A previously missing intrinsic for an old instruction.
Reviewers: craig.topper, echristo
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45312
llvm-svn: 329936
Similar to the wbinvd instruction, except this
one does not invalidate caches. Ring 0 only.
The encoding matches a wbinvd instruction with
an F3 prefix.
Reviewers: craig.topper, zvi, ashlykov
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43816
llvm-svn: 329847
Atom is the only x86 target that still uses schedule itineraries, if we can remove this then we can begin the work on removing x86 itineraries. I've also found that it will help with PR36550.
I've focussed on matching the existing model as closely as possible (relying on the schedule tests), PR36895 indicated a lot of these were incorrect but we can just as easily fix these after this patch as before. Hopefully we can get llvm-exegesis to help here,
There are a few instructions that rely on itinerary scheduling (mainly push/pop/return) of multiple resource stages, but I don't think any of these are show stoppers.
There are also a few codegen changes that seem related to the post-ra scheduler acting a little differently, I haven't tracked these down but they don't seem critical.
NOTE: I don't have access to any Atom hardware, so this hasn't been tested in the wild.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45486
llvm-svn: 329837
Pre-commit for D45486, don't rely on itinerary scheduler model to determine latencies for padding, use the generic TargetSchedModel::computeInstrLatency call.
Also, replace hard coded (atom specific) 2*uop creation per padding cycle with a version based on the scheduler model's issue width.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45486
llvm-svn: 329834
The 128/256-bit versions were no longer used by clang. It uses the legacy SSE/AVX2 version and a select. The 512-bit was changed to the same for consistency.
llvm-svn: 329774
The BroadwellModelProcResources had an entry for HWPort5, which is a Haswell
resource, and not a Broadwell processor resource. That entry was added to the
Broadwell model because variable blends were consuming it.
This was clearly a typo (the resource name should have been BWPort5), which
unfortunately was never caught before. It was not reported as an error because
HWPort5 is a resource defined by the Haswell model. It has been found when
testing some code with llvm-mca: the list of resources in the resource pressure
view was odd.
This patch fixes the issue; now variable blend instructions consume 2 cycles on
BWPort5 instead of HWPort5. This is enough to get rid of the extra (spurious)
entry in the BroadWellModelProcResources table.
llvm-svn: 329686
Summary:
Subtargets can define the libpfm counter names that can be used to
measure cycles and uops issued on ProcResUnits.
This allows making llvm-exegesis available on more targets.
Fixes PR36984.
Reviewers: gchatelet, RKSimon, andreadb, craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45360
llvm-svn: 329675
This cleans up a number of operations that only claimed te use EFLAGS
due to using DF. But no instructions which we think of us setting EFLAGS
actually modify DF (other than things like popf) and so this needlessly
creates uses of EFLAGS that aren't really there.
In fact, DF is so restrictive it is pretty easy to model. Only STD, CLD,
and the whole-flags writes (WRFLAGS and POPF) need to model this.
I've also somewhat cleaned up some of the flag management instruction
definitions to be in the correct .td file.
Adding this extra register also uncovered a failure to use the correct
datatype to hold X86 registers, and I've corrected that as necessary
here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45154
llvm-svn: 329673
Prefer to use the 32-bit AND with immediate instead.
Primarily I'm doing this to ensure that immediates created by shrinkAndImmediate will always get absorbed into the AND. But I do believe this would be a reduction in the number of uops that need to execute. Ideally we should shrink the 'and' and the 'load' during DAG combine to re-enable the fold.
Fixes PR37063.
llvm-svn: 329667
The key idea is to lower COPY nodes populating EFLAGS by scanning the
uses of EFLAGS and introducing dedicated code to preserve the necessary
state in a GPR. In the vast majority of cases, these uses are cmovCC and
jCC instructions. For such cases, we can very easily save and restore
the necessary information by simply inserting a setCC into a GPR where
the original flags are live, and then testing that GPR directly to feed
the cmov or conditional branch.
However, things are a bit more tricky if arithmetic is using the flags.
This patch handles the vast majority of cases that seem to come up in
practice: adc, adcx, adox, rcl, and rcr; all without taking advantage of
partially preserved EFLAGS as LLVM doesn't currently model that at all.
