to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Currently the Clang AST doesn't store information about how the callee of a CallExpr was found. Specifically if it was found using ADL.
However, this information is invaluable to tooling. Consider a tool which renames usages of a function. If the originally CallExpr was formed using ADL, then the tooling may need to additionally qualify the replacement.
Without information about how the callee was found, the tooling is left scratching it's head. Additionally, we want to be able to match ADL calls as quickly as possible, which means avoiding computing the answer on the fly.
This patch changes `CallExpr` to store whether it's callee was found using ADL. It does not change the size of any AST nodes.
Reviewers: fowles, rsmith, klimek, shafik
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, riccibruno, calabrese, titus, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55534
llvm-svn: 348977
Summary:
Compound literals, enums, file-scoped arrays, etc. require their
initializers and size specifiers to be constant. Wrap the initializer
expressions in a ConstantExpr so that we can easily check for this later
on.
Reviewers: rsmith, shafik
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, jyknight, nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53921
llvm-svn: 346455
Summary:
This patch introduces a new matcher for `DecltypeType` and its underlying type
in order to fix a bug in clang-tidy, see https://reviews.llvm.org/D48717 for more.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, NoQ, dcoughlin
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48759
llvm-svn: 337703
This allows matchers like:
friendDecl(hasType(cxxRecordDecl(...)))
friendDecl(hasType(asString(...)))
It seems that hasType is probably the most reasonable narrowing matcher to
overload, since it is already used to narrow to other declaration kinds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48242
Reviewers: klimek, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
llvm-svn: 334930
The specifiesTypeLoc() matcher narrows a nestedNameSpecifier matcher based on a
typeloc within the NNS. However, the matcher does not guard against NNS which
are a namespace, and cause getTypeLoc to assert-fail.
llvm-svn: 334929
HasDeclarationMatcher did not handle DeducedType, it always returned false for deduced types.
So with code like this:
struct X{};
auto x = X{};
This did no longer match:
varDecl(hasType(recordDecl(hasName("X"))))
Because HasDeclarationMatcher didn't resolve the DeducedType of x.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36308
llvm-svn: 310095
documentation.
Trying to match integerLiteral(-1) will silently fail, because an numeric
literal is always positive.
- Update the documentation to explain how to match negative numeric
literals.
- Add a unit test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35196
llvm-svn: 307663
Summary:
This adds a new ASTMatcher for CXXStdInitializerListExprs that matches C++ initializer list expressions.
The primary motivation is to use it to fix [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32896 | PR32896 ]] (review here [[ https://reviews.llvm.org/D32767 | D32767 ]]).
Reviewers: alexfh, Prazek, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: alexfh, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: malcolm.parsons, cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32810
llvm-svn: 302287
It was failing because it had an explicit check for whether we're on
Windows.
There are a few other similar explicit checks in this file which I
didn't remove because they serve as reasonable documentation that the
test doesn't work with a Windows triple.
llvm-svn: 274269
These ExprWithCleanups are added for holding a RunCleanupsScope not
for destructor calls; rather, they are for lifetime marks. This requires
ExprWithCleanups to keep a bit to indicate whether it have cleanups with
side effects (e.g. dtor calls).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20498
llvm-svn: 272296
Chandler Carruth