Rework template argument checking so that all arguments are type-checked
and cast if necessary.
Add a test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96416
If we instantiate self-referenced anonymous records in foreach and
multiclass, the NAME value will point to incorrect record. It's because
anonymous name is resolved too early.
This patch adds AnonymousNameInit to represent an anonymous record name.
When instantiating an anonymous record, it will update the referred name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95309
Update the documentation and add a test.
Build failed: Change SIZE_MAX to std::numeric_limits<int64_t>::max().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93419
Describe in the BackEnd Developer's Guide. Instrument a few backends.
Remove an old unused timing facility. Add a null backend for timing
the parser.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91388
Summary:
There are a few field init values that are concrete but not complete/foldable (e.g. `?`). This allows for using those values as initializers without erroring out.
Example:
```
class A {
string value = ?;
}
class B<A impl> : A {
let value = impl.value; // This currently emits an error.
let value = ?; // This doesn't emit an error.
}
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74360
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Summary:
These allow you to get and set the operator of a dag node, without
affecting its list of arguments.
`!getop` is slightly fiddly because in many contexts you need its
return value to have a static type more specific than 'any record'. It
works to say `!cast<BaseClass>(!getop(...))`, but it's cumbersome, so
I made `!getop` take an optional type suffix itself, so that can be
written as the shorter `!getop<BaseClass>(...)`.
Reviewers: hfinkel, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71191
This is not a new semantic feature. The syntax `(? 1, 2, 3)` was
disallowed by the parser in a dag //expression//, but there were
already ways to sneak a `?` into the operator field of a dag
//value//, e.g. by initializing it from a class template parameter
which is then set to `?` by the instantiating `def`.
This patch makes `?` in the operator slot syntactically legal, so it's
now easy to construct dags with an unset operator. Also, the semantics
of `!con` are relaxed so that it will allow a combination of set and
unset operator fields in the dag nodes it's concatenating, with the
restriction that all the operators that are //not// unset still have
to agree with each other.
Reviewers: hfinkel, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: hfinkel, nhaehnle
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71195
Using `?` as an optional marker is very useful in Clang's AST-node
emitters because otherwise we need a separate class just to encode
the presence or absence of a base node reference.
Summary:
While working with DagInit's, it's often the case that you expect the
operator to be a reference to a def. This patch adds a wrapper for this
common case to reduce the amount of boilerplate callers need to duplicate
repeatedly.
getOperatorAsDef() returns the record if the DagInit has an operator that is
a DefInit. Otherwise, it prints a fatal error.
There's only a few pre-existing examples in LLVM at the moment and I've
left a few instances of the code this simplifies as they had more specific
error messages than the generic one this produces. I'm going to be using
this a fair bit in my subsequent patches.
Reviewers: bogner, volkan, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Subscribers: nhaehnle, hiraditya, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68424
llvm-svn: 374101
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
Summary:
```
``!listsplat(a, size)``
A list value that contains the value ``a`` ``size`` times.
Example: ``!listsplat(0, 2)`` results in ``[0, 0]``.
```
I plan to use this in X86ScheduleBdVer2.td for LoadRes handling.
This is a little bit controversial because unlike every other binary operator
the types aren't identical.
Reviewers: stoklund, javed.absar, nhaehnle, craig.topper
Reviewed By: javed.absar
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60367
llvm-svn: 358117
These two values correspond to the 'Empty' and 'Tombstone' special
keys defined by DenseMapInfo<int64_t>, which means that neither one
can be used as a key in DenseMap<int64_t, anything>. Hence, if you try
to use either of those values as an int literal, IntInit::get() fails
an assertion when it tries to insert them into its static cache of
int-literal objects.
Fixed by replacing the DenseMap with a std::map, which doesn't intrude
on the space of legal values of the key type.
Reviewers: nhaehnle, hfinkel, javedabsar, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: fhahn, efriedma, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59016
llvm-svn: 355900
Currently one can concatenate strings using hash(#),
but not lists, although that would be a natural thing to do.
This patch allows one to write something like:
def : A<!listconcat([1,2], [3,4])>;
simply as :
def : A<[1,2] # [3,4]>;
This was missing feature was highlighted by Nicolai
at FOSDEM talk.
Reviewed by: nhaehnle, hfinkel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58895
llvm-svn: 355414
Paul C. Anagnostopoulos