There are a large number of operations that techinaclly observe EFLAGS
currently but shouldn't in this case -- they typically are using DF.
Currently, they will not be handled by this approach. However, I have
never seen this issue come up in practice. It is already pretty rare to
have these patterns come up in practical code with LLVM. I had to resort
to writing MIR tests to cover most of the logic in this pass already.
I suspect even with its current amount of coverage of arithmetic users
of EFLAGS it will be a significant improvement over the current use of
pushf/popf. It will also produce substantially faster code in most of
the common patterns.
This patch also removes all of the old lowering for EFLAGS copies, and
the hack that forced us to use a frame pointer when EFLAGS copies were
found anywhere in a function so that the dynamic stack adjustment wasn't
a problem. None of this is needed as we now lower all of these copies
directly in MI and without require stack adjustments.
Lots of thanks to Reid who came up with several aspects of this
approach, and Craig who helped me work out a couple of things tripping
me up while working on this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45146
llvm-svn: 329657
LowerIntUnary as its name says has an assert for integer types. But for the bitcast case one side might be an FP type.
Rather than making sure the function really works for fp types and renaming it. Just do really basic splitting directly. The LowerIntUnary has the advantage that it can peek through BUILD_VECTOR because every other call is during Lowering. But these calls are during legalization and will be followed by a DAG combine round.
Revert some change to LowerVectorIntUnary that were originally made just to make these two calls work even in pure integer cases.
This was found purely by compiling the avx512f-builtins.c test from clang so I've copied over the offending function from that.
llvm-svn: 329616
While it appears to be correct information based on Intel's optimization manual and Agner's data, it causes perf regressions on a couple of the benchmarks in our internal list.
llvm-svn: 329593
The TargetSchedModel is always initialized using the TargetSubtargetInfo's
MCSchedModel and TargetInstrInfo, so we don't need to extract those and
pass 3 parameters to init().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44789
llvm-svn: 329540
Summary:
Cmov and setcc previously used WriteALU, but on Intel processors at least they are more restricted than basic ALU ops.
This patch adds new SchedWrites for them and removes the InstRWs. I had to leave some InstRWs for CMOVA/CMOVBE and SETA/SETBE because those have an extra uop relative to the other condition codes on Intel CPUs.
The test changes are due to fixing a missing ZnAGU dependency on the memory form of setcc.
Reviewers: RKSimon, andreadb, GGanesh
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: GGanesh, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45380
llvm-svn: 329539
Summary:
This removes the InstRWs for BLENDVPS/PD in favor of WriteFVarBlend. The latency listed was 3 cycles but WriteFVarBlend is defined as 1 cycle latency. The 1 cycle latency matches Agner Fog's data.
The patterns were missing the VEX forms which is why there are no test changes. We don't test "-mcpu=znver1 -mattr=-avx"
Reviewers: RKSimon, GGanesh
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44841
llvm-svn: 329538
Summary:
r327219 added wrappers to std::sort which randomly shuffle the container before sorting.
This will help in uncovering non-determinism caused due to undefined sorting
order of objects having the same key.
To make use of that infrastructure we need to invoke llvm::sort instead of std::sort.
Note: This patch is one of a series of patches to replace *all* std::sort to llvm::sort.
Refer the comments section in D44363 for a list of all the required patches.
Reviewers: chandlerc, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: chandlerc, craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44874
llvm-svn: 329534
Previously we used a custom lowering for this because of the AVX1 splitting requirement. But we can do the split during DAG combine if we check the types and subtarget
llvm-svn: 329510
Summary:
This patch removes InstRW overrides for basic arithmetic/logic instructions. To do this I've added the store address port to RMW. And used a WriteSequence to make the latency additive. It does not cover ADC/SBB because they have different latency.
Apparently we were inconsistent about whether the store has latency or not thus the test changes.
I've also left out Sandy Bridge because the load latency there is currently 4 cycles and should be 5.
Reviewers: RKSimon, andreadb
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45351
llvm-svn: 329416
As mentioned on D44647, this patch increases the default memory latency to +5cy , which more closely matches what most custom cases are doing for reg-mem instructions.
I've bumped LoadLatency, ReadAfterLd and WriteLoad values to 5cy to be consistent.
As Sandy Bridge is currently our default generic model, this affects a lot of scheduling tests...
