Commit Graph

27 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Roman Lebedev a5baf86744 AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
  * All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
  * Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
  They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...

To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!

# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark                                                                                        Time             CPU      Time Old      Time New       CPU Old       CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                             0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean                              -0.0607         -0.0604           234           219           233           219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median                            -0.0630         -0.0626           233           219           233           219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                            +0.2581         +0.2587             1             2             1             2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                             0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean                              -0.0770         -0.0767           144           133           144           133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median                            -0.0767         -0.0763           144           133           144           133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                            -0.4170         -0.4156             1             0             1             0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0271         -0.0270           463           450           463           450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0093         -0.0093           453           449           453           449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.7280         -0.7280            13             4            13             4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0004          0.0004      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0065         -0.0065           569           565           569           565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0077         -0.0077           569           564           569           564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         +1.0077         +1.0068             2             5             2             5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0220          0.0199      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           +0.0006         +0.0007           312           312           312           312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         +0.0031         +0.0032           311           312           311           312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.7069         -0.7072             4             1             4             1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0004          0.0004      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0015         -0.0015           141           141           141           141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0010         -0.0011           141           141           141           141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.1486         -0.1456             0             0             0             0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.6139          0.8766      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0008         -0.0005            60            60            60            60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0006         -0.0002            60            60            60            60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.1467         -0.1390             0             0             0             0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0137          0.0137      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           +0.0002         +0.0002           275           275           275           275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0015         -0.0014           275           275           275           275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         +3.3687         +3.3587             0             2             0             2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                     0.4041          0.3933      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean                                      +0.0004         +0.0004            67            67            67            67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median                                    -0.0000         -0.0000            67            67            67            67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                    +0.1947         +0.1995             0             0             0             0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                              0.0074          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean                               -0.0092         +0.0074           547           542            25            25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median                             -0.0054         +0.0115           544           541            25            25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                             -0.4086         -0.3486             8             5             0             0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                        0.3320          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean                                         +0.0015         +0.0204           218           218            12            12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median                                       +0.0001         +0.0203           218           218            12            12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                       +0.2259         +0.2023             1             1             0             0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                      0.0000          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean                                       -0.0209         -0.0179            96            94            90            88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median                                     -0.0182         -0.0155            95            93            90            88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                     -0.6164         -0.2703             2             1             2             1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                     0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean                                      -0.0098         -0.0098           176           175           176           175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median                                    -0.0126         -0.0126           176           174           176           174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                    +6.9789         +6.9157             0             2             0             2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                 0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean                  -0.0237         -0.0238           474           463           474           463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median                -0.0267         -0.0267           473           461           473           461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                +0.7179         +0.7178             3             5             3             5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                   0.6837          0.6554      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean                    -0.0014         -0.0013          1375          1373          1375          1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median                  +0.0018         +0.0019          1371          1374          1371          1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                  -0.7457         -0.7382            11             3            10             3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                        0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                         -0.0080         -0.0289            22            22            10            10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                       -0.0070         -0.0287            22            22            10            10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                       +1.0977         +0.6614             0             0             0             0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                       0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                        +0.0132         +0.0967            35            36            10            11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                      +0.0132         +0.0956            35            36            10            11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                      -0.0407         -0.1695             0             0             0             0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                      0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean                                       +0.0331         +0.1307            13            13             6             6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median                                     +0.0430         +0.1373            12            13             6             6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                     -0.9006         -0.8847             1             0             0             0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                            0.0016          0.0010      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean                                             -0.0023         -0.0024           395           394           395           394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median                                           -0.0029         -0.0030           395           394           395           393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                           -0.0275         -0.0375             1             1             1             1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                          0.0232          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean                                           -0.0047         +0.0039           114           113            28            28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median                                         -0.0050         +0.0037           114           113            28            28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                         -0.0599         -0.2683             1             1             0             0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                          0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean                           +0.0206         +0.0207           405           414           405           414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median                         +0.0204         +0.0205           405           414           405           414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                         +0.2155         +0.2212             1             1             1             1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                         0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean                          -0.0109         -0.0108           147           145           147           145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median                        -0.0104         -0.0103           147           145           147           145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev                        -0.4919         -0.4800             0             0             0             0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                         0.0000          0.0000      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                          -0.0149         -0.0147           220           217           220           217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median                                        -0.0173         -0.0169           221           217           220           217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                        +1.0337         +1.0341             1             3             1             3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                         0.0001          0.0001      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                          -0.0019         -0.0019           194           193           194           193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median                                        -0.0021         -0.0021           194           193           194           193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                                        -0.4441         -0.4282             0             0             0             0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue                                0.0000          0.4263      U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean                                 +0.0258         -0.0006            81            83            19            19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median                               +0.0235         -0.0011            81            82            19            19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev                               +0.1634         +0.1070             1             1             0             0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.

llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}

Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh

Reviewed By: andreadb

Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779

llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-27 20:46:30 +00:00
Roman Lebedev a51921877a [NFC][X86] Baseline tests for AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Scheduler model
Adding the baseline tests in a preparatory NFC commit,
so that the actual commit shows the *diff*.

Yes, i'm aware that a few of these codegen-based sched tests
are testing wrong instructions, i will fix that afterwards.

For https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779

llvm-svn: 345462
2018-10-27 20:36:11 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 1c1335a10d [X86][BMI1] Fix BLSI/BLSMSK/BLSR BMI1 scheduling on btver2
These have the same behaviour as tzcnt on btver2 - confirmed with AMD 16h SOG, Agner and instlatx64.

llvm-svn: 342235
2018-09-14 13:31:14 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 6028dc451a [X86][BMI1] Remove test for non-existent andn i16 instruction
llvm-svn: 333826
2018-06-02 17:02:27 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 8a83f16ccd [X86][SandyBridge] SBWriteResPair +5cy Memory Folds
As mentioned on D44647, this patch increases the default memory latency to +5cy , which more closely matches what most custom cases are doing for reg-mem instructions.

I've bumped LoadLatency, ReadAfterLd and WriteLoad values to 5cy to be consistent.

As Sandy Bridge is currently our default generic model, this affects a lot of scheduling tests...

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44654

llvm-svn: 329388
2018-04-06 11:00:51 +00:00
Craig Topper 89310f56c8 [X86] Correct the placement of ReadAfterLd in BEXTR and BZHI. Add dedicated SchedRW for BEXTR/BZHI.
These instructions have the memory operand before the register operand. So we need to put ReadDefault for all the load ops first. Then the ReadAfterLd

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44838

llvm-svn: 328823
2018-03-29 20:41:39 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim f6440b6fb1 Fix newlines. NFCI.
llvm-svn: 328583
2018-03-26 21:07:59 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim f33d905293 [X86] Add WriteBitScan/WriteLZCNT/WriteTZCNT/WritePOPCNT scheduler classes (PR36881)
Give the bit count instructions their own scheduler classes instead of forcing them into existing classes.

These were mostly overridden anyway, but I had to add in costs from Agner for silvermont and znver1 and the Fam16h SoG for btver2 (Jaguar).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44879

llvm-svn: 328566
2018-03-26 18:19:28 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 8d28ae6aec [X86][Btver2] Add correct lzcnt/tzcnt/popcnt schedule costs
Don't use WriteIMul defaults

llvm-svn: 327706
2018-03-16 13:43:55 +00:00
Puyan Lotfi 43e94b15ea Followup on Proposal to move MIR physical register namespace to '$' sigil.
Discussed here:

http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html

In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for
physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of
named physical register with named vregs.

llvm-svn: 323922
2018-01-31 22:04:26 +00:00
Gadi Haber 2cf601f28f [X86][Haswell]: Updating the scheduling information for the Haswell subtarget.
Updated the scheduling information for the Haswell subtarget with the following changes:

Regrouped the instructions after adding appropriate load + store latencies.
Added scheduling for missing instructions such as the GATHER instrs.
The changes were made after revisiting the latencies impact of all memory uOps.

Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, craig.topper, apilipenko
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40021

Change-Id: Iaf6c1f5169add1552845a8a566af4e5a359217a7
llvm-svn: 320137
2017-12-08 09:48:44 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 386b23f1fa [X86] Tag BMI/BMI2/TBM instructions scheduler classes
Put these under UNARY/BINOP ALU itinerary classes for now - seems to be a good average value

llvm-svn: 320064
2017-12-07 17:37:39 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim f1d599adb2 [X86] Tag LZCNT/TZCNT instructions scheduler classes
Tagged as IMUL instructions for a reasonable approximation (ALU tends to be a lot faster) - POPCNT is currently tagged as FAdd which I think should be replaced with IMUL as well

llvm-svn: 320051
2017-12-07 15:24:14 +00:00
Francis Visoiu Mistrih a8a83d150f [CodeGen] Use MachineOperand::print in the MIRPrinter for MO_Register.
Work towards the unification of MIR and debug output by refactoring the
interfaces.

