Summary:
Both the input Value pointer and the returned Value
pointers in GetUnderlyingObjects are now declared as
const.
It turned out that all current (in-tree) uses of
GetUnderlyingObjects were trivial to update, being
satisfied with have those Value pointers declared
as const. Actually, in the past several of the users
had to use const_cast, just because of ValueTracking
not providing a version of GetUnderlyingObjects with
"const" Value pointers. With this patch we get rid
of those const casts.
Reviewers: hfinkel, materi, jkorous
Reviewed By: jkorous
Subscribers: dexonsmith, jkorous, jholewinski, sdardis, eraman, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61038
llvm-svn: 359072
In some circumstances we can end up with setup costs that are very complex to
compute, even though the scevs are not very complex to create. This can also
lead to setupcosts that are calculated to be exactly -1, which LSR treats as an
invalid cost. This patch puts a limit on the recursion depth for setup cost to
prevent them taking too long.
Thanks to @reames for the report and test case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60944
llvm-svn: 358958
This reverts commit 7bf4d7c07f2fac862ef34c82ad0fef6513452445.
After thinking about this more, this isn't right, the range is not exact
in the same sense as makeExactICmpRegion(). This needs a separate
function.
llvm-svn: 358876
Following D60632 makeGuaranteedNoWrapRegion() always returns an
exact nowrap region. Rename the function accordingly. This is in
line with the naming of makeExactICmpRegion().
llvm-svn: 358875
Summary:
Teach CorrelatedValuePropagation to also handle sub instructions in addition to add. Relatively simple since makeGuaranteedNoWrapRegion already understood sub instructions. Only subtle change is which range is passed as "Other" to that function, since sub isn't commutative.
Note that CorrelatedValuePropagation::processAddSub is still hidden behind a default-off flag as IndVarSimplify hasn't yet been fixed to strip the added nsw/nuw flags and causes a miscompile. (PR31181)
Reviewers: sanjoy, apilipenko, nikic
Reviewed By: nikic
Subscribers: hiraditya, jfb, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60036
llvm-svn: 358816
This is a follow-up to r291037+r291258, which used null debug locations
to prevent jumpy line tables.
Using line 0 locations achieves the same effect, but works better for
crash attribution because it preserves the right inline scope.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60913
llvm-svn: 358791
Summary:
Make the flags in LICM + MemorySSA tuning options in the old and new
pass managers.
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, jlebar, Prazek, george.burgess.iv, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60490
llvm-svn: 358772
The bug is that I didn't check whether the operand of the invariant_loads were themselves invariant. I don't know how this got missed in the patch and review. I even had an unreduced test case locally, and I remember handling this case, but I must have lost it in one of the rebases. Oops.
llvm-svn: 358688
The purpose of this patch is to eliminate a pass ordering dependence between LoopPredication and LICM. To understand the purpose, consider the following snippet of code inside some loop 'L' with IV 'i'
A = _a.length;
guard (i < A)
a = _a[i]
B = _b.length;
guard (i < B);
b = _b[i];
...
Z = _z.length;
guard (i < Z)
z = _z[i]
accum += a + b + ... + z;
Today, we need LICM to hoist the length loads, LoopPredication to make the guards loop invariant, and TrivialUnswitch to eliminate the loop invariant guard to establish must execute for the next length load. Today, if we can't prove speculation safety, we'd have to iterate these three passes 26 times to reduce this example down to the minimal form.
Using the fact that the array lengths are known to be invariant, we can short circuit this iteration. By forming the loop invariant form of all the guards at once, we remove the need for LoopPredication from the iterative cycle. At the moment, we'd still have to iterate LICM and TrivialUnswitch; we'll leave that part for later.
As a secondary benefit, this allows LoopPred to expose peeling oppurtunities in a much more obvious manner. See the udiv test changes as an example. If the udiv was not hoistable (i.e. we couldn't prove speculation safety) this would be an example where peeling becomes obviously profitable whereas it wasn't before.
A couple of subtleties in the implementation:
- SCEV's isSafeToExpand guarantees speculation safety (i.e. let's us expand at a new point). It is not a precondition for expansion if we know the SCEV corresponds to a Value which dominates the requested expansion point.
- SCEV's isLoopInvariant returns true for expressions which compute the same value across all iterations executed, regardless of where the original Value is located. (i.e. it can be in the loop) This implies we have a speculation burden to prove before expanding them outside loops.
