This patch adds support for the CRJ and CGRJ instructions. Support for
the immediate forms will be a separate patch.
The architecture has a large number of comparison instructions. I think
it's generally better to concentrate on using the "best" comparison
instruction first and foremost, then only use something like CRJ if
CR really was the natual choice of comparison instruction. The patch
therefore opportunistically converts separate CR and BRC instructions
into a single CRJ while emitting instructions in ISelLowering.
llvm-svn: 182764
When -ffast-math is in effect (on Linux, at least), clang defines
__FINITE_MATH_ONLY__ > 0 when including <math.h>. This causes the
preprocessor to include <bits/math-finite.h>, which renames the sqrt functions.
For instance, "sqrt" is renamed as "__sqrt_finite".
This patch adds the 3 new names in such a way that they will be treated
as equivalent to their respective original names.
llvm-svn: 182739
isConsecutiveLS is a slightly more general form of
SelectionDAG::isConsecutiveLoad. Aside from also handling stores, it also does
not assume equality of the chain operands is necessary. In the case of the PPC
backend, this chain condition is checked in a more general way by the
surrounding code.
Mostly, this part of the refactoring in preparation for supporting optimized
unaligned stores.
llvm-svn: 182723
When expanding unaligned Altivec loads, we use the decremented offset trick to
prevent page faults. Unfortunately, if we have a sequence of consecutive
unaligned loads, this leads to suboptimal code generation because the 'extra'
load from the first unaligned load can be combined with the base load from the
second (but only if the decremented offset trick is not used for the first).
Search up and down the chain, through loads and token factors, looking for
consecutive loads, and if one is found, don't use the offset reduction trick.
These duplicate loads are later combined to yield the desired sequence (in the
future, we might want a more-powerful chain search, but that will require some
changes to allow the combiner routines to access the AA object).
This should complete the initial implementation of the optimized unaligned
Altivec load expansion. There is some refactoring that should be done, but
that will happen when the unaligned store expansion is added.
llvm-svn: 182719
The lvsl permutation control instruction is a function only of the alignment of
the pointer operand (relative to the 16-byte natural alignment of Altivec
vectors). As a result, multiple lvsl intrinsics where the operands differ by a
multiple of 16 can be combined.
llvm-svn: 182708
Altivec only directly supports aligned loads, but the loads have a strange
property: If given an unaligned address, they truncate the address to the next
lower aligned address, and load from there. This property, along with an extra
load and some special-purpose permutation-control instructions that generate
the appropriate permutations from the original unaligned address, allow
efficient lowering of aligned loads. This code uses the trick explained in the
Apple Velocity Engine optimization overview document to prevent the needed
extra load from possibly causing a page fault if the original address happens
to be aligned.
As noted in the FIXMEs, there are several additional optimizations that can be
performed to reduce the cost of these loads even more. These will be
implemented in future commits.
llvm-svn: 182691
Previously, an invalid instruction like:
foo %r1, %r0
would generate the rather odd error message:
....: error: unknown token in expression
foo %r1, %r0
^
We now get the more informative:
....: error: invalid instruction
foo %r1, %r0
^
The same would happen if an address were used where a register was expected.
We now get "invalid operand for instruction" instead.
llvm-svn: 182644
The idea is to make sure that:
(1) "register expected" is restricted to cases where ParseRegister()
is called and the token obviously isn't a register.
(2) "invalid register" is restricted to cases where a register-like "%..."
sequence is found, but the "..." makes no sense.
(3) the generic "invalid operand for instruction" is used in cases where
the wrong register type is used (GPR instead of FPR, etc.).
(4) the new "invalid register pair" is used if the register has the right type,
but is not a valid register pair.
Testing of (1)-(3) is now restricted to regs-bad.s. It uses a representative
instruction for each register class to make sure that only registers from
that class are accepted.
(4) is tested by both regs-bad.s (which checks all invalid register pairs)
and insn-bad.s (which tests one invalid pair for each instruction that
requires a pair).
While there, I changed "Number" to "Num" for consistency with the
operand class.
llvm-svn: 182643
There was exactly one caller using this API right, the others were relying on
specific behavior of the default implementation. Since it's too hard to use it
right just remove it and standardize on the default behavior.
Defines away PR16132.
llvm-svn: 182636
This patch builds on some existing code to do CFG reconstruction from
a disassembled binary:
- MCModule represents the binary, and has a list of MCAtoms.
- MCAtom represents either disassembled instructions (MCTextAtom), or
contiguous data (MCDataAtom), and covers a specific range of addresses.
- MCBasicBlock and MCFunction form the reconstructed CFG. An MCBB is
backed by an MCTextAtom, and has the usual successors/predecessors.
