Summary:
RISC-V uses a post-select peephole pass to optimise
`(load/store (ADDI $reg, %lo(addr)), 0)` into `(load/store $reg, %lo(addr))`.
This peephole wasn't firing for accesses to constant pools, which is how we
materialise most floating point constants.
This adds support for the constantpool case, which improves code generation for
lots of small FP loading examples. I have not added any tests because this
structure is well-covered by the `fp-imm.ll` testcases, as well as almost
all other uses of floating point constants in the RISC-V backend tests.
Reviewed By: luismarques, asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79523
Summary:
RISC-V uses a post-select peephole pass to optimise
`(load/store (ADDI $reg, %lo(addr)), 0)` into `(load/store $reg, %lo(addr))`.
This peephole wasn't firing for accesses to constant pools, which is how we
materialise most floating point constants.
This adds support for the constantpool case, which improves code generation for
lots of small FP loading examples. I have not added any tests because this
structure is well-covered by the `fp-imm.ll` testcases, as well as almost
all other uses of floating point constants in the RISC-V backend tests.
Reviewed By: luismarques, asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79523
Summary:
The current lowering of `select` on RISC-V uses a branch instruction to load a
register with one or other value. This is inefficient, especially in the case of
small constants that can be computed easily.
By implementing the TargetLowering::convertSelectOfConstantsToMath hook, some of
the simpler cases are covered that let us avoid introducing a branch in these
cases.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79260
Summary:
This just adds some simple cases for testing select of constants. There will be
a follow-up patch that improves code generation in some of these cases.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79259
Sam Elliott