It looks like we forgot to set the FTM when adding constexpr vector support.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137729
This mirrors what we have done in the classic algorithms
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137186
This target (as well as 32-bit ARM Android) have sizeof(long double)
equal to sizeof(double).
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137135
Mark tests XFAIL that use APIs that are unsupported on old versions of
Android:
- aligned_alloc isn't available until API 28.
- timespec_get isn't available until API 29.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137134
This doesn't affect our ABI because `std::string::substr()` isn't in the dylib and the mangling of `substr() const` and `substr() const&` are different.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, var-const, avogelsgesang, #libc
Spies: arphaman, huixie90, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131668
This makes the tests more minimal, and in particular it avoids relying on a complete `<cstdlib>`, which may not be available on all platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137188
No code changes, but only increased the range in the tests.
Completes:
- LWG3273. Specify weekday_indexed to range of [0, 7]
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137015
This commit deprecates <experimental/memory_resource> since we now ship the non-experimental
version of it. Per the libc++ policy [1], we are deprecating the experimental feature in
upcoming LLVM 16 and will remove it entirely in LLVM 18.
[1]: https://libcxx.llvm.org/DesignDocs/ExperimentalFeatures.html#id4
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: EricWF, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136245
This avoids emitting the VTable of `pmr::memory_resource` in every TU.
Reviewed By: ldionne
Spies: EricWF, nemanjai, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136196
This allows the compiler to do more optimizations.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits, krytarowski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136191
We currently define the preferred names in multiple places. `basic_string` and `basic_string_view` also have a lot of aliases, which makes the declarations quite long. So let's only add the preferred names in forward-declaring headers to make the implementation more readable and have all the preferred names in one place.
Reviewed By: ldionne
Spies: EricWF, krytarowski, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135824
Replace the two-level implementation with a simpler one that directly subclasses
the predicates, avoiding the instantiation of the template to get the `type`
member in a situation where we should short-circuit. This prevents incorrect
diagnostics when the instantiated predicate contains a static assertion.
Add a test case that reproduced the previous problem. The existing test case
involving `HasNoValue` didn't catch the problem because `HasNoValue` was in the
final position. The bug comes up when the predicate that shouldn't be
instantiated is after the short-circuit position but there is more to follow,
because then `__conjunction_impl<False, BadPredicate, ...>` instantiates
`__conjunction_impl<BadPredicate, ...>` (in order to obtain its `type` member),
which in turn instantiates `BadPredicate` in order to obtain its `value` member.
In contrast the new implementation doesn't recurse in instantiation any further
than it needs to, because it doesn't require particular members of the recursive
case.
I've also updated the test cases for `std::disjunction` to match,
although it doesn't have the same particular bug (its implementation is
quite different).
Fixes#58490.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, philnik
Spies: philnik, ldionne, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136318
We've said that we'll remove `std::function` from C++03 in LLVM 16, so we might as well do it now before we forget.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, Mordante
Spies: jloser, Mordante, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135868
Partially implements:
- P1361 Integration of chrono with text formatting
- P2372 Fixing locale handling in chrono formatters
- LWG3270 Parsing and formatting %j with durations
Completes:
- P1650R0 std::chrono::days with 'd' suffix
- LWG3262 Formatting of negative durations is not specified
- LWG3314 Is stream insertion behavior locale dependent when Period::type is micro?
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134742
LWG-3539 was already implemented but not marked as done.
LWG-3567 is implemented in this commit.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112368
`std::variant::operator<=>` is missing a requires clause ensuring that
`operator<=>` only exists when all of the types in the variant are
`three_way_comparable`.
Add the missing requires clause and adjust the existing test which was
incorrect.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/58192.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D136050
Implements:
- P2291R3 Add Constexpr Modifiers to Functions to_chars and from_chars for
Integral Types in <charconv> Header
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131317
This partly reverts D133535 and enables CTAD for more parts in format.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135292
This is mainly to improve the readability of the tests. As a side
effects the tests run faster too,
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D135288
This patch is the rebase and squash of three earlier patches.
It supersedes all three of them.
- D47111: experimental monotonic_buffer_resource.
- D47358: experimental pool resources.
- D47360: Copy std::experimental::pmr to std::pmr.