- invariant_loads and AA->pointsToConstantMemory are two cases that SCEV currently does not handle, but meets the SCEV definition of invariance. I plan to sink this part into SCEV once this has baked for a bit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60093
llvm-svn: 358684
Reverse the checking of the domiance order so that when a self compare happens,
it returns false. This makes compare function have strict weak ordering.
llvm-svn: 358636
This patch adds a basic loop fusion pass. It will fuse loops that conform to the
following 4 conditions:
1. Adjacent (no code between them)
2. Control flow equivalent (if one loop executes, the other loop executes)
3. Identical bounds (both loops iterate the same number of iterations)
4. No negative distance dependencies between the loop bodies.
The pass does not make any changes to the IR to create opportunities for fusion.
Instead, it checks if the necessary conditions are met and if so it fuses two
loops together.
The pass has not been added to the pass pipeline yet, and thus is not enabled by
default. It can be run stand alone using the -loop-fusion option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55851
llvm-svn: 358607
Summary:
In the following cases, unrolling can be beneficial, even when
optimizing for code size:
1) very low trip counts
2) potential to constant fold most instructions after fully unrolling.
We can unroll in those cases, by setting the unrolling threshold to the
loop size. This might highlight some cost modeling issues and fixing
them will have a positive impact in general.
Reviewers: vsk, efriedma, dmgreen, paquette
Reviewed By: paquette
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60265
llvm-svn: 358586
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
This patch adds a basic loop fusion pass. It will fuse loops that conform to the
following 4 conditions:
1. Adjacent (no code between them)
2. Control flow equivalent (if one loop executes, the other loop executes)
3. Identical bounds (both loops iterate the same number of iterations)
4. No negative distance dependencies between the loop bodies.
The pass does not make any changes to the IR to create opportunities for fusion.
Instead, it checks if the necessary conditions are met and if so it fuses two
loops together.
The pass has not been added to the pass pipeline yet, and thus is not enabled by
default. It can be run stand alone using the -loop-fusion option.
Phabricator: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55851
llvm-svn: 358543
This is 1 of the problems discussed in the post-commit thread for:
rL355741 / http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190311/635516.html
and filed as:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41101
Instcombine tries to canonicalize some of these cases (and there's room for improvement
there independently of this patch), but it can't always do that because of extra uses.
So we need to recognize these commuted operand patterns here in EarlyCSE. This is similar
to how we detect commuted compares and commuted min/max/abs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60723
llvm-svn: 358523
If a umul.with.overflow or smul.with.overflow operation cannot
overflow, simplify it to a simple mul nuw / mul nsw. After the
refactoring in D60668 this is just a matter of removing an
explicit check against multiplications.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60791
llvm-svn: 358521
This adds a WithOverflowInst class with a few helper methods to get
the underlying binop, signedness and nowrap type and makes use of it
where sensible. There will be two more uses in D60650/D60656.
The refactorings are all NFC, though I left some TODOs where things
could be improved. In particular we have two places where add/sub are
handled but mul isn't.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60668
llvm-svn: 358512
If LSR split critical edge during rewriting phi operands and
phi node has other pending fixup operands, we need to
update those pending fixups. Otherwise formulae will not be
implemented completely and some instructions will not be eliminated.
llvm.org/PR41445
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60645
Patch by: Denis Bakhvalov <denis.bakhvalov@intel.com>
llvm-svn: 358457
This is a preparatory patch for D60093. This patch itself is NFC, but while preparing this I noticed and committed a small hoisting change in rL358419.
The basic structure of the new scheme is that we pass around the guard ("the using instruction"), and select an optimal insert point by examining operands at each construction point. This seems conceptually a bit cleaner to start with as it isolates the knowledge about insertion safety at the actual insertion point.
Note that the non-hoisting path is not actually used at the moment. That's not exercised until D60093 is rebased on this one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60718
llvm-svn: 358434
Summary:
Enable some of the existing size optimizations for cold code under PGO.
A ~5% code size saving in big internal app under PGO.
The way it gets BFI/PSI is discussed in the RFC thread
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-March/130894.html
Note it doesn't currently touch loop passes.
Reviewers: davidxl, eraman
Reviewed By: eraman
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, smeenai, mehdi_amini, eraman, zzheng, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59514
llvm-svn: 358422
If we have multiple range checks which can be predicated, hoist the and of the results outside the loop. This minorly cleans up the resulting IR, but the main motivation is as a building block for D60093.
llvm-svn: 358419
Summary:
Create a method to forget everything in SCEV.
Add a cl::opt and PassManagerBuilder option to use this in LoopUnroll.
Motivation: Certain Halide applications spend a very long time compiling in forgetLoop, and prefer to forget everything and rebuild SCEV from scratch.
Sample difference in compile time reduction: 21.04 to 14.78 using current ToT release build.
Testcase showcasing this cannot be opensourced and is fairly large.
