Current findBestLoopTop can find and move one kind of block to top, a latch block has one successor. Another common case is:
* a latch block
* it has two successors, one is loop header, another is exit
* it has more than one predecessors
If it is below one of its predecessors P, only P can fall through to it, all other predecessors need a jump to it, and another conditional jump to loop header. If it is moved before loop header, all its predecessors jump to it, then fall through to loop header. So all its predecessors except P can reduce one taken branch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43256
llvm-svn: 363471
This is a branch opcode that takes a jump table pointer, jump table index and an
index into the table to do an indirect branch.
We pass both the table pointer and JTI to allow targets like ARM64 to more
easily use the existing jump table compression optimization without having to
walk up the block to find a paired G_JUMP_TABLE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63159
llvm-svn: 363434
Avoid producing illegal register bank copies for reg_sequence and
phi. The default implementation assumes it is possible to pick any
operand's bank and use that for the result, introducing a copy for
operands with a different bank. This does not check for illegal
copies. It is not legal to introduce a VGPR->SGPR copy, so any VGPR
operand requires the result to be a VGPR.
The changes in getInstrMappingImpl aren't strictly necessary, since
AMDGPU now just bypasses this for reg_sequence/phi. This could be
replaced with an assert in case other targets run into this. It is
currently responsible for producing the error for unsatisfiable
copies, but this will be better served with a verifier check.
For phis, for now assume any undetermined operands must be
VGPRs. Eventually, this needs to be able to defer mapping these
operations. This also does not yet have a way to check for whether the
block is in a divergent region.
llvm-svn: 363410
Avoid a check for valid and a set of redundant asserts. The place
InstructionMapping is constructed asserts all of the default fields
are passed anyway for an invalid mapping, so don't overcomplicate
this.
llvm-svn: 363391
This is consistent with GCC's behavior (which is the defacto standard
for pubnames). Though I find the presence of enumerators from enum
classes to be a bit confusing, possibly a bug on GCC's end (since they
can't be named unqualified, unlike the other names - and names nested in
classes don't go in pubnames, for instance - presumably because one must
name the class first & that's enough to limit the scope of the search)
llvm-svn: 363349
Summary:
Before it was using the fully qualified name only for static data members.
Now it does for all variable names to match MSVC.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63012
llvm-svn: 363335
Constants, including G_GLOBAL_VALUE, are all emitted into the entry block which
lets us use the vreg def assuming it dominates all other users. However, it can
cause jumpy debug behaviour since the DebugLoc attached to these MIs are from
a user instruction that could be in a different block.
Fixes PR40887.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63286
llvm-svn: 363331
This was exposed by PowerPC target enablement.
In ScheduleDAG, if we haven't seen any uses in this scheduling region,
we will create a dependence edge to ExitSU to model the live-out latency.
This is required for vreg defs with no in-region use, and prefetches with
no vreg def.
When we build NodeOrder in Scheduler, we ignore these boundary nodes.
However, when we check Succs in checkValidNodeOrder, we did not skip
them, so we still assume all the nodes have been sorted and in order in
Indices array. So when we call lower_bound() for ExitSU, it will return
Indices.end(), causing memory issues in following Node access.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63282
llvm-svn: 363329
Summary:
I found the following case having tail blocks with no successors merging opportunities after block placement.
Before block placement:
bb0:
...
bne a0, 0, bb2:
bb1:
mv a0, 1
ret
bb2:
...
bb3:
mv a0, 1
ret
bb4:
mv a0, -1
ret
The conditional branch bne in bb0 is opposite to beq.
After block placement:
bb0:
...
beq a0, 0, bb1
bb2:
...
bb4:
mv a0, -1
ret
bb1:
mv a0, 1
ret
bb3:
mv a0, 1
ret
After block placement, that appears new tail merging opportunity, bb1 and bb3 can be merged as one block. So the conditional constraint for merging tail blocks with no successors should be removed. In my experiment for RISC-V, it decreases code size.
Author of original patch: Jim Lin
Reviewers: haicheng, aheejin, craig.topper, rnk, RKSimon, Jim, dmgreen
Reviewed By: Jim, dmgreen
Subscribers: xbolva00, dschuff, javed.absar, sbc100, jgravelle-google, aheejin, kito-cheng, dmgreen, PkmX, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54411
llvm-svn: 363284
Summary:
Relate bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37472
The shrink wrapping pass prematurally restores the stack, at a point where the stack might still be accessed.
Taking an exception can cause the stack to be corrupted.