The significant difference between this patch and the-sum-of-those-three
is that this patch does not add `std::experimental::pmr::monotonic_buffer_resource`
and so on. This patch simply adds the C++17 standard facilities, and
leaves the `std::experimental` namespace entirely alone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89057
Implementing the paper
P2291R3 Add Constexpr Modifiers to Functions to_chars and from_chars for
Integral Types in <charconv> Header
Gives issues in language versions prior to C++17. As suggested in
D131855 disable the code prior to C++17. This removes libc++'s
extension.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc_vendors, #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133216
implement `std::ranges::basic_istream_view` and `std::views::istream`. Although the view itself is constexpr,
the constructor argument is a base class std::istream where its ctor/dtor are not constexpr. So no tests are performed in
constexpr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133317
This concept is introduced in P2286, but was implemented in libc++
before. This implementation was used in the library internally. This
implementation lacked the resolution of LWG3636. The original formatter
had a non-const member function that wasn't trivial to make a const
member. The recent parser improvements made this member a const member
in preparation of LWG3636.
Note LWG3636 isn't voted in. Its status is Ready. P2286's concept has
been written as-if LWG3636 is accepted and refers to that LWG issue.
Updates some tests make format a const member function and removes a
tests that's mainly a duplicate of the formattable concept test.
Implements
- LWG3636 formatter<T>::format should be const-qualified
Implements parts of
- P2286R8 Formatting Ranges
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134110
There are a handful of standard library types that are intended
to support CTAD but don't need any explicit deduction guides to
do so.
This patch adds a dummy deduction guide to those types to suppress
-Wctad-maybe-unsupported (which gets emitted in user code).
This is a re-application of the original patch by Eric Fiselier in
fcd549a7d8 which had been reverted due to reasons lost at this point.
I also added the macro to a few more types. Reviving this patch was
prompted by the discussion on https://llvm.org/D133425.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133535
Instead of using `reverse_iterator`, share the optimization between the 4 algorithms. The key observation here that `memmove` applies to both `copy` and `move` identically, and to their `_backward` versions very similarly. All algorithms now follow the same pattern along the lines of:
```
if constexpr (can_memmove<InIter, OutIter>) {
memmove(first, last, out);
} else {
naive_implementation(first, last, out);
}
```
A follow-up will delete `unconstrained_reverse_iterator`.
This patch removes duplication and divergence between `std::copy`, `std::move` and `std::move_backward`. It also improves testing:
- the test for whether the optimization is used only applied to `std::copy` and, more importantly, was essentially a no-op because it would still pass if the optimization was not used;
- there were no tests to make sure the optimization is not used when the effect would be visible.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130695
Implement LWG 3629, by making lookup for make_error_code and
make_error_condition only consider names found by ADL. This is achieved
by adding a block scope using-declaration for a function that will be
found by unqualified lookup, preventing unqualified lookup from
continuing to enclosing scopes (the class scope, then enclosing
namespaces). The function named by the using declaration is not
viable, so overload resolution must select a candidate found by ADL.
This fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57614
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134943
Noticed this while working on D133326. Let's see whehter all compilers
now support this feature.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134818
We should strive to have our own tests, except when there is overwhelming
value in using another standard library's existing tests. The reason is
that it ensures that implementations don't all start relying on the same
interpretation of the Standard.
The unique_ptr tests did not add any test coverage AFAICT, and the
forward_like tests were moved to the style used everywhere in the
libc++ test suite.
Note that I got to this because this actually broke a downstream
configuration where we use -ffreestanding. The signature of main()
was not consistent with the signature we (need to) use everywhere
in the test suite.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134767
In the implementation of `std::views::take`, it uses `subrange<Iter>` as part of the return type. But in case of input iterator, `subrange<Iter>` can be ill-formed
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133220
While testing a test failure of C++17 with Clang ToT it was noticed the
paper
P0602R4 variant and optional should propagate copy/move triviality
was not applied as a DR in libc++.
This was discovered while investigating the issue "caused by" D131479.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133326
Update the formatter day tests to the new style.
Other test will be done separately.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134031
In https://llvm.org/D56913, we added an emulation for the __atomic_always_lock_free
compiler builtin when compiling in Freestanding mode. However, the emulation
did (and could not) give exactly the same answer as the compiler builtin,
which led to a potential ABI break for e.g. enum classes.
After speaking to the original author of D56913, we agree that the correct
behavior is to instead always use the compiler builtin, since that provides
a more accurate answer, and __atomic_always_lock_free is a purely front-end
builtin which doesn't require any runtime support. Furthermore, it is
available regardless of the Standard mode (see https://godbolt.org/z/cazf3ssYY).
However, this patch does constitute an ABI break. As shown by https://godbolt.org/z/1eoex6zdK:
- In LLVM <= 11.0.1, an atomic<enum class with 1 byte> would not contain a lock byte.
- In LLVM >= 12.0.0, an atomic<enum class with 1 byte> would contain a lock byte.
This patch breaks the ABI again to bring it back to 1 byte, which seems
like the correct thing to do.
Fixes#57440
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133377
Nikolas Klauser