broken logic for merging shuffle masks in the face of SM_SentinelZero
mask operands.
While these are '-1' they don't mean 'undef' the way '-1' means in the
pre-legalized shuffle masks. Instead, they mean that the shuffle
operation is forcibly zeroing that lane. Reflect this and explicitly
handle it in a bunch of places. In one place the effect is equivalent
but much more clear. In the rest it was really weirdly broken.
Also, rewrite the entire merging thing to be a more directy operation
with a single loop and just doing math to map the indices through the
various masks.
Also add a bunch of asserts to try to make in extremely clear what the
different masks can possibly look like.
Finally, add some comments to clarify that we're merging shuffle masks
*up* here rather than *down* as we do everywhere else, and thus the
logic is quite confusing.
Thanks to several different people for sending test cases, and for
Robert Khasanov for an initial attempt at fixing.
llvm-svn: 215687
lowering scheme.
Currently, this just directly bails to the fallback path of splitting
the 256-bit vector into two 128-bit vectors, operating there, and then
joining the results back together. While the results are far from
perfect, they are *shockingly* good for what we're doing here. I'll be
layering the rest of the functionality on top of this piece by piece and
updating tests as I go.
Note that 256-bit vectors in this mode are still somewhat WIP. While
I think the code paths that I'm adding here are clean and good-to-go,
there are still a lot of 128-bit assumptions that I'll need to stomp out
as I march through the functional spread here.
llvm-svn: 215637
one pesky test case correctly.
This test case caused the old code to infloop occilating between solving
the low-half and the high-half. The 'side balancing' part of
single-input v8 shuffle lowering didn't handle the one pattern which can
cause it to occilate. Fortunately the fuzz testing found this case.
Unfortuately it was *terrible* to handle. I'm really sorry for the
amount and density of the code here, I'd love suggestions on how to
simplify it. I feel like there *must* be a simpler form here, but after
a lot of days I've not found it. This is the only one I've found that
even works. I've added the one pesky test case along with some nice
comments explaining the core problem that we have to solve here.
So far this has survived approximately 32k test cases. More strenuous
fuzzing commencing.
llvm-svn: 215519
I think that this will scale better in most cases than adding a Pat<> for each
mapping from the intrinsic DAG to the intruction (i.e. rri, rrik, rrikz). We
can just lower to the SDNode and have the resulting DAG be matches by the DAG
patterns.
Alternatively (long term), we could keep the Pat<>s but generate them via the
new AVX512_masking multiclass. The difficulty is that in order to formulate
that we would have to concatenate DAGs. Currently this is only supported if
the operators of the input DAGs are identical.
llvm-svn: 215473
shuffle lowering.
This is closely related to the previous one. Here we failed to use the
source offset when swapping in the other case -- where we end up
swapping the *final* shuffle. The cause of this bug is a bit different:
I simply wasn't thinking about the fact that this mask is actually
a slice of a wide mask and thus has numbers that need SourceOffset
applied. Simple fix. Would be even more simple with an algorithm-y thing
to use here, but correctness first. =]
llvm-svn: 215095
via the fuzz tester.
Here I missed an offset when round-tripping a value through a shuffle
mask. I got it right 2 lines below. See a problem? I do. ;] I'll
probably be adding a little "swap" algorithm which accepts a range and
two values and swaps those values where they occur in the range. Don't
really have a name for it, let me know if you do.
llvm-svn: 215094
through the new fuzzer.
This one is great: bad operator precedence led the modulus to happen at
the wrong point. All the asserts didn't fire because there were usually
the right values past the end of the 4 element region we were looking
at. Probably could have gotten a crash here with ASan + fuzzing, but the
correctness tests pinpointed this really nicely.
llvm-svn: 215092
Summary:
Since pointers are 32-bit on x32 we can use ebp and esp as frame and stack
pointer. Some operations like PUSH/POP and CFI_INSTRUCTION still
require 64-bit register, so using 64-bit MachineFramePtr where required.
X86_64 NaCl uses 64-bit frame/stack pointers, however it's been found that
both isTarget64BitLP64 and isTarget64BitILP32 are true for NaCl. Addressing
this issue here as well by making isTarget64BitLP64 false.
