These swap tests were swapping non-POCS non-equal allocators which
is undefined behavior. This patch changes the tests to use allocators
which compare equal. In order to test that the allocators were not
swapped I added an "id" field to test_allocator which does not
participate in equality but does propagate across copies/swaps.
This patch is based off of D26623 which was submitted by STL.
llvm-svn: 289358
test/std/algorithms/alg.modifying.operations/alg.random.shuffle/random_shuffle_rand.pass.cpp
(Affects 64-bit architectures.) Include <cstddef> so we can take/return std::ptrdiff_t
(instead of int) in random_shuffle()'s RNG. (C++14 D.12 [depr.alg.random.shuffle]/2 says that
difference_type is used, and we're shuffling a plain array.)
test/std/algorithms/alg.sorting/alg.sort/sort/sort.pass.cpp
test/std/algorithms/alg.sorting/alg.sort/stable.sort/stable_sort.pass.cpp
(Affects 64-bit architectures.) Include <iterator> because we're already using iterator_traits.
Then, store the result of subtracting two RanIts as difference_type instead of long
(which truncates on LLP64 architectures like MSVC x64).
test/std/containers/sequences/forwardlist/forwardlist.ops/splice_after_flist.pass.cpp
test/std/containers/sequences/forwardlist/forwardlist.ops/splice_after_one.pass.cpp
(Affects 64-bit architectures.) Include <cstddef> so we can store the result of
subtracting two pointers as std::ptrdiff_t (instead of int).
test/std/input.output/iostream.format/input.streams/istream.unformatted/ignore_0xff.pass.cpp
(Affects 32-bit architectures.) Sometimes, size_t is too small. That's the case here,
where tellg() returns pos_type (N4606 27.7.2.3 [istream.unformatted]/39). Implementations can
have 64-bit pos_type (to handle large files) even when they have 32-bit size_t.
Fixes D27543.
llvm-svn: 289110
test/std/containers/sequences/vector.bool/copy.pass.cpp
test/std/containers/sequences/vector.bool/copy_alloc.pass.cpp
test/std/containers/sequences/vector/vector.cons/copy.pass.cpp
test/std/containers/sequences/vector/vector.cons/copy_alloc.pass.cpp
Change "unsigned s = x.size();" to "typename C::size_type s = x.size();"
because that's what it returns.
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.cons/pointer_alloc.pass.cpp
Include <cstddef>, then change "unsigned n = T::length(s);"
to "std::size_t n = T::length(s);" because that's what char_traits returns.
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.cons/substr.pass.cpp
Change unsigned to typename S::size_type because that's what str.size() returns.
test/std/utilities/template.bitset/bitset.cons/ull_ctor.pass.cpp
This was needlessly truncating std::size_t to unsigned.
It's being used to compare and initialize std::size_t.
llvm-svn: 288753
Various changes:
test/std/algorithms/alg.sorting/alg.merge/inplace_merge.pass.cpp
This is comparing value_type to unsigned. value_type is sometimes int and sometimes struct S (implicitly constructible from int).
static_cast<value_type>(unsigned) silences the warning and doesn't do anything bad (as the values in question are small).
test/std/algorithms/alg.sorting/alg.nth.element/nth_element_comp.pass.cpp
This is comparing an int remote-element to size_t. The values in question are small and non-negative,
so either type is fine. I think that converting int to size_t is marginally better here than the reverse.
test/std/containers/sequences/deque/deque.cons/size.pass.cpp
DefaultOnly::count is int (and non-negative). When comparing to unsigned, use static_cast<unsigned>.
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.access/index.pass.cpp
We're comparing char to '0' through '9', but formed with the type size_t. Add static_cast<char>.
test/std/utilities/template.bitset/bitset.cons/ull_ctor.pass.cpp
Include <cstddef> for pedantic correctness (this test was already mentioning std::size_t).
"v[i] == (i & 1)" was comparing bool to size_t. Saying "v[i] == ((i & 1) != 0)" smashes the RHS to bool.
llvm-svn: 288749
Change "unsigned n = 0;" to "int n = 0;". It's being compared to int elements and ptrdiff_t distances.
test/std/containers/sequences/forwardlist/forwardlist.cons/move.pass.cpp
This one's a little special, but not really. "*i == n" is comparing MoveOnly to n.
MoveOnly is implicitly constructible from int, so int is the correct type to use here.
llvm-svn: 288748
Add static_cast<int>. In these cases, the values are guaranteed to be small-ish,
and they're being compared to int elements.
test/std/containers/sequences/deque/deque.capacity/access.pass.cpp
Use int instead of unsigned to iterate from 0 to 10.
llvm-svn: 288747
Add static_cast<std::size_t> to more comparisons. (Performed manually, unlike part 8/12.)
