Although this doesn't usually come up, we can have uses of the
BaseAccess of a distributed postinc being a PHI. This doesn't need the
usual dominance check as we will dominate along the phi edge, allowing
us to still create a postinc load/store.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127676
This patch implements PAC return address signing for armv8-m. This patch roughly
accomplishes the following things:
- PAC and AUT instructions are generated.
- They're part of the stack frame setup, so that shrink-wrapping can move them
inwards to cover only part of a function
- The auth code generated by PAC is saved across subroutine calls so that AUT
can find it again to check
- PAC is emitted before stacking registers (so that the SP it signs is the one
on function entry).
- The new pseudo-register ra_auth_code is mentioned in the DWARF frame data
- With CMSE also in use: PAC is emitted before stacking FPCXTNS, and AUT
validates the corresponding value of SP
- Emit correct unwind information when PAC is replaced by PACBTI
- Handle tail calls correctly
Some notes:
We make the assembler accept the `.save {ra_auth_code}` directive that is
emitted by the compiler when it saves a register that contains a
return address authentication code.
For EHABI we need to have the `FrameSetup` flag on the instruction and
handle the `t2PACBTI` opcode (identically to `t2PAC`), so we can emit
`.save {ra_auth_code}`, instead of `.save {r12}`.
For PACBTI-M, the instruction which computes return address PAC should use SP
value before adjustment for the argument registers save are (used for variadic
functions and when a parameter is is split between stack and register), but at
the same it should be after the instruction that saves FPCXT when compiling a
CMSE entry function.
This patch moves the varargs SP adjustment after the FPCXT save (they are never
enabled at the same time), so in a following patch handling of the `PAC`
instruction can be placed between them.
Epilogue emission code adjusted in a similar manner.
PACBTI-M code generation should not emit any instructions for architectures
v6-m, v8-m.base, and for A- and R-class cores. Diagnostic message for such cases
is handled separately by a future ticket.
note on tail calls:
If the called function has four arguments that occupy registers `r0`-`r3`, the
only option for holding the function pointer itself is `r12`, but this register
is used to keep the PAC during function/prologue epilogue and clobbers the
function pointer.
When we do the tail call we need the five registers (`r0`-`r3` and `r12`) to
keep six values - the four function arguments, the function pointer and the PAC,
which is obviously impossible.
One option would be to authenticate the return address before all callee-saved
registers are restored, so we have a scratch register to temporarily keep the
value of `r12`. The issue with this approach is that it violates a fundamental
invariant that PAC is computed using CFA as a modifier. It would also mean using
separate instructions to pop `lr` and the rest of the callee-saved registers,
which would offset the advantages of doing a tail call.
Instead, this patch disables indirect tail calls when the called function take
four or more arguments and the return address sign and authentication is enabled
for the caller function, conservatively assuming the caller function would spill
LR.
This patch is part of a series that adds support for the PACBTI-M extension of
the Armv8.1-M architecture, as detailed here:
https://community.arm.com/arm-community-blogs/b/architectures-and-processors-blog/posts/armv8-1-m-pointer-authentication-and-branch-target-identification-extension
The PACBTI-M specification can be found in the Armv8-M Architecture Reference
Manual:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0553/latest
The following people contributed to this patch:
- Momchil Velikov
- Ties Stuij
Reviewed By: danielkiss
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112429
Some instructions with i8 immediate ranges can only hold negative values
(like t2LDRHi8), only hold positive values (like t2STRT) or hold +/-
depending on the U bit (like the pre/post inc instructions. e.g
t2LDRH_POST). This patch splits the AddrModeT2_i8 into AddrModeT2_i8,
AddrModeT2_i8pos and AddrModeT2_i8neg to make this clear.
