Within the MatchFPUWaitAlias function, Operands[0] is potentially overwritten leading to &Op referencing a deleted object. To fix this, assign the reference after the function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57376
llvm-svn: 356973
This error can only happen if an unfinished operation is at Eof.
Patch by Brandon Jones
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57379
llvm-svn: 356972
Previously we had a regular form of the instruction used when the immediate was 0-7. And _alt form that allowed the full 8 bit immediate. Codegen would always use the 0-7 form since the immediate was always checked to be in range. Assembly parsing would use the 0-7 form when a mnemonic like vpcomtrueb was used. If the immediate was specified directly the _alt form was used. The disassembler would prefer to use the 0-7 form instruction when the immediate was in range and the _alt form otherwise. This way disassembly would print the most readable form when possible.
The assembly parsing for things like vpcomtrueb relied on splitting the mnemonic into 3 pieces. A "vpcom" prefix, an immediate representing the "true", and a suffix of "b". The tablegenerated printing code would similarly print a "vpcom" prefix, decode the immediate into a string, and then print "b".
The _alt form on the other hand parsed and printed like any other instruction with no specialness.
With this patch we drop to one form and solve the disassembly printing issue by doing custom printing when the immediate is 0-7. The parsing code has been tweaked to turn "vpcomtrueb" into "vpcomb" and then the immediate for the "true" is inserted either before or after the other operands depending on at&t or intel syntax.
I'd rather not do the custom printing, but I tried using an InstAlias for each possible mnemonic for all 8 immediates for all 16 combinations of element size, signedness, and memory/register. The code emitted into printAliasInstr ended up checking the number of operands, the register class of each operand, and the immediate for all 256 aliases. This was repeated for both the at&t and intel printer. Despite a lot of common checks between all of the aliases, when compiled with clang at least this commonality was not well optimized. Nor do all the checks seem necessary. Since I want to do a similar thing for vcmpps/pd/ss/sd which have 32 immediate values and 3 encoding flavors, 3 register sizes, etc. This didn't seem to scale well for clang binary size. So custom printing seemed a better trade off.
I also considered just using the InstAlias for the matching and not the printing. But that seemed like it would add a lot of extra rows to the matcher table. Especially given that the 32 immediates for vpcmpps have 46 strings associated with them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59398
llvm-svn: 356343
AMDGPU target run out of Subtarget feature flags hitting the limit of 64.
AssemblerPredicates uses at most uint64_t for their representation.
At the same time CodeGen has exhausted this a long time ago and switched
to a FeatureBitset with the current limit of 192 bits.
This patch completes transition to the bitset for feature bits extending
it to asm matcher and MC code emitter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59002
llvm-svn: 355839
When parsing a sequence of tokens beginning with {, it will hit an assert and crash if the token afterwards is not an identifier. Instead of this, return a more verbose error as seen elsewhere in the function.
Patch by Brandon Jones (BrandonTJones)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57375
llvm-svn: 354356
This patch removes hidden codegen flag -print-schedule effectively reverting the
logic originally committed as r300311
(https://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=300311).
Flag -print-schedule was originally introduced by r300311 to address PR32216
(https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32216). That bug was about adding "Better
testing of schedule model instruction latencies/throughputs".
These days, we can use llvm-mca to test scheduling models. So there is no longer
a need for flag -print-schedule in LLVM. The main use case for PR32216 is
now addressed by llvm-mca.
Flag -print-schedule is mainly used for debugging purposes, and it is only
actually used by x86 specific tests. We already have extensive (latency and
throughput) tests under "test/tools/llvm-mca" for X86 processor models. That
means, most (if not all) existing -print-schedule tests for X86 are redundant.
When flag -print-schedule was first added to LLVM, several files had to be
modified; a few APIs gained new arguments (see for example method
MCAsmStreamer::EmitInstruction), and MCSubtargetInfo/TargetSubtargetInfo gained
a couple of getSchedInfoStr() methods.
Method getSchedInfoStr() had to originally work for both MCInst and
MachineInstr. The original implmentation of getSchedInfoStr() introduced a
subtle layering violation (reported as PR37160 and then fixed/worked-around by
r330615).
In retrospect, that new API could have been designed more optimally. We can
always query MCSchedModel to get the latency and throughput. More importantly,
the "sched-info" string should not have been generated by the subtarget.