- MCObjectDisassembler creates a module from an ObjectFile using a
disassembler. It first builds an atom for each section. It can also
construct the CFG, and this splits the text atoms into basic blocks.
MCModule and MCAtom were only sketched out; MCFunction and MCBB were
implemented under the experimental "-cfg" llvm-objdump -macho option.
This cleans them up for further use; llvm-objdump -d -cfg now generates
graphviz files for each function found in the binary.
In the future, MCObjectDisassembler may be the right place to do
"intelligent" disassembly: for example, handling constant islands is just
a matter of splitting the atom, using information that may be available
in the ObjectFile. Also, better initial atom formation than just using
sections is possible using symbols (and things like Mach-O's
function_starts load command).
This brings two minor regressions in llvm-objdump -macho -cfg:
- The printing of a relocation's referenced symbol.
- An annotation on loop BBs, i.e., which are their own successor.
Relocation printing is replaced by the MCSymbolizer; the basic CFG
annotation will be superseded by more related functionality.
llvm-svn: 182628
This is a basic first step towards symbolization of disassembled
instructions. This used to be done using externally provided (C API)
callbacks. This patch introduces:
- the MCSymbolizer class, that mimics the same functions that were used
in the X86 and ARM disassemblers to symbolize immediate operands and
to annotate loads based off PC (for things like c string literals).
- the MCExternalSymbolizer class, which implements the old C API.
- the MCRelocationInfo class, which provides a way for targets to
translate relocations (either object::RelocationRef, or disassembler
C API VariantKinds) to MCExprs.
- the MCObjectSymbolizer class, which does symbolization using what it
finds in an object::ObjectFile. This makes simple symbolization (with
no fancy relocation stuff) work for all object formats!
- x86-64 Mach-O and ELF MCRelocationInfos.
- A basic ARM Mach-O MCRelocationInfo, that provides just enough to
support the C API VariantKinds.
Most of what works in otool (the only user of the old symbolization API
that I know of) for x86-64 symbolic disassembly (-tvV) works, namely:
- symbol references: call _foo; jmp 15 <_foo+50>
- relocations: call _foo-_bar; call _foo-4
- __cf?string: leaq 193(%rip), %rax ## literal pool for "hello"
Stub support is the main missing part (because libObject doesn't know,
among other things, about mach-o indirect symbols).
As for the MCSymbolizer API, instead of relying on the disassemblers
to call the tryAdding* methods, maybe this could be done automagically
using InstrInfo? For instance, even though PC-relative LEAs are used
to get the address of string literals in a typical Mach-O file, a MOV
would be used in an ELF file. And right now, the explicit symbolization
only recognizes PC-relative LEAs. InstrInfo should have already have
most of what is needed to know what to symbolize, so this can
definitely be improved.
I'd also like to remove object::RelocationRef::getValueString (it seems
only used by relocation printing in objdump), as simply printing the
created MCExpr is definitely enough (and cleaner than string concats).
llvm-svn: 182625
Now that there is no longer any distinction between symbolLo
and symbolHi operands in either printing, encoding, or parsing,
the operand types can be removed in favor of simply using
s16imm.
This completes the patch series to decouple lo/hi operand part
processing from the particular instruction whose operand it is.
No change in code generation expected from this patch.
llvm-svn: 182618
When targeting the Darwin assembler, we need to generate markers ha16() and
lo16() to designate the high and low parts of a (symbolic) immediate. This
is necessary not just for plain symbols, but also for certain symbolic
expression, typically along the lines of ha16(A - B). The latter doesn't
work when simply using VariantKind flags on the symbol reference.
This is why the current back-end uses hacks (explicitly called out as such
via multiple FIXMEs) in the symbolLo/symbolHi print methods.
This patch uses target-defined MCExpr codes to represent the Darwin
ha16/lo16 constructs, following along the lines of the equivalent solution
used by the ARM back end to handle their :upper16: / :lower16: markers.
This allows us to get rid of special handling both in the symbolLo/symbolHi
print method and in the common code MCExpr::print routine. Instead, the
ha16 / lo16 markers are printed simply in a custom print routine for the
target MCExpr types. (As a result, the symbolLo/symbolHi print methods
can now replaced by a single printS16ImmOperand routine that also handles
symbolic operands.)
The patch also provides a EvaluateAsRelocatableImpl routine to handle
ha16/lo16 constructs. This is not actually used at the moment by any
in-tree code, but is provided as it makes merging into David Fang's
out-of-tree Mach-O object writer simpler.