This allows us to get the offset ranges of t2LDRHi8 correct in the
load/store optimizer, fixing issues where we could end up creating
instructions with positive offsets (which may then be encoded as ldrht).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114638
The semantics of tail predication loops means that the value of LR as an
instruction is executed determines the predicate. In other words:
mov r3, #3
DLSTP lr, r3 // Start tail predication, lr==3
VADD.s32 q0, q1, q2 // Lanes 0,1 and 2 are updated in q0.
mov lr, #1
VADD.s32 q0, q1, q2 // Only first lane is updated.
This means that the value of lr cannot be spilled and re-used in tail
predication regions without potentially altering the behaviour of the
program. More lanes than required could be stored, for example, and in
the case of a gather those lanes might not have been setup, leading to
alignment exceptions.
This patch adds a new lr predicate operand to MVE instructions in order
to keep a reference to the lr that they use as a tail predicate. It will
usually hold the zeroreg meaning not predicated, being set to the LR phi
value in the MVETPAndVPTOptimisationsPass. This will prevent it from
being spilled anywhere that it needs to be used.
A lot of tests needed updating.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107638
This changes a couple of calls to LiveRegs.contains to
!LiveRegs.available, one in Thumb1FrameLoweringInfo (which modifies a
test to look more correct to me, given r7 should be the frame pointer so
is not available), and another in the ARMLoadStoreOptimizer, that I
don't have a test for, it was just found by inspection.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107454
The register class required for some MVE loads/stores is more
constrained than the register we use when creating postinc. Make sure we
constrain the register class to keep the code correct.
Currently the load/store optimizer will only fold in increments of the
same size as the load/store. This patch expands that to any legal
immediate for the post-inc instruction.
This is a recommit of 3b34b06fc5 with correctness fixes and extra
tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95885
Currently the load/store optimizer will only fold in increments of the
same size as the load/store. This patch expands that to any legal
immediate for the post-inc instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95885
Currently the findIncDecAfter will only look at the next instruction for
post-inc candidates in the load/store optimizer. This extends that to a
search through the current BB, until an instruction that modifies or
uses the increment reg is found. This allows more post-inc load/stores
and ldm/stm's to be created, especially in cases where a schedule might
move instructions further apart.
We make sure not to look any further for an SP, as that might invalidate
stack slots that are still in use.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95881
This adds uses for locals introduced for new debug messages for the load store optimizer. Those locals are only used on debug statements and otherwise create unused variable warnings.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94398
This extends the distributing postinc code in load/store optimizer to
also handle the case where there is an existing pre/post inc instruction,
where subsequent instructions can be modified to use the adjusted
offset from the increment. This can save us having to keep the old
register live past the increment instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83377
This adds sign/zero extending scalar loads/stores to the MVE
instructions added in D77813, allowing us to create up more post-inc
instructions. These are comparatively simple, compared to LDR/STR (which
may be better turned into an LDRD/LDM), but still require some additions
over MVE instructions. Because there are i12 and i8 variants of the
offset loads/stores dealing with different signs, we may need to convert
an i12 address to a i8 negative instruction. t2LDRBi12 can also be
shrunk to a tLDRi under the right conditions, so we need to be careful
with codesize too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78625
This adds some extra processing into the Pre-RA ARM load/store optimizer
to detect and merge MVE loads/stores and adds of the same base. This we
don't always turn into a post-inc during ISel, and due to the nature of
it being a graph we don't always know an order to use for the nodes, not
knowing which nodes to make post-inc and which to use the new post-inc
of. After ISel, we have an order that we can use to post-inc the
following instructions.
So this looks for a loads/store with a starting offset of 0, and an
add/sub from the same base, plus a number of other loads/stores. We then
do some checks and convert the zero offset load/store into a postinc
variant. Any loads/stores after it have the offset subtracted from their
immediates. For example:
LDR #4 LDR #4
LDR #0 LDR_POSTINC #16
LDR #8 LDR #-8
LDR #12 LDR #-4
ADD #16
It only handles MVE loads/stores at the moment. Normal loads/store will
be added in a followup patch, they just have some extra details to
ensure that we keep generating LDRD/LDM successfully.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77813
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: arsenm, dschuff, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, jrtc27, atanasyan, jfb, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76925
Summary:
This patch fixes pr23772 [ARM] r226200 can emit illegal thumb2 instruction: "sub sp, r12, #80".