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44654
llvm-svn: 329388
This is the 32-bit mode version of LEAVE64. It should be at least somewhat similar to LEAVE64.
The Sandy Bridge version was missing a load port use.
llvm-svn: 329347
We were forcing the latency of these instructions to 5 cycles, but every other scheduler model had them as 1 cycle. I'm sure I didn't get everything, but this gets a big portion.
llvm-svn: 329339
This patch adds the ability to describe properties of the hardware retire
control unit.
Tablegen class RetireControlUnit has been added for this purpose (see
TargetSchedule.td).
A RetireControlUnit specifies the size of the reorder buffer, as well as the
maximum number of opcodes that can be retired every cycle.
A zero (or negative) value for the reorder buffer size means: "the size is
unknown". If the size is unknown, then llvm-mca defaults it to the value of
field SchedMachineModel::MicroOpBufferSize. A zero or negative number of
opcodes retired per cycle means: "there is no restriction on the number of
instructions that can be retired every cycle".
Models can optionally specify an instance of RetireControlUnit. There can only
be up-to one RetireControlUnit definition per scheduling model.
Information related to the RCU (RetireControlUnit) is stored in (two new fields
of) MCExtraProcessorInfo. llvm-mca loads that information when it initializes
the DispatchUnit / RetireControlUnit (see Dispatch.h/Dispatch.cpp).
This patch fixes PR36661.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45259
llvm-svn: 329304
It's failing on the bots and I'm not sure why.
This reverts:
[X86] Synchronize the SchedRW on some EVEX instructions with their VEX equivalents.
[X86] Use WriteFShuffle256 for VEXTRACTF128 to be consistent with VEXTRACTI128 which uses WriteShuffle256.
[X86] Remove some InstRWs for plain store instructions on Sandy Bridge.
[X86] Auto-generate complete checks. NFC
llvm-svn: 329256
The MachineOutliner has a bunch of target hooks that will call llvm_unreachable
if the target doesn't implement them. Therefore, if you enable the outliner on
such a target, it'll just crash. It'd be much better if it'd just *not* run
the outliner at all in this case.
This commit adds a hook to TargetInstrInfo that returns false by default.
Targets that implement the hook make it return true. The outliner checks the
return value of this hook to decide whether or not to continue.
llvm-svn: 329220
Makes it easier to see mistakes such as the one fixed in r329178 and makes
the different target CMakeLists more consistent.
Also remove some stale-looking comments from the Nios2 target cmakefile.
No intended behavior change.
llvm-svn: 329181
These both use a 16-bit load, but one used loadi16_anyext and the other used extloadi32i16. The only difference between them is that loadi16_anyext checked that the load was at least 2 byte aligned and non-volatile. But the alignment doesn't matter here. Just use extloadi32i16 for both.
llvm-svn: 329154
Summary:
The ShadowCallStack pass instruments functions marked with the
shadowcallstack attribute. The instrumented prolog saves the return
address to [gs:offset] where offset is stored and updated in [gs:0].
The instrumented epilog loads/updates the return address from [gs:0]
and checks that it matches the return address on the stack before
returning.
Reviewers: pcc, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: cryptoad, eugenis, craig.topper, mgorny, llvm-commits, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44802
llvm-svn: 329139
This commit is similar to r329120, but uses the existing getUsesRedZone() function
in X86MachineFunctionInfo. This teaches the outliner to look at whether or not a
function *truly* uses a redzone instead of just the noredzone attribute on a
function.
Thus, after this commit, it's possible to outline from x86 without using
-mno-red-zone and still get outlining results.
This also adds a new test for the new redzone behaviour.
llvm-svn: 329134
This patch allows the description of register files in processor scheduling
models. This addresses PR36662.
A new tablegen class named 'RegisterFile' has been added to TargetSchedule.td.
Targets can optionally describe register files for their processors using that
class. In particular, class RegisterFile allows to specify:
- The total number of physical registers.
- Which target registers are accessible through the register file.
- The cost of allocating a register at register renaming stage.
Example (from this patch - see file X86/X86ScheduleBtVer2.td)
def FpuPRF : RegisterFile<72, [VR64, VR128, VR256], [1, 1, 2]>
Here, FpuPRF describes a register file for MMX/XMM/YMM registers. On Jaguar
(btver2), a YMM register definition consumes 2 physical registers, while MMX/XMM
register definitions only cost 1 physical register.