As a first approach, this patch is overly conservative, assuming that any instruction that may load or store could access
the stack.
Reviewers: dmgreen, qcolombet
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: simpal01, efriedma, eli.friedman, javed.absar, llvm-commits, eugenis, chill, carwil, thegameg
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63152
llvm-svn: 363265
This patch makes the LiveDebugValues pass consider fragments when propagating
DBG_VALUE insts between blocks, fixing PR41979. Fragment info for a variable
location is added to the open-ranges key, which allows distinct fragments to be
tracked separately. To handle overlapping fragments things become slightly
funkier. To avoid excessive searching for overlaps in the data-flow part of
LiveDebugValues, this patch:
* Pre-computes pairings of fragments that overlap, for each DILocalVariable
* During data-flow, whenever something happens that causes an open range to
be terminated (via erase), any fragments pre-determined to overlap are
also terminated.
The effect of which is that when encountering a DBG_VALUE fragment that
overlaps others, the overlapped fragments do not get propagated to other
blocks. We still rely on later location-list building to correctly handle
overlapping fragments within blocks.
It's unclear whether a mixture of DBG_VALUEs with and without fragmented
expressions are legitimate. To avoid suprises, this patch interprets a
DBG_VALUE with no fragment as overlapping any DBG_VALUE _with_ a fragment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62904
llvm-svn: 363256
Since the DebugLocEntry::Value is used as part of DwarfDebug and
DebugLocEntry make it as the separate class.
Reviewers: aprantl, dstenb
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63213
llvm-svn: 363246
We aim to ignore changes in variable locations during the prologue and
epilogue of functions, to avoid using space documenting location changes
that aren't visible. However in D61940 / r362951 this got ripped out as
the previous implementation was unsound.
Instead, use the FrameDestroy flag to identify when we're in the epilogue
of a function, and ignore variable location changes accordingly. This fits
in with existing code that examines the FrameSetup flag.
Some variable locations get shuffled in modified tests as they now cover
greater ranges, which is what would be expected. Some additional
single-location variables are generated too. Two tests are un-xfailed,
they were only xfailed due to r362951 deleting functionality they depended
on.
Apparently some out-of-tree backends don't accurately maintain FrameDestroy
flags -- if you're an out-of-tree maintainer and see changes in variable
locations disappear due to a faulty FrameDestroy flag, it's safe to back
this change out. The impact is just slightly more debug info than necessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62314
llvm-svn: 363245
As discussed on D62910, we need to check whether particular types of memory access are allowed, not just their alignment/address-space.
This NFC patch adds a MachineMemOperand::Flags argument to allowsMemoryAccess and allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses, and wires up calls to pass the relevant flags to them.
If people are happy with this approach I can then update X86TargetLowering::allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses to handle misaligned NT load/stores.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63075
llvm-svn: 363179
This was using its own, outdated list of possible captures. This was
at minimum not catching cmpxchg and addrspacecast captures.
One change is now any volatile access is treated as capturing. The
test coverage for this pass is quite inadequate, but this required
removing volatile in the lifetime capture test.
Also fixes some infrastructure issues to allow running just the IR
pass.
Fixes bug 42238.
llvm-svn: 363169
Summary:
Fix hoisting to basic block which are not legal for hoisting cause
it can be terminated by exception or it is return block.
Reviewers: john.brawn, RKSimon, MatzeB
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63148
llvm-svn: 363164
This opcode generates a pointer to the address of the jump table
specified by the source operand, which is a jump table index.
It will be used in conjunction with an upcoming G_BRJT opcode to support
jump table codegen with GlobalISel.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63111
llvm-svn: 363096
Implement necessary target hooks to enable MachinePipeliner for P9 only.
The pass is off by default, can be enabled with -ppc-enable-pipeliner for P9.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62164
llvm-svn: 363085
As suggested by @arsenm on D63075 - this adds a TargetLowering::allowsMemoryAccess wrapper that takes a Load/Store node's MachineMemOperand to handle the AddressSpace/Alignment arguments and will also implicitly handle the MachineMemOperand::Flags change in D63075.
llvm-svn: 363048
This patch changes how LLVM handles the accumulator/start value
in the reduction, by never ignoring it regardless of the presence of
fast-math flags on callsites. This change introduces the following
new intrinsics to replace the existing ones:
llvm.experimental.vector.reduce.fadd -> llvm.experimental.vector.reduce.v2.fadd
llvm.experimental.vector.reduce.fmul -> llvm.experimental.vector.reduce.v2.fmul
and adds functionality to auto-upgrade existing LLVM IR and bitcode.
