This change reduces the live range of the loaded function pointer,
resulting in a slight code size decrease (~10KB in clang), and also
improves the security of CFI for virtual calls by making it less
likely that the function pointer will be spilled, and ensuring that
it is not spilled across a function call boundary.
Fixes PR35353.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42725
llvm-svn: 324286
The 'trivial_abi' attribute can be applied to a C++ class, struct, or
union. It makes special functions of the annotated class (the destructor
and copy/move constructors) to be trivial for the purpose of calls and,
as a result, enables the annotated class or containing classes to be
passed or returned using the C ABI for the underlying type.
When a type that is considered trivial for the purpose of calls despite
having a non-trivial destructor (which happens only when the class type
or one of its subobjects is a 'trivial_abi' class) is passed to a
function, the callee is responsible for destroying the object.
For more background, see the discussions that took place on the mailing
list:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-November/055955.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20180101/thread.html#214043
rdar://problem/35204524
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41039
llvm-svn: 324269
Under the Microsoft ABI, it is possible for an object not to have
a virtual table pointer of its own if all of its virtual functions
were introduced by virtual bases. In that case, we need to load the
vtable pointer from one of the virtual bases and perform the type
check using its type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41036
llvm-svn: 320638
Summary:
The MS ABI convention is that the 'this' pointer on entry is the address
of the vfptr that was used to make the virtual method call. In other
words, the pointer on entry always points to the base subobject that
introduced the virtual method. Consider this hierarchy:
struct A { virtual void f() = 0; };
struct B { virtual void g() = 0; };
struct C : A, B {
void f() override;
void g() override;
};
On entry to C::g, [ER]CX will contain the address of C's B subobject,
and C::g will have to subtract sizeof(A) to recover a pointer to C.
Before this change, we applied this adjustment in the prologue and
stored the new value into the "this" local variable alloca used for
debug info. However, MSVC does not do this, presumably because it is
often profitable to fold the adjustment into later field accesses. This
creates a problem, because the debugger expects the variable to be
unadjusted. Unfortunately, CodeView doesn't have anything like DWARF
expressions for computing variables that aren't in the program anymore,
so we have to declare 'this' to be the unadjusted value if we want the
debugger to see the right value.
This has the side benefit that, in optimized builds, the 'this' pointer
will usually be available on function entry because it doesn't require
any adjustment.
Reviewers: hans
Subscribers: aprantl, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40109
llvm-svn: 318440
Fix PR32990 by effectively reverting r283063 and solving it a different
way.
We want to limit the hack to not replace equivalent available_externally
dtors specifically to libc++, which uses always_inline. It seems certain
versions of libc++ do not provide all the symbols that an explicit
template instantiation is expected to provide.
If we get to the code that forms a real alias, only *then* check if this
is available_externally, and do that by asking a better question, which
is "is this a declaration for the linker?", because *that's* what means
we can't form an alias to it.
As a follow-on simplification, remove the InEveryTU parameter. Its last
use guarded this code for forming aliases, but we should never form
aliases to declarations, regardless of what we know about every TU.
llvm-svn: 315656
constructors when deciding whether classes should be passed indirectly.
This fixes ABI differences between Clang and GCC:
* Previously, Clang ignored the move constructor when making this
determination. It now takes the move constructor into account, per
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/17 (this change may
seem recent, but the ABI change was agreed on the Itanium C++ ABI
list a long time ago).
* Previously, Clang's behavior when the copy constructor was deleted
was unstable -- depending on whether the lazy declaration of the
copy constructor had been triggered, you might get different behavior.
We now eagerly declare the copy constructor whenever its deletedness
is unclear, and ignore deleted copy/move constructors when looking for
a trivial such constructor.
This also fixes an ABI difference between Clang and MSVC:
* If the copy constructor would be implicitly deleted (but has not been
lazily declared yet), for instance because the class has an rvalue
reference member, we would pass it directly. We now pass such a class
indirectly, matching MSVC.
Based on a patch by Vassil Vassilev, which was based on a patch by Bernd
Schmidt, which was based on a patch by Reid Kleckner!
This is a re-commit of r310401, which was reverted in r310464 due to ARM
failures (which should now be fixed).
llvm-svn: 310983
constructors when deciding whether classes should be passed indirectly.
This fixes ABI differences between Clang and GCC:
* Previously, Clang ignored the move constructor when making this
determination. It now takes the move constructor into account, per
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/pull/17 (this change may
seem recent, but the ABI change was agreed on the Itanium C++ ABI
list a long time ago).