The violation was that SUB and ADD (reg, immediate) instructions can only write to SP if the source register is also SP. So the above instructions was unpredictable.
To enforce that the instruction t2(ADD|SUB)ri does not write to SP we now enforce the destination register to be rGPR (That exclude PC and SP).
Different than the ARM specification, that defines one instruction that can read from SP, and one that can't, here we inserted one that can't write to SP, and other that can only write to SP as to reuse most of the hard-coded size optimizations.
When performing this change, it uncovered that emitting Thumb2 Reg plus Immediate could not emit all variants of ADD SP, SP #imm instructions before so it was refactored to be able to. (see test/CodeGen/Thumb2/mve-stacksplot.mir where we use a subw sp, sp, Imm12 variant )
It also uncovered a disassembly issue of adr.w instructions, that were only written as SUBW instructions (see llvm/test/MC/Disassembler/ARM/thumb2.txt).
Reviewers: eli.friedman, dmgreen, carwil, olista01, efriedma, andreadb
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: gbedwell, john.brawn, efriedma, ostannard, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, dmgreen, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70680
Summary:
This patch fixes pr23772 [ARM] r226200 can emit illegal thumb2 instruction: "sub sp, r12, #80".
The violation was that SUB and ADD (reg, immediate) instructions can only write to SP if the source register is also SP. So the above instructions was unpredictable.
To enforce that the instruction t2(ADD|SUB)ri does not write to SP we now enforce the destination register to be rGPR (That exclude PC and SP).
Different than the ARM specification, that defines one instruction that can read from SP, and one that can't, here we inserted one that can't write to SP, and other that can only write to SP as to reuse most of the hard-coded size optimizations.
When performing this change, it uncovered that emitting Thumb2 Reg plus Immediate could not emit all variants of ADD SP, SP #imm instructions before so it was refactored to be able to. (see test/CodeGen/Thumb2/mve-stacksplot.mir where we use a subw sp, sp, Imm12 variant )
It also uncovered a disassembly issue of adr.w instructions, that were only written as SUBW instructions (see llvm/test/MC/Disassembler/ARM/thumb2.txt).
Reviewers: eli.friedman, dmgreen, carwil, olista01, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: john.brawn, efriedma, ostannard, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, dmgreen, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70680
Summary:
This clang-tidy check is looking for unsigned integer variables whose initializer
starts with an implicit cast from llvm::Register and changes the type of the
variable to llvm::Register (dropping the llvm:: where possible).
Partial reverts in:
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FixupLEAs.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
HexagonBitSimplify.cpp - Function takes BitTracker::RegisterRef which appears to be unsigned&
MachineVerifier.cpp - Ambiguous operator==() given MCRegister and const Register
PPCFastISel.cpp - No Register::operator-=()
PeepholeOptimizer.cpp - TargetInstrInfo::optimizeLoadInstr() takes an unsigned&
MachineTraceMetrics.cpp - MachineTraceMetrics lacks a suitable constructor
Manual fixups in:
ARMFastISel.cpp - ARMEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
HexagonSplitDouble.cpp - Ternary operator was ambiguous between unsigned/Register
HexagonConstExtenders.cpp - Has a local class named Register, used llvm::Register instead of Register.
PPCFastISel.cpp - PPCEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
Depends on D65919
Reviewers: arsenm, bogner, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: RKSimon, craig.topper, lenary, aemerson, wuzish, jholewinski, MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, tpr, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65962
llvm-svn: 369041
This should hopefully lead to minor improvements in code generation, and
more accurate spill/reload comments in assembly.
