This moves the registry higher in the LLVM library dependency stack.
Every client of the target registry needs to link against MC anyway to
actually use the target, so we might as well move this out of Support.
This allows us to ensure that Support doesn't have includes from MC/*.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111454
clang-cl maps /wdNNNN to -Wno-flags for a few warnings that map
cleanly from cl.exe concepts to clang concepts.
This patch adds support for the same numbers to
`#pragma warning(disable : NNNN)`. It also lets
`#pragma warning(push)` and `#pragma warning(pop)` have an effect,
since these are used together with `warning(disable)`.
The optional numeric argument to `warning(push)` is ignored,
as are the other non-`disable` `pragma warning()` arguments.
(Supporting `error` would be easy, but we also don't support
`/we`, and those should probably be added together.)
The motivating example is that a bunch of code (including in LLVM)
uses this idiom to locally disable warnings about calls to deprecated
functions in Windows-only code, and 4996 maps nicely to
-Wno-deprecated-declarations:
#pragma warning(push)
#pragma warning(disable: 4996)
f();
#pragma warning(pop)
Implementation-wise:
- Move `/wd` flag handling from Options.td to actual Driver-level code
- Extract the function mapping cl.exe IDs to warning groups to the
new file clang/lib/Basic/CLWarnings.cpp
- Create a diag::Group enum so that CLWarnings.cpp can refer to
existing groups by ID (and give DllexportExplicitInstantiationDecl
a named group), and add a function to map a diag::Group to the
spelling of it's associated commandline flag
- Call that new function from PragmaWarningHandler
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110668
To avoid using the AST when emitting diagnostics, split the "dontcall"
attribute into "dontcall-warn" and "dontcall-error", and also add the
frontend attribute value as the LLVM attribute value. This gives us all
the information to report diagnostics we need from within the IR (aside
from access to the original source).
One downside is we directly use LLVM's demangler rather than using the
existing Clang diagnostic pretty printing of symbols.
Previous revisions didn't properly declare the new dependencies.
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110364
For x86 Darwin, we have a stack checking feature which re-uses some of this
machinery around stack probing on Windows. Renaming this to be more appropriate
for a generic feature.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109993
Vitaly Buka