* Previously, Clang's behavior when the copy constructor was deleted
was unstable -- depending on whether the lazy declaration of the
copy constructor had been triggered, you might get different behavior.
We now eagerly declare the copy constructor whenever its deletedness
is unclear, and ignore deleted copy/move constructors when looking for
a trivial such constructor.
This also fixes an ABI difference between Clang and MSVC:
* If the copy constructor would be implicitly deleted (but has not been
lazily declared yet), for instance because the class has an rvalue
reference member, we would pass it directly. We now pass such a class
indirectly, matching MSVC.
llvm-svn: 310401
The initializer for a static local variable cannot be hot, because it runs at
most once per program. That's not quite the same thing as having a low branch
probability, but under the assumption that the function is invoked many times,
modeling this as a branch probability seems reasonable.
For TLS variables, the situation is less clear, since the initialization side
of the branch can run multiple times in a program execution, but we still
expect initialization to be rare relative to non-initialization uses. It would
seem worthwhile to add a PGO counter along this path to make this estimation
more accurate in future.
For globals with guarded initialization, we don't yet apply any branch weights.
Due to our use of COMDATs, the guard will be reached exactly once per DSO, but
we have no idea how many DSOs will define the variable.
llvm-svn: 309195
In addition to the formal linkage rules, the Modules TS includes cases where
internal-linkage symbols within a module interface unit can be referenced from
outside the module via exported inline functions / templates. We give such
declarations "module-internal linkage", which is formally internal linkage, but
results in an externally-visible symbol.
llvm-svn: 307434
Summary:
If the first parameter of the function is the ImplicitParamDecl, codegen
automatically marks it as an implicit argument with `this` or `self`
pointer. Added internal kind of the ImplicitParamDecl to separate
'this', 'self', 'vtt' and other implicit parameters from other kind of
parameters.
Reviewers: rjmccall, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33735
llvm-svn: 305075
Summary:
We can emit vtable definition having inline function
if they are all emitted.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33437
llvm-svn: 304394
This patch makes use of the prefix/suffix ABI argument distinction that
was introduced in r295870, so that we now emit ExtParameterInfo at the
correct offset for member calls that have added ABI arguments. I don't
see a good way to test the generated param info, since we don't actually
seem to use it in CGFunctionInfo outside of Swift. Any
suggestions/thoughts for how to better test this are welcome. :)
This patch also fixes a small bug with inheriting constructors: if we
decide not to pass args into an base class ctor, we would still
generate ExtParameterInfo as though we did. The added test-case is for
that behavior.
llvm-svn: 296024
Meta: The ultimate goal is to teach ExtParameterInfo about
pass_object_size attributes. This is necessary for that, since our
ExtParameterInfo is a bit buggy in C++. I plan to actually make use of
this Prefix/Suffix info in the near future, but I like small
single-purpose changes. Especially when those changes are hard to
actually test...
At the moment, some of our C++-specific CodeGen pretends that ABIs can
only add arguments to the beginning of a function call. This isn't quite
correct: args can be appended to the end, as well. It hasn't mattered
much until now, since we seem to only use this "number of arguments
added" data when calculating the ExtParameterInfo to use when making a
CGFunctionInfo. Said ExtParameterInfo is currently only used for
ParameterABIs (Swift) and ns_consumed (ObjC).
So, this patch allows ABIs to indicate whether args they added were at
the beginning or end of an argument list. We can use this information to
emit ExtParameterInfos more correctly, though like said, that bit is
coming soon.
No tests since this is theoretically a nop.
llvm-svn: 295870
In ThinLTO mode, type metadata will require the module to be written as a
multi-module bitcode file, which is currently incompatible with the Darwin
linker. It is also useful to be able to enable or disable multi-module bitcode
for testing purposes. This introduces a cc1-level flag, -f{,no-}lto-unit,
which is used by the driver to enable multi-module bitcode on all but
Darwin+ThinLTO, and can also be used to enable/disable the feature manually.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28877
llvm-svn: 292448
The MS ABI RTTI has a reserved field which is used as a cache for the
demangled name. It must be zero-initialized, which is used as a hint by
the runtime to say that the cache has not been populated. Since this
field is populated at runtime, the RTTI structures must be placed in the
.data section rather than .rdata. NFC
llvm-svn: 290799
Properly attribute DLL storage to runtime functions. When generating the
runtime function, scan for an existing declaration which may provide an explicit
declaration (local storage) or a DLL import or export storage from the user.