Reviewers: RKSimon, greened, dmgreen, nikic, simoll, aemerson
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60261
llvm-svn: 363035
An earlier fix of a subtle iterator invalidation bug had uncovered a
nondeterminism that was present in the MultiUsers bag. Problem was that
MultiUsers was being looked up using pointers.
This patch is an NFC change that numbers each multiuser and processes each in
numbered order. This fixes the test failure on netbsd and will likely fix the
green-dragon bot too.
llvm-svn: 363012
If the source is undef, then just don't do anything.
This matches SelectionDAG's behaviour in SelectionDAG.cpp.
Also add a test showing that we do the right thing here.
(irtranslator-memfunc-undef.ll)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63095
llvm-svn: 362989
This behavior was added in r130928 for both FastISel and SD, and then
disabled in r131156 for FastISel.
This re-enables it for FastISel with the corresponding fix.
This is triggered only when FastISel can't lower the arguments and falls
back to SelectionDAG for it.
FastISel contains a map of "register fixups" where at the end of the
selection phase it replaces all uses of a register with another
register that FastISel sometimes pre-assigned. Code at the end of
SelectionDAGISel::runOnMachineFunction is doing the replacement at the
very end of the function, while other pieces that come in before that
look through the MachineFunction and assume everything is done. In this
case, the real issue is that the code emitting COPY instructions for the
liveins (physreg to vreg) (EmitLiveInCopies) is checking if the vreg
assigned to the physreg is used, and if it's not, it will skip the COPY.
If a register wasn't replaced with its assigned fixup yet, the copy will
be skipped and we'll end up with uses of undefined registers.
This fix moves the replacement of registers before the emission of
copies for the live-ins.
The initial motivation for this fix is to enable tail calls for
swiftself functions, which were blocked because we couldn't prove that
the swiftself argument (which is callee-save) comes from a function
argument (live-in), because there was an extra copy (vreg to vreg).
A few tests are affected by this:
* llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/swifterror.ll: we used to spill x21
(callee-save) but never reload it because it's attached to the return.
We now don't even spill it anymore.
* llvm/test/CodeGen/*/swiftself.ll: we tail-call now.
* llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/mubuf-legalize-operands.ll: I believe this
test was not really testing the right thing, but it worked because the
same registers were re-used.
* llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/cmpxchg-O0.ll: regalloc changes
* llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/swifterror.ll: get rid of a copy
* llvm/test/CodeGen/Mips/*: get rid of spills and copies
* llvm/test/CodeGen/SystemZ/swift-return.ll: smaller stack
* llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/atomic-unordered.ll: smaller stack
* llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/swifterror.ll: same as AArch64
* llvm/test/DebugInfo/X86/dbg-declare-arg.ll: stack size changed
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62361
llvm-svn: 362963
This commit reapplies r359426 (which was reverted in r360301 due to
performance problems) and rolls in D61940 to address the performance problem.
I've combined the two to avoid creating a span of slow-performance, and to
ease reverting if more problems crop up.
The summary of D61940: This patch removes the "ChangingRegs" facility in
DbgEntityHistoryCalculator, as its overapproximate nature can produce incorrect
variable locations. An unchanging register doesn't mean a variable doesn't
change its location.
The patch kills off everything that calculates the ChangingRegs vector.
Previously ChangingRegs spotted epilogues and marked registers as unchanging if
they weren't modified outside the epilogue, increasing the chance that we can
emit a single-location variable record. Without this feature,
debug-loc-offset.mir and pr19307.mir become temporarily XFAIL. They'll be
re-enabled by D62314, using the FrameDestroy flag to identify epilogues, I've
split this into two steps as FrameDestroy isn't necessarily supported by all
backends.
The logic for terminating variable locations at the end of a basic block now
becomes much more enjoyably simple: we just terminate them all.
Other test changes: inlined-argument.ll becomes XFAIL, but for a longer term.
The current algorithm for detecting that a variable has a single-location
doesn't work in this scenario (inlined function in multiple blocks), only other
bugs were making this test work. fission-ranges.ll gets slightly refreshed too,
as the location of "p" is now correctly determined to be a single location.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61940
llvm-svn: 362951
Variable's stack location can stretch longer than it should. If a
variable is placed at the stack in a some nested basic block its range
can be calculated to be up to the next occurrence of the variable's
DBG_VALUE, or up to the end of the function, thus covering a basic
blocks that should not be included in the variable’s location range.
