Extend this to support ComputeNumSignBits of the (used) source vector elements so that we can handle more than just the case where we're sext_in_reg from the source element signbit.
Noticed while investigating the poor codegen in D98587.
Add ISD::ABS to the existing unary instructions handling for splat detection
This is similar to D83605, but doesn't appear to need to touch any of the wasm refactoring.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98778
Fixed section of code that iterated through a SmallDenseMap and added
instructions in each iteration, causing non-deterministic code; replaced
SmallDenseMap with MapVector to prevent non-determinism.
This reverts commit 01ac6d1587.
This caused non-deterministic compiler output; see comment on the
code review.
> This patch updates the various IR passes to correctly handle dbg.values with a
> DIArgList location. This patch does not actually allow DIArgLists to be produced
> by salvageDebugInfo, and it does not affect any pass after codegen-prepare.
> Other than that, it should cover every IR pass.
>
> Most of the changes simply extend code that operated on a single debug value to
> operate on the list of debug values in the style of any_of, all_of, for_each,
> etc. Instances of setOperand(0, ...) have been replaced with with
> replaceVariableLocationOp, which takes the value that is being replaced as an
> additional argument. In places where this value isn't readily available, we have
> to track the old value through to the point where it gets replaced.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88232
This reverts commit df69c69427.
This patch addresses a few issues when dealing with scalable-vector
INSERT_SUBVECTOR and EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR nodes.
When legalizing in DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitVecRes_INSERT_SUBVECTOR, we
store the low and high halves to the stack separately. The offset for
the high half was calculated incorrectly.
Additionally, we can optimize this process when we can detect that the
subvector is contained entirely within the low/high split vector type.
While this optimization is valid on scalable vectors, when performing
the 'high' optimization, the subvector must also be a scalable vector.
Note that the 'low' optimization is still conservative: it may be
possible to insert v2i32 into the low half of a split nxv1i32/nxv1i32,
but we can't guarantee it. It is always possible to insert v2i32 into
nxv2i32 or v2i32 into nxv4i32+2 as we know vscale is at least 1.
Lastly, in SelectionDAG::isSplatValue, we early-exit on the extracted subvector value
type being a scalable vector, forgetting that we can also extract a
fixed-length vector from a scalable one.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98495
A 1-bit smulo overflows is both inputs are -1 since the result
should be +1 which can't be represented in a signed 1 bit value.
We can detect this with an AND and a setcc. The multiply result
can also use the same AND.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97634
Use a more general strategy when splitting a vector into scalar parts (and vice-versa) to correctly handle vector types whose element size is not a power of 2 (and a multiple of 8).
Reviewed By: atanasyan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98273
This patch improves salvageDebugInfoImpl by allowing it to salvage arithmetic
operations with two or more non-const operands; this includes the GetElementPtr
instruction, and most Binary Operator instructions. These salvages produce
DIArgList locations and are only valid for dbg.values, as currently variadic
DIExpressions must use DW_OP_stack_value. This functionality is also only added
for salvageDebugInfoForDbgValues; other functions that directly call
salvageDebugInfoImpl (such as in ISel or Coroutine frame building) can be
updated in a later patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91722
Recently gc.result has been marked with readnone instead of readonly and
this opens a door for different optimization to duplicate gc.result.
Statepoint lowering is not ready to see several gc.results.
The problem appears when there are gc.results with one located in the same
basic block and another located in other basic block.
In this case we need both export VR and fill local setValue.
Note that this case is not sufficient optimization done before CodeGen.
It is evident that local gc.result dominates all other gc.results and it is handled
by GVN and EarlyCSE.
But anyway, even if IR is not optimal Backend should not crash on a valid IR.
Reviewers: reames, dantrushin
Reviewed By: dantrushin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98393
On riscv32, i64 isn't a legal scalar type but we would like to
support scalable vectors of i64.
This patch introduces a new node that can represent a splat made
of multiple scalar values. I've used this new node to solve the current
crashes we experience when getConstant is used after type legalization.
For RISCV, we are now default expanding SPLAT_VECTOR to SPLAT_VECTOR_PARTS
when needed and then handling the SPLAT_VECTOR_PARTS later during
LegalizeOps. I've remove the special case I previously put in for
ABS for D97991 as the default expansion is now able to succesfully
use getConstant.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98004
If it was decided to relocate derived pointer using the spill its value is
not exported in general case.