Also mark hasReservedSpillSlot unreachable on X86. See inlined comments.
Test Plan: Add one new simple test and upgrade 2 existing with x32 target case.
Reviewers: nadav, dschuff
Subscribers: llvm-commits, zinovy.nis
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4617
llvm-svn: 215091
fuzz testing.
The function which tested for adjacency did what it said on the tin, but
when I called it, I wanted it to do something more thorough: I wanted to
know if the *pairs* of shuffle elements were adjacent and started at
0 mod 2. In one place I had the decency to try to test for this, but in
the other it was completely skipped, miscompiling this test case. Fix
this by making the helper actually do what I wanted it to do everywhere
I called it (and removing the now redundant code in one place).
I *really* dislike the name "canWidenShuffleElements" for this
predicate. If anyone can come up with a better name, please let me know.
The other name I thought about was "canWidenShuffleMask" but is it
really widening the mask to reduce the number of lanes shuffled? I don't
know. Naming things is hard.
llvm-svn: 215089
to get the subtarget and that's accessible from the MachineFunction
now. This helps clear the way for smaller changes where we getting
a subtarget will require passing in a MachineFunction/Function as
well.
llvm-svn: 214988
test case to actually generate correct code.
The primary miscompile fixed here is that we weren't correctly handling
in-place elements in one half of a single-input v8i16 shuffle when
moving a dword of elements from that half to the other half. Some times,
we would clobber the in-place elements in forming the dword to move
across halves.
The fix to this involves forcibly marking the in-place inputs even when
there is no need to gather them into a dword, and to much more carefully
re-arrange the elements when grouping them into a dword to move across
halves. With these two changes we would generate correct shuffles for
the test case, but found another miscompile. There are also some random
perturbations of the generated shuffle pattern in SSE2. It looks like
a wash; more instructions in some cases fewer in others.
The second miscompile would corrupt the results into nonsense. This is
a buggy pattern in one of the added DAG combines. Mapping elements
through a PSHUFD when pairing redundant half-shuffles is *much* harder
than this code makes it out to be -- it requires reasoning about *all*
of where the input is used in the PSHUFD, not just one part of where it
is used. Plus, we can't combine a half shuffle *into* a PSHUFD but the
code didn't guard against it. I think this was just a bad idea and I've
just removed that aspect of the combine. No tests regress as
a consequence so seems OK.
llvm-svn: 214954
not corrupting the mask by mutating it more times than intended. No
functionality changed (the results were non-overlapping so the old
version "worked" but was non-obvious).
llvm-svn: 214953
a test case.
We also miscompile this test case which is showing a serious flaw in the
single-input v8i16 shuffle code. I've left the specific instruction
checks FIXME-ed out until I can address the bug in the single-input
code, but I wanted to separate out a significant functionality change to
produce correct code from a very simple and targeted crasher fix.
The miscompile problem stems from keeping track of inputs by value
rather than by index. As a consequence of doing this, we can't reliably
update those inputs because they might swap and we can't detect this
without copying the mask.
The blend code now uses indices for the input lists and this seems
strictly better. It also should make it easier to sort things and do
other cleanups. I think the time has come to simplify The Great Lambda
here.
llvm-svn: 214914
This was currently part of lowering to PALIGNR with some special-casing to
make interlane shifting work. Since AVX512F has interlane alignr (valignd/q)
and AVX512BW has vpalignr we need to support both of these *at the same time*,
e.g. for SKX.
This patch breaks out the common code and then add support to check both of
these lowering options from LowerVECTOR_SHUFFLE.
I also added some FIXMEs where I think the AVX512BW and AVX512VL additions
should probably go.
llvm-svn: 214888
They have different semantics (valign is interlane while palingr is intralane)
and palingr is still needed even in the AVX512 context. According to the
latest spec AVX512BW provides these.
llvm-svn: 214887
found by a single test reduced out of a failure on llvm-stress.