This happens because the DbgEntityHistoryCalculator ends register
locations at the end of a basic block only if the variable’s location
register has been changed throughout the function, which is not the
case for the register used to reference stack objects.
This patch also tries to produce a single value location if the location
list builder managed to merge all the locations into one.
Reviewers: aprantl, dstenb, jmorse
Reviewed By: aprantl, dstenb, jmorse
Subscribers: djtodoro, ivanbaev, asowda
Tags: #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61600
llvm-svn: 362923
This opportunity is found from spec 2017 557.xz_r. And it is used by the sha encrypt/decrypt. See sha-2/sha512.c
static void store64(u64 x, unsigned char* y)
{
for(int i = 0; i != 8; ++i)
y[i] = (x >> ((7-i) * 8)) & 255;
}
static u64 load64(const unsigned char* y)
{
u64 res = 0;
for(int i = 0; i != 8; ++i)
res |= (u64)(y[i]) << ((7-i) * 8);
return res;
}
The load64 has been implemented by https://reviews.llvm.org/D26149
This patch is trying to implement the store pattern.
Match a pattern where a wide type scalar value is stored by several narrow
stores. Fold it into a single store or a BSWAP and a store if the targets
supports it.
Assuming little endian target:
i8 *p = ...
i32 val = ...
p[0] = (val >> 0) & 0xFF;
p[1] = (val >> 8) & 0xFF;
p[2] = (val >> 16) & 0xFF;
p[3] = (val >> 24) & 0xFF;
>
*((i32)p) = val;
i8 *p = ...
i32 val = ...
p[0] = (val >> 24) & 0xFF;
p[1] = (val >> 16) & 0xFF;
p[2] = (val >> 8) & 0xFF;
p[3] = (val >> 0) & 0xFF;
>
*((i32)p) = BSWAP(val);
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62897
llvm-svn: 362921
This is the second part of the commit fixing PR38917 (hoisting
partitially redundant machine instruction). Most of PRE (partitial
redundancy elimination) and CSE work is done on LLVM IR, but some of
redundancy arises during DAG legalization. Machine CSE is not enough
to deal with it. This simple PRE implementation works a little bit
intricately: it passes before CSE, looking for partitial redundancy
and transforming it to fully redundancy, anticipating that the next
CSE step will eliminate this created redundancy. If CSE doesn't
eliminate this, than created instruction will remain dead and eliminated
later by Remove Dead Machine Instructions pass.
The third part of the commit is supposed to refactor MachineCSE,
to make it more clear and to merge MachinePRE with MachineCSE,
so one need no rely on further Remove Dead pass to clear instrs
not eliminated by CSE.
First step: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54839
Fixes llvm.org/PR38917
This is fixed recommit of r361356 after PowerPC64 multistage build failure.
llvm-svn: 362901
This patch aims to reduce spilling and register moves by using the 3-address
versions of instructions per default instead of the 2-address equivalent
ones. It seems that both spilling and register moves are improved noticeably
generally.
Regalloc hints are passed to increase conversions to 2-address instructions
which are done in SystemZShortenInst.cpp (after regalloc).
Since the SystemZ reg/mem instructions are 2-address (dst and lhs regs are
the same), foldMemoryOperandImpl() can no longer trivially fold a spilled
source register since the reg/reg instruction is now 3-address. In order to
remedy this, new 3-address pseudo memory instructions are used to perform the
folding only when the dst and lhs virtual registers are known to be allocated
to the same physreg. In order to not let MachineCopyPropagation run and
change registers on these transformed instructions (making it 3-address), a
new target pass called SystemZPostRewrite.cpp is run just after
VirtRegRewriter, that immediately lowers the pseudo to a target instruction.
If it would have been possibe to insert a COPY instruction and change a
register operand (convert to 2-address) in foldMemoryOperandImpl() while
trusting that the caller (e.g. InlineSpiller) would update/repair the
involved LiveIntervals, the solution involving pseudo instructions would not
have been needed. This is perhaps a potential improvement (see Phabricator
post).
Common code changes:
* A new hook TargetPassConfig::addPostRewrite() is utilized to be able to run a
target pass immediately before MachineCopyPropagation.
* VirtRegMap is passed as an argument to foldMemoryOperand().
Review: Ulrich Weigand, Quentin Colombet
https://reviews.llvm.org/D60888
llvm-svn: 362868
In order for GlobalISel to re-use the significant amount of analysis and
optimization code in SDAG's switch lowering, we first have to extract it and
create an interface to be used by both frameworks.
