This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
This reverts commit bf15f1e489.
The updated version fixes a crash by checking the induction kind instead
of the opcode; for integer inductions, the step is always added, but the
opcode might not be set.
This patch splits off the logic to transform the canonical IV to a
a value for an induction with a different start and step. This
transformation only needs to be done once (independent of VF/UF) and
enables sinking of VPScalarIVStepsRecipe as follow-up.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133758
StoredValues only has entries for members of the interleave group. If
there are gaps, then using the index i here will either access a wrong
entry or be out-of-bounds.
Instead use a dedicated index that only gets incremented for members of
the interleave group.
Fixes#59090.
Minor refactoring in LoopVectorizationCostModel::calculateRegisterUsage.
Also adding some FIXME:s related to what appears to be some short
comings related to how the register usage is calculated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138342
Update comment to reflect current code, which also allows for
VPScalarIVStepsRecipes to be uniform.
Suggested by @Ayal during review of D136068, thanks!
The existing code already unconditionally dereferences RepR, so
cast_or_null can be replaced by just cast.
Suggested by @Ayal during review of D136068, thanks!
The return value of getDef is guaranteed to be a VPRecipeBase and all
users can also accept a VPRecipeBase *. Most users actually case to
VPRecipeBase or a specific recipe before using it, so this change
removes a number of redundant casts.
Also rename it to getDefiningRecipe to make the name a bit clearer.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136068
Epilogue loop vectorization is a feature in the vectorize intended to avoid running fully scalar code when the vector length of the main loop turns out to be either longer than the trip count of the actual loop, or with a huge remainder.
In practice, this feature appears to not have been well tuned. I honestly don't think it should be on by default at all, but it definitely shouldn't be on for RISCV. Note that other targets have also disabled it, but they've done so via disabling interleaving - which is, well, completely unrelated - and we don't want to do that for RISCV.
In the near term, many examples I'm seeing have terrible codegen for epilogue vectorization. We are greatly increasing code size for little value at reasonable VLEN values for small types. In the long term, the cases that epilogue vectorization are intended to handle are likely better handled via tail folding on RISCV.
As an aside, I also don't really trust the correctness of epilogue vectorization. The code structure is such that otherwise straight forward changes sometimes break only epilogue vectorization. The reuse of an existing vplan without careful validation opens significant room for nasty bugs. Given how rarely the code is exercised, that is not a good combination.
As such, this patch introduces a TTI hook, and completely disables epilogue vectorization on RISCV.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136695
The code in buildScalarSteps already properly handles creating the
scalar induction values with VF = 1. Use it directly instead of using
extra code to handle that case.
Suggested by @Ayal in D133760.
@Ayal suggested a better named helper than using `!getDef()` to check if
a value is invariant across all parts.
The property we are using here is that the VPValue is defined outside
any vector loop region. There's a TODO left to handle recipes defined in
pre-header blocks.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133666
Instead of checking whether a map entry exists to decide if we should
initialize it or add to it, we can rely on the map entry being constructed
and initialized to 0 before the addition happens.
For the std::max case, I've made a reference to the map entry to
avoid looking it up twice.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135977
optimizeInductions may leave dead recipes which can prevent sinking.
Sinking on the other hand should not introduce new dead recipes, so
clean up dead recipes before sinking.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133762
Use LoopAccessInfoManager directly instead of various GetLAA lambdas.
Depends on D134608.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134609
At the moment, LoopAccessAnalysis is a loop analysis for the new pass
manager. The issue with that is that LAI caches SCEV expressions and
modifications in a loop may impact SCEV expressions in other loops, but
we do not have a convenient way to invalidate LAI for other loops
withing a loop pipeline.
To avoid this issue, turn it into a function analysis which returns a
manager object that keeps track of the individual LAI objects per loop.
Fixes#50940.
Fixes#51669.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134606
Factor out the logic to create induction resume values for a specific
induction. This will be used in D92132 to support widened IVs during
epilogue vectorization.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134211
Interestingly, MathExtras.h doesn't use <cmath> declaration, so move it out of
that header and include it when needed.
No functional change intended, but there's no longer a transitive include
fromMathExtras.h to cmath.
Follow up to D133580; adjust the cost model to prefer uniform store lowering for scalable stores which are unpredicated.
The impact here isn't in the uniform store lowering quality itself. InstCombine happily converts the scatter form into the single store form. The main impact is in letting the rest of the cost model make choices based on the knowledge that the vector will be scalarized on use.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134460
The dependent code has been changed quite a lot since 151c144 which
b73d2c8 effectively reverts. Now we run into a case where lowering
didn't expect/support the behavior pre 151c144 any longer.
Update the code dealing with scalable pointer inductions to also check
for uniformity in combination with isScalarAfterVectorization. This
should ensure scalable pointer inductions are handled properly during
epilogue vectorization.
Fixes#57912.
This extends the previously added uniform store case to handle stores of loop varying values to a loop invariant address. Note that the placement of this code only allows unpredicated stores; this is important for correctness. (That is "IsPredicated" is always false at this point in the function.)
This patch does not include scalable types. The diff felt "large enough" as it were; I'll handle that in a separate patch. (It requires some changes to cost modeling.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133580
Epilogue vectorization uses isScalarAfterVectorization to check if
widened versions for inductions need to be generated and bails out in
those cases.
At the moment, there are scenarios where isScalarAfterVectorization
returns true but VPWidenPointerInduction::onlyScalarsGenerated would
return false, causing widening.
This can lead to widened phis with incorrect start values being created
in the epilogue vector body.
This patch addresses the issue by storing the cost-model decision in
VPWidenPointerInductionRecipe and restoring the behavior before 151c144.
This effectively reverts 151c144, but the long-term fix is to properly
support widened inductions during epilogue vectorization
Fixes#57712.
My understanding is that NoImplicitFloat, despite it's name, is
supposed to disable all vectors not just float vectors.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134084
Use VPExpandSCEVRecipe to expand the step of pointer inductions. This
cleanup addresses a corresponding FIXME.
It should be NFC, as steps for pointer induction must be constants,
which makes expansion trivial.
This extends the safe-divisor widening scheme recently added for scalable vectors to handle fixed vectors as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132591
VPReplicateRecipe::isUniform actually means uniform-per-parts, hence a
scalar instruction is generated per-part.
This is a potential alternative D132892. For now the current patch only
catches cases where the address is trivially invariant (defined outside
VPlan), while D132892 catches any address that is considered invariant
by SCEV AFAICT.
It should be possible to hoist fully invariant recipes feeding loads out
of the vector loop region as well, but in practice LICM should do that
already.
This version of the patch artificially limits this to loads to make it
easier to compare, but this restriction should be easily liftable.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133019
This patch moves the cost-based decision whether to use an intrinsic or
library call to the point where the recipe is created. This untangles
code-gen from the cost model and also avoids doing some extra work as
the information is already computed at construction.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132585
I keep finding myself needing to rule this out as a possible source of scalarization, so add debug output like we have for other instructions we decide to scalarize.
I'd extracted isUniform, and Florian moved isUniformAfterVectorization out of VPlan at basically the same time. Let's go ahead and merge them.
For the VPTransformState::get path, a VPValue without a def (which corresponds to an external IR value outside of VPLan) is explicitly handled above the uniform check. On the scalarizeInstruction path, I'm less sure why the change isn't visible, but test cases which would seem likely to hit it were already being handled as uniform through some other mechanism. It would be correct to consider values defined outside of vplan uniform here.
Kazu Hirata