The start of the problem (and the crash) came when we tried to use
a find of a non-used slot in the move-to half of the move-mask as the
target for two bad-half inputs. While if lucky this will be the first of
a pair of slots which we can place the bad-half inputs into, it isn't
actually guaranteed. This really isn't surprising, not sure what I was
thinking. The correct way to find the two unused slots is to look for
one of the *used* slots. We know it isn't that pair, and we can use some
modular arithmetic to find the other pair by masking off the odd bit and
adding 2 modulo 4. With this, we reliably found a viable pair of slots
for the bad-half inputs.
Sadly, that wasn't enough. We also had a wrong code bug that surfaced
when I reduced the test case for this where we would use the same slot
twice for the two bad inputs. This is because both of the bad inputs
could be in odd slots originally and thus the mod-2 mapping would
actually be the same. The whole point of the weird indexing into the
pair of empty slots was to try to leverage when the end result needed
the two bad-half inputs to be paired in a dword and pre-pair them in the
correct orrientation. This is less important with the powerful combining
we're now doing, and also easier and more reliable to achieve be noting
that we add the bad-half inputs in order. Thus, if they are in a dword
pair, the low part of that will be the first input in the sequence.
Always putting that in the low element will just do the right thing in
addition to computing the correct result.
Test case added. =]
llvm-svn: 214849
shorter/easier and have the DAG use that to do the same lookup. This
can be used in the future for TargetMachine based caching lookups from
the MachineFunction easily.
Update the MIPS subtarget switching machinery to update this pointer
at the same time it runs.
llvm-svn: 214838
use of PACKUS. It's cleaner that way.
I looked at implementing clever combine-based folding of PACKUS chains
into PSHUFB but it is quite hard and doesn't seem likely to be worth it.
The most annoying part would be detecting that the correct masking had
been done to use PACKUS-style instructions as a blend operation rather
than there being any saturating as is indicated by its name. We generate
really nice code for what few test cases I've come up with that aren't
completely contrived for this by just directly prefering PSHUFB and so
let's go with that strategy for now. =]
llvm-svn: 214707
patterns of v16i8 shuffles.
This implements one of the more important FIXMEs for the SSE2 support in
the new shuffle lowering. We now generate the optimal shuffle sequence
for truncate-derived shuffles which show up essentially everywhere.
Unfortunately, this exposes a weakness in other parts of the shuffle
logic -- we can no longer form PSHUFB here. I'll add the necessary
support for that and other things in a subsequent commit.
llvm-svn: 214702
I spent some time looking into a better or more principled way to handle
this. For example, by detecting arbitrary "unneeded" ORs... But really,
there wasn't any point. We just shouldn't build blatantly wrong code so
late in the pipeline rather than adding more stages and logic later on
to fix it. Avoiding this is just too simple.
llvm-svn: 214680
lowering with a small addition to it and adding PSHUFB combining.
There is one obvious place in the new vector shuffle lowering where we
should form PSHUFBs directly: when without them we will unpack a vector
of i8s across two different registers and do a potentially 4-way blend
as i16s only to re-pack them into i8s afterward. This is the crazy
expensive fallback path for i8 shuffles and we can just directly use
pshufb here as it will always be cheaper (the unpack and pack are
two instructions so even a single shuffle between them hits our
three instruction limit for forming PSHUFB).
However, this doesn't generate very good code in many cases, and it
leaves a bunch of common patterns not using PSHUFB. So this patch also
adds support for extracting a shuffle mask from PSHUFB in the X86
lowering code, and uses it to handle PSHUFBs in the recursive shuffle
combining. This allows us to combine through them, combine multiple ones
together, and generally produce sufficiently high quality code.
Extracting the PSHUFB mask is annoyingly complex because it could be
either pre-legalization or post-legalization. At least this doesn't have
to deal with re-materialized constants. =] I've added decode routines to
handle the different patterns that show up at this level and we dispatch
through them as appropriate.
The two primary test cases are updated. For the v16 test case there is
still a lot of room for improvement. Since I was going through it
systematically I left behind a bunch of FIXME lines that I'm hoping to
turn into ALL lines by the end of this.
llvm-svn: 214628
of normally binary shuffle instructions like PUNPCKL and MOVLHPS.
