To simplify the process:
Refactor taint generation checker to simplify passing the
information on which arguments need to be tainted from pre to post
visit.
Todo: We need to factor out the code that sema is using to identify the
string and memcpy functions and use it here and in the CString checker.
llvm-svn: 148010
We already have a more conservative check in the compiler (if the
format string is not a literal, we warn). Still adding it here for
completeness and since this check is stronger - only triggered if the
format string is tainted.
llvm-svn: 147714
(Stmt*,LocationContext*) pairs to SVals instead of Stmt* to SVals.
This is needed to support basic IPA via inlining. Without this, we cannot tell
if a Stmt* binding is part of the current analysis scope (StackFrameContext) or
part of a parent context.
This change introduces an uglification of the use of getSVal(), and thus takes
two steps forward and one step back. There are also potential performance implications
of enlarging the Environment. Both can be addressed going forward by refactoring the
APIs and optimizing the internal representation of Environment. This patch
mainly introduces the functionality upon when we want to build upon (and clean up).
llvm-svn: 147688
Check if the input parameters are tainted (or point to tainted data) on
a checkPreStmt<CallExpr>. If the output should be tainted, record it in
the state. On post visit (checkPostStmt<CallExpr>), use the state to
make decisions (in addition to the existing logic). Use this logic for
atoi and fscanf.
llvm-svn: 146793
Some of the test cases do not currently work because the analyzer core
does not seem to call checkers for pre/post DeclRefExpr visits.
(Opened radar://10573500. To be fixed later on.)
llvm-svn: 146536
We are now often generating expressions even if the solver is not known to be able to simplify it. This is another cleanup of the existing code, where the rest of the analyzer and checkers should not base their logic on knowing ahead of the time what the solver can reason about.
In this case, CStringChecker is performing a check for overflow of 'left+right' operation. The overflow can be checked with either 'maxVal-left' or 'maxVal-right'. Previously, the decision was based on whether the expresion evaluated to undef or not. With this patch, we check if one of the arguments is a constant, in which case we know that 'maxVal-const' is easily simplified. (Another option is to use canReasonAbout() method of the solver here, however, it's currently is protected.)
This patch also contains 2 small bug fixes:
- swap the order of operators inside SValBuilder::makeGenericVal.
- handle a case when AddeVal is unknown in GenericTaintChecker::getPointedToSymbol.
llvm-svn: 146343
Anna Zaks