Honour that if available. Otherwise, if building with a local visibility of the
public or standard namespaces (-flto-visibility-public-std), give the symbols
local storage (it indicates a /MT[d] link, so static runtime). Otherwise,
assume that the link is dynamic, and give the runtime function dllimport
storage.
This allows for implementations to get the correct storage as long as they are
properly declared, the user to override the import storage, and in case no
explicit storage is given, use of the import storage.
llvm-svn: 289776
In a future change, this representation will allow us to use the new inrange
annotation on getelementptr to allow the optimizer to split vtable groups.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22296
llvm-svn: 289584
The problem only happen on window ( A MS-ABI issuer )
The nature of the problem is virtual base dtor called more than it is needed after exception throw in inheriting base class(with virtual bases) ctor.
The root problem is when throw happen, not all virtual base classes have been contructed, so not all virtual base dtors are need to call for ehcleanup.
clang has code to handle vbase initialization: basically add check for "complete object flag" before call to v-base ctor.
But that part is missing for cleanup code.
To fix this add similar code as v-base init to cleanup code, same algorithm.
1> Add new routine:
EmitDtorCompleteObjectHandler
With corresponding to EmitCtorCompleteObjectHandler
2> In the EmitDestructorCal
Call EmitDtorCompleteObjectHandler when generate ehcleanup inside ctor.
Just add check for "complete object flag" before call to v-base dtor.
Without my change:
ehcleanup: ; preds = %ctor.skip_vbases
%13 = cleanuppad within none [], !dbg !66
%14 = bitcast %struct.class_0* %this1 to i8*, !dbg !66
%15 = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %14, i64 8, !dbg !66
%16 = bitcast i8* %15 to %struct.class_2*, !dbg !66
call void @"\01??1class_2@@UEAA@XZ"(%struct.class_2* %16) #6 [ "funclet"(token
%13) ], !dbg !66
cleanupret from %13 unwind to caller, !dbg !66
with my change:
ehcleanup: ; preds = %ctor.skip_vbases
%13 = cleanuppad within none [], !dbg !66
%14 = bitcast %struct.class_0* %this1 to i8*, !dbg !66
%15 = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %14, i64 8, !dbg !66
%16 = bitcast i8* %15 to %struct.class_2*, !dbg !66
%is_complete_object4 = icmp ne i32 %is_most_derived2, 0, !dbg !66
br i1 %is_complete_object4, label %Dtor.dtor_vbase, label %Dtor.skip_vbase, !d
bg !66
Dtor.dtor_vbase: ; preds = %ehcleanup
call void @"\01??1class_2@@UEAA@XZ"(%struct.class_2* %16) #6 [ "funclet"(token
%13) ], !dbg !66
br label %Dtor.skip_vbase, !dbg !66
Dtor.skip_vbase: ; preds = %Dtor.dtor_vbase, %ehcleanup
cleanupret from %13 unwind to caller, !dbg !66
Please let me know you need more info.
Patch by Jennifer Yu.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27358
llvm-svn: 288869
Summary:
We don't need a side table in ASTContext to hold CXXDefaultArgExprs. The
important part of building the CXXDefaultArgExprs was to ODR use the
default argument expressions, not to make AST nodes. Refactor the code
to only check the default argument, and remove the side table in
ASTContext which wasn't being serialized.
Fixes PR31121
Reviewers: thakis, rsmith, majnemer
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27007
llvm-svn: 287774
This is needed because whether the constructor is deleted can control whether
we pass structs by value directly.
To fix this properly we probably want a more direct way for CodeGen to ask
whether the constructor was deleted.
Fixes PR31049.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26822
llvm-svn: 287600
getClassAtVTableLocation hunts through virtual bases without using the
MDC layout which is indicative of a bug.
Instead, reuse the getVFPtrOffsets machinery to calculate which
subobject within the MDC is responsible for the vfptr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25895
llvm-svn: 285315
abstract information about the callee. NFC.
The goal here is to make it easier to recognize indirect calls and
trigger additional logic in certain cases. That logic will come in
a later patch; in the meantime, I felt that this was a significant
improvement to the code.
llvm-svn: 285258
getClassAtVTableLocation() was calling
ASTRecordLayout::getBaseClassOffset() on a virtual base, causing an
assert.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25779
llvm-svn: 284624
MSVC emits /include directives in the .drective section for the
__dyn_tls_init function (decorated as ___dyn_tls_init@12 for 32-bit).
This fixes PR30347.
llvm-svn: 281189
- Simplify signature of CreateVTableInitializer function.