When gc.relocate is located in an another block than a statepoint we cannot
get SD for derived value but for spill case it is not required at all.
However implementation of gc.relocate lowering unconditionally request SD value
causing the assert triggering.
The CL fixes this by handling spill case earlier than SD is really required.
Reviewers: reames, dantrushin
Reviewed By: dantrushin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98324
All extractvalues of the same value at the same index will map to
the same register, so even if one specific extractvalue only has
one use, we should not mark it as a trivial kill, as there may be
more extractvalues later.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49467.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98145
This patch updates the various IR passes to correctly handle dbg.values with a
DIArgList location. This patch does not actually allow DIArgLists to be produced
by salvageDebugInfo, and it does not affect any pass after codegen-prepare.
Other than that, it should cover every IR pass.
Most of the changes simply extend code that operated on a single debug value to
operate on the list of debug values in the style of any_of, all_of, for_each,
etc. Instances of setOperand(0, ...) have been replaced with with
replaceVariableLocationOp, which takes the value that is being replaced as an
additional argument. In places where this value isn't readily available, we have
to track the old value through to the point where it gets replaced.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88232
This patch completes ISel support for DIArgList dbg.values by allowing
SDDbgValues with multiple location operands to be emitted as DBG_VALUE_LIST
instructions.
The primary change of this patch is refactoring EmitDbgValue by pulling location
operand emission out to the new function AddDbgValueLocationOps, which is used
for both DIArgList and single value dbg.values. Outside of that, the only
behaviour change is that the scheduler has a lambda added, HasUnknownVReg, to
prevent us from attempting to emit a DBG_VALUE_LIST before all of its used VRegs
have become available.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88592
This patch introduces a new intrinsic @llvm.experimental.vector.splice
that constructs a vector of the same type as the two input vectors,
based on a immediate where the sign of the immediate distinguishes two
variants. A positive immediate specifies an index into the first vector
and a negative immediate specifies the number of trailing elements to
extract from the first vector.
For example:
@llvm.experimental.vector.splice(<A,B,C,D>, <E,F,G,H>, 1) ==> <B, C, D, E> ; index
@llvm.experimental.vector.splice(<A,B,C,D>, <E,F,G,H>, -3) ==> <B, C, D, E> ; trailing element count
These intrinsics support both fixed and scalable vectors, where the
former is lowered to a shufflevector to maintain existing behaviour,
although while marked as experimental the recommended way to express
this operation for fixed-width vectors is to use shufflevector. For
scalable vectors where it is not possible to express a shufflevector
mask for this operation, a new ISD node has been implemented.
This is one of the named shufflevector intrinsics proposed on the
mailing-list in the RFC at [1].
Patch by Paul Walker and Cullen Rhodes.
[1] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-November/146864.html
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94708
This patch adds partial support in Instruction Selection for dbg.values that use
a DIArgList. This patch does not add support for producing DBG_VALUE_LIST, but
adds the logic for processing DIArgLists within the ISel pass. This change is
largely focused on handleDebugValue and some of the functions that it calls.
Outside of this, salvageDebugInfo and transferDbgValues have been modified to
replace individual operands instead of the entire value; dangling debug info for
variadic debug values is not currently supported (but may be added later).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88589
Similar to the workaround code in ScalarizeVecRes_UnaryOp, ScalarizeVecRes_SETCC
, ScalarizeVecRes_VSELECT, etc.
If we have a case like this:
```
define <1 x half> @func(<1 x float> %x) {
%tmp = fptrunc <1 x float> %x to <1 x half>
ret <1 x half> %tmp
}
```
On AArch64, the <1 x float> is legal. So, this will crash if we call
GetScalarizedVector on it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98208
This patch modifies the class that represents debug values during ISel,
SDDbgValue, to support multiple location operands (to represent a dbg.value that
uses a DIArgList). Part of this class's functionality has been split off into a
new class, SDDbgOperand.
The new class SDDbgOperand represents a single value, corresponding to an SSA
value or MachineOperand in the IR and MIR respectively. Members of SDDbgValue
that were previously related to that specific value (as opposed to the
variable or DIExpression), such as the Kind enum, have been moved to
SDDbgOperand. SDDbgValue now contains an array of SDDbgOperand instead, allowing
it to hold more than one of these values.
