C++20 revised the definition of what it means to be an iterator. While
all _Cpp17InputIterators_ satisfy `std::input_iterator`, the reverse
isn't true. D100271 introduces a new test adaptor to accommodate this
new definition (`cpp20_input_iterator`).
In order to help readers immediately distinguish which input iterator
adaptor is _Cpp17InputIterator_, the current `input_iterator` adaptor
has been prefixed with `cpp17_`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101242
This reverts a224bf8ec4 and fixes the
underlying issue.
The underlying issue is simply that MSVC headers contains a define
like "#define __in", where __in is one macro in the MSVC Source
Code Annotation Language, defined in sal.h
Just use a different variable name than "__in"
__indirectly_readable_impl, and add "__in" to nasty_macros.h just
like the existing __out. (Also adding a couple more potentially
conflicting ones.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101613
Implements parts of:
* P0896R4 The One Ranges Proposal`
Depends on D100073.
Reviewed By: ldionne, zoecarver, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100080
This nasty patch rewrites the tuple constructors to match those defined
by the Standard. We were previously providing several extensions in those
constructors - those extensions are removed by this patch.
The issue with those extensions is that we've had numerous bugs filed
against us over the years for problems essentially caused by them. As a
result, people are unable to use tuple in ways that are blessed by the
Standard, all that for the perceived benefit of providing them extensions
that they never asked for.
Since this is an API break, I communicated it in the release notes.
I do not foresee major issues with this break because I don't think the
extensions are too widely relied upon, but we can ship it and see if we
get complaints before the next LLVM release - that will give us some
amount of information regarding how much use these extensions have.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96523
That was originally committed in 04733181b5 and then reverted in
a9f11cc0d9 because it broke several people.
The problem was a missing include of __iterator/concepts.h, which has now
been fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100073
Implements parts of:
* P0896R4 The One Ranges Proposal`
Depends on D99873.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100073
This patch fixes LWG2874. It is based on the original patch by Zoe Carver
originally uploaded at D81417.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81417
Some of Microsoft's unit tests in D70631 fail because libc++'s
implementation of std::chars_format isn't a proper bitmask type. Adding
the required functions to make std::chars_format a proper bitmask type.
Implements parts of P0067: Elementary string conversions
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97115
These [[nodiscard]] annotations are added as a conforming extension;
it's unclear whether the paper will actually be adopted and make them
mandatory, but they do seem like good ideas regardless.
https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D2351R0.pdf
This patch implements the paper's effect on:
- std::to_integer, std::to_underlying
- std::forward, std::move, std::move_if_noexcept
- std::as_const
- std::identity
The paper also affects (but libc++ does not yet have an implementation of):
- std::bit_cast
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99895
After this patch, we can use `--param std=c++20` even if the compiler only
supports -std=c++2a. The test suite will handle that for us. The only Lit
feature that isn't fully baked will always be the "in development" one,
since we don't know exactly what year the standard will be ratified in.
This is another take on https://reviews.llvm.org/D99789.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100210
Use `_LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS` instead of `_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS` for a template
class.
This fixes the nodiscard_extensions.pass.cpp and a couple
func.search.default test cases when built in MSVC/DLL configurations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99932
This doesn't fail when _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INT128 is defined consistently
in both CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS and LIBCXX_TEST_COMPILER_FLAGS; the XFAIL was
added based on early CI testruns where that flag was missing in
LIBCXX_TEST_COMPILER_FLAGS.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99705
This will avoid typos like `_LIBCPP_STD_VERS` (<future>) or using `#if TEST_STD_VER > 17` without including "test_macros.h".
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99515
Because the constexpr-time codepath triggers a Clang bug. It seems
that Clang compiles it okay in release mode, but when Clang itself
is compiled in debug mode (with assertions turned on), this input
triggers an assertion failure in Clang itself. See comments on D96385
and Clang bug report https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45879
This commit should get the debug-mode buildbots back to green.
This patch changes the variant even in pre-C++2b.
It should not break anything, only allow use cases that didn't work previously.
Notes:
`__as_variant` is used in `__visitation::__variant::__visit_alt`, but I haven't used it in `__visitation::__variant::__visit_alt_at`.
That's because it is used only in `__visit_value_at`, which in turn is always used on variant specializations (that's in comparison operators).
* https://wg21.link/P2162
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97394
This makes no attempt yet to look into the why/what for each of them,
but makes the CI configuration useful for tracking further regressions.
After looking into each case, they can either be fixed, or converted
into UNSUPPORTED: windows or XFAIL: windows, once the cause is known
and explained.
A number of the filesystem cases can be fixed by patches that are
currently in review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99095
In previous versions of clang, __is_signed and __is_unsigned builtins did not
correspond to is_signed and is_unsigned behaviour for enums. The builtins were
fixed in D67897 and D98104.
* Disable the fast path of is_unsigned for clang versions < 13
* Add more tests for is_signed, is_unsigned and is_arithmetic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97283
Implements part of P0898R3 Standard Library Concepts
Reworks D74351 to use requires-clauses over SFINAE and so that it more
closely follows the wording.
Co-authored by: Michael Schellenberger Costa <mschellenbergercosta@googlemail.com>
(Michael did all the heavy lifting and I came in to polish it for
submission, since Michael is focussing on `std::format` now.)
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96657
The implementation of tuple's constructors and assignment operators
currently diverges from the way the Standard specifies them, which leads
to subtle cases where the behavior is not as specified. In particular, a
class derived from a tuple-like type (e.g. pair) can't be assigned to a
tuple with corresponding members, when it should. This commit re-implements
the assignment operators (BUT NOT THE CONSTRUCTORS) in a way much closer
to the specification to get rid of this bug. Most of the tests have been
stolen from Eric's patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D27606.
As a fly-by improvement, tests for noexcept correctness have been added
to all overloads of operator=. We should tackle the same issue for the
tuple constructors in a future patch - I'm just trying to make progress
on fixing this long-standing bug.
PR17550
rdar://15837420
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50106
This patch ensures that SFINAE is used to delete assignment operators in pair and tuple based on issue 2729.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62454
This patch implements 2802. Requires _Deleter to have call operator and be move constructible. Based on D62233.
Refs PR37637.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62274
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
Depends on D92214
Reland with changes:
The format header will only be compiled if the compiler used has support
for concepts. This should fix the issues with the initial version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93166
Implement the resolution of LWG2993. Replace a deleted constructor
with a constructor that SFINAEs away in appropriate circumstances.
Also, now that the constructor is templated, we must have an
explicit deduction guide to make CTAD work.
Some tests have been merged in from Agustín Bergé's D40259.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92725
This reverts commit 35a57f39b5.
A build is broken during clang bootstrap with:
In file included from ../libcxx/src/format.cpp:9:
/tmp/ci-nGNyLRM9V3/include/c++/v1/format:153:16: error: no member named 'is_constant_evaluated' in namespace 'std::__1'
if (_VSTD::is_constant_evaluated() && __id >= __num_args_)
~~~~~~~^
1 error generated.
Christopher Di Bella