lit is not very clever when it performs substitution on RUN lines. It
simply looks for a match anywhere in the line (without tokenization)
and replaces it by the expansion. This means that a RUN line containing
e.g. `-verify-ignore-unexpected=note` wouod be expanded to
`-verify-ignore-unexpected=<substitution for not>e`, which is
surprising and nonsensical.
It also means that something like `%compile_module` could be expanded
to `<substitution-for-%compile>_module` or to the correct substitution,
depending on the order in which substitutions are evaluated by lit.
To avoid such problems, it is a good habit to delimit custom substitutions
with some token. This commit does that for all substitutions used in the
libc++ and libc++abi test suites.
Forcing -Werror and other warnings means that the test suite isn't
actually testing what most people are seeing in their code -- it seems
better and less arbitrary to compile these tests as close as possible
to the compiler default instead.
Removing -Werror also means that we get to differentiate between
diagnostics that are errors and those that are warnings, which makes
the test suite more precise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76311
Some tests do not fail at all when -verify is not supported, unless some
arbitrary warning flag is added to make them fail. We currently used
-Werror=unused-result to make them fail, but doing so makes the test
suite a lot more inscrutable. It seems better to just disable those
tests when -verify is not supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76256
[libcxx] [test] Calling min and max on an empty valarray is UB.
libcxx/test/std/numerics/numarray/template.valarray/valarray.members/min.pass.cpp
libcxx/test/std/numerics/numarray/template.valarray/valarray.members/max.pass.cpp
The calls `v1.min();` and `v1.max();` were emitting nodiscard warnings
with MSVC's STL. Upon closer inspection, these calls were triggering
undefined behavior. N4842 [valarray.members] says:
"T min() const;
8 Preconditions: size() > 0 is true.
T max() const;
10 Preconditions: size() > 0 is true."
As these tests already provide coverage for non-empty valarrays
(immediately above), I've simply deleted the code for empty valarrays.
[libcxx] [test] Add macros to msvc_stdlib_force_include.h (NFC).
libcxx/test/support/msvc_stdlib_force_include.h
These macros are being used by:
libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.trans/meta.trans.other/result_of11.pass.cpp
Defining them to nothing allows that test to pass.
[libcxx] [test] Silence MSVC warning C5063 for is_constant_evaluated (NFC).
libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.const.eval/is_constant_evaluated.pass.cpp
This test is intentionally writing code that MSVC intentionally warns
about, so the warning should be silenced.
Additionally, comment an endif for clarity.
[libcxx] [test] Silence MSVC warning C4127 (NFC).
libcxx/test/support/charconv_test_helpers.h
MSVC avoids emitting this warning when it sees a single constexpr value
being tested, but this condition is a mix of compile-time and run-time.
Using push-disable-pop is the least intrusive way to silence this.
[libcxx] [test] Silence MSVC truncation warning (NFC).
libcxx/test/std/containers/sequences/vector/vector.cons/construct_iter_iter.pass.cpp
This test is intentionally truncating float to int, which MSVC
intentionally warns about, so push-disable-pop is necessary.
[libcxx] [test] Avoid truncation warnings in erase_if tests (NFC).
libcxx/test/std/containers/associative/map/map.erasure/erase_if.pass.cpp
libcxx/test/std/containers/associative/multimap/multimap.erasure/erase_if.pass.cpp
libcxx/test/std/containers/unord/unord.map/erase_if.pass.cpp
libcxx/test/std/containers/unord/unord.multimap/erase_if.pass.cpp
These tests use maps with `short` keys and values, emitting MSVC
truncation warnings from `int`. Adding `static_cast` to `key_type`
and `mapped_type` avoids these warnings.
As these tests require C++20 mode (or newer), for brevity I've changed
the multimap tests to use emplace to initialize the test data.
This has no effect on the erase_if testing.
* Silence unused-local-typedef warnings: `map.cons/assign_initializer_list.pass.cpp` (and the `set.cons` variant) uses a local typedef only within `LIBCPP_ASSERT`s, so clang diagnoses it as unused when testing non-libc++.
* Add missing include: `c.math/abs.pass.cpp` uses `std::numeric_limits` but failed to `#include <limits>`.
* Don't test non-type: A "recent" change to `meta.trans.other/underlying_type.pass.cpp` unconditionally tests the type `F` which is conditionally defined.
* Use `hash<long long>` instead of `hash<short>` with `int` in `unordered_meow` deduction guide tests to avoid truncation warnings.
* Convert `3.14` explicitly in `midpoint.float.pass` since MSVC incorrectly diagnoses `float meow = 3.14;` as truncating.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68681
llvm-svn: 374248
When assigning an initializer list into set/map, libc++ would
leak memory if the initializer list contained equivalent keys
because we failed to check if the insertion was successful.
llvm-svn: 365840
This is a re-application of r362986 (which was reverted in r363688) with fixes
for the issue that caused it to be reverted.
Thanks to Arthur O'Dwyer for the patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58587
llvm-svn: 363968
This was found to be broken on Clang trunk. This is a revert of the
following commits (the subsequent commits added XFAILs to the tests
that were missing from the original submission):
r362986: Implement deduction guides for map/multimap.
r363014: Add some XFAILs
r363097: Add more XFAILs
r363197: Add even more XFAILs
llvm-svn: 363688
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
This patch adds tests to ensure that multiset/unordered_multiset's emplace
method correctly constructs the elements without any intervening
constructions.
llvm-svn: 346743
This commit adds a merge member function to all the map and set containers,
which splices nodes from the source container. This completes support for
P0083r3.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48896
llvm-svn: 345744
This commit adds a node handle type, (located in __node_handle), and adds
extract() and insert() members to all map and set types, as well as their
implementations in __tree and __hash_table.
The second half of this feature is adding merge() members, which splice nodes
in bulk from one container into another. This will be committed in a follow-up.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46845
llvm-svn: 338472
Patch from Joe Loser.
Several unit tests meaning to test the behavior of lvalue insertion incorrectly
pass rvalues. Fixes bug PR # 27394
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D44411
llvm-svn: 329541
Patch from ngolovliov@gmail.com
Reviewed as: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42344
As described in llvm.org/PR30959, the current
implementation of std::{map, key}::{count, equal_range} in libcxx is
non-conforming. Quoting the C++14 standard [associative.reqmts]p3
> The phrase “equivalence of keys” means the equivalence relation imposed by
> the comparison and not the operator== on keys. That is, two keys k1 and k2 are
> considered to be equivalent if for the comparison object comp,
> comp(k1, k2) == false && comp(k2, k1) == false.
In the same section, the requirements table states the following:
> a.equal_range(k) equivalent to make_pair(a.lower_bound(k), a.upper_bound(k))
> a.count(k) returns the number of elements with key equivalent to k
The behaviour of libstdc++ seems to conform to the standard here.
llvm-svn: 324799
Louis Dionne