I've:
- Sorted the members of FormatStyle alphabetical. The enums and structs
are kept close to the member.
- Sorted the yaml io functions, based on the type they operate on.
- Sorted the initializers in getLLVMStyle(), except that penalities are
kept at the end.
- Sorted the io of FormatStyle, this changes the --dump-config behavior.
- Moved the deprecated options into the only input case, this also
changes --dump-config, it does not put the not directly used options
in the .clang-format anymore.
- Sorted the comparisons in operator==.
- Added WhiteSpaceMacros in operator==, I've not actively looked if all
other members are compared.
- This showed flawed tests (or in my opinion a flawed io operation, but
that is another discussion and change).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137409
The token that records the number of closing braces to be inserted
may be on an unaffected line. Extra work is required in order to
actually insert the closing braces after inserting the matching
opening braces of affected lines.
Fixes#58161.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136437
Adds an option whether requires clause body should be aligned with
the `requires` keyword.
This option is now the default, both without configuration and in LLVM
style.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56283
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129443
Co-authored-by: Emilia Dreamer <emilia@rymiel.space>
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/58217
This change is to remove extraneous and unnecessary ';' from after a function definition, its off by default and carries the same "code modification" warning as some of our other code manipulating changes.
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135466
Working in a mixed environment of both vscode/vim with a team configured prettier configuration, this can leave clang-format and prettier fighting each other over the formatting of arrays, both simple arrays of elements.
This review aims to add some "control knobs" to the Json formatting in clang-format to help align the two tools so they can be used interchangeably.
This will allow simply arrays `[1, 2, 3]` to remain on a single line but will break those arrays based on context within that array.
Happy to change the name of the option (this is the third name I tried)
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133589
If the style wraps control statement braces, the opening braces
should be inserted after the trailing comments if present.
Fixes#57419.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132905
These statements are like switch statements in C, but without the 'case'
keyword in labels.
How labels are parsed. In UnwrappedLineParser, the program tries to
parse a statement every time it sees a colon. In TokenAnnotator, a
colon that isn't part of an expression is annotated as a label.
The token type `TT_GotoLabelColon` is added. We did not include Verilog
in the name because we thought we would eventually have to fix the
problem that case labels in C can't contain ternary conditional
expressions and we would use that token type.
The style is like below. Labels are on separate lines and indented by
default. The linked style guide also has examples where labels and the
corresponding statements are on the same lines. They are not supported
for now.
https://github.com/lowRISC/style-guides/blob/master/VerilogCodingStyle.md
```
case (state_q)
StIdle:
state_d = StA;
StA: begin
state_d = StB;
end
endcase
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128714
When removing an r_brace that is the first token of an annotated line, if the
line above ends with a line comment, clang-format generates invalid code by
merging the tokens after the r_brace into the line comment.
Fixes#56488.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129742
This patch mainly handles treating `begin` as block openers.
While and for statements will be handled in another patch.
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123450
Turn off RemoveBracesLLVM while analyzing InsertBraces and vice
versa to avoid potential interference of each other and better the
performance.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127685
If a closing brace is followed by a non-trailing comment, the
newline before the closing brace must also be removed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125451
This reverts commit d46fa023ca.
Regressed include order in some cases with trailing comments, see the
comments on https://reviews.llvm.org/D121370. Will add a regression test
in a follow-up commit.
Fixes [[ https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/38995 | #38995 ]]
This is an attempt to modify the regular expression to identify
`@import` and `import` alongside the regular `#include`. The challenging
part was not to support `@` in addition to `#` but how to handle
everything that comes after the `include|import` keywords. Previously
everything that wasn't `"` or `<` was consumed. But as you can see in
this example from the issue #38995, there is no `"` or `<` following the
keyword:
```
@import Foundation;
```
I experimented with a lot of fancy and useful expressions in [this
online regex tool](https://regex101.com) only to find out that some
things are simply not supported by the regex implementation in LLVM.
* For example the beginning `[\t\ ]*` should be replacable by the
horizontal whitespace character `\h*` but this will break the
`SortIncludesTest.LeadingWhitespace` test.
That's why I've chosen to come back to the basic building blocks.
The essential change in this patch is the change from this regular
expression:
```
^[\t\ ]*#[\t\ ]*(import|include)[^"<]*(["<][^">]*[">])
~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
^ ^
| |
only support # prefix not @ |
only support "" and <> as
delimiters
no support for C++ modules and ;
ending. Also this allows for ">
or <" or "" or <> which all seems
either off or wrong.
```
to this:
```
^[\t\ ]*[@#][\t\ ]*(import|include)([^"]*("[^"]+")|[^<]*(<[^>]+>)|[\t\
]*([^;]+;))
~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
^ ^ ^ ^ ^
| | | | |
Now support @ and #. Clearly support "" and <> as
well as an
include name without enclosing
characters.
Allows for no mixture of "> or
<" or
empty include names.
```
Here is how I've tested this patch:
```
ninja clang-Format
ninja FormatTests
./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
--gtest_filter=SortIncludesTest*
```
And if that worked I doubled checked that nothing else broke by running
all format checks:
```
./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
```
One side effect of this change is it should partially support
[C++20 Module](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/modules)
`import` lines without the optional `export` in front. Adding
this can be a change on its own that shouldn't be too hard. I say
partially because the `@` or `#` are currently *NOT* optional in the
regular expression.
I see an opportunity to optimized the matching to exclude `@include` for
example. But eventually these should be caught by the compiler, so...
With my change, the matching group is not at a fixed position any
longer. I decided to
choose the last match (group) that is not empty.
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121370
Adds a new option InsertBraces to insert the optional braces after
if, else, for, while, and do in C++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120217
We can now configure the space between requires and the following paren,
seperate for clauses and expressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113369
The second space in `void foo() &` is always produced by clang-format,
and isn't evidence of any particular style.
Before this patch, it was considered evidence of PAS_Right, because
there is a space before a pointerlike ampersand.
This caused the following code to have "unstable" pointer alignment:
void a() &;
void b() &;
int *x;
PAS_Left, Derive=false would produce 'int* x' with other lines unchanged.
But subsequent formatting with Derive=true would produce 'int *x' again.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118921
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/31592.
This commits enables lexing of digraphs in C++11 and onwards.
Enabling them in C++03 is error-prone, as it would unconditionally treat sequences like "<:" as digraphs, even if they are followed by a single colon, e.g. "<::" would be treated as "[:" instead of "<" followed by "::". Lexing in C++11 doesn't have this problem as it looks ahead the following token.
The relevant excerpt from Lexer::LexTokenInternal:
```
// C++0x [lex.pptoken]p3:
// Otherwise, if the next three characters are <:: and the subsequent
// character is neither : nor >, the < is treated as a preprocessor
// token by itself and not as the first character of the alternative
// token <:.
```
Also, note that both clang and gcc turn on digraphs by default (-fdigraphs), so clang-format should match this behaviour.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118706
Björn Schäpers