The option disabled by default, but it may be desirable to enable by
default. Evidence in favor (two difference runs on different days/ToT state):
File Before (s) After (s)
clang-9.bc 7267.91 6639.14
llvm-as.bc 194.12 194.12
llvm-dis.bc 62.50 62.50
opt.bc 1855.85 1857.53
File Before (s) After (s)
clang-9.bc 8588.70 7812.83
llvm-as.bc 196.20 194.78
llvm-dis.bc 61.55 61.97
opt.bc 1739.78 1886.26
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, jlebar, zzheng, javed.absar, dmgreen, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60144
llvm-svn: 358304
When CVP determines that a with.overflow intrinsic cannot overflow,
it currently inserts a simple add/sub. As we already determined that
there can be no overflow, we should add the appropriate NUW/NSW flag.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60585
llvm-svn: 358298
Bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41175
In the bug test case the DSE pass is shortening the range of memory that a
memset is working on. A getelementptr is generated so that the new
starting address can be passed to memset. This instruction was not given
a DebugLoc.
To fix the bug, copy the DebugLoc from the memset instruction.
Patch by Orlando Cazalet-Hyams!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60556
llvm-svn: 358270
Fixes bug 40992: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40992
There is potential for miscompiled code emitted from JumpThreading when
analyzing a block with one or more indirectbr or callbr predecessors. The
ProcessThreadableEdges() function incorrectly folds conditional branches
into an unconditional branch.
This patch prevents incorrect branch folding without fully pessimizing
other potential threading opportunities through the same basic block.
This IR shape was manually fed in via opt and is unclear if clang and the
full pass pipeline will ever emit similar code shapes.
Thanks to Matthias Liedtke for the bug report and simplified IR example.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60284
llvm-svn: 357930
Create method `optForNone()` testing for the function level equivalent of
`-O0` and refactor appropriately.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59852
llvm-svn: 357638
The code doesn't actually need any of the information about the widenable condition at this level. The only thing we need is to ensure the WC call is the last thing anded in, and even that is a quirk we should really look to remove.
llvm-svn: 357448
We'd been optimizing the case where the predicate was obviously true, do the same for the false case. Mostly just for completeness sake, but also may improve compile time in loops which will exit through the guard. Such loops are presumed rare in fastpath code, but may be present down untaken paths, so optimizing for them is still useful.
llvm-svn: 357408
LoopPredication was replacing the original condition, but leaving the instructions to compute the old conditions around. This would get cleaned up by other passes of course, but we might as well do it eagerly. That also makes the test output less confusing.
llvm-svn: 357406
Updated to use DenseMap::insert instead of [] operator for insertion, to
avoid a crash caused by epoch checks.
This reverts commit 2b85de4383.
llvm-svn: 357257
For the attached test case, unchecked addition of immediate starts and
ends overflows, as they can be arbitrary i64 constants.
Proof: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Plqc
Reviewers: qcolombet, gilr, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59218
llvm-svn: 357217
By extending OrderedBB to allow removing and replacing cached
instructions, we can preserve OrderedBBs in DSE easily. This eliminates
one source of quadratic compile time in DSE.
Fixes PR38829.
Reviewers: rnk, efriedma, hfinkel
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59789
llvm-svn: 357208
This adds ConstantRange::getFull(BitWidth) and
ConstantRange::getEmpty(BitWidth) named constructors as more readable
alternatives to the current ConstantRange(BitWidth, /* full */ false)
and similar. Additionally private getFull() and getEmpty() member
functions are added which return a full/empty range with the same bit
width -- these are commonly needed inside ConstantRange.cpp.
The IsFullSet argument in the ConstantRange(BitWidth, IsFullSet)
constructor is now mandatory for the few usages that still make use of it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59716
llvm-svn: 356852
Summary:
Between building the pair map and querying it there are a few places that
erase and create Values. It's rare but the address of these newly created
Values is occasionally the same as a just-erased Value that we already
have in the pair map. These coincidences should be accounted for to avoid
non-determinism.
Thanks to Roman Tereshin for the test case.
Reviewers: rtereshin, bogner
Reviewed By: rtereshin
Subscribers: mgrang, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59401
llvm-svn: 356803
Summary:
Before this patch, if any Use existed in the loop, with a defining
access in the loop, we conservatively decide to not move the store.
What this approach was missing, is that ordered loads are not Uses, they're Defs
in MemorySSA. So, even when the clobbering walker does not find that
volatile load to interfere, we still cannot hoist a store past a
volatile load.
Resolves PR41140.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59564
llvm-svn: 356588
We are adding a sign extended IR value to an int64_t, which can cause
signed overflows, as in the attached test case, where we have a formula
with BaseOffset = -1 and a constant with numeric_limits<int64_t>::min().
If the addition would overflow, skip the simplification for this
formula. Note that the target triple is required to trigger the failure.