All changes outside SDDbgValue are simply updates to use the new interface.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88585
This patch updates DbgVariableIntrinsics to support use of a DIArgList for the
location operand, resulting in a significant change to its interface. This patch
does not update all IR passes to support multiple location operands in a
dbg.value; the only change is to update the DbgVariableIntrinsic interface and
its uses. All code outside of the intrinsic classes assumes that an intrinsic
will always have exactly one location operand; they will still support
DIArgLists, but only if they contain exactly one Value.
Among other changes, the setOperand and setArgOperand functions in
DbgVariableIntrinsic have been made private. This is to prevent code from
setting the operands of these intrinsics directly, which could easily result in
incorrect/invalid operands being set. This does not prevent these functions from
being called on a debug intrinsic at all, as they can still be called on any
CallInst pointer; it is assumed that any code directly setting the operands on a
generic call instruction is doing so safely. The intention for making these
functions private is to prevent DIArgLists from being overwritten by code that's
naively trying to replace one of the Values it points to, and also to fail fast
if a DbgVariableIntrinsic is updated to use a DIArgList without a valid
corresponding DIExpression.
The result of ISD::USUBSAT will never be larger than the LHS. We
can use this to put a bound on the number of leading zeros.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98133
Implement the promotion rule for SELECT_CC nodes by upcasting all the parameters and downcasting the result.
The AArch64 target makes use of this rule and, since it was not implemented, in some cases the instruction selector would hit an assertion upon encountering the illegal node.
This patch requires D97840, the included test cases hit both problems.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97859
I'm not sure this would catch all such issues, but it would catch some.
The problem for PR49393 was that we were holding a reference to a node that
wasn't connect edto the DAG across a function that could delete unused nodes. In
this particular case we managed to try to use the deleted node while it was in
the deleted state before its memory got recycled.
It could also happen that we delete the node, something allocates a new node
which recycles the memory. Then we try to use the reference we were holding and
it is now a completely different node with different valid opcode. This patch
would not catch that.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97969
For binary or ternary ops we call getNegatedExpression multiple
times and then compare costs. While we're doing this we need to
hold a node from the first call across the second call, but its
not yet attached to the DAG. Its possible the second call creates
an identical node and then decides it didn't need it so will try
to delete it if it has no uses. This can cause a reference to the
node we're holding further up the call stack to become invalidated.
To prevent this, we can use a HandleSDNode to artifically give
the node a use without connecting it to the DAG.
I've used a std::list of HandleSDNodes so we can create handles
only when we have a node to hold. HandleSDNode does not have
default constructor and cannot be copied or moved.
Fixes PR49393.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97914
explicitly emitting retainRV or claimRV calls in the IR
This reapplies ed4718eccb, which was reverted
because it was causing a miscompile. The bug that was causing the miscompile
has been fixed in 75805dce5f.
Original commit message:
Background:
This fixes a longstanding problem where llvm breaks ARC's autorelease
optimization (see the link below) by separating calls from the marker
instructions or retainRV/claimRV calls. The backend changes are in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D92569.
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AutomaticReferenceCounting.html#arc-runtime-objc-autoreleasereturnvalue
What this patch does to fix the problem:
- The front-end adds operand bundle "clang.arc.attachedcall" to calls,
which indicates the call is implicitly followed by a marker
instruction and an implicit retainRV/claimRV call that consumes the
call result. In addition, it emits a call to
@llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use, which consumes the call result, to
prevent the middle-end passes from changing the return type of the
called function. This is currently done only when the target is arm64
and the optimization level is higher than -O0.
- ARC optimizer temporarily emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the calls
with the operand bundle in the IR and removes the inserted calls after
processing the function.
- ARC contract pass emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the call with the
operand bundle. It doesn't remove the operand bundle on the call since
the backend needs it to emit the marker instruction. The retainRV and
claimRV calls are emitted late in the pipeline to prevent optimization
passes from transforming the IR in a way that makes it harder for the
ARC middle-end passes to figure out the def-use relationship between
the call and the retainRV/claimRV calls (which is the cause of
PR31925).
