Schütt