Reviewers: qcolombet, gilr, kparzysz, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59211
llvm-svn: 356256
Create members for Loop, ScalarEvolution, DominatorTree,
TargetTransformInfo and Formula.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58389
llvm-svn: 356131
The included test case currently crashes on tip of tree. Rather than adding a bailout, I chose to restructure the code so that the existing helper function could be used. Given that, the majority of the diff is NFC-ish, but the key difference is that canConvertValue returns false when only one side is a non-integral pointer.
Thanks to Cherry Zhang for the test case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59000
llvm-svn: 355962
Fixes bug 37966: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37966
The Jump Threading pass will replace certain conditional branch
instructions with unconditional branches when it can prove that only one
branch can occur. Prior to this patch, it would not carry the debug
info from the old instruction to the new one.
This patch fixes the bug described by copying the debug info from the
conditional branch instruction to the new unconditional branch
instruction, and adds a regression test for the Jump Threading pass that
covers this case.
Patch by Stephen Tozer!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58963
llvm-svn: 355822
In some loops, we end up generating loop induction variables that look like:
{(-1 * (zext i16 (%i0 * %i1) to i32))<nsw>,+,1}
As opposed to the simpler:
{(zext i16 (%i0 * %i1) to i32),+,-1}
i.e we count up from -limit to 0, not the simpler counting down from limit to
0. This is because the scores, as LSR calculates them, are the same and the
second is filtered in place of the first. We end up with a redundant SUB from 0
in the code.
This patch tries to make the calculation of the setup cost a little more
thoroughly, recursing into the scev members to better approximate the setup
required. The cost function for comparing LSR costs is:
return std::tie(C1.NumRegs, C1.AddRecCost, C1.NumIVMuls, C1.NumBaseAdds,
C1.ScaleCost, C1.ImmCost, C1.SetupCost) <
std::tie(C2.NumRegs, C2.AddRecCost, C2.NumIVMuls, C2.NumBaseAdds,
C2.ScaleCost, C2.ImmCost, C2.SetupCost);
So this will only alter results if none of the other variables turn out to be
different.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58770
llvm-svn: 355597
I'm not too familiar with this pass, so there might be a better
solution, but this appears to fix the degenerate:
PR40930
PR40931
PR40932
PR40934
...without affecting any real-world code.
As we've seen in several other passes, when we have unreachable blocks,
they can contain semi-bogus IR and/or cause unexpected conditions. We
would not typically expect these patterns to make it this far, but we
have to guard against them anyway.
llvm-svn: 355337
This patch fixes an issue where we would compute an unnecessarily small alignment during scalar promotion when no store is not to be guaranteed to execute, but we've proven load speculation safety. Since speculating a load requires proving the existing alignment is valid at the new location (see Loads.cpp), we can use the alignment fact from the load.
For non-atomics, this is a performance problem. For atomics, this is a correctness issue, though an *incredibly* rare one to see in practice. For atomics, we might not be able to lower an improperly aligned load or store (i.e. i32 align 1). If such an instruction makes it all the way to codegen, we *may* fail to codegen the operation, or we may simply generate a slow call to a library function. The part that makes this super hard to see in practice is that the memory location actually *is* well aligned, and instcombine knows that. So, to see a failure, you have to have a) hit the bug in LICM, b) somehow hit a depth limit in InstCombine/ValueTracking to avoid fixing the alignment, and c) then have generated an instruction which fails codegen rather than simply emitting a slow libcall. All around, pretty hard to hit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58809
llvm-svn: 355217
Summary:
ConstIntInfoVec contains elements extracted from the previous function.
In new PM, releaseMemory() is not called and the dangling elements can
cause segfault in findConstantInsertionPoint.
Rename releaseMemory() to cleanup() to deliver the idea that it is
mandatory and call cleanup() in ConstantHoistingPass::runImpl to fix
this.
Reviewers: ormris, zzheng, dmgreen, wmi
Reviewed By: ormris, wmi
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58589
llvm-svn: 355174
Summary:
The original assumption for the insertDef method was that it would not
materialize Defs out of no-where, hence it will not insert phis needed
after inserting a Def.
However, when cloning an instruction (use case used in LICM), we do
materialize Defs "out of no-where". If the block receiving a Def has at
least one other Def, then no processing is needed. If the block just
received its first Def, we must check where Phi placement is needed.
The only new usage of insertDef is in LICM, hence the trigger for the bug.
But the original goal of the method also fails to apply for the move()
method. If we move a Def from the entry point of a diamond to either the
left or right blocks, then the merge block must add a phi.
While this usecase does not currently occur, or may be viewed as an
incorrect transformation, MSSA must behave corectly given the scenario.