The syntax allows to specify an empty set of register classes. An empty set of
register classes means: this register file models all the registers specified by
the Target. For each register class, users can specify an optional register
cost. By default, register costs default to 1. A value of 0 for the number of
physical registers means: "this register file has an unbounded number of
physical registers".
This patch is structured in two parts.
* Part 1 - MC/Tablegen *
A first part adds the tablegen definition of RegisterFile, and teaches the
SubtargetEmitter how to emit information related to register files.
Information about register files is accessible through an instance of
MCExtraProcessorInfo.
The idea behind this design is to logically partition the processor description
which is only used by external tools (like llvm-mca) from the processor
information used by the llvm machine schedulers.
I think that this design would make easier for targets to get rid of the extra
processor information if they don't want it.
* Part 2 - llvm-mca related *
The second part of this patch is related to changes to llvm-mca.
The main differences are:
1) class RegisterFile now needs to take into account the "cost of a register"
when allocating physical registers at register renaming stage.
2) Point 1. triggered a minor refactoring which lef to the removal of the
"maximum 32 register files" restriction.
3) The BackendStatistics view has been updated so that we can print out extra
details related to each register file implemented by the processor.
The effect of point 3. is also visible in tests register-files-[1..5].s.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44980
llvm-svn: 329067
If a load follows a store and reloads data that the store has written to memory, Intel microarchitectures can in many cases forward the data directly from the store to the load, This "store forwarding" saves cycles by enabling the load to directly obtain the data instead of accessing the data from cache or memory.
A "store forward block" occurs in cases that a store cannot be forwarded to the load. The most typical case of store forward block on Intel Core microarchiticutre that a small store cannot be forwarded to a large load.
The estimated penalty for a store forward block is ~13 cycles.
This pass tries to recognize and handle cases where "store forward block" is created by the compiler when lowering memcpy calls to a sequence
of a load and a store.
The pass currently only handles cases where memcpy is lowered to XMM/YMM registers, it tries to break the memcpy into smaller copies.
breaking the memcpy should be possible since there is no atomicity guarantee for loads and stores to XMM/YMM.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41330
Change-Id: Ib48836ccdf6005989f7d4466fa2035b7b04415d9
llvm-svn: 328973
Give them both the same itineraries. Add hasSideEffects = 0 to ADOX since they don't have patterns. Rename source operands to $src1 and $src2 instead of $src0 and $src. Add ReadAfterLd to the memory form SchedRW.
llvm-svn: 328952
This also moves to define it in the same way as ADCX which seems to use
constraints a bit better.
This is pulled out of the review for reducing the use of popf for
restoring EFLAGS, but is independent. There are still more problems with
our definitions for these instructions that Craig is going to look at
but this is at least less broken and he can start from this to improve
them more fully.
Thanks to Craig for the review here.
llvm-svn: 328945
for X86's instruction information. I've now got a second patch under
review that needs these same APIs. This bit is nicely orthogonal and
obvious, so landing it. NFC.
llvm-svn: 328944
This Promote flag was alwasys set to true except in the default case. But in the default case we don't need to set PVT and can just return false.
llvm-svn: 328926
Summary:
It seems many CPUs don't implement this instruction as well as the other vector multiplies. Often using a multi uop flow. Silvermont in particular has a 7 uop flow with 11 cycle throughput. Sandy Bridge implements it as a single uop with 5 cycle latency and 1 cycle throughput. But Haswell and later use 2 uops with 10 cycle latency and 2 cycle throughput.
This patch adds a new X86SchedWritePair we can use to tag this instruction separately. I've provided correct information for Silvermont, Btver2, and Sandy Bridge. I've removed the InstRWs for SandyBridge. I've left Haswell/Broadwell/Skylake InstRWs in place because I wasn't sure how to account for the different load latency between 128 and 256 bits. I also left Znver1 InstRWs in place because the existing values don't match Agner's spreadsheet.
I also left a FIXME in the SandyBridge model because it being used for the "generic" model is too optimistic for the 256/512-bit versions since those are multiple uops on all known CPUs.