This detects cases where a single register is used for both operands
making the shuffle behave in a unary way. We detect this and adjust the
mask to use the unary form which allows the existing DAG combine for
shuffle instructions to actually work at all.
As a consequence, this uncovered a number of obvious bugs in the
existing DAG combine which are fixed. It also now canonicalizes several
shuffles even with the existing lowering. These typically are trying to
match the shuffle to the domain of the input where before we only really
modeled them with the floating point variants. All of the cases which
change to an integer shuffle here have something in the integer domain, so
there are no more or fewer domain crosses here AFAICT. Technically, it
might be better to go from a GPR directly to the floating point domain,
but detecting floating point *outputs* despite integer inputs is a lot
more code and seems unlikely to be worthwhile in practice. If folks are
seeing domain-crossing regressions here though, let me know and I can
hack something up to fix it.
Also as a consequence, a bunch of missed opportunities to form pshufb
now can be formed. Notably, splats of i8s now form pshufb.
Interestingly, this improves the existing splat lowering too. We go from
3 instructions to 1. Yes, we may tie up a register, but it seems very
likely to be worth it, especially if splatting the 0th byte (the
common case) as then we can use a zeroed register as the mask.
llvm-svn: 214625
Stop using ST registers for function returns and inline-asm instructions and use
FP registers instead. This allows removing a large amount of code in the
stackifier pass that was needed to track register liveness and handle copies
between ST and FP registers and function calls returning floating point values.
It also fixes a bug which manifests when an ST register defined by an
inline-asm instruction was live across another inline-asm instruction, as shown
in the following sequence of machine instructions:
1. INLINEASM <es:frndint> $0:[regdef], %ST0<imp-def,tied5>
2. INLINEASM <es:fldcw $0>
3. %FP0<def> = COPY %ST0
<rdar://problem/16952634>
llvm-svn: 214580
Currently when DAGCombine converts loads feeding a switch into a switch of
addresses feeding a load the new load inherits the isInvariant flag of the left
side. This is incorrect since invariant loads can be reordered in cases where it
is illegal to reoarder normal loads.
This patch adds an isInvariant parameter to getExtLoad() and updates all call
sites to pass in the data if they have it or false if they don't. It also
changes the DAGCombine to use that data to make the right decision when
creating the new load.
llvm-svn: 214449
Rename to allowsMisalignedMemoryAccess.
On R600, 8 and 16 byte accesses are mostly OK with 4-byte alignment,
and don't need to be split into multiple accesses. Vector loads with
an alignment of the element type are not uncommon in OpenCL code.
llvm-svn: 214055
instructions in the legalized DAG, and leverage it to combine long
sequences of instructions to PSHUFB.
Eventually, the other x86-instruction-specific shuffle combines will
probably all be driven out of this routine. But the real motivation is
to detect after we have fully legalized and optimized a shuffle to the
minimal number of x86 instructions whether it is profitable to replace
the chain with a fully generic PSHUFB instruction even though doing so
requires either a load from a constant pool or tying up a register with
the mask.
While the Intel manuals claim it should be used when it replaces 5 or
more instructions (!!!!) my experience is that it is actually very fast
on modern chips, and so I've gon with a much more aggressive model of
replacing any sequence of 3 or more instructions.
I've also taught it to do some basic canonicalization to special-purpose
instructions which have smaller encodings than their generic
counterparts.
There are still quite a few FIXMEs here, and I've not yet implemented
support for lowering blends with PSHUFB (where its power really shines
due to being able to zero out lanes), but this starts implementing real
PSHUFB support even when using the new, fancy shuffle lowering. =]
llvm-svn: 214042
The tale starts with r212808 which attempted to fix inversion of the low
and high bits when lowering MUL_LOHI. Sadly, that commit did not include
any positive test cases, and just removed some operations from a test
case where the actual logic being changed isn't fully visible from the
test.
What this commit did was two things. First, it reversed the low and high
results in the formation of the MERGE_VALUES node for the multiple
results. This is entirely correct.