Resolves PR40749 and PR40754.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58652
llvm-svn: 355040
Summary:
This patch separates two semantics of `applyUpdates`:
1. User provides an accurate CFG diff and the dominator tree is updated according to the difference of `the number of edge insertions` and `the number of edge deletions` to infer the status of an edge before and after the update.
2. User provides a sequence of hints. Updates mentioned in this sequence might never happened and even duplicated.
Logic changes:
Previously, removing invalid updates is considered a side-effect of deduplication and is not guaranteed to be reliable. To handle the second semantic, `applyUpdates` does validity checking before deduplication, which can cause updates that have already been applied to be submitted again. Then, different calls to `applyUpdates` might cause unintended consequences, for example,
```
DTU(Lazy) and Edge A->B exists.
1. DTU.applyUpdates({{Delete, A, B}, {Insert, A, B}}) // User expects these 2 updates result in a no-op, but {Insert, A, B} is queued
2. Remove A->B
3. DTU.applyUpdates({{Delete, A, B}}) // DTU cancels this update with {Insert, A, B} mentioned above together (Unintended)
```
But by restricting the precondition that updates of an edge need to be strictly ordered as how CFG changes were made, we can infer the initial status of this edge to resolve this issue.
Interface changes:
The second semantic of `applyUpdates` is separated to `applyUpdatesPermissive`.
These changes enable DTU(Lazy) to use the first semantic if needed, which is quite useful in `transforms/utils`.
Reviewers: kuhar, brzycki, dmgreen, grosser
Reviewed By: brzycki
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58170
llvm-svn: 354669
The correct edge being deleted is not to the unswitched exit block, but to the
original block before it was split. That's the key in the map, not the
value.
The insert is correct. The new edge is to the .split block.
The splitting turns OriginalBB into:
OriginalBB -> OriginalBB.split.
Assuming the orignal CFG edge: ParentBB->OriginalBB, we must now delete
ParentBB->OriginalBB, not ParentBB->OriginalBB.split.
llvm-svn: 354656
Summary:
MemorySSA is not properly updated in LoopSimplifyCFG after recent changes. Use SplitBlock utility to resolve that and clear all updates once handleDeadExits is finished.
All updates that follow are removal of edges which are safe to handle via the removeEdge() API.
Also, deleting dead blocks is done correctly as is, i.e. delete from MemorySSA before updating the CFG and DT.
Reviewers: mkazantsev, rtereshin
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, george.burgess.iv, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58524
llvm-svn: 354613
We are planning to be able to delete the current loop in LoopSimplifyCFG
in the future. Add API to notify the loop pass manager that it happened.
llvm-svn: 354314
Summary:
Unlimitted number of calls to getClobberingAccess can lead to high
compile times in pathological cases.
Limitting getClobberingAccess to a fairly high number. Can be adjusted
based on users/need.
Note: this is the only user of MemorySSA currently enabled by default.
The same handling exists in LICM (disabled atm). As MemorySSA gains more
users, this logic of capping will need to move inside MemorySSA.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58248
llvm-svn: 354182
Summary:
The idea is that we now manipulate bases through a `unsigned BaseID` based on
order of appearance in the comparison chain rather than through the `Value*`.
Fixes 40714.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: mgrang, jfb, jdoerfert, llvm-commits, hans
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58274
llvm-svn: 354131
This patch adds support of guards expressed in explicit form via
`widenable_condition` in Guard Widening pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56075
Reviewed By: reames
llvm-svn: 353932
Known underlying bugs have been fixed, intensive fuzz testing did not
find any new problems. Re-enabling by default. Feel free to revert if
it causes any functional failures.
llvm-svn: 353911
Add plumbing to get MemorySSA in the remaining loop passes.
Also update unit test to add the dependency.
[EnableMSSALoopDependency remains disabled].
llvm-svn: 353901
Summary:
Unlimitted number of calls to getClobberingAccess can lead to high
compile times in pathological cases.
Switching EnableLicmCap flag from bool to int, and enabling to default 100.
(tested to be appropriate for current bechmarks)
We can revisit this value when enabling MemorySSA.
Reviewers: sanjoy, chandlerc, george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: jlebar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57968
llvm-svn: 353897
Logic in `getInsertPointForUses` doesn't account for a corner case when `Def`
only comes to a Phi user from unreachable blocks. In this case, the incoming
value may be arbitrary (and not even available in the input block) and break
the loop-related invariants that are asserted below.
In fact, if we encounter this situation, no IR modification is needed. This
Phi will be simplified away with nearest cleanup.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58045
Reviewed By: spatel
llvm-svn: 353816
The function `LI.erase` has some invariants that need to be preserved when it
tries to remove a loop which is not the top-level loop. In particular, it
requires loop's preheader to be strictly in loop's parent. Our current logic
of deletion of dead blocks may erase the information about preheader before we
handle the loop, and therefore we may hit this assertion.