For MachineOperand::print, keep a simple version that can be easily called
from `dump()`, and a more complex one which will be called from both the
MIRPrinter and MachineInstr::print.

Add extra checks inside MachineOperand for detached operands (operands
with getParent() == nullptr).

https://reviews.llvm.org/D40836

* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" -o -name "*.s" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/kill: ([^ ]+) ([^ ]+)<def> ([^ ]+)/kill: \1 def \2 \3/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" -o -name "*.s" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/kill: ([^ ]+) ([^ ]+) ([^ ]+)<def>/kill: \1 \2 def \3/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" -o -name "*.s" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/kill: def ([^ ]+) ([^ ]+) ([^ ]+)<def>/kill: def \1 \2 def \3/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" -o -name "*.s" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/<def>//g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" -o -name "*.s" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/([^ ]+)<kill>/killed \1/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" -o -name "*.s" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/([^ ]+)<imp-use,kill>/implicit killed \1/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" -o -name "*.s" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/([^ ]+)<dead>/dead \1/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" -o -name "*.s" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/([^ ]+)<def[ ]*,[ ]*dead>/dead \1/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" -o -name "*.s" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/([^ ]+)<imp-def[ ]*,[ ]*dead>/implicit-def dead \1/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" -o -name "*.s" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/([^ ]+)<imp-def>/implicit-def \1/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" -o -name "*.s" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/([^ ]+)<imp-use>/implicit \1/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" -o -name "*.s" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/([^ ]+)<internal>/internal \1/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" -o -name "*.s" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/([^ ]+)<undef>/undef \1/g'

llvm-svn: 320022
2017-12-07 10:40:31 +00:00
Francis Visoiu Mistrih 25528d6de7 [CodeGen] Unify MBB reference format in both MIR and debug output
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format, print
MBB references as '%bb.5'.

The MIR printer prints the IR name of a MBB only for block definitions.

* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)->getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(*\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#" << ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)\.getNumber\(\)/" << printMBBReference(\1)/g'
* find . \( -name "*.txt" -o -name "*.s" -o -name "*.mir" -o -name "*.cpp" -o -name "*.h" -o -name "*.ll" \) -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' -E 's/BB#([0-9]+)/%bb.\1/g'
* grep -nr 'BB#' and fix

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40422

llvm-svn: 319665
2017-12-04 17:18:51 +00:00
Francis Visoiu Mistrih 9d7bb0cb40 [CodeGen] Print register names in lowercase in both MIR and debug output
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format,
always print registers as lowercase.

* Only debug printing is affected. It now follows MIR.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40417

llvm-svn: 319187
2017-11-28 17:15:09 +00:00
Gadi Haber 323f2e1715 [X86][Broadwell] Added the instruction scheduling information for the Broadwell CPU.
Adding the scheduling information for the Browadwell (BDW) CPU target.

This patch adds the instruction scheduling information for the Broadwell (BDW) architecture target by adding the file X86SchedBroadwell.td located under the X86 Target.
We used the scheduling information retrieved from the Broadwell architects in order to create the file.
The scheduling information includes latency, number of micro-Ops and used ports by each BDW instruction.

The patch continues the scheduling replacement and insertion effort started with the SandyBridge (SNB) target in r310792, the Haswell (HSW) target in r311879, the SkylakeClient (SKL) target in rL313613 + rL315978 and the SkylakeServer (SKX) in rL315175.

Performance fluctuations may be expected due to code alignment effects.

Reviewers: zvi, RKSimon, craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39054

Change-Id: If6f799e5ff60e1091c8d43b05ea78c53581bae01
llvm-svn: 316492
2017-10-24 20:19:47 +00:00
Gadi Haber 85d99b4310 [X86][Broadwell] Added the broadwell cpu to the scheduling regression tests.<NFC>
NFC.
Added the Broadwell cpu and the BROADWELL prefix to all the scheduling regression tests, as part of prepartion for a larger commit of adding all Broadwell scheduiling.

Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, aaboud
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38994

Change-Id: I54bc9065168844c107b1729fcdc1d311ce3ea0a9
llvm-svn: 315998
2017-10-17 13:45:39 +00:00
Gadi Haber 1e0f1f476a [X86][SKL] Updated scheduling information for the SkylakeClient target
Updated the scheduling information for the SkylakeClient target with the following changes:

1. regrouped the instructions after adding load and store latencies.
2. regrouped the instructions after adding identified missing ports in several groups.
The changes were made after revisiting the latencies impact of all the load and store uOps.

Reviewers: zvi, RKSimon, craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38727

Change-Id: I778a308cc11e490e8fa5e27e2047412a1dca029f
llvm-svn: 315978
2017-10-17 06:47:04 +00:00
Gadi Haber 2b132eb4f8 [X86][SKYLAKE] Update regression test to differentiate between HASWELL and SKYLAKE scheduling.<NFC>
NFC.
Updated 6 regression tests to differentiate between HASWELL and SKYLAKE scheduling information.

The fix is in preparation of a patch to update the information of the Skylake Client scheduling to include the appropriate load and store latencies.

Reviewers: zvi, RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38685

Change-Id: Ifc6b98d9eaf266913698f24c766fd994fc977555
llvm-svn: 315291
2017-10-10 09:53:18 +00:00
Ashutosh Nema bfcac0b480 AMD family 17h (znver1) scheduler model update.
Summary:
This patch enables the following:
1) Regex based Instruction itineraries for integer instructions.
2) The instructions are grouped as per the nature of the instructions
   (move, arithmetic, logic, Misc, Control Transfer). 
3) FP instructions and their itineraries are added which includes values
   for SSE4A, BMI, BMI2 and SHA instructions.

Patch by Ganesh Gopalasubramanian

Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper

Subscribers: vprasad, shivaram, ddibyend, andreadb, javed.absar, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36617

llvm-svn: 312237
2017-08-31 12:38:35 +00:00
Gadi Haber d76f7b824e [X86][Haswell] Updating HSW instruction scheduling information
This patch completely replaces the instruction scheduling information for the Haswell architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedHaswell.td located under the X86 Target.
We used the scheduling information retrieved from the Haswell architects in order to replace and modify the existing scheduling.
The patch continues the scheduling replacement effort started with the SNB target in r307529 and r310792.
Information includes latency, number of micro-Ops and used ports by each HSW instruction.

Please expect some performance fluctuations due to code alignment effects.

Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, aymanmus, craig.topper, m_zuckerman, igorb, dim, chandlerc, aaboud

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36663

llvm-svn: 311879
2017-08-28 10:04:16 +00:00
Gadi Haber bed2c50607 [X86][SandyBridge] Additional updates to the SNB instructions scheduling information
This is a continuation patch for commit r307529 which completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target (see also https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019).

In this patch we added the scheduling information of additional SNB instructions that were missing from the patch commit r307529, fixed the scheduling of several resource groups that include only port0 instead of port05 (i.e., port0 OR port5) and fixed several incorrect instructions' scheduling in the r307529 commit.

The patch also includes the X87 instructions which were missing in previous patch commit r307529 as reported in bugzilla bug 34080.

Reviewers: zvi, RKSimon, chandlerc, igorb, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, aymanmus, dim

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36388

llvm-svn: 310792
2017-08-13 13:59:24 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim 8484698321 [X86] Added missing cpu to fix generic scheduling model tests
llvm-svn: 309691
2017-08-01 15:14:35 +00:00
Andrew V. Tischenko d1fefa3d7c This patch returns proper value to indicate the case when instruction throughput can't be calculated.
Differential revision https://reviews.llvm.org/D35831

llvm-svn: 309156
2017-07-26 18:55:14 +00:00
Craig Topper 106b5b6856 AMD znver1 Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
This patch adds the following
1. Adds a skeleton scheduler model for AMD Znver1.
2. Introduces the znver1 execution units and pipes.
3. Caters the instructions based on the generic scheduler classes.
4. Further additions to the scheduler model with instruction itineraries will be carried out incrementally based on
        a. Instructions types
        b. Registers used
5. Since itineraries are not added based on instructions, throughput information are bound to change when incremental changes are added.
6. Scheduler testcases are modified accordingly to suit the new model.

Patch by Ganesh Gopalasubramanian. With minor formatting tweaks from me.

Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon

Subscribers: javed.absar, shivaram, ddibyend, vprasad

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35293

llvm-svn: 308411
2017-07-19 02:45:14 +00:00
Simon Pilgrim dfb6eb279f [X86] Add BMI1 scheduling tests
llvm-svn: 308135
2017-07-16 13:59:44 +00:00