Since there is no longer any need to treat VK_PPC_GAS_HA16 and
VK_PPC_DARWIN_HA16 differently, they are merged into a single
VK_PPC_ADDR16_HA (and likewise for the _LO16 types).
llvm-svn: 182616
This implements the @llvm.readcyclecounter intrinsic as the specific
MRC instruction specified in the ARM manuals for CPUs with the Power
Management extensions.
Older CPUs had slightly different methods which may also have to be
implemented eventually, but this should cover all v7 cases.
rdar://problem/13939186
llvm-svn: 182603
Performance monitors, including a basic cycle counter, are an official
extension in the ARMv7 specification. This adds support for enabling and
disabling them, orthogonally from CPU selection.
rdar://problem/13939186
llvm-svn: 182602
The error was:
error: non-constant-expression cannot be narrowed from type 'long long' to 'long' in initializer list [-Wc++11-narrowing]
MI.getOperand(6).getImm() & 0x1F,
llvm-svn: 182584
Using PatLeaf rather than ImmLeaf when defining immediate predicates
prevents simple patterns using those predicates from being recognized
for fast instruction selection. This patch replaces the immSExt16
PatLeaf predicate with two ImmLeaf predicates, imm32SExt16 and
imm64SExt16, allowing a few more patterns to be recognized (ADDI,
ADDIC, MULLI, ADDI8, and ADDIC8). Using the new predicates does not
help for LI, LI8, SUBFIC, and SUBFIC8 because these are rejected for
other reasons, but I see no reason to retain the PatLeaf predicate.
No functional change intended, and thus no test cases yet. This is
preliminary work for enabling fast-isel support for PowerPC. When
that support is ready, we'll be able to test this function.
llvm-svn: 182510
Addresses a review comment from Ulrich Weigand. No functional change intended.
I'm not sure whether the old TODO that this patch touches still holds,
but that's something we'd get to when adding a targetted scheduling
description.
llvm-svn: 182474
The original version of the pass could underestimate the length of a backward
branch in cases like:
alignment to N bytes or more
...
relaxable branch A
...
foo: (aligned to M<N bytes)
...
bar: (aligned to N bytes)
...
relaxable branch B to foo
We don't add any misalignment gap for "bar" because N bytes of alignment
had already been reached earlier in the function. In this case, assuming
that A is relaxed can push "foo" closer to "bar", and make B appear to be
in range. Similar problems can occur for forward branches.
I don't think it's possible to create blocks with mixed alignments as
things stand, not least because we haven't yet defined getPrefLoopAlignment()
for SystemZ (that would need benchmarking). So I don't think we can test
this yet.
Thanks to Rafael Espíndola for spotting the bug.
llvm-svn: 182460
Although I had added some support for the BDZ/BDNZ branches into the selector
(in r158204), I had not correctly adjusted the condition at the top of the
loop. As a result, these branches were still essentially unsupported.
This fixes PR16086. Unfortunately, any test case would be very large (because
it would need to force the loop backedge to exceed the range of the 16-bit
immediate).
llvm-svn: 182385
pic calls. These need to be there so we don't try and use helper
functions when we call those.
As part of this, make sure that we properly exclude helper functions in pic
mode when indirect calls are involved.
llvm-svn: 182343
By default, a teq instruction is inserted after integer divide. No divide-by-zero
checks are performed if option "-mnocheck-zero-division" is used.
llvm-svn: 182306
Now that the preheader insertion logic in LoopSimplify is externally exposed,
use it, and remove the copy-and-pasted version.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 182300
As the pairing of this instruction form with the bdnz/bdz branches is now
enforced by the verification pass, make it clear from the name that these
are used only for counter-based loops.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 182296
When asserts are enabled, this adds a verification pass for PPC counter-loop
formation. Unfortunately, without sacrificing code quality, there is no better
way of forming counter-based loops except at the (late) IR level. This means
that we need to recognize, at the IR level, anything which might turn into a
function call (or indirect branch). Because this is currently a finite set of
things, and because SelectionDAG lowering is basic-block local, this can be
done. Nevertheless, it is fragile, and failure results in a miscompile. This
verification pass checks that all (reachable) counter-based branches are
dominated by a loop mtctr instruction, and that no instructions in between
clobber the counter register. If these conditions are not satisfied, then an
ICE will be triggered.
In short, this is to help us sleep better at night.
llvm-svn: 182295
R600TextureIntrinsicsReplacer.cpp:232: warning: the address of ‘ArgsType’ will always evaluate as ‘true’
This doesn't have any effect on the output as a vararg intrinsic behaves the
same way as a non-vararg one.
llvm-svn: 182293
Before this change, the SystemZ backend would use BRCL for all branches
and only consider shortening them to BRC when generating an object file.