Note, r317782 fixed an issue where "print-schedule" didn't work very well in the
presence of inline assembly. That commit is also reverted by this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57244
llvm-svn: 353043
Looking into gcc and objdump behavior more this was overly aggressive. If the register is encoded in the instruction we should print %st(0), if its implicit we should print %st.
I'll be making a more directed change in a future patch.
llvm-svn: 353013
Summary:
When calculating clobbers for MS style inline assembly we fail if the asm clobbers stack top because we print st(0) and try to pass it through the gcc register name check. This was found with when I attempted to make a emms/femms clobber all ST registers. If you use emms/femms in MS inline asm we would try to use st(0) as the clobber name but clang would think that wasn't a valid clobber name.
This also matches what objdump disassembly prints. It's also what is printed by gcc -S.
Reviewers: RKSimon, rnk, efriedma, spatel, andreadb, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: eraman, gbedwell, lebedev.ri, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57621
llvm-svn: 352985
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Teach x86 assembly operand parsing to distinguish between assembler
variable assigned to named registers and those assigned to immediate
values.
Reviewers: rnk, nickdesaulniers, void
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56287
llvm-svn: 350966
This was here because out and in instructions allow '(%dx)' even though its not a memory reference. To handle this we build a special operand for the DX register reference before we get to the call to CheckBaseRegAndIndexRegAndScale. So we no longer need this special case.
llvm-svn: 350483
Summary:
This renames the IsParsingMSInlineAsm member variable of AsmLexer to
LexMasmIntegers and moves it up to MCAsmLexer. This is the only behavior
controlled by that variable. I added a public setter, so that it can be
set from outside or from the llvm-mc command line. We may need to
arrange things so that users can get this behavior from clang, but
that's future work.
I also put additional hex literal lexing functionality under this flag
to fix PR32973. It appears that this hex literal parsing wasn't intended
to be enabled in non-masm-style blocks.
Now, masm integers (0b1101 and 0ABCh) work in __asm blocks from clang,
but 0b label references work when using .intel_syntax in standalone .s
files.
However, 0b label references will *not* work from __asm blocks in clang.
They will work from GCC inline asm blocks, which it sounds like is
important for Crypto++ as mentioned in PR36144.
Essentially, we only lex masm literals for inline asm blobs that use
intel syntax. If the .intel_syntax directive is used inside a gnu-style
inline asm statement, masm literals will not be lexed, which is
compatible with gas and llvm-mc standalone .s assembly.
This fixes PR36144 and PR32973.
Reviewers: Gerolf, avt77
Subscribers: eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53535
llvm-svn: 345189
Add the .cv_fpo_stackalign directive so that we can define $T0, or the
VFRAME virtual register, with it. This was overlooked in the initial
implementation because unlike MSVC, we push CSRs before allocating stack
space, so this value is only needed to describe local variable
locations. Variables that the compiler now addresses via ESP are instead
described as being stored at offsets from VFRAME, which for us is ESP
after alignment in the prologue.
This adds tests that show that we use the VFRAME register properly in
our S_DEFRANGE records, and that we emit the correct FPO data to define
it.
Fixes PR38857
llvm-svn: 343603
This basically reverts a change made in r336217, but improves the text of the error message for not allowing IP-relative addressing in 32-bit mode.
Fixes PR38826.
Patch by Iain Sandoe.
llvm-svn: 341512
Allow the comparison of x86 registers in the evaluation of assembler
directives. This generalizes and simplifies the extension from r334022
to catch another case found in the Linux kernel.
Reviewers: rnk, void
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: hiraditya, nickdesaulniers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50795
llvm-svn: 339895
This patch adds a new token type specifically for (%dx). We will now always create this token when we parse (%dx). After all operands have been parsed, if the mnemonic is in/out we'll morph this token to a regular register token. Otherwise we keep it as the special DX token which won't match any instructions.
This removes the need for passing Mnemonic through the parsing functions. It also seems closer to gas where when its used on the wrong instruction it just gets diagnosed as an invalid operand rather than a bad memory address.
llvm-svn: 336218
This might make the error message added in r335668 unneeded, but I'm not sure yet.
