C++20 revised the definition of what it means to be an iterator. While
all _Cpp17InputIterators_ satisfy `std::input_iterator`, the reverse
isn't true. D100271 introduces a new test adaptor to accommodate this
new definition (`cpp20_input_iterator`).
In order to help readers immediately distinguish which input iterator
adaptor is _Cpp17InputIterator_, the current `input_iterator` adaptor
has been prefixed with `cpp17_`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101242
This reverts a224bf8ec4 and fixes the
underlying issue.
The underlying issue is simply that MSVC headers contains a define
like "#define __in", where __in is one macro in the MSVC Source
Code Annotation Language, defined in sal.h
Just use a different variable name than "__in"
__indirectly_readable_impl, and add "__in" to nasty_macros.h just
like the existing __out. (Also adding a couple more potentially
conflicting ones.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101613
To run llvm-lit manually from the command line:
./bin/llvm-lit -sv --param std=c++2b --param cxx_under_test=`pwd`/bin/clang \
--param debug_level=1 ../libcxx/test/
Tests that currently fail with `debug_level=1` are marked `LIBCXX-DEBUG-FIXME`,
but my intent is to deal with all of them and leave no such annotations in
the codebase within the next couple weeks. (I have patches for all of them
in my local checkout.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100866
* `std::ranges::range`
* `std::ranges::sentinel_t`
* `std::ranges::range_difference_t`
* `std::ranges::range_value_t`
* `std::ranges::range_reference_t`
* `std::ranges::range_rvalue_reference_t`
* `std::ranges::common_range`
`range_size_t` depends on `sized_range` and will be added alongside it.
Implements parts of:
* P0896R4 The One Ranges Proposal`
Depends on D100255.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100269
In particular, `span<int>::iterator` may be a raw pointer type
and thus have no nested typedef `iterator::value_type`. However,
we already know that the value_type we expect for `span<int>` is just `int`.
Fix up all other iterator_concept_conformance tests in the same way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101420
This reverts a large chunk of http://reviews.llvm.org/D15862 ,
and also fixes bugs in `insert`, `append`, and `assign`, which are now regression-tested.
(Thanks to Tim Song for pointing out the bug in `append`!)
Before this patch, we did a special dance in `append`, `assign`, and `insert`
(but not `replace`). All of these require the strong exception guarantee,
even when the user-provided InputIterator might have throwing operations.
The naive way to accomplish this is to construct a temporary string and
then append/assign/insert from the temporary; i.e., finish all the potentially
throwing and self-inspecting InputIterator operations *before* starting to
modify self. But this is slow, so we'd like to skip it when possible.
The old code (D15682) attempted to check that specific iterator operations
were nothrow: it assumed that if the iterator operations didn't throw, then
it was safe to iterate the input range multiple times and therefore it was
safe to use the fast-path non-naive version. This was wrong for two reasons:
(1) the old code checked the wrong operations (e.g. checked noexceptness of `==`,
but the code that ran used `!=`), and (2) the conversion of value_type to char
could still throw, or inspect the contents of self.
The new code is much simpler, although still much more complicated than it
really could be. We'll likely revisit this codepath at some point, but for now
this patch suffices to get it passing all the new regression tests.
The added tests all fail before this patch, and succeed afterward.
See https://quuxplusone.github.io/blog/2021/04/17/pathological-string-appends/
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98573
Implements parts of:
* P0896R4 The One Ranges Proposal`
Depends on D100073.
Reviewed By: ldionne, zoecarver, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100080
This functionality is tested in std/containers/sequences/vector/iterators.pass.cpp
(and similarly for all containers, but vector is the only one to be tested that
uses debug iterators).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100881
That was originally committed in 04733181b5 and then reverted in
a9f11cc0d9 because it broke several people.
The problem was a missing include of __iterator/concepts.h, which has now
been fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100073
Implements parts of:
* P0896R4 The One Ranges Proposal`
Depends on D99873.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100073
This is the initial patch to implement ranges in libc++.
Implements parts of:
- P0896R4 One Ranges Proposal
- P1870 forwarding-range is too subtle
- LWG3379 in several library names is misleading
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, cjdb, zoecarver, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90999
In 5fd17ab, we worked around the Apple system headers not providing
const-correct overloads for some <string.h> functions. However, that
required an attribute that was only present in recent Clangs at the
time. We can now assume that all supported Clang versions on Apple
platforms do support that attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100477
After this patch, we can use `--param std=c++20` even if the compiler only
supports -std=c++2a. The test suite will handle that for us. The only Lit
feature that isn't fully baked will always be the "in development" one,
since we don't know exactly what year the standard will be ratified in.
