LLDB has a few different styles of header guards and they're not very
consistent because things get moved around or copy/pasted. This patch
unifies the header guards across LLDB and converts everything to match
LLVM's style.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74743
The x86 assembly inspection engine has code to support detecting a
mid-function epilogue that ends in a RET instruction; add support for
recognizing an epilogue that ends in a JMP, and add a check that the
unwind state has been restored to the original stack setup; reinstate
the post-prologue unwind state after this JMP instruction.
The assembly inspection engine used for other architectures,
UnwindAssemblyInstEmulation, detects mid-function epilogues by
tracking branch instructions within the function and "forwards"
the current unwind state to the targets of the branches. If
an epilogue unwinds the stack and exits, followed by a branch
target, we get back to the correct unwind state. The x86
unwinder should move to this same algorithm, or possibly even
look at implementing an x86 instruction emulation plugin and
get UnwindAssemblyInstEmulation to work for x86 too. I added
a branch instruction recognizier method that will be necessary
if we want to switch the algorithm.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62764
<rdar://problem/51074422>
llvm-svn: 362456
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
This patch fixes issues with a stack realignment.
MSVC maintains two frame pointers (`ebx` and `ebp`) for a realigned stack - one
is used for access to function parameters, while another is used for access to
locals. To support this the patch:
- adds an alternative frame pointer (`ebx`);
- considers stack realignment instructions (e.g. `and esp, -32`);
- along with CFA (Canonical Frame Address) which point to the position next to
the saved return address (or to the first parameter on the stack) introduces
AFA (Aligned Frame Address) which points to the position of the stack pointer
right after realignment. AFA is used for access to registers saved after the
realignment (see the test);
Here is an example of the code with the realignment:
```
struct __declspec(align(256)) OverAligned {
char c;
};
void foo(int foo_arg) {
OverAligned oa_foo = { 1 };
auto aaa_foo = 1234;
}
void bar(int bar_arg) {
OverAligned oa_bar = { 2 };
auto aaa_bar = 5678;
foo(1111);
}
int main() {
bar(2222);
return 0;
}
```
and here is the `bar` disassembly:
```
push ebx
mov ebx, esp
sub esp, 8
and esp, -100h
add esp, 4
push ebp
mov ebp, [ebx+4]
mov [esp+4], ebp
mov ebp, esp
sub esp, 200h
mov byte ptr [ebp-200h], 2
mov dword ptr [ebp-4], 5678
push 1111 ; foo_arg
call j_?foo@@YAXH@Z ; foo(int)
add esp, 4
mov esp, ebp
pop ebp
mov esp, ebx
pop ebx
retn
```
Reviewers: labath, zturner, jasonmolenda, stella.stamenova
Reviewed By: jasonmolenda
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53435
llvm-svn: 345577
The rationale here is that ArchSpec is used throughout the codebase,
including in places which should not depend on the rest of the code in
the Core module.
This commit touches many files, but most of it is just renaming of
#include lines. In a couple of cases, I removed the #include ArchSpec
line altogether, as the file was not using it. In one or two places,
this necessitated adding other #includes like lldb-private-defines.h.
llvm-svn: 318048
blocks of memory, and if the final bytes of that block look like a long
x86 instruction, it can cause the llvm disassembler to read past the end
of the buffer. Use the maximum allowed instruction length that we pass
to the llvm disassembler as a way to limit this to the size of the buffer.
An example of how to trigger this is when lldb does a function call, it
puts a breakpoint on the beginning of main() and uses that as the return
address from the function call. When we stop at that location, lldb may
try to find the first frame up the stack. Because this is on the first
instruction of a function, it will get the word-size value at the stack
pointer and assume that this was the caller's pc value. But this is random
stack memory and could point to anything - an object in memory, something
in the data section, whatever. And if we have a symbol for that thing,
we'll try to disassemble it.
This was leading to infrequent crashes in customer scenarios; figured out
what was happening with address sanitizer.
