Before D94153 this threshold was in a pre-scaled units.
After D94153 inlining threshold multiplier is not applied
to this portion of the threshold anymore. Restore the
threshold by applying the multiplier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98362
Having a custom inliner doesn't really fit in with the new PM's
pipeline. It's also extra technical debt.
amdgpu-inline only does a couple of custom things compared to the normal
inliner:
1) It disables inlining if the number of BBs in a function would exceed
some limit
2) It increases the threshold if there are pointers to private arrays(?)
These can all be handled as TTI inliner hooks.
There already exists a hook for backends to multiply the inlining
threshold.
This way we can remove the custom amdgpu-inline pass.
This caused inline-hint.ll to fail, and after some investigation, it
looks like getInliningThresholdMultiplier() was previously getting
applied twice in amdgpu-inline (https://reviews.llvm.org/D62707 fixed it
not applying at all, so some later inliner change must have fixed
something), so I had to change the threshold in the test.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94153
This was backwards from intended and missing a test. We perhaps should
just ignored the FP mode here, since it shouldn't be legal to mix code
with different default modes in the absence of strictfp.
Summary:
Since the target has no significant advantage of vectorization,
vector instructions bous threshold bonus should be optional.
amdgpu-inline-arg-alloca-cost parameter default value and the target
InliningThresholdMultiplier value tuned then respectively.
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, eraman, hiraditya, haicheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64642
llvm-svn: 366348
AMDGPU uses multiplier 9 for the inline cost. It is taken into account
everywhere except for inline hint threshold. As a result we are penalizing
functions with the inline hint making them less probable to be inlined
than those without the hint. Defaults are 225 for a normal function and
325 for a function with an inline hint. Currently we have effective
threshold 225 * 9 = 2025 for normal functions and just 325 for those with
the hint. That is fixed by this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62707
llvm-svn: 362239
This was skipping GetUnderlyingObject for nonprivate addresses, but an
alloca could also be found through an addrspacecast if it's flat.
llvm-svn: 361649
This is the conservatively correct default. It is always safe to
assume xnack is enabled, but not the converse.
Introduce a feature to blacklist targets where xnack can never be
meaningfully enabled. I'm not sure the targets this is applied to is
100% correct.
llvm-svn: 360903
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
The test should really be checking for the property directly in the
code object headers, but there are problems with this. I don't see
this directly represented in the text form, and for the binary
emission this is depending on a function level subtarget feature to
emit a global flag.
llvm-svn: 357558
Since this can be set with s_setreg*, it should not be a subtarget
property. Set a default based on the calling convention, and Introduce
a new amdgpu-dx10-clamp attribute to override this if desired.
Also introduce a new amdgpu-ieee attribute to match.
The values need to match to allow inlining. I think it is OK for the
caller's dx10-clamp attribute to override the callee, but there
doesn't appear to be the infrastructure to do this currently without
definining the attribute in the generic Attributes.td.
Eventually the calling convention lowering will need to insert a mode
switch somewhere for these.
llvm-svn: 357302
This was inhibiting inlining of library functions when clang was
invoking the inliner directly. This is covering a bit of a mess with
subtarget feature handling, and this shouldn't be a subtarget
feature. The behavior is different depending on whether you are using
a -mattr flag in clang, or llc, opt.
llvm-svn: 353899
Stanislav Mekhanoshin