This patch changes the logic of loop deletion: we make them top-level loops
before we actually erase them. This allows us to trigger the simple branch of
`erase` logic which just detatches blocks from the loop and does not try to do
some complex stuff that need this invariant.
Thanks to @uabelho for reporting this!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57221
Reviewed By: fedor.sergeev
llvm-svn: 353813
Utility function that we use for blocks deletion always unconditionally removes
one-input Phis. In LoopSimplifyCFG, it can lead to breach of LCSSA form.
This patch alters this function to keep them if needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57231
Reviewed By: fedor.sergeev
llvm-svn: 353803
The code checked that the first root was an appropriate distance from
the base value, but skipped checking the other roots. This could lead to
rerolling a loop that can't be legally rerolled (at least, not without
rewriting the loop in a non-trivial way).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56812
llvm-svn: 353779
Summary:
If there is no clobbering access for a store inside the loop, that store
can only be hoisted if there are no interfearing loads.
A more general verification introduced here: there are no loads that are
not optimized to an access outside the loop.
Addresses PR40586.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57967
llvm-svn: 353734
`CallBase` class rather than `CallSite` wrappers.
I pushed this change down through most of the statepoint infrastructure,
completely removing the use of CallSite where I could reasonably do so.
I ended up making a couple of cut-points: generic call handling
(instcombine, TLI, SDAG). As soon as it hit truly generic handling with
users outside the immediate code, I simply transitioned into or out of
a `CallSite` to make this a reasonable sized chunk.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56122
llvm-svn: 353660
This patch accompanies the RFC posted here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/127239.html
This patch adds a new CallBr IR instruction to support asm-goto
inline assembly like gcc as used by the linux kernel. This
instruction is both a call instruction and a terminator
instruction with multiple successors. Only inline assembly
usage is supported today.
This also adds a new INLINEASM_BR opcode to SelectionDAG and
MachineIR to represent an INLINEASM block that is also
considered a terminator instruction.
There will likely be more bug fixes and optimizations to follow
this, but we felt it had reached a point where we would like to
switch to an incremental development model.
Patch by Craig Topper, Alexander Ivchenko, Mikhail Dvoretckii
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53765
llvm-svn: 353563
`insert/deleteEdge` methods in DTU can make updates incorrectly in some cases
(see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40528), and it is recommended to
use `applyUpdates` methods instead when it is needed to make a mass update in CFG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57316
Reviewed By: kuhar
llvm-svn: 353502
Modify GenerateConstantOffsetsImpl to create offsets that can be used
by indexed addressing modes. If formulae can be generated which
result in the constant offset being the same size as the recurrence,
we can generate a pre-indexed access. This allows the pointer to be
updated via the single pre-indexed access so that (hopefully) no
add/subs are required to update it for the next iteration. For small
cores, this can significantly improve performance DSP-like loops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55373
llvm-svn: 353403
Summary:
Experimentally we found that promotion to scalars carries less benefits
than sinking and hoisting in LICM. When using MemorySSA, we build an
AliasSetTracker on demand in order to reuse the current infrastructure.
We only build it if less than AccessCapForMSSAPromotion exist in the
loop, a cap that is by default set to 250. This value ensures there are
no runtime regressions, and there are small compile time gains for
pathological cases. A much lower value (20) was found to yield a single
regression in the llvm-test-suite and much higher benefits for compile
times. Conservatively we set the current cap to a high value, but we will
explore lowering it when MemorySSA is enabled by default.
Reviewers: sanjoy, chandlerc
Subscribers: nemanjai, jlebar, Prazek, george.burgess.iv, jfb, jsji, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56625
llvm-svn: 353339
DomTreeUpdater depends on headers from Analysis, but is in IR. This is a
layering violation since Analysis depends on IR. Relocate this code from IR
to Analysis to fix the layering violation.
llvm-svn: 353265
When LSR first adds SCEVs to BaseRegs, it only does it if `isZero()` has
returned false. In the end, in invocation of `InsertFormula`, it asserts that
all values there are still not zero constants. However between these two
points, it makes some transformations, in particular extends them to wider
type.
SCEV does not give us guarantee that if `S` is not a constant zero, then
`sext(S)` is also not a constant zero. It might have missed some optimizing
transforms when it was calculating `S` and then made them when it took `sext`.
For example, it may happen if previously optimizing transforms were limited
by depth or somehow else.
This patch adds a bailout when we may end up with a zero SCEV after extension.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57565
Reviewed By: samparker
llvm-svn: 353136
This cleans up all GetElementPtr creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
value type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57173
llvm-svn: 352913
This cleans up all LoadInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass the
value type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57172
llvm-svn: 352911
This cleans up all CallInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
function type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57170
llvm-svn: 352909
Recommit r352791 after tweaking DerivedTypes.h slightly, so that gcc
doesn't choke on it, hopefully.