No test changes as it's NFC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62745
llvm-svn: 362857
When we call checkResourceLimit in bumpCycle or bumpNode, and we
know the resource count has just reached the limit (the equations
are equal). We should return true to mark that we are resource
limited for next schedule, or else we might continue to schedule
in favor of latency for 1 more schedule and create a schedule that
actually overbook the resource.
When we call checkResourceLimit to estimate the resource limite before
scheduling, we don't need to return true even if the equations are
equal, as it shouldn't limit the schedule for it .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62345
llvm-svn: 362805
This could fail, which looked concerning. However nothing was actually
using the results of this. I assume this was intended to use the
anti-feature of analyzeBranch of removing instructions, but wasn't
actually calling it with AllowModify = true.
Fixes bug 42162.
llvm-svn: 362800
Patch which introduces a target-independent framework for generating
hardware loops at the IR level. Most of the code has been taken from
PowerPC CTRLoops and PowerPC has been ported over to use this generic
pass. The target dependent parts have been moved into
TargetTransformInfo, via isHardwareLoopProfitable, with
HardwareLoopInfo introduced to transfer information from the backend.
Three generic intrinsics have been introduced:
- void @llvm.set_loop_iterations
Takes as a single operand, the number of iterations to be executed.
- i1 @llvm.loop_decrement(anyint)
Takes the maximum number of elements processed in an iteration of
the loop body and subtracts this from the total count. Returns
false when the loop should exit.
- anyint @llvm.loop_decrement_reg(anyint, anyint)
Takes the number of elements remaining to be processed as well as
the maximum numbe of elements processed in an iteration of the loop
body. Returns the updated number of elements remaining.
llvm-svn: 362774
Incorrect Debug Variable Range was calculated while "COMPUTING LIVE DEBUG VARIABLES" stage.
Range for Debug Variable("i") computed according to current state of instructions
inside of basic block. But Register Allocator creates new instructions which were not taken
into account when Live Debug Variables computed. In the result DBG_VALUE instruction for
the "i" variable was put after these newly inserted instructions. This is incorrect.
Debug Value for the loop counter should be inserted before any loop instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62650
llvm-svn: 362750
Summary:
(1) Function descriptor on AIX
On AIX, a called routine may have 2 distinct symbols associated with it:
* A function descriptor (Name)
* A function entry point (.Name)
The descriptor structure on AIX is the same as those in the ELF V1 ABI:
* The address of the entry point of the function.
* The TOC base address for the function.
* The environment pointer.
The descriptor symbol uses the same name as the source level function in C.
The function entry point is analogous to the symbol we would generate for a
function in a non-descriptor-based ABI, except that it is renamed by
prepending a ".".
Which symbol gets referenced depends on the context:
* Taking the address of the function references the descriptor symbol.
* Calling the function references the entry point symbol.
(2) Speaking of implementation on AIX, for direct function call target, we
create proper MCSymbol SDNode(e.g . ".foo") while constructing SDAG to
replace original TargetGlobalAddress SDNode. Then down the path, we can
take advantage of this MCSymbol.
Patch by: Xiangling_L
Reviewed by: sfertile, hubert.reinterpretcast, jasonliu, syzaara
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62532
llvm-svn: 362735
This patch is the first step towards ensuring MergeConsecutiveStores correctly handles non-temporal loads\stores:
1 - When merging load\stores we must ensure that they all have the same non-temporal flag. This is unlikely to occur, but can in strange cases where we're storing at the end of one page and the beginning of another.
2 - The merged load\store node must retain the non-temporal flag.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62910
llvm-svn: 362723
The ISD::STRICT_ nodes used to implement the constrained floating-point
intrinsics are currently never passed to the target back-end, which makes
it impossible to handle them correctly (e.g. mark instructions are depending
on a floating-point status and control register, or mark instructions as
possibly trapping).
This patch allows the target to use setOperationAction to switch the action
on ISD::STRICT_ nodes to Legal. If this is done, the SelectionDAG common code
will stop converting the STRICT nodes to regular floating-point nodes, but
instead pass the STRICT nodes to the target using normal SelectionDAG
matching rules.
To avoid having the back-end duplicate all the floating-point instruction
patterns to handle both strict and non-strict variants, we make the MI
codegen explicitly aware of the floating-point exceptions by introducing
two new concepts:
- A new MCID flag "mayRaiseFPException" that the target should set on any
instruction that possibly can raise FP exception according to the
architecture definition.
- A new MI flag FPExcept that CodeGen/SelectionDAG will set on any MI
instruction resulting from expansion of any constrained FP intrinsic.