This is another take on https://reviews.llvm.org/D99789.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100210
The tests expect that the <cuchar> include should fail. When libc++
is built on top of the MSVC runtime, the header does exist provided
by MSVC. Therefore, just mark the test as unsupported on windows,
to avoid tests that unexpectedly succeed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99096
Left to finish P0482:
* <cuchar> header.
* Parts of <memory_resource> concerning char8_t. Also, tests for hash<pmr::*string>.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99184
Adds `noexcept` to `string_view`/`string::find` and similar members
(`rfind`, etc.). See discussion in D95251. Refs D95821.
Reviewed By: curdeius, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95848
This should make the builder http://lab.llvm.org:8011/#/builders/101/ happy.
It uses gcc-9 and not Tip-Of-Trunk as its name indicates BTW.
GCC-10 passes all these tests.
Fix gcc warnings: -Wsign-compare, -Wparentheses, -Wpragmas.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, #libc_abi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92099
Zoe Carver says: "We decided that libc++ only supports C++20 constexpr algorithms
when `is_constant_evaluated` is also supported. Here's a link to the discussion."
https://reviews.llvm.org/D65721#inline-735682
Remove _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_BUILTIN_IS_CONSTANT_EVALUATED from tests, too.
See Louis's 5911e6a885 if needed to fix bots.
I've applied `UNSUPPORTED: clang-8` preemptively to the altered tests;
I don't know for sure that this was needed, because no clang-8 buildbots
are triggered on pull requests.
When porting libc++ to embedded systems, it can be useful to drop support
for localization, which these systems don't implement or care about.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90072
Also, some tests had multiple death tests in them, so split them into
separate tests instead. The second death test would obviously never
get run, because the first one would kill the program before.
This is needed when running the tests in Freestanding mode, where main()
isn't treated specially. In Freestanding, main() doesn't get mangled as
extern "C", so whatever runtime we're using fails to find the entry point.
One way to solve this problem is to define a symbol alias from __Z4mainiPPc
to _main, however this requires all definitions of main() to have the same
mangling. Hence this commit.
These tests were only being run when _LIBCPP_DEBUG was defined, which
isn't the case by default when we run the test suite. In other words,
all these debug mode tests were never being run. This commit makes sure
they are run, and in some cases, extracts them into a file under test/libcxx
to separate them from the Standard tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88836
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.
This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
Tests that require support for Clang-verify are already marked as such
explicitly by their extension, which is .verify.cpp. Requiring the use
of an explicit Lit feature is, after thought, not really helpful.
This is a change in design: we have been bitten in the past by tests not
being enabled when we thought they were. However, the issue was mostly
with file extensions being ignored. The fix for that is not to blindly
require explicit features all the time, but instead to report all files
that are in the suite but that don't match any known test format. This
can be implemented in a follow-up patch.
Instead of having different names for the same Lit feature accross code
bases, use the same name everywhere. This NFC commit is in preparation
for a refactor where all three projects will be using the same Lit
feature detection logic, and hence it won't be convenient to use
different names for the feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78370
By renaming .fail.cpp tests that don't need clang-verify to .compile.fail.cpp,
the new test format will not try to compile these tests with clang-verify,
and the old test format will work just the same. However, this allows
removing a workaround that requires parsing each test looking for
clang-verify markup.
After this change, a .fail.cpp test should always have clang-verify markup.
When clang-verify is not supported by the compiler, we will just check that
these tests fail to compile. When clang-verify is supported, these tests
will be compiled with clang-verify whether they have markup or not (so
they should have markup, or they will fail).
This simplifies the test suite and also ensures that all of our .fail.cpp
tests provide clang-verify markup. If it's impossible for a test to have
clang-verify markup, it can be moved to a .compile.fail.cpp test, which
are unconditionally just checked for compilation failure.
The libc++ test suite has a lot of old Lit features used to XFAIL tests
and mark them as UNSUPPORTED. Many of them are to workaround problems on
old compilers or old platforms. As time goes by, it is good to go and
clean those up to simplify the configuration of the test suite, and also
to reflect the testing reality. It's not useful to have markup that gives
the impression that e.g. clang-3.3 is supported, when we don't really
test on it anymore (and hence several new tests probably don't have the
necessary markup on them).
Christopher Di Bella