- The function inliner removes an autoreleaseRV call in the callee if
nothing in the callee prevents it from being paired up with the
retainRV/claimRV call in the caller. It then inserts a release call if
claimRV is attached to the call since autoreleaseRV+claimRV is
equivalent to a release. If it cannot find an autoreleaseRV call, it
tries to transfer the operand bundle to a function call in the callee.
This is important since the ARC optimizer can remove the autoreleaseRV
returning the callee result, which makes it impossible to pair it up
with the retainRV/claimRV call in the caller. If that fails, it simply
emits a retain call in the IR if retainRV is attached to the call and
does nothing if claimRV is attached to it.
- SCCP refrains from replacing the return value of a call with a
constant value if the call has the operand bundle. This ensures the
call always has at least one user (the call to
@llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use).
- This patch also fixes a bug in replaceUsesOfNonProtoConstant where
multiple operand bundles of the same kind were being added to a call.
Future work:
- Use the operand bundle on x86-64.
- Fix the auto upgrader to convert call+retainRV/claimRV pairs into
calls with the operand bundles.
rdar://71443534
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92808
This caused miscompiles of Chromium tests for iOS due clobbering of live
registers. See discussion on the code review for details.
> Background:
>
> This fixes a longstanding problem where llvm breaks ARC's autorelease
> optimization (see the link below) by separating calls from the marker
> instructions or retainRV/claimRV calls. The backend changes are in
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D92569.
>
> https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AutomaticReferenceCounting.html#arc-runtime-objc-autoreleasereturnvalue
>
> What this patch does to fix the problem:
>
> - The front-end adds operand bundle "clang.arc.attachedcall" to calls,
> which indicates the call is implicitly followed by a marker
> instruction and an implicit retainRV/claimRV call that consumes the
> call result. In addition, it emits a call to
> @llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use, which consumes the call result, to
> prevent the middle-end passes from changing the return type of the
> called function. This is currently done only when the target is arm64
> and the optimization level is higher than -O0.
>
> - ARC optimizer temporarily emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the calls
> with the operand bundle in the IR and removes the inserted calls after
> processing the function.
>
> - ARC contract pass emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the call with the
> operand bundle. It doesn't remove the operand bundle on the call since
> the backend needs it to emit the marker instruction. The retainRV and
> claimRV calls are emitted late in the pipeline to prevent optimization
> passes from transforming the IR in a way that makes it harder for the
> ARC middle-end passes to figure out the def-use relationship between
> the call and the retainRV/claimRV calls (which is the cause of
> PR31925).
>
> - The function inliner removes an autoreleaseRV call in the callee if
> nothing in the callee prevents it from being paired up with the
> retainRV/claimRV call in the caller. It then inserts a release call if
> claimRV is attached to the call since autoreleaseRV+claimRV is
> equivalent to a release. If it cannot find an autoreleaseRV call, it
> tries to transfer the operand bundle to a function call in the callee.
> This is important since the ARC optimizer can remove the autoreleaseRV
> returning the callee result, which makes it impossible to pair it up
> with the retainRV/claimRV call in the caller. If that fails, it simply
> emits a retain call in the IR if retainRV is attached to the call and
> does nothing if claimRV is attached to it.
>
> - SCCP refrains from replacing the return value of a call with a
> constant value if the call has the operand bundle. This ensures the
> call always has at least one user (the call to
> @llvm.objc.clang.arc.noop.use).
>
> - This patch also fixes a bug in replaceUsesOfNonProtoConstant where
> multiple operand bundles of the same kind were being added to a call.
>
> Future work:
>
> - Use the operand bundle on x86-64.
>
> - Fix the auto upgrader to convert call+retainRV/claimRV pairs into
> calls with the operand bundles.
>
> rdar://71443534
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92808
This reverts commit ed4718eccb.
This function isn't exercised in lit tests today today according to
the code coverage report. But will be after the tests in D97543 and
D97559.
Posting this patch to help a crash that Fraser hit.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97582
This prepares codegen for a change that will remove the identical
folds from IR because they are not poison-safe. See
D93065 / D97360
for details.
We already generically support scalar types, and there are various
target-specific transforms that overlap the vector folds. For example,
x86 recognizes the and patterns, but not or. We can end up with 1
extra instruction there, but I think that is still preferred over the
blendv alternative that loads a constant vector.
