Currenlty PseudoProbeInserter is a pass conditioned on a target switch. It works well with a single clang invocation. It doesn't work so well when the backend is called separately (i.e, through the linker or llc), where user has always to pass -pseudo-probe-for-profiling explictly. I'm making the pass a default pass that requires no command line arg to trigger, but will be actually run depending on whether the CU comes with `llvm.pseudo_probe_desc` metadata.
Reviewed By: wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110209
Previously dangling samples were represented by INT64_MAX in sample profile while probes never executed were not reported. This was based on an observation that dangling probes were only at a smaller portion than zero-count probes. However, with compiler optimizations, dangling probes end up becoming at large portion of all probes in general and reporting them does not make sense from profile size point of view. This change flips sample reporting by reporting zero-count probes instead. This enabled dangling probe to be represented by none (missing entry in profile). This has a couple benefits:
1. Reducing sample profile size in optimize mode, even when the number of non-executed probes outperform the number of dangling probes, since INT64_MAX takes more space over 0 to encode.
2. Binary size savings. No need to encode dangling probe anymore, since missing probes are treated as dangling in the profile reader.
3. Reducing compiler work to track dangling probes. However, for probes that are real dead and removed, we still need the compiler to identify them so that they can be reported as zero-count, instead of mistreated as dangling probes.
4. Improving counts quality by respecting the counts already collected on the non-dangling copy of a probe. A probe, when duplicated, gets two copies at runtime. If one of them is dangling while the other is not, merging the two probes at profile generation time will cause the real samples collected on the non-dangling one to be discarded. Not reporting the dangling counterpart will keep the real samples.
5. Better readability.
6. Be consistent with non-CS dwarf line number based profile. Zero counts are trusted by the compiler counts inferencer while missing counts will be inferred by the compiler.
Note that the current patch does include any work for #3. There will be follow-up changes.
For #1, I've seen for a large Facebook service, the text profile is reduced by 7%. For extbinary profile, the size of LBRProfileSection is reduced by 35%.
For #4, I have seen general counts quality for SPEC2017 is improved by 10%.
Reviewed By: wenlei, wlei, wmi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104129
Make extended binary the default output format for CSSPGO. This avoids having to pass flag every time when generating profile. It also matches llvm-profdata where binary profile is the default (should we switch to extbinary as default for llvm-profdata?).
We plan to compress name table for context profile, which depends on the built-in compression of extbinary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103650
Fixing an issue where samples collected for an untrackable frame is not reported. An untrackable frame refers to a frame whose caller is untrackable due to missing debug info or pseudo probe. Though the frame is connected to its parent frame through the frame pointer chain at runtime, the compiler cannot build the connection without debug info or pseudo probe. In such case we just need to report the untrackable frame as the base frame and all of its child frames.
With more samples reported I'm seeing this improves the performance of an internal benchmark by 2.5%.
Reviewed By: wenlei, wlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102961
Hongtao Yu