Original Message:
The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue passing the
result of getOrInsertFunction() through to EmitCall, even once pointer
types lose their pointee-type.
Then:
- update the CallInst/InvokeInst instruction creation functions to
take a Callee,
- modify getOrInsertFunction to return FunctionCallee, and
- update all callers appropriately.
One area of particular note is the change to the sanitizer
code. Previously, they had been casting the result of
`getOrInsertFunction` to a `Function*` via
`checkSanitizerInterfaceFunction`, and storing that. That would report
an error if someone had already inserted a function declaraction with
a mismatching signature.
However, in general, LLVM allows for such mismatches, as
`getOrInsertFunction` will automatically insert a bitcast if
needed. As part of this cleanup, cause the sanitizer code to do the
same. (It will call its functions using the expected signature,
however they may have been declared.)
Finally, in a small number of locations, callers of
`getOrInsertFunction` actually were expecting/requiring that a brand
new function was being created. In such cases, I've switched them to
Function::Create instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57315
llvm-svn: 352827
This reverts commit f47d6b38c7 (r352791).
Seems to run into compilation failures with GCC (but not clang, where
I tested it). Reverting while I investigate.
llvm-svn: 352800
The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue passing the
result of getOrInsertFunction() through to EmitCall, even once pointer
types lose their pointee-type.
Then:
- update the CallInst/InvokeInst instruction creation functions to
take a Callee,
- modify getOrInsertFunction to return FunctionCallee, and
- update all callers appropriately.
One area of particular note is the change to the sanitizer
code. Previously, they had been casting the result of
`getOrInsertFunction` to a `Function*` via
`checkSanitizerInterfaceFunction`, and storing that. That would report
an error if someone had already inserted a function declaraction with
a mismatching signature.
However, in general, LLVM allows for such mismatches, as
`getOrInsertFunction` will automatically insert a bitcast if
needed. As part of this cleanup, cause the sanitizer code to do the
same. (It will call its functions using the expected signature,
however they may have been declared.)
Finally, in a small number of locations, callers of
`getOrInsertFunction` actually were expecting/requiring that a brand
new function was being created. In such cases, I've switched them to
Function::Create instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57315
llvm-svn: 352791
Introduces a pass that provides default lowering strategy for the
`experimental.widenable.condition` intrinsic, replacing all its uses with
`i1 true`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56096
Reviewed By: reames
llvm-svn: 352739
Summary:
If MemorySSA is avaiable, we can skip checking all instructions if block has any Defs.
(volatile loads are also Defs).
We still need to check all instructions for "canThrow", even if no Defs are found.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, george.burgess.iv, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57129
llvm-svn: 352393
Summary:
Set default value for retrieved attributes to 1, since the check is against 1.
Eliminates the warning noise generated when the attributes are not present.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: jlebar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57253
llvm-svn: 352238
2nd part of D57095 with the same reason, just in another place. We never
fold branches that are not immediately in the current loop, but this check
is missing in `IsEdgeLive` As result, it may think that the edge in subloop is
dead while it's live. It's a pessimization in the current stance.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57147
Reviewed By: rupprecht
llvm-svn: 352170
Summary:
MemorySSA needs updating each time an instruction is moved.
LICM and control flow hoisting re-hoists instructions, thus needing another update when re-moving those instructions.
Pending cleanup: the MSSA update is duplicated, should be moved inside moveInstructionBefore.
Reviewers: jnspaulsson
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, george.burgess.iv, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57176
llvm-svn: 352092
After submitting https://reviews.llvm.org/D57138, I realized it was slightly more conservative than needed. The scalar indices don't appear to be a problem on a vector gep, we even had a test for that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57161
llvm-svn: 352061
This is an alternative to https://reviews.llvm.org/D57103. After discussion, we dedicided to check this in as a temporary workaround, and pursue a true fix under the original thread.
The issue at hand is that the base rewriting algorithm doesn't consider the fact that GEPs can turn a scalar input into a vector of outputs. We had handling for scalar GEPs and fully vector GEPs (i.e. all vector operands), but not the scalar-base + vector-index forms. A true fix here requires treating GEP analogously to extractelement or shufflevector.
This patch is merely a workaround. It simply hides the crash at the cost of some ugly code gen for this presumable very rare pattern.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57138
llvm-svn: 352059
When we choose whether or not we should mark block as dead, we have an
inconsistent logic in markup of live blocks.
- We take candidate IF its terminator branches on constant AND it is immediately
in current loop;
- We mark successor live IF its terminator doesn't branch by constant OR it branches
by constant and the successor is its always taken block.