- Move vtable component builder to a separate function.
- Remove unnecessary accessors from VTableLayout class.
This is in preparation for a future change that will alter the type of the
vtable initializer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22642
llvm-svn: 280897
This isn't exactly what MSVC does, unfortunately. MSVC does not pass
objects with destructors but no copy constructors by address. More ARM
expertise is required to really understand what should be done here.
Fixes PR29136.
llvm-svn: 279764
Summary:
Previously this crashed inside EmitThisParam(). There should be no
prelude for naked functions, so just skip the whole thing.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22715
llvm-svn: 276925
'ReusingBase' was a terrible name. It might actually refer to the most
derived class, which is not a base. 'BaseWithVPtr' was also bad, since
again, it could refer to the most derived class. It was actually the
first base to introduce the vptr, so now it is 'IntroducingObject'.
llvm-svn: 276120
We need to mark the appropriate bits in ThrowInfo and HandlerType so
that the personality routine can correctly handle qualification
conversions.
llvm-svn: 275154
Don't create unnecessary truncations if the result will not be used.
Also prefer preforming math before the truncation, it makes it a little
easier to reason about.
llvm-svn: 274984
A constructor needs to know whether or not it is most derived in order
to determine if it is responsible for virtual bases. Delegating
constructors assumed they were most derived.
llvm-svn: 269465
It makes compiler-rt tests fail if the gold plugin is enabled.
Revert "Rework interface for bitset-using features to use a notion of LTO visibility."
Revert "Driver: only produce CFI -fvisibility= error when compiling."
Revert "clang/test/CodeGenCXX/cfi-blacklist.cpp: Exclude ms targets. They would be non-cfi."
llvm-svn: 267871
Bitsets, and the compiler features they rely on (vtable opt, CFI),
only have visibility within the LTO'd part of the linkage unit. Therefore,
only enable these features for classes with hidden LTO visibility. This
notion is based on object file visibility or (on Windows)
dllimport/dllexport attributes.
We provide the [[clang::lto_visibility_public]] attribute to override the
compiler's LTO visibility inference in cases where the class is defined
in the non-LTO'd part of the linkage unit, or where the ABI supports
calling classes derived from abstract base classes with hidden visibility
in other linkage units (e.g. COM on Windows).
If the cross-DSO CFI mode is enabled, bitset checks are emitted even for
classes with public LTO visibility, as that mode uses a separate mechanism
to cause bitsets to be exported.
This mechanism replaces the whole-program-vtables blacklist, so remove the
-fwhole-program-vtables-blacklist flag.
Because __declspec(uuid()) now implies [[clang::lto_visibility_public]], the
support for the special attr:uuid blacklist entry is removed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18635
llvm-svn: 267784
This patch introduces the -fwhole-program-vtables flag, which enables the
whole-program vtable optimization feature (D16795) in Clang.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16821
llvm-svn: 261767
We gave a VBTable dllimport storage class and external linkage while
also providing an initializer. An initializer is only valid if the
VBTable has available_externally linkage. Fix this by setting the
linkage to available_externally in situ while generating the
initializer.
This fixes PR26686.
llvm-svn: 261535
This reverts commit r260449.
We would supress our emission of vftable definitions if we thought
another translation unit would provide the definition because we saw an
explicit instantiation declaration. This is not the case with
dllimport, we want to synthesize a definition of the vftable regardless.
This fixes PR26569.
llvm-svn: 260548
Referencing a dllimported vtable is impossible in a constexpr
constructor. It would be friendlier to C++ programmers if we
synthesized a copy of the vftable which referenced imported virtual
functions. This would let us initialize the object in a way which
preserves both the intent to import functionality from another DLL while
also making constexpr work.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17061
llvm-svn: 260388
A dllimport'd vtable always points one past the RTTI data, this means
that the initializer will never end up referencing the data. Our
emission is a harmless waste.
llvm-svn: 260062
Clang-side cross-DSO CFI.
* Adds a command line flag -f[no-]sanitize-cfi-cross-dso.
* Links a runtime library when enabled.
* Emits __cfi_slowpath calls is bitset test fails.
* Emits extra hash-based bitsets for external CFI checks.
* Sets a module flag to enable __cfi_check generation during LTO.
This mode does not yet support diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 255694
`pass_object_size` is our way of enabling `__builtin_object_size` to
produce high quality results without requiring inlining to happen
everywhere.