<rdar://problem/30463256>
llvm-svn: 307454
Summary:
The instruction pattern:
and $-16, %esp
sub $imm, %esp
...
lea imm(%ebp), %esp
appears when the compiler is realigning the stack (for example in
main(), or almost everywhere with -mstackrealign switch). The "and"
instruction is very difficult to model, but that's not necessary, as
these frames are always %ebp-based (the compiler also needs a way to
restore the original %esp). Therefore the plans we were generating for
these function were almost correct already. The only place we were doing
it wrong were the last instructions of the epilogue (usually just
"ret"), where we had to revert to %esp-based unwinding, as the %ebp had
been popped already.
This was wrong because our "distance of esp from cfa" counter had picked
up the "sub" instruction (and incremented the counter) but it had not
seen that the register was reset by the "lea" instruction.
This patch fixes that shortcoming, and adds a test for handling
functions like this.
I have not been able to tickle the compiler into producing a 64-bit
function with this pattern, but I don't see a reason why it couldn't
produce it, if it chose to, so I add a x86_64 test as well.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, tberghammer
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34750
llvm-svn: 306666
This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility.
ConstString
Error
RegularExpression
Stream
StreamString
The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has
no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the
starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies.
These are all low level and very widely used classes, and
previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order
to use these classes. So moving then down to lldbUtility makes
sense from both the short term and long term perspective in
solving this problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427
llvm-svn: 293941
unittests. If I have time, I'd like to see if I can write some
tests of the eh_frame augmentation which is a wholly separate code
path (it seems like maybe it should be rolled into the main instruction
scanning codepath, to be honest, and operate on the generated
UnwindPlan instead of bothering with raw instructions at all).
Outside the eh_frame augmentation, I'm comfortable that this unwind
generator is being tested well now.
llvm-svn: 283186
'push 0x20(%esp)' which clang can generate when emitting
-fomit-frame-pointer code for 32-bit.
Add a unit test program which includes this instruction.
Also fix a bug in the refactoring/rewrite of the x86 assembly
instruction profiler where I'd hard coded it as a 64-bit disassembler
instead of using the ArchSpec to pick a 32-bit or 64-bit disassembler
from llvm. When the disassembler would hit an instruction
that is invalid in 64-bit mode, it would stop disassembling the function.
This likely led to the TestSBData testsuite failure on linux with 32-bit
i386 and gcc-4.9; I'll test that in a bit.
The newly added unit test program is 32-bit i386 code and it includes
an instruction which is invalid in 64-bit mode so it will catch this.
<rdar://problem/28557876>
llvm-svn: 282991
a linux bot test failure. That one is fixed; hopefully there won't
be any others turned up this time.
The eh_frame augmentation code wasn't working right after the
reorg/rewrite of the classes. It works correctly now for the one
test that was failing - but we'll see what the test bots come up
with.
<rdar://problem/28509178>
llvm-svn: 282659
A testbot found a regression introduced in the testsuite with
the changes in r282565 on Ubuntu (TestStepNoDebug.ReturnValueTestCase).
I'll get this set up on an ubuntu box and figure out what is happening
there -- likely a problem with the eh_frame augmentation, which isn't
used on macosx.
llvm-svn: 282566
x86AssemblyInspectionEngine and the current UnwindAssembly_x86 to
allow for the core engine to be exercised by unit tests.
The UnwindAssembly_x86 class will have access to Targets, Processes,
Threads, RegisterContexts -- it will be working in the full lldb
environment.
x86AssemblyInspectionEngine is layered away from all of that, it is
given some register definitions and a bag of bytes to profile.
I wrote an initial unittest for a do-nothing simple x86_64/i386
function to start with. I'll be adding more.
The x86 assembly unwinder was added to lldb early in its bringup;
I made some modernization changes as I was refactoring the code
to make it more consistent with how we write lldb today.
I also added RegisterContextMinidump_x86_64.cpp to the xcode project
file so I can run the unittests from that.
The testsuite passes with this change, but there was quite a bit of
code change by the refactoring and it's possible there are some
issues. I'll be testing this more in the coming days, but it looks
like it is behaving correctly as far as I can tell with automated
testing.
<rdar://problem/28509178>
llvm-svn: 282565
Konrad Kleine