Also fix a comment typo, and remove a superfluous "std::" qualififcation
in __libcpp_semaphore_wait_timed for consistency.
This mirrors what was suggested in review of
1773eec692.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98015
We do ship those headers, so the directory name should not be something
that can potentially conflict with user-defined directories.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95956
Summary:
The type timespec is unconditionally used in __threading_support.
Since the C library is only required to provide it in C11, this might
cause problems for platforms with external thread porting layer (i.e.
when _LIBCPP_HAS_THREAD_API_EXTERNAL is defined) with pre-C11
C libraries.
In our downstream port of libc++ we used to provide a definition of
timespec in __external_threading, but this solution is not ideal
because timespec is not a reserved name.
This patch renames timespec into __libcpp_timespec_t in the
thread-related parts of libc++. For all cases except external
threading this type is an alias for ::timespec (and no functional
changes are intended).
In case of external threading it is expected that the
__external_threading header will either provide a similar typedef (if
timespec is available in the vendor's C library) or provide a
definition of __libcpp_timespec_t compatible with POSIX timespec.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: dexonsmith, libcxx-commits, christof, carwil
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63328
llvm-svn: 364012
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
This fixes a warning like this:
warning: comparison of integers of different signs:
'std::__1::__libcpp_tls_key' (aka 'long') and 'DWORD'
(aka 'unsigned long') [-Wsign-compare]
if (*__key == FLS_OUT_OF_INDEXES)
~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49782
llvm-svn: 337946
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Note that this commit had originally been applied in r336369 and then
reverted in r336382 because of unforeseen problems. Both of these problems
have now been fixed.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
llvm-svn: 336866
This reverts commit r336369. The commit had two problems:
1. __pbump was marked as _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY instead of
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which lead to two symbols being added in the
dylib and the check-cxx-abilist failing.
2. The LLDB tests started failing because they undefine
`_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY`. I need to figure out why they do that and
fix the tests before we can go forward with this change.
llvm-svn: 336382
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Reviewers: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel, mclow.lists
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
llvm-svn: 336369
This allows us to avoid polluting the namespace of users of <thread>
with the definitions in windows.h.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42214
llvm-svn: 323169
Martin Storsjö