Second it changed the shuffles for extracting the low and high
components from the i64 results of the multiplies to extract them
assuming a big-endian-style encoding of the multiply results. This
second change is wrong. There is no big-endian encoding in x86, the
results of the multiplies are normal v2i64s: when cast to v4i32, the low
i32s are at offsets 0 and 2, and the high i32s are at offsets 1 and 3.
However, the first change wasn't enough to actually fix the bug, which
is (I assume) why the second change was also made. There was another bug
in the MERGE_VALUES formation: we weren't using a VTList, and so were
getting a single result node! When grabbing the *second* result from the
node, we got... well.. colud be anything. I think this *appeared* to
invert things, but had to be causing other problems as well.
Fortunately, I fixed the MERGE_VALUES issue in r213931, so we should
have been fine, right? NOOOPE! Because the core bug was never addressed,
the test in vector-idiv failed when I fixed the MERGE_VALUES node.
Because there are essentially no docs for this node, I had to guess at
how to fix it and tried swapping the operands, restoring the order of
the original code before r212808. While this "fixed" the test case (in
that we produced the write instructions) we were still extracting the
wrong elements of the i64s, and thus PR20355 was still broken.
This commit essentially reverts the big-endian-style extraction part of
r212808 and goes back to the original masks which were correct. Now that
the MERGE_VALUES node formation is also correct, everything works. I've
also included a more detailed test from PR20355 to make sure this stays
fixed.
llvm-svn: 214011
The clever way to implement signed multiplication with unsigned *is
already implemented* and tested and working correctly. The bug is
somewhere else. Re-investigating.
This will teach me to not scroll far enough to read the code that did
what I thought needed to be done.
llvm-svn: 214009
signed multiplication is requested. While there is not a difference in
the *low* half of the result, the *high* half (used specifically to
implement the signed division by these constants) certainly is used. The
test case I've nuked was actively asserting wrong code.
There is a delightful solution to doing signed multiplication even when
we don't have it that Richard Smith has crafted, but I'll add the
machinery back and implement that in a follow-up patch. This at least
restores correctness.
llvm-svn: 214007
address of the stack guard was being spilled to the stack.
Previously the address of the stack guard would get spilled to the stack if it
was impossible to keep it in a register. This patch introduces a new target
independent node and pseudo instruction which gets expanded post-RA to a
sequence of instructions that load the stack guard value. Register allocator
can now just remat the value when it can't keep it in a register.
<rdar://problem/12475629>
llvm-svn: 213967
SDValues, fixing the two bugs left in the regression suite.
The key for both of these was the use a single value type rather than
a VTList which caused an unintentionally single-result merge-value node.
Fix this by getting the appropriate VTList in place.
Doing this exposed that the comments in x86's code abouth how MUL_LOHI
operands are handle is wrong. The bug with the use of out-of-range
result numbers was hiding the bug about the order of operands here (as
best i can tell). There are more places where the code appears to get
this backwards still...
llvm-svn: 213931
vector operation legalization with support for custom target lowering
and fallback to expand when it fails, and use this to implement sext and
anyext load lowering for x86 in a more principled way.
Previously, the x86 backend relied on a target DAG combine to "combine
away" sextload and extload nodes prior to legalization, or would expand
them during legalization with terrible code. This is particularly
problematic because the DAG combine relies on running over non-canonical
DAG nodes at just the right time to match several common and important
patterns. It used a combine rather than lowering because we didn't have
good lowering support, and to expose some tricks being employed to more
combine phases.
With this change it becomes a proper lowering operation, the backend
marks that it can lower these nodes, and I've added support for handling
the canonical forms that don't have direct legal representations such as
sextload of a v4i8 -> v4i64 on AVX1. With this change, our test cases
for this behavior continue to pass even after the DAG combiner beigns
running more systematically over every node.
There is some noise caused by this in the test suite where we actually
use vector extends instead of subregister extraction. This doesn't
really seem like the right thing to do, but is unlikely to be a critical
regression. We do regress in one case where by lowering to the
target-specific patterns early we were able to combine away extraneous
legal math nodes. However, this regression is completely addressed by
switching to a widening based legalization which is what I'm working
toward anyways, so I've just switched the test to that mode.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4654
llvm-svn: 213897
Chandler Carruth