Also fix isLoadFromStackSlotPostFE/isStoreToStackSlotPostFE so they
don't lead to misleading assembly comments for merged memory operands;
this is technically orthogonal, but in practice the relevant memory
operand lists don't show up without this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59713
llvm-svn: 356963
As requested during review of D57601 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D57601> https://reviews.llvm.org/D57601, be equally conservative for atomic MMOs as for volatile MMOs in all in tree backends. At the moment, all atomic MMOs are also volatile, but I'm about to change that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58490
Note: D58498 landed in several pieces as individual backends were approved. This is the last chunk.
llvm-svn: 354845
The whole design of generating LDMs/STMs is fragile and unreliable: it depends on
rescheduling here in the LoadStoreOptimizer that isn't register pressure aware
and regalloc that isn't aware of generating LDMs/STMs.
This patch adds a (hidden) option to control the total number of instructions that
can be re-ordered. I appreciate this looks only a tiny bit better than a hard-coded
constant, but at least it allows more easy experimentation with different values
for now. Ideally we calculate this reorder limit based on some heuristics, and take
register pressure into account. I might be looking into that next.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57954
llvm-svn: 353678
In many places in the backend, we like to know whether we're
optimising for code size and this is performed by checking the
current machine function attributes. A subtarget is created on a
per-function basis, so it's possible to know when we're compiling for
code size on construction so record this in the new object.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57812
llvm-svn: 353501
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
- The load store optimizer is currently merging multiple loads/stores into VLDM/VSTM with more than 16 doubleword registers
- This is an UNPREDICTABLE instruction and shouldn't be done
- It looks like the Limit for how many registers included in a merge got dropped at some point so I am reintroducing it in this patch
- This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38389
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52085
llvm-svn: 342872
a generically extensible collection of extra info attached to
a `MachineInstr`.
The primary change here is cleaning up the APIs used for setting and
manipulating the `MachineMemOperand` pointer arrays so chat we can
change how they are allocated.
Then we introduce an extra info object that using the trailing object
pattern to attach some number of MMOs but also other extra info. The
design of this is specifically so that this extra info has a fixed
necessary cost (the header tracking what extra info is included) and
everything else can be tail allocated. This pattern works especially
well with a `BumpPtrAllocator` which we use here.
I've also added the basic scaffolding for putting interesting pointers
into this, namely pre- and post-instruction symbols. These aren't used
anywhere yet, they're just there to ensure I've actually gotten the data
structure types correct. I'll flesh out support for these in
a subsequent patch (MIR dumping, parsing, the works).
Finally, I've included an optimization where we store any single pointer
inline in the `MachineInstr` to avoid the allocation overhead. This is
expected to be the overwhelmingly most common case and so should avoid
any memory usage growth due to slightly less clever / dense allocation
when dealing with >1 MMO. This did require several ergonomic
improvements to the `PointerSumType` to reasonably support the various
usage models.
This also has a side effect of freeing up 8 bits within the
`MachineInstr` which could be repurposed for something else.
The suggested direction here came largely from Hal Finkel. I hope it was
worth it. ;] It does hopefully clear a path for subsequent extensions
w/o nearly as much leg work. Lots of thanks to Reid and Justin for
careful reviews and ideas about how to do all of this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50701
llvm-svn: 339940
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
Because we create a new kind of debug instruction, DBG_LABEL, we need to
check all passes which use isDebugValue() to check MachineInstr is debug
instruction or not. When expelling debug instructions, we should expel
both DBG_VALUE and DBG_LABEL. So, I create a new function,
isDebugInstr(), in MachineInstr to check whether the MachineInstr is
debug instruction or not.
This patch has no new test case. I have run regression test and there is
no difference in regression test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45342
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331844
Summary:
r327219 added wrappers to std::sort which randomly shuffle the container before sorting.
This will help in uncovering non-determinism caused due to undefined sorting
order of objects having the same key.
To make use of that infrastructure we need to invoke llvm::sort instead of std::sort.
Note: This patch is one of a series of patches to replace *all* std::sort to llvm::sort.
Refer the comments section in D44363 for a list of all the required patches.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, RKSimon, MatzeB, bkramer
Reviewed By: bkramer
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44855
llvm-svn: 329329
David Green