Reviewers: RKSimon, GGanesh, courbet
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: gchatelet, gbedwell, andreadb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44972
llvm-svn: 328914
Sometimes the operand comes after the memory operand so we need 5 ReadDefaults first.
I suspect we also need to do something for the mask operand for masked avx512 instructions? I'm not sure if the mask should be ReadAfterLd or not since it can mask faults. If it shouldn't be ReadAfterLd then we're probably wrong for zero masking instructions already.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44726
llvm-svn: 328834
The memory form of these instructions only read an input from memory. They don't have any register operands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44836
llvm-svn: 328828
These instructions have the memory operand before the register operand. So we need to put ReadDefault for all the load ops first. Then the ReadAfterLd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44838
llvm-svn: 328823
Currently EVT is in the IR layer only because of Function.cpp needing a very small piece of the functionality of EVT::getEVTString(). The rest of EVT is used in codegen making CodeGen a better place for it.
The previous code converted a Type* to EVT and then called getEVTString. This was only expected to handle the primitive types from Type*. Since there only a few primitive types, we can just print them as strings directly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45017
llvm-svn: 328806
We are re-adding all the bitcasts, constant masks and target shuffles to the work list for no apparent gain.
Found while investigating adding SimplifyDemandedVectorElts to target shuffles.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44942
llvm-svn: 328771
The IntelPrinter and the ATTPrinter produce the same strings for the same input. We already use the ATTPrinter explicitly in several other places.
llvm-svn: 328762
Most of these were optional matches at the end of the strings, but since the strings themselves are prefix matches by default you don't need to check for something optional at the end.
I've left the 'b' on memory instructions where it means 'broadcast' because I'm not sure those really have the same load latency and we may need to split them explicitly in the future.
llvm-svn: 328730
Similar to r328694. The number of micro opcodes should be 2 for those
instructions.
This was found when testing AVX code for BtVer2 using llvm-mca.
llvm-svn: 328698
The Jaguar backend natively supports 128-bit data types. Operations on YMM
registers are split into two COPs (complex operations). Each COP consumes a slot
in the dispatch group, and in the reorder buffer.
The scheduling model for Jaguar should mark those instructions as `let
NumMicroOps = 2`.
This was found when testing AVX code for BtVer2 using llvm-mca.
llvm-svn: 328694
Currently MOVMSK instructions use the WriteVecLogic class, which is a very poor choice given that MOVMSK involves a SSE->GPR transfer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44924
llvm-svn: 328664
Currently CRC32 instructions use the WriteFAdd class, this patch splits them off into their own, at the moment it is still mostly just a duplicate of WriteFAdd but it can now be tweaked on a target by target basis.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44647
llvm-svn: 328582
Summary:
Re-lands r328386 and r328443, reverting r328482.
Incorporates fixes from @mstorsjo in D44876 (thanks!) so that small
parameters in i8 and i16 do not end up in the SysV register parameters
(EDI, ESI, etc).
I added tests for how we receive small parameters, since that is the
important part. It's always safe to store more bytes than will be read,
but the assumptions you make when loading them are what really matter.
I also tested this by self-hosting clang and it passed tests on win64.
Reviewers: mstorsjo, hans
Subscribers: hiraditya, mstorsjo, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44900
llvm-svn: 328570
Give the bit count instructions their own scheduler classes instead of forcing them into existing classes.
These were mostly overridden anyway, but I had to add in costs from Agner for silvermont and znver1 and the Fam16h SoG for btver2 (Jaguar).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44879
llvm-svn: 328566
This broke Chromium (see crbug.com/825748). It looks like mstorsjo's follow-up
patch at D44876 fixes this, but let's revert back to green for now until that's
ready to land.
(Also reverts r328443.)
> Both GCC and MSVC only look at the low byte of a boolean when it is
> passed.
llvm-svn: 328482
Add fdiv costs for Goldmont using table 16-17 of the Intel Optimization Manual. Also add overrides for FSQRT for Goldmont and Silvermont.
Reviewers: RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44644
llvm-svn: 328451
The Intel models need an extra 1uop for memory folded instructions, plus a lot of instructions take a non-default memory latency which should allow us to use the multiclass a lot more to tidy things up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44840
llvm-svn: 328446
Simon Pilgrim