The check for RIP is technically unnecessary since RIP is in GR64, but that fact is kind of surprising so be explicit.
llvm-svn: 336217
The X86 asm parser currently has custom parsing logic for .word. Rather than
use this custom logic, we can just use addAliasForDirective to enable the
reuse of AsmParser::parseDirectiveValue.
See also similar changes to Sparc (rL333078), AArch64 (rL333077), and Hexagon
(rL332607) backends.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47004
This is a fixed reland of rL336100. This should have been caught in
pre-commit testing so apologies for the noise.
llvm-svn: 336104
The X86 asm parser currently has custom parsing logic for .word. Rather than
use this custom logic, we can just use addAliasForDirective to enable the
reuse of AsmParser::parseDirectiveValue.
See also similar changes to Sparc (rL333078), AArch64 (rL333077), and Hexagon
(rL332607) backends.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47004
llvm-svn: 336100
Right now, when we use RIP-relative instructions in 32-bit mode, we'll just
assert and crash.
This adds an error message which tells the user that they can't do that in
32-bit mode, so that we don't crash (and also can see the issue outside of
assert builds).
llvm-svn: 335658
-Ensure EIP isn't used with an index reigster.
-Ensure EIP isn't used as index register.
-Ensure base register isn't a vector register.
-Ensure eiz/riz usage matches the size of their base register.
llvm-svn: 335412
Previously, to support (%dx) we left a wide open hole in our 16-bit memory address checking. This let this address value be used with any instruction without error in the parser. It would later fail in the encoder with an assertion failure on debug builds and who knows what on release builds.
This patch passes the mnemonic down to the memory operand parsing function so we can allow the (%dx) form only on specific instructions.
llvm-svn: 335403
This allows us to check these:
-16-bit addressing doesn't support scale so we should error if we find one there.
-Multiplying ESP/RSP by a scale even if the scale is 1 should be an error because ESP/RSP can't be an index.
llvm-svn: 335398
By default, the second register gets assigned to the index register slot. But ESP can't be an index register so we need to swap it with the other register.
There's still a slight bug that we allow [EAX+ESP*1]. The existence of the multiply even though its with 1 should force ESP to the index register and trigger an error, but it doesn't currently.
llvm-svn: 335394
The second register is the index register and should only be %si or %di if used with a base register. And in that case the base register should be %bp or %bx.
This makes us compatible with gas.
We do still need to support both orders with Intel syntax which uses [bp+si] and [si+bp]
llvm-svn: 335384
Summary:
Allow extended parsing of variable assembler assignment syntax and modify X86 to permit
VAR = register assignment. As we emit these as .set directives when possible, we inline
such expressions in output assembly.
Fixes PR37425.
Reviewers: rnk, void, echristo
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: nickdesaulniers, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47545
llvm-svn: 334022
These instructions are unusual in that they operate on 4 consecutive registers so supporting them in codegen will be more difficult than normal.
Includes an assembler check to warn if the source register is not the first register of a 4 register group.
llvm-svn: 333812
Previously for instructions like fxsave we would print "opaque ptr" as part of the memory operand. Now we print nothing.
We also no longer accept "opaque ptr" in the parser. We still accept any size to be specified for these instructions, but we may want to consider only parsing when no explicit size is specified. This what gas does.
llvm-svn: 331243
X86 Supports Indirect Branch Tracking (IBT) as part of Control-Flow Enforcement Technology (CET).
IBT instruments ENDBR instructions used to specify valid targets of indirect call / jmp.
The `nocf_check` attribute has two roles in the context of X86 IBT technology:
1. Appertains to a function - do not add ENDBR instruction at the beginning of the function.
2. Appertains to a function pointer - do not track the target function of this pointer by adding nocf_check prefix to the indirect-call instruction.
This patch implements `nocf_check` context for Indirect Branch Tracking.
It also auto generates `nocf_check` prefixes before indirect branchs to jump tables that are guarded by range checks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41879
llvm-svn: 327767
Summary:
We should always be able to accept AVX512 registers and instructions in llvm-mc. The only subtarget mode that should be checked is 16-bit vs 32-bit vs 64-bit mode.
I've also removed all the mattr/mcpu lines from test RUN lines to be consistent with this. Most were due to AVX512, but a few were for other features.
Fixes PR36202
Reviewers: RKSimon, echristo, bkramer
Reviewed By: echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42824
llvm-svn: 324106
Craig Topper