template<typename T> void f(T x) {
g(x); // g is a dependent name, so don't even bother to look it up
g(); // error: g is not a dependent name
}
Note that when we see "g(", we build a CXXDependentNameExpr. However,
if none of the call arguments are type-dependent, we will force the
resolution of the name "g" and replace the CXXDependentNameExpr with
its result.
GCC actually produces a nice error message when you make this
mistake, and even offers to compile your code with -fpermissive. I'll
do the former next, but I don't plan to do the latter.
llvm-svn: 60618
with implicit quotes around them. This has a bunch of follow-on
effects and requires tweaking to a whole lot of code. This causes
a regression in two tests (xfailed) by causing it to emit things like:
Line 10: duplicate interface declaration for category 'MyClass1' ('Category1')
instead of:
Line 10: duplicate interface declaration for category 'MyClass1(Category1)'
I will fix this in a follow-up commit.
As part of this, I had to start switching stuff to use ->getDeclName() instead
of Decl::getName() for consistency. This is good, but I was planning to do this
as an independent patch. There will be several follow-on patches
to clean up some of the mess, but this patch is already too big.
llvm-svn: 59917
built-in operator candidates. Test overloading of '&' and ','.
In C++, a comma expression is an lvalue if its right-hand
subexpression is an lvalue. Update Expr::isLvalue accordingly.
llvm-svn: 59643
The core fix in Sema::ActOnClassMessage(). All the other changes have to do with passing down the SourceLocation for the receiver (to properly position the cursor when producing an error diagnostic).
llvm-svn: 59639
post-decrement, including support for generating all of the built-in
operator candidates for these operators.
C++ and C have different rules for the arguments to the builtin unary
'+' and '-'. Implemented both variants in Sema::ActOnUnaryOp.
In C++, pre-increment and pre-decrement return lvalues. Update
Expr::isLvalue accordingly.
llvm-svn: 59638
and let the clients push whatever they want into the DiagnosticInfo
instead of hard coding a few forms. Also switch various clients to
use Diag(Tok, ...) instead of Diag(Tok.getLocation(), ...) as the
canonical form to simplify the code a bit.
llvm-svn: 59509
operators. For example, one can now write "x + y" where x or y is a
class or enumeration type, and Clang will perform overload resolution
for "+" based on the overloaded operators it finds.
The other kinds of overloadable operators in C++ will follow this same
approach.
Three major issues remain:
1) We don't find member operators
2) Since we don't have user-defined conversion operators, we can't
call any of the built-in overloaded operators in C++ [over.built].
3) Once we've done the semantic checks, we drop the overloaded
operator on the floor; it doesn't get into the AST at all.
llvm-svn: 58821
operators in C++. Overloaded operators can be called directly via
their operator-function-ids, e.g., "operator+(foo, bar)", but we don't
yet implement the semantics of operator overloading to handle, e.g.,
"foo + bar".
llvm-svn: 58817
-The Parser calls a new "ActOnCXXTypeConstructExpr" action.
-Sema, depending on the type and expressions number:
-If the type is a class, it will treat it as a class constructor. [TODO]
-If there's only one expression (i.e. "int(0.5)" ), creates a new "CXXFunctionalCastExpr" Expr node
-If there are no expressions (i.e "int()" ), creates a new "CXXZeroInitValueExpr" Expr node.
llvm-svn: 55177
-Remove ParseExpressionWithLeadingIdentifier and ParseAssignmentExprWithLeadingIdentifier.
-Separate ParseLabeledStatement from ParseIdentifierStatement.
llvm-svn: 53376
Note that Parser::ParseCXXMemberSpecification is temporarily disabled until the Sema support is in place.
Once ParseCXXMemberSpecification is enabled, the Parser/cxx-class.cpp test will pass.
llvm-svn: 52694
Sebastian Redl