What we are missing here is that when the terminator branches on a constant but is
not taken as a candidate because is it not immediately in the current loop, we will
mark only one (always taken) successor as live. Therefore, we do NOT do the actual
folding but may NOT mark one of the successors as live. So the result of markup is
wrong in this case, and we may then hit various asserts.
Thanks Jordan Rupprech for reporting this!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57095
Reviewed By: rupprecht
llvm-svn: 352024
This patch relaxes restrictions on types of latch condition and range check.
In current implementation, they should match. This patch allows to handle
wide range checks against narrow condition. The motivating example is the
following:
int N = ...
for (long i = 0; (int) i < N; i++) {
if (i >= length) deopt;
}
In this patch, the option that enables this support is turned off by
default. We'll wait until it is switched to true.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56837
Reviewed By: reames
llvm-svn: 351926
This patch adds support of guards expressed as branches by widenable
conditions in Loop Predication.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56081
Reviewed By: reames
llvm-svn: 351805
Deopt operands are generally intended to record information about a site in code with minimal perturbation of the surrounding code. Idiomatically, they also tend to appear down rare paths. Putting these together, we have an obvious case for extending CVP w/deopt operand constant folding. Arguably, we should be doing this for all operands on all instructions, but that's definitely a much larger and risky change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55678
llvm-svn: 351774
As noted in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36651, the specialization for
isPodLike<std::pair<...>> did not match the expectation of
std::is_trivially_copyable which makes the memcpy optimization invalid.
This patch renames the llvm::isPodLike trait into llvm::is_trivially_copyable.
Unfortunately std::is_trivially_copyable is not portable across compiler / STL
versions. So a portable version is provided too.
Note that the following specialization were invalid:
std::pair<T0, T1>
llvm::Optional<T>
Tests have been added to assert that former specialization are respected by the
standard usage of llvm::is_trivially_copyable, and that when a decent version
of std::is_trivially_copyable is available, llvm::is_trivially_copyable is
compared to std::is_trivially_copyable.
As of this patch, llvm::Optional is no longer considered trivially copyable,
even if T is. This is to be fixed in a later patch, as it has impact on a
long-running bug (see r347004)
Note that GCC warns about this UB, but this got silented by https://reviews.llvm.org/D50296.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54472
llvm-svn: 351701
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
During the transforms in LoopSimplifyCFG, when we remove a dead exiting edge, the
parent loop may stop being reachable from the child loop, and therefore they become
siblings. If the former child loop had uses of some values from its former parent loop,
now such uses will require LCSSA Phis, even if they weren't needed before. So we must
form LCSSA for all loops that stopped being ancestors of the current loop in this case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56144
Reviewed By: fedor.sergeev
llvm-svn: 351434
Function `DeleteDeadBlock` requires that all predecessors of a block
being deleted have already been deleted, with the exception of a
single-block loop. When we use it for removal of dead subloops that
contain more than one block, we may not fulfull this requirement and
fail an assertion.
This patch replaces invocation of `DeleteDeadBlock` with a generalized
version `DeleteDeadBlocks` that is able to deal with multiple dead blocks,
even if they contain some cycles.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56121
Reviewed By: fedor.sergeev
llvm-svn: 351433
For the given test SROA detects possible replacement and creates a correct alloca. After that SROA is adding lifetime markers for this new alloca. The function getNewAllocaSlicePtr is trying to deduce the pointer type based on the original alloca, which is split, to use it later in lifetime intrinsic.
For the test we ended up with such code (rA is initial alloca [10 x float], which is split, and rA.sroa.0.0 is a new split allocation)
```
%rA.sroa.0.0.rA.sroa_cast = bitcast i32* %rA.sroa.0 to [10 x float]* <----- this one causing the assertion and is an extra bitcast
%5 = bitcast [10 x float]* %rA.sroa.0.0.rA.sroa_cast to i8*
call void @llvm.lifetime.start.p0i8(i64 4, i8* %5)
```
isAllocaPromotable code assumes that a user of alloca may go into lifetime marker through bitcast but it must be the only one bitcast to i8* type. In the test it's not a i8* type, return false and throw the assertion.
As we are creating a pointer, which will be used in lifetime markers only, the proposed fix is to create a bitcast to i8* immediately to avoid extra bitcast creation.
The test is a greatly simplified to just reproduce the assertion.
Author: Igor Tsimbalist <igor.v.tsimbalist@intel.com>
Reviewers: chandlerc, craig.topper
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55934
llvm-svn: 351325
Increment statistics counter NumSwitches at unswitchNontrivialInvariants() for
unswitching a non-trivial switch instruction. This is to fix a bug that it
increments NumBranches even for the case of switch instruction.
There is no functional change in this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56408
llvm-svn: 351193
Bjorn Pettersson