Any MI instruction that is *both* marked as mayRaiseFPException *and*
FPExcept then needs to be considered as raising exceptions by MI-level
codegen (e.g. scheduling).
Setting those two new flags is straightforward. The mayRaiseFPException
flag is simply set via TableGen by marking all relevant instruction
patterns in the .td files.
The FPExcept flag is set in SDNodeFlags when creating the STRICT_ nodes
in the SelectionDAG, and gets inherited in the MachineSDNode nodes created
from it during instruction selection. The flag is then transfered to an
MIFlag when creating the MI from the MachineSDNode. This is handled just
like fast-math flags like no-nans are handled today.
This patch includes both common code changes required to implement the
new features, and the SystemZ implementation.
Reviewed By: andrew.w.kaylor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55506
llvm-svn: 362663
Most parts of LLVM don't care whether the byval type is derived from an
explicit Attribute or from the parameter's pointee type, so it makes
sense for the main access function to just return the right value.
The very few users who do care (only BitcodeReader so far) can find out
how it's specified by accessing the Attribute directly.
llvm-svn: 362642
Instead of passing around fast-math-flags as a parameter, we can set those
using an IRBuilder guard object. This is no-functional-change-intended.
The motivation is to eventually fix the vectorizers to use and set the
correct fast-math-flags for reductions. Examples of that not behaving as
expected are:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23116 (should be able to reduce with less than 'fast')
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35538 (possible miscompile for -0.0)
D61802 (should be able to reduce with IR-level FMF)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62272
llvm-svn: 362612
Summary:
An argument that is return by a function but bit-casted before can still
be annotated as "returned". Make sure we do not crash for this case.
Reviewers: sunfish, stephenwlin, niravd, arsenm
Subscribers: wdng, hiraditya, bollu, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59917
llvm-svn: 362546
This is a special case of a more general transform (not (sub Y, X)) -> (add X, ~Y). InstCombine knows the general form. I've restricted to the special case to fix the motivating case PR42118. I tried handling any case where Y was constant, but got some changes on some Mips tests that I couldn't quickly prove where beneficial.
Fixes PR42118
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62828
llvm-svn: 362533
The proposal in D62498 showed that x86 would benefit from vector
store splitting, but that may conflict with the generic DAG
combiner's store merging transforms.
Add memory type to the existing TLI hook that enables the merging
transforms, so we can limit those changes to scalars only for x86.
llvm-svn: 362507
Summary:
This *might* be the last fold for `sink-addsub-of-const.ll`, but i'm not sure yet.
As far as i can tell, there are no regressions here (ignoring x86-32),
all changes are either good or neutral.
This, almost surprisingly to me, fixes the motivational tests (in `shift-amount-mod.ll`)
`@reg32_lshr_by_sub_from_negated` from [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41952 | PR41952 ]].
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/vMd3
Reviewers: RKSimon, t.p.northover, craig.topper, spatel, efriedma
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: sdardis, javed.absar, arichardson, kristof.beyls, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62774
llvm-svn: 362488
As I mentioned on D61887 we don't get many hits on ComputeNumSignBits as we did on computeKnownBits.
The case we do get is interesting though - it allows us to use the 'ConditionalNegate' combine in combineLogicBlendIntoPBLENDV to remove a select.
It comes too late for SSE41 (BLENDV) cases, but SSE2 tests can hit it now. We should probably try to make use of this for SSE41+ targets as well - avoiding variable blends is usually a good idea. I'll investigate as a followup.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62777
llvm-svn: 362486
This opportunity is found from spec 2017 557.xz_r. And it is used by the sha encrypt/decrypt. See sha-2/sha512.c
static void store64(u64 x, unsigned char* y)
{
for(int i = 0; i != 8; ++i)
y[i] = (x >> ((7-i) * 8)) & 255;
}
static u64 load64(const unsigned char* y)
{
u64 res = 0;
for(int i = 0; i != 8; ++i)
res |= (u64)(y[i]) << ((7-i) * 8);
return res;
}
The load64 has been implemented by https://reviews.llvm.org/D26149
This patch is trying to implement the store pattern.
Match a pattern where a wide type scalar value is stored by several narrow
stores. Fold it into a single store or a BSWAP and a store if the targets
supports it.
