and separates lexical name lookup from qualified name lookup. In
particular:
* Make DeclContext the central data structure for storing and
looking up declarations within existing declarations, e.g., members
of structs/unions/classes, enumerators in C++0x enums, members of
C++ namespaces, and (later) members of Objective-C
interfaces/implementations. DeclContext uses a lazily-constructed
data structure optimized for fast lookup (array for small contexts,
hash table for larger contexts).
* Implement C++ qualified name lookup in terms of lookup into
DeclContext.
* Implement C++ unqualified name lookup in terms of
qualified+unqualified name lookup (since unqualified lookup is not
purely lexical in C++!)
* Limit the use of the chains of declarations stored in
IdentifierInfo to those names declared lexically.
* Eliminate CXXFieldDecl, collapsing its behavior into
FieldDecl. (FieldDecl is now a ScopedDecl).
* Make RecordDecl into a DeclContext and eliminates its
Members/NumMembers fields (since one can just iterate through the
DeclContext to get the fields).
llvm-svn: 60878
expressions, and value-dependent expressions. This permits us to parse
some template definitions.
This is not a complete solution; we're missing type- and
value-dependent computations for most of the expression types, and
we're missing checks for dependent types and type-dependent
expressions throughout Sema.
llvm-svn: 60615
parameters, with some semantic analysis:
- Template parameters are introduced into template parameter scope
- Complain about template parameter shadowing (except in Microsoft mode)
Note that we leak template parameter declarations like crazy, a
problem we'll remedy once we actually create proper declarations for
templates.
Next up: dependent types and value-dependent/type-dependent
expressions.
llvm-svn: 60597
built-in operator candidates. Test overloading of '&' and ','.
In C++, a comma expression is an lvalue if its right-hand
subexpression is an lvalue. Update Expr::isLvalue accordingly.
llvm-svn: 59643
post-decrement, including support for generating all of the built-in
operator candidates for these operators.
C++ and C have different rules for the arguments to the builtin unary
'+' and '-'. Implemented both variants in Sema::ActOnUnaryOp.
In C++, pre-increment and pre-decrement return lvalues. Update
Expr::isLvalue accordingly.
llvm-svn: 59638
function call created in response to the use of operator syntax that
resolves to an overloaded operator in C++, e.g., "str1 +
str2" that resolves to std::operator+(str1, str2)". We now build a
CXXOperatorCallExpr in C++ when we pick an overloaded operator. (But
only for binary operators, where we actually implement overloading)
I decided *not* to refactor the current CallExpr to make it abstract
(with FunctionCallExpr and CXXOperatorCallExpr as derived
classes). Doing so would allow us to make CXXOperatorCallExpr a little
bit smaller, at the cost of making the argument and callee accessors
virtual. We won't know if this is going to be a win until we can parse
lots of C++ code to determine how much memory we'll save by making
this change vs. the performance penalty due to the extra virtual
calls.
llvm-svn: 59306
some more bullet-proofing/enhancements for tryEvaluate. This shouldn't
cause any behavior changes except for handling cases where we were
crashing before and being able to evaluate a few more cases in tryEvaluate.
This should settle the minor mess surrounding r59196.
llvm-svn: 59224
little rude; I figure it's cleaner to just back this out now so
it doesn't get forgotten or mixed up with other checkins.
The modification to isICE is simply wrong; I've added a test that the
change to isICE breaks.
I'm pretty sure the modification to tryEvaluate is also wrong.
At the very least, there's some serious miscommunication going on here,
as this is going in exactly the opposite direction of r59105. My
understanding is that tryEvaluate is not supposed to care about side
effects. That said, a lot of the clients to tryEvaluate are
expecting it to enforce a no-side-effects policy, so we probably need
another method that provides that guarantee.
llvm-svn: 59212
- Evaluation of , operator used bogus assumption that LHS could be
evaluated as an integral expression even though its type is
unspecified.