If this is not optimal, then it should be fixed with a later transform
(this change is not expected to result in any regressions because
InstCombine currently does the same thing).
Removing custom code and supporting undefs in constant-pattern-matching
can be follow-up changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97730
The code previously used two BUILD_PAIRs to concatenate the two UMULO
results with 0s in the lower bits to match original VT. Then it created
an ADD and a UADDO with the original bit width. Each of those operations
need to be expanded since they have illegal types.
Since we put 0s in the lower bits before the ADD, the lower half of the
ADD result will be 0. So the lower half of the UADDO result is
solely determined by the other operand. Since the UADDO need to
be split in half, we don't really needd an operation for the lower
bits. Unfortunately, we don't see that in type legalization and end up
creating something more complicated and DAG combine or
lowering aren't always able to recover it.
This patch directly generates the narrower ADD and UADDO to avoid
needing to legalize them. Now only the MUL is done on the original
type.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97440
This patch addresses issues arising from the fact that the index type
used for subvector insertion/extraction is inconsistent between the
intrinsics and SDNodes. The intrinsic forms require i64 whereas the
SDNodes use the type returned by SelectionDAG::getVectorIdxTy.
Rather than update the intrinsic definitions to use an overloaded index
type, this patch fixes the issue by transforming the index to the
correct type as required. Any loss of index bits going from i64 to a
smaller type is unexpected, and will be caught by an assertion in
SelectionDAG::getVectorIdxConstant.
The patch also updates the documentation for INSERT_SUBVECTOR and adds
an assertion to its creation to bring it in line with EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR.
This necessitated changes to AArch64 which was using i64 for
EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR but i32 for INSERT_SUBVECTOR. Only one test changed
its codegen after updating the backend accordingly.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97459
Currently dead gc value mentioned in the deopt section are not listed in gc section
and so are processed separately.
With this CL all deopt gc values are considered as base pointers and processed in the
same way as other gc values.
The fact that deopt gc pointer is a base pointer was used all the time but
it is explicitly documented here by putting the value in SI.Base.
The idea of the patch comes from Philip Reames.
Reviewers: reames, dantrushin
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97554
If the type of the deopt operand has an illegal type and we want to use
register for it then it needs to be legalized.
This is not supported currently by legalizer and it is not actually clear how to
legalize this type of values.
Instead we just spill such values and use spill slot location in statepoint.
Originally tests were created by Philip Reames.
Reviewers: reames, dantrushin
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97541
Peeking through AND is only valid if the input to both shifts is
the same. If the inputs are different, then the original pattern
ORs the two values when the masked shift amount is 0. This is ok
if the values are the same since the OR would be a NOP which is
why its ok for rotate.
Fixes PR49365 and reverts PR34641
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97637
Even if the first computeKnownBits call doesn't have any zero
bits it is possible the other operand has bitwidth-1 leading zero.
In that case overflow is still impossible. So always call computeKnownBits
for both operands.
D97247 added the reverse mapping from unwind destination to their
source, but it had a critical bug; sources can be multiple, because
multiple BBs can have a single BB as their unwind destination.
This changes `WasmEHFuncInfo::getUnwindSrc` to `getUnwindSrcs` and makes
it return a vector rather than a single BB. It does not return the const
reference to the existing vector but creates a new vector because
`WasmEHFuncInfo` stores not `BasicBlock*` or `MachineBasicBlock*` but
`PointerUnion` of them. Also I hoped to unify those methods for
`BasicBlock` and `MachineBasicBlock` into one using templates to reduce
duplication, but failed because various usages require `BasicBlock*` to
be `const` but it's hard to make it `const` for `MachineBasicBlock`
usages.
Fixes https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/13514.
(More precisely, fixes
https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/13514#issuecomment-784708744)
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97583
Using ComputeNumSignBits or computeKnownBits we might be able
to determine that overflow is impossible.
This especially helps after type legalization if the type was
promoted from a type with half the bits or more. Type legalization
conservatively creates a promoted smulo/umulo and an overflow
check for the promoted bits. The overflow from the promoted
smulo/umulo is ORed with the result of the promoted bits
overflow check. Proving that the promoted smulo/umulo can never
overflow will leave us with just the promoted bits overflow check.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97160
Simon Pilgrim