Assuming little endian target:
i8 *p = ...
i32 val = ...
p[0] = (val >> 0) & 0xFF;
p[1] = (val >> 8) & 0xFF;
p[2] = (val >> 16) & 0xFF;
p[3] = (val >> 24) & 0xFF;
>
*((i32)p) = val;
i8 *p = ...
i32 val = ...
p[0] = (val >> 24) & 0xFF;
p[1] = (val >> 16) & 0xFF;
p[2] = (val >> 8) & 0xFF;
p[3] = (val >> 0) & 0xFF;
>
*((i32)p) = BSWAP(val);
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61843
llvm-svn: 362472
Summary: This change facilitates propagating fmf which was placed on setcc from fcmp through folds with selects so that back ends can model this path for arithmetic folds on selects in SDAG.
Reviewers: qcolombet, spatel
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: nemanjai, jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62552
llvm-svn: 362439
For some reason multiple places need to do this, and the variant the
loop unroller and inliner use was not handling it.
Also, introduce a new wrapper to be slightly more precise, since on
AMDGPU some addrspacecasts are free, but not no-ops.
llvm-svn: 362436
We were missing this fold in the DAG, which I've copied directly from llvm::ConstantFoldCastInstruction
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62807
llvm-svn: 362397
When LiveDebugValues deduces new variable's location from spill, restore or
register copy instruction it should close old variable's location. Otherwise
we can have multiple block output locations for same variable. That could lead
to inserting two DBG_VALUEs for same variable to the beginning of the successor
block which results to ignoring of first DBG_VALUE.
Reviewers: aprantl, jmorse, wolfgangp, dstenb
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: probinson, asowda, ivanbaev, petarj, djtodoro
Tags: #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62196
llvm-svn: 362373
If we hit the limit, we do expand the outstanding tokenfactors.
Otherwise, we might drop nodes with users in the unexpanded
tokenfactors. This fixes the crashes reported by Jordan Rupprecht.
Reviewers: niravd, spatel, craig.topper, rupprecht
Reviewed By: niravd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62633
llvm-svn: 362350
Move this combine from x86 into generic DAGCombine, which currently only manages cases where the bitcast is between types of the same scalarsize.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59188
llvm-svn: 362324
Add (opt-in) support for implicit truncation to isConstOrConstSplat, which allows us to match truncated 'all ones' cases in isBitwiseNot.
PR41020 compares against using ISD::isBuildVectorAllOnes() instead, but that predicate silently accepts any UNDEF elements in the build vector which might not be what we want in isBitwiseNot - so I've added an opt-in 'AllowUndefs' flag that is set to false by default but will allow us to enable it on individual cases where its safe.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62783
llvm-svn: 362323
The results of the dyn_casts were immediately dereferenced on the next line
so they had better not be null.
I don't think there's any way for these dyn_casts to fail, so use a cast
of adding null check.
llvm-svn: 362315
Over a year ago, MachineInstr gained a fourth boolean parameter that occurs
before the TII pointer. When this happened, several places started accidentally
passing TII into this boolean parameter instead of the TII parameter.
llvm-svn: 362312
We were hashing the string pointer, not the string, so two instructions
could be identical (isIdenticalTo), but have different hash codes.
This showed up as a very rare, non-deterministic assertion failure
rehashing a DenseMap constructed by MachineOutliner. So there's no
"real" testcase, just a unittest which checks that the hash function
behaves correctly.
I'm a little scared fixing this is going to cause a regression in
outlining or MachineCSE, but hopefully we won't run into any issues.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61975
llvm-svn: 362281
Just copy all of the operands except the chain and call MorphNode on that.
This removes the IsUnary and IsTernary flags.
Also always get the result type from the result type of the original
nodes. Previously we got it from the operand except for two nodes
where that didn't work.
llvm-svn: 362269
Summary:
Fixes a warning produced from scan-build (llvm.org/reports/scan-build/),
further warnings found by annotation isMoveInstr [[nodiscard]].
isMoveInstr potentially does not assign to its parameters, so if they
were uninitialized, they will potentially stay uninitialized. It seems
most call sites pass references to uninitialized values, then use them
without checking the return value.
Reviewers: wmi
Reviewed By: wmi
Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, hiraditya, tpr, llvm-commits, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62109
llvm-svn: 362265
We don't want to create vregs if there is nothing to use them for. That causes
verifier errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62740
llvm-svn: 362247
[FPEnv] Added a special UnrollVectorOp method to deal with the chain on StrictFP opcodes
This change creates UnrollVectorOp_StrictFP. The purpose of this is to address a failure that consistently occurs when calling StrictFP functions on vectors whose number of elements is 3 + 2n on most platforms, such as PowerPC or SystemZ. The old UnrollVectorOp method does not expect that the vector that it will unroll will have a chain, so it has an assert that prevents it from running if this is the case. This new StrictFP version of the method deals with the chain while unrolling the vector. With this new function in place during vector widending, llc can run vector-constrained-fp-intrinsics.ll for SystemZ successfully.