This change is making isICE very permissive of the LHS in non-evaluated
contexts because it is not clear what predicate we would use to reject
code here. The standard didn't offer me any guidance; opinions?
llvm-svn: 59196
functions for built-in operators, e.g., the builtin
bool operator==(int const*, int const*)
can be used for the expression "x1 == x2" given:
struct X {
operator int const*();
} x1, x2;
The scheme for handling these built-in operators is relatively simple:
for each candidate required by the standard, create a special kind of
candidate function for the built-in. If overload resolution picks the
built-in operator, we perform the appropriate conversions on the
arguments and then let the normal built-in operator take care of it.
There may be some optimization opportunity left: if we can reduce the
number of built-in operator overloads we generate, overload resolution
for these cases will go faster. However, one must be careful when
doing this: GCC generates too few operator overloads in our little
test program, and fails to compile it because none of the overloads it
generates match.
Note that we only support operator overload for non-member binary
operators at the moment. The other operators will follow.
As part of this change, ImplicitCastExpr can now be an lvalue.
llvm-svn: 59148
of copy initialization. Other pieces of the puzzle:
- Try/Perform-ImplicitConversion now handles implicit conversions
that don't involve references.
- Try/Perform-CopyInitialization uses
CheckSingleAssignmentConstraints for C. PerformCopyInitialization
is now used for all argument passing and returning values from a
function.
- Diagnose errors with declaring references and const values without
an initializer. (Uses a new Action callback, ActOnUninitializedDecl).
We do not yet have implicit conversion sequences for reference
binding, which means that we don't have any overloading support for
reference parameters yet.
llvm-svn: 58353
- Do not allow expressions to ever have reference type
- Extend Expr::isLvalue to handle more cases where having written a
reference into the source implies that the expression is an lvalue
(e.g., function calls, C++ casts).
- Make GRExprEngine::VisitCall treat the call arguments as lvalues when
they are being bound to a reference parameter.
llvm-svn: 58306
- CastExpr is the root of all casts
- ImplicitCastExpr is (still) used for all explicit casts
- ExplicitCastExpr is now the root of all *explicit* casts
- ExplicitCCastExpr (new name needed!?) is a C-style cast in C or C++
- CXXFunctionalCastExpr inherits from ExplicitCastExpr
- CXXNamedCastExpr inherits from ExplicitCastExpr and is the root of all
of the C++ named cast expression types (static_cast, dynamic_cast, etc.)
- Added classes CXXStaticCastExpr, CXXDynamicCastExpr,
CXXReinterpretCastExpr, and CXXConstCastExpr to
Also, fixed returned-stack-addr.cpp, which broke once when we fixed
reinterpret_cast to diagnose double->int* conversions and again when
we eliminated implicit conversions to reference types. The fix is in
both testcase and SemaChecking.cpp.
Most of this patch is simply support for the renaming. There's very
little actual change in semantics.
llvm-svn: 58264
- Implement child_begin() and child_end() for AsmStmt. Previously these had stub implementations that did not iterate over the input/output operands of an inline assembly statement.
- Use ExprIterator for performing iteration over input/output operands.
llvm-svn: 58261
aren't trying to compare with address-space qualifiers (for now).
Clean up handing of DeclRefExprs in Expr::isLvalue and refactor part
of the check into a static DeclCanBeLvalue.
llvm-svn: 57980
Changes:
- Sema::IsQualificationConversion determines whether we have a qualification
conversion.
- Sema::CheckSingleAssignment constraints now follows the C++ rules in C++,
performing an implicit conversion from the right-hand side to the type of
the left-hand side rather than checking based on the C notion of
"compatibility". We now rely on the implicit-conversion code to
determine whether the conversion can happen or
not. Sema::TryCopyInitialization has an ugly reference-related
hack to cope with the initialization of references, for now.
- When building DeclRefExprs, strip away the reference type, since
there are no expressions whose type is a reference. We'll need to
do this throughout Sema.
- Expr::isLvalue now permits functions to be lvalues in C++ (but not
in C).
llvm-svn: 57935
Chris Lattner