A link to the design doc for this attribute is available at the
Differential review link below.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13263
llvm-svn: 254554
Certain CXXConstructExpr nodes require zero-initialization before a
constructor is called. We had a bug in the case where the constructor
is called on a virtual base: we zero-initialized the base's vbptr field.
A complementary bug is present in MSVC where no zero-initialization
occurs for the subobject at all.
This fixes PR25370.
llvm-svn: 251783
attributes to internal functions.
This patch fixes CodeGenModule::CreateGlobalInitOrDestructFunction to
use SetInternalFunctionAttributes instead of SetLLVMFunctionAttributes
to attach function attributes to internal functions.
Also, make sure the correct CGFunctionInfo is passed instead of always
passing what arrangeNullaryFunction returns.
rdar://problem/20828324
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13610
llvm-svn: 251734
This avoids building a fake LLVM IR global variable just to ferry an i32
down into LLVM codegen. It also puts a nail in the coffin of using MS
ABI C++ EH with landingpads, since now we'll assert in the lpad code
when flags are present.
llvm-svn: 247843
These are a few cleanups I happened to have from trying to go in a
different direction recently, so just flushing them out while I have
them.
llvm-svn: 247593
This was the wrong direction to take anyway (because ultimately the
GlobalValue needed the pointee type again and /it/ used
PointerType::getElementType eventually anyway)... let's go a different way.
This reverts commit r236161.
llvm-svn: 247586
The type of a member pointer is incomplete if it has no inheritance
model. This lets us reuse more general logic already embedded in clang.
llvm-svn: 247346
It seems that there is small bug, and we can't generate assume loads
when some virtual functions have internal visibiliy
This reverts commit 982bb7d966947812d216489b3c519c9825cacbf2.
llvm-svn: 247332
Generating call assume(icmp %vtable, %global_vtable) after constructor
call for devirtualization purposes.
For more info go to:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-July/044227.html
Edit:
Fixed version because of PR24479.
After this patch got reverted because of ScalarEvolution bug (D12719)
Merged after John McCall big patch (Added Address).
http://reviews.llvm.org/D11859
llvm-svn: 247199
Introduce an Address type to bundle a pointer value with an
alignment. Introduce APIs on CGBuilderTy to work with Address
values. Change core APIs on CGF/CGM to traffic in Address where
appropriate. Require alignments to be non-zero. Update a ton
of code to compute and propagate alignment information.
As part of this, I've promoted CGBuiltin's EmitPointerWithAlignment
helper function to CGF and made use of it in a number of places in
the expression emitter.
The end result is that we should now be significantly more correct
when performing operations on objects that are locally known to
be under-aligned. Since alignment is not reliably tracked in the
type system, there are inherent limits to this, but at least we
are no longer confused by standard operations like derived-to-base
conversions and array-to-pointer decay. I've also fixed a large
number of bugs where we were applying the complete-object alignment
to a pointer instead of the non-virtual alignment, although most of
these were hidden by the very conservative approach we took with
member alignment.
Also, because IRGen now reliably asserts on zero alignments, we
should no longer be subject to an absurd but frustrating recurring
bug where an incomplete type would report a zero alignment and then
we'd naively do a alignmentAtOffset on it and emit code using an
alignment equal to the largest power-of-two factor of the offset.
We should also now be emitting much more aggressive alignment
attributes in the presence of over-alignment. In particular,
field access now uses alignmentAtOffset instead of min.
Several times in this patch, I had to change the existing
code-generation pattern in order to more effectively use
the Address APIs. For the most part, this seems to be a strict
improvement, like doing pointer arithmetic with GEPs instead of
ptrtoint. That said, I've tried very hard to not change semantics,
but it is likely that I've failed in a few places, for which I
apologize.
ABIArgInfo now always carries the assumed alignment of indirect and
indirect byval arguments. In order to cut down on what was already
a dauntingly large patch, I changed the code to never set align
attributes in the IR on non-byval indirect arguments. That is,
we still generate code which assumes that indirect arguments have
the given alignment, but we don't express this information to the
backend except where it's semantically required (i.e. on byvals).
This is likely a minor regression for those targets that did provide
this information, but it'll be trivial to add it back in a later
patch.
I partially punted on applying this work to CGBuiltin. Please
do not add more uses of the CreateDefaultAligned{Load,Store}
APIs; they will be going away eventually.
llvm-svn: 246985
There was linker problem, and it turns out that it is not always safe
to refer to vtable. If the vtable is used, then we can refer to it
without any problem, but because we don't know when it will be used or
not, we can only check if vtable is external or it is safe to to emit it
speculativly (when class it doesn't have any inline virtual functions).