Also, include <cstddef> when it wasn't already being included.
llvm-svn: 288746
Replace throw with TEST_THROW and protect tests that do throw. Also add missing assert(false).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27252
llvm-svn: 288383
Summary: The `max_size()` method of containers should respect both the allocator's reported `max_size` and the range of the `difference_type`. This patch makes all containers choose the smallest of those two values.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26885
llvm-svn: 287729
With a max_load_factor of 1.0, the only guarantee is that
bucket_count() >= size(). (Note: setting max_load_factor without
rehashing isn't supposed to affect this, because setting
max_load_factor is currently specified to be constant time.)
llvm-svn: 286982
This replaces every occurrence of _LIBCPP_STD_VER in the tests with
TEST_STD_VER. Additionally, for every affected
file, #include "test_macros.h" is being added explicitly if it wasn't
already there.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D26294
llvm-svn: 286007
This is a follow up of D24562.
These tests do not check anything but exceptions, so it makes sense to mark
them as UNSUPPORTED under a library built without exceptions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26075
llvm-svn: 285550
Summary:
To quote STL the problems with stack allocator are"
>"stack_allocator<T, N> is seriously nonconformant to N4582 17.6.3.5 [allocator.requirements].
> First, it lacks a rebinding constructor. (The nested "struct rebind" isn't sufficient.)
> Second, it lacks templated equality/inequality.
> Third, it completely ignores alignment.
> Finally, and most severely, the Standard forbids its existence. Allocators are forbidden from returning memory "inside themselves". This requirement is implied by the Standard's requirements for rebinding and equality. It's permitted to return memory from a separate buffer object on the stack, though."
This patch attempts to address all of those issues.
First, instead of storing the buffer inside the allocator I've change `stack_allocator` to accept the buffer as an argument.
Second, in order to fix rebinding I changed the parameter list from `<class T, size_t NumElements>` to `<class T, size_t NumBytes>`. This allows allocator rebinding
between types that have different sizes.
Third, I added copy and rebinding constructors and assignment operators.
And finally I fixed the allocation logic to always return properly aligned storage.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, howard.hinnant, STL_MSFT
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25154
llvm-svn: 283631
Summary:
Libc++ still uses per-feature configuration macros when configuring for C++11. However libc++ requires a feature-complete C++11 compiler so there is no reason to check individual features. This patch starts the process of removing the feature specific macros and replacing their usage with `_LIBCPP_CXX03_LANG`.
This patch removes the __config macros:
* _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_TRAILING_RETURN
* _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_TEMPLATE_ALIASES
* _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_ADVANCED_SFINAE
* _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_DEFAULT_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ARGS
* _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_STATIC_ASSERT
As a drive I also changed our C++03 static_assert to use _Static_assert if available.
I plan to commit this without review if nobody voices an objection.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24895
llvm-svn: 282347
Summary:
This patch attempts to fix the undefined behavior in __tree by changing the node pointer types used throughout. The pointer types are changed for raw pointers in the current ABI and for fancy pointers in ABI V2 (since the fancy pointer types may not be ABI compatible).
The UB in `__tree` arises because tree downcasts the embedded end node and then deferences that pointer. Currently there are 3 node types in __tree.
* `__tree_end_node` which contains the `__left_` pointer. This node is embedded within the container.
* `__tree_node_base` which contains `__right_`, `__parent_` and `__is_black`. This node is used throughout the tree rebalancing algorithms.
* `__tree_node` which contains `__value_`.
Currently `__tree` stores the start of the tree, `__begin_node_`, as a pointer to a `__tree_node`. Additionally the iterators store their position as a pointer to a `__tree_node`. In both of these cases the pointee can be the end node. This is fixed by changing them to store `__tree_end_node` pointers instead.
To make this change I introduced an `__iter_pointer` typedef which is defined to be a pointer to either `__tree_end_node` in the new ABI or `__tree_node` in the current one.
Both `__tree::__begin_node_` and iterator pointers are now stored as `__iter_pointers`.
The other situation where `__tree_end_node` is stored as the wrong type is in `__tree_node_base::__parent_`. Currently `__left_`, `__right_`, and `__parent_` are all `__tree_node_base` pointers. Since the end node will only be stored in `__parent_` the fix is to change `__parent_` to be a pointer to `__tree_end_node`.
To make this change I introduced a `__parent_pointer` typedef which is defined to be a pointer to either `__tree_end_node` in the new ABI or `__tree_node_base` in the current one.
Note that in the new ABI `__iter_pointer` and `__parent_pointer` are the same type (but not in the old one). The confusion between these two types is unfortunate but it was the best solution I could come up with that maintains the ABI.
The typedef changes force a ton of explicit type casts to correct pointer types and to make current code compatible with both the old and new pointer typedefs. This is the bulk of the change and it's really messy. Unfortunately I don't know how to avoid it.
Please let me know what you think.
Reviewers: howard.hinnant, mclow.lists
Subscribers: howard.hinnant, bbannier, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20786
llvm-svn: 276003
Eric Fiselier