E.g. a branch on equal would use the JGE alias of BRCL in assembly output,
but might be shortened to the JE alias of BRC in ELF output. This was
a useful first step, but it had two problems:
(1) The z assembler isn't traditionally supposed to perform branch shortening
or branch relaxation. We followed this rule by not relaxing branches
in assembler input, but that meant that generating assembly code and
then assembling it would not produce the same result as going directly
to object code; the former would give long branches everywhere, whereas
the latter would use short branches where possible.
(2) Other useful branches, like COMPARE AND BRANCH, do not have long forms.
We would need to do something else before supporting them.
(Although COMPARE AND BRANCH does not change the condition codes,
the plan is to model COMPARE AND BRANCH as a CC-clobbering instruction
during codegen, so that we can safely lower it to a separate compare
and long branch where necessary. This is not a valid transformation
for the assembler proper to make.)
This patch therefore moves branch relaxation to a pre-emit pass.
For now, calls are still shortened from BRASL to BRAS by the assembler,
although this too is not really the traditional behaviour.
The first test takes about 1.5s to run, and there are likely to be
more tests in this vein once further branch types are added. The feeling
on IRC was that 1.5s is a bit much for a single test, so I've restricted
it to SystemZ hosts for now.
The patch exposes (and fixes) some typos in the main CodeGen/SystemZ tests.
A later patch will remove the {{g}}s from that directory.
llvm-svn: 182274
This converter currently only handles global variables in address space 0. For
these variables, they are promoted to address space 1 (global memory), and all
uses are updated to point to the result of a cvta.global instruction on the new
variable.
The motivation for this is address space 0 global variables are illegal since we
cannot declare variables in the generic address space. Instead, we place the
variables in address space 1 and explicitly convert the pointer to address
space 0. This is primarily intended to help new users who expect to be able to
place global variables in the default address space.
llvm-svn: 182254
Introduction:
In case when stack alignment is 8 and GPRs parameter part size is not N*8:
we add padding to GPRs part, so part's last byte must be recovered at
address K*8-1.
We need to do it, since remained (stack) part of parameter starts from
address K*8, and we need to "attach" "GPRs head" without gaps to it:
Stack:
|---- 8 bytes block ----| |---- 8 bytes block ----| |---- 8 bytes...
[ [padding] [GPRs head] ] [ ------ Tail passed via stack ------ ...
FIX:
Note, once we added padding we need to correct *all* Arg offsets that are going
after padded one. That's why we need this fix: Arg offsets were never corrected
before this patch. See new test-cases included in patch.
We also don't need to insert padding for byval parameters that are stored in GPRs
only. We need pad only last byval parameter and only in case it outsides GPRs
and stack alignment = 8.
Though, stack area, allocated for recovered byval params, must satisfy
"Size mod 8 = 0" restriction.
This patch reduces stack usage for some cases:
We can reduce ArgRegsSaveArea since inner N*4 bytes sized byval params my be
"packed" with alignment 4 in some cases.
llvm-svn: 182237
We don't need to reject all inline asm as using the counter register (most does
not). Only those that explicitly clobber the counter register need to prevent
the transformation.
llvm-svn: 182191
The peephole tries to reorder MOV32r0 instructions such that they are
before the instruction that modifies EFLAGS.
The problem is that the peephole does not consider the case where the
instruction that modifies EFLAGS also depends on the previous state of
EFLAGS.
Instead, walk backwards until we find an instruction that has a def for
EFLAGS but does not have a use.
If we find such an instruction, insert the MOV32r0 before it.
If it cannot find such an instruction, skip the optimization.
llvm-svn: 182184
This patch matches GCC behavior: the code used to only allow unaligned
load/store on ARM for v6+ Darwin, it will now allow unaligned load/store
for v6+ Darwin as well as for v7+ on Linux and NaCl.
The distinction is made because v6 doesn't guarantee support (but LLVM
assumes that Apple controls hardware+kernel and therefore have
conformant v6 CPUs), whereas v7 does provide this guarantee (and
Linux/NaCl behave sanely).
The patch keeps the -arm-strict-align command line option, and adds
-arm-no-strict-align. They behave similarly to GCC's -mstrict-align and
-mnostrict-align.
I originally encountered this discrepancy in FastIsel tests which expect
unaligned load/store generation. Overall this should slightly improve
performance in most cases because of reduced I$ pressure.
llvm-svn: 182175
The errors were:
non-constant-expression cannot be narrowed from type 'int64_t' (aka 'long') to 'uint32_t' (aka 'unsigned int') in initializer list
and
non-constant-expression cannot be narrowed from type 'long' to 'uint32_t' (aka 'unsigned int') in initializer list
llvm-svn: 182168
Tim Northover