It should be fixed in the future.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12385
llvm-svn: 246214
Summary:
The signatures of the methods in LLVM for creating EH pads/rets are changing
to require token arguments on rets and assume token return type on pads.
Update creation code accordingly.
Reviewers: majnemer, rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12109
llvm-svn: 245798
After r244870 flush() will only compare two null pointers and return,
doing nothing but wasting run time. The call is not required any more
as the stream and its SmallString are always in sync.
Thanks to David Blaikie for reviewing.
llvm-svn: 244928
The new EH instructions make it possible for LLVM to generate .xdata
tables that the MSVC personality routines will be happy about. Because
this is experimental, hide it behind a -cc1 flag (-fnew-ms-eh).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11405
llvm-svn: 243767
Generating available_externally vtables for optimizations purposes.
Unfortunatelly ItaniumABI doesn't guarantee that we will be able to
refer to virtual inline method by name.
But when we don't have any inline virtual methods, and key function is
not defined in this TU, we can generate that there will be vtable and
mark it as available_externally.
This is patch will help devirtualize better.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11441
llvm-svn: 243090
- Make it a proper random access iterator with a little help from iterator_adaptor_base
- Clean up users of magic dereferencing. The iterator should behave like an Expr **.
- Make it an implementation detail of Stmt. This allows inlining of the assertions.
llvm-svn: 242608
We were previously creating bit set entries at virtual table offset
sizeof(void*) unconditionally under the Microsoft C++ ABI. This is incorrect
if RTTI data is disabled; in that case the "address point" is at offset
0. This change modifies bit set emission to take into account whether RTTI
data is being emitted.
Also make a start on a blacklisting scheme for records.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11048
llvm-svn: 241845
We had two separate paths for member pointer conversion: one which
takes a constant and another which takes an arbitrary value. In the
latter case, we are permitted to construct arbitrary instructions.
It turns out that the bulk of the member pointer conversion is sharable
if we construct an artificial IRBuilder.
llvm-svn: 240921
Virtual inheritance member pointers are always relative to the vbindex,
even when the member pointer doesn't point into a virtual base. This is
corrected by adjusting the non-virtual offset backwards from the vbptr
back to the top of the most derived class. While we performed this
adjustment when manifesting member pointers as constants or when
performing conversions, we didn't perform the adjustment when mangling
them.
llvm-svn: 240453
Member pointers in the MS ABI are made complicated due to the following:
- Virtual methods in the most derived class (MDC) might live in a
vftable in a virtual base.
- There are four different representations of member pointer: single
inheritance, multiple inheritance, virtual inheritance and the "most
general" representation.
- Bases might have a *more* general representation than classes which
derived from them, a most surprising result.
We believed that we could treat all member pointers as-if they were a
degenerate case of the multiple inheritance model. This fell apart once
we realized that implementing standard member pointers using this ABI
requires referencing members with a non-zero vbindex.
On a bright note, all but the virtual inheritance model operate rather
similarly. The virtual inheritance member pointer representation
awkwardly requires a virtual base adjustment in order to refer to
entities in the MDC.
However, the first virtual base might be quite far from the start of the
virtual base. This means that we must add a negative non-virtual
displacement.
However, things get even more complicated. The most general
representation interprets vbindex zero differently from the virtual
inheritance model: it doesn't reference the vbtable at all.
It turns out that this complexity can increase for quite some time:
consider a derived to base conversion from the most general model to the
multiple inheritance model...
To manage this complexity we introduce a concept of "normalized" member
pointer which allows us to treat all three models as the most general
model. Then we try to figure out how to map this generalized member
pointer onto the destination member pointer model. I've done my best to
furnish the code with comments explaining why each adjustment is
performed.
This fixes PR23878.
llvm-svn: 240384
The MS ABI has very complicated member pointers. Don't attempt to
synthesize the final member pointer ab ovo usque ad mala in one go.
Instead, start with a member pointer which points to the declaration in
question as-if it's decl context was the target class. Then, utilize
our conversion logical to convert it to the target type.
This allows us to simplify how we think about member pointers because we
don't need to consider non-zero nv adjustments before we even generate
the member pointer. Furthermore, it gives our adjustment logic more
exposure by utilizing it in a common path.
llvm-svn: 240383
Peter Collingbourne