Submitted by: Drew Wock <drew.wock@sas.com>
Reviewed by: Cameron McInally, Kevin P. Neal
Approved by: Cameron McInally
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62546
llvm-svn: 362241
This consolidates the vreg skip code into one function (SkipVRegs()).
SkipVRegs() now knows if it should skip as if it is the first initialization or
subsequent skips.
The first skip is also done the first time createVirtualRegister is called by
the cursor instead of by the cursor's constructor. This prevents verifier
errors on machine functions that have no vregs (where the verifier will
complain that there are vregs when the function uses none).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62717
llvm-svn: 362195
This is am almost NFC, it does the following:
- If there is no register class for a COPY's src or dst, bail.
- Fixes uses iterator invalidation bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62713
llvm-svn: 362191
Separate the remark serialization to YAML from the LLVM Diagnostics.
This adds a new serialization abstraction: remarks::Serializer. It's
completely independent from lib/IR and it provides an easy way to
replace YAML by providing a new remarks::Serializer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62632
llvm-svn: 362160
I don't have a test case for these, but there is a test case for D62266
where, even after all the constant-folding patches, we still end up
with endless combine loop. Which makes sense, since we don't constant
fold for opaque constants.
llvm-svn: 362156
Summary:
Only vector tests are being affected here,
since subtraction by scalar constant is rewritten
as addition by negated constant.
No surprising test changes.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/pbT
This is a recommit, originally committed in rL361852, but reverted
to investigate test-suite compile-time hangs.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62257
llvm-svn: 362146
Summary:
Again only vectors affected. Frustrating. Let me take a look into that..
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/AAq
This is a recommit, originally committed in rL361852, but reverted
to investigate test-suite compile-time hangs, and then reverted in
rL362109 to fix missing constant folds that were causing
endless combine loops.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: javed.absar, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62294
llvm-svn: 362145
Summary:
This prevents regressions in next patch,
and somewhat recovers from the regression to AMDGPU test in D62223.
It is indeed not great that we leave vector decrement,
don't transform it into vector add all-ones..
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ZRl
This is a recommit, originally committed in rL361852, but reverted
to investigate test-suite compile-time hangs, and then reverted in
rL362109 to fix missing constant folds that were causing
endless combine loops.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, arsenm
Reviewed By: RKSimon, arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, javed.absar, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62263
llvm-svn: 362144
Summary:
Direct sibling of D62223 patch.
While i don't have a direct motivational pattern for this,
it would seem to make sense to handle both patterns (or none),
for symmetry?
The aarch64 changes look neutral;
sparc and systemz look like improvement (one less instruction each);
x86 changes - 32bit case improves, 64bit case shows that LEA no longer
gets constructed, which may be because that whole test is `-mattr=+slow-lea,+slow-3ops-lea`
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ffh
This is a recommit, originally committed in rL361852, but reverted
to investigate test-suite compile-time hangs, and then reverted in
rL362109 to fix missing constant folds that were causing
endless combine loops.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, t.p.northover
Reviewed By: t.p.northover
Subscribers: t.p.northover, jyknight, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, fedor.sergeev, jrtc27, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62252
llvm-svn: 362143
Summary:
The main motivation is shown by all these `neg` instructions that are now created.
In particular, the `@reg32_lshr_by_negated_unfolded_sub_b` test.
AArch64 test changes all look good (`neg` created), or neutral.
X86 changes look neutral (vectors), or good (`neg` / `xor eax, eax` created).
I'm not sure about `X86/ragreedy-hoist-spill.ll`, it looks like the spill
is now hoisted into preheader (which should still be good?),
2 4-byte reloads become 1 8-byte reload, and are elsewhere,
but i'm not sure how that affects that loop.
I'm unable to interpret AMDGPU change, looks neutral-ish?
This is hopefully a step towards solving [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41952 | PR41952 ]].
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/pkdq (we are missing more patterns, i'll submit them later)
This is a recommit, originally committed in rL361852, but reverted
to investigate test-suite compile-time hangs, and then reverted in
rL362109 to fix missing constant folds that were causing
endless combine loops.
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, spatel, arsenm
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: bjope, qcolombet, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, javed.absar, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62223
llvm-svn: 362142
Guozhi Wei