After rL315683 (improve SCEV to calculate max BETakenCount when end
bound of loop is variant and loop is of form {Start,+1, Stride} LT End)
this test in polly started failing.
However, as discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/rL315683,
this polly test is not a loops bound test and the MaxBECount calculated by
SCEV looks correct. The max BECount is the value calculated even when the end
bound of loop is invariant.
As discussed with Tobias offline, I'm marking this as an XFAIL, until he
gets a chance to update the testcase, so the build bot goes to green.
llvm-svn: 315912
Such RTCs may introduce integer wrapping intrinsics with more than 64 bit,
which are translated to library calls on AOSP that are not part of the
runtime and will consequently cause linker errors.
Thanks to Eli Friedman for reporting this issue and reducing the test case.
llvm-svn: 314065
In order to speed up compile time and to avoid random timeouts we now
separately track assumptions and restrictions. In this context
assumptions describe parameter valuations we need and restrictions
describe parameter valuations we do not allow. During AST generation
we create a runtime check for both, whereas the one for the
restrictions is negated before a conjunction is build.
Except the In-Bounds assumptions we currently only track restrictions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17247
llvm-svn: 262328
Anna Thomas