This is a follow up discussed in the comments of D66583.
Currently, if for example, we have both StOther and Other set in YAML document for a symbol,
then yaml2obj reports an "unknown key 'Other'" error.
It happens because 'mapOptional()' is never called for 'Other/Visibility' in this case,
leaving those unhandled.
This message does not describe the reason of the error well. This patch fixes it.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66642
llvm-svn: 370032
This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40337.
Previously, it was always assumed that relocations referenced symbols in the static symbol table.
Now, if the Link field references a section called ".dynsym" it will look up these symbols
in the dynamic symbol table.
This patch is heavily based on D59097 by James Henderson
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66532
llvm-svn: 369645
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
In some cases a symbol might have section index == SHN_XINDEX.
This is an escape value indicating that the actual section header index
is too large to fit in the containing field.
Then the SHT_SYMTAB_SHNDX section is used. It contains the 32bit values
that stores section indexes.
ELF gABI says that there can be multiple SHT_SYMTAB_SHNDX sections,
i.e. for example one for .symtab and one for .dynsym
(1) https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/generic-abi/-XJAV5d8PRg
(2) DT_SYMTAB_SHNDX: http://www.sco.com/developers/gabi/latest/ch5.dynamic.html
In this patch I am only supporting a single SHT_SYMTAB_SHNDX associated
with a .symtab. This is a more or less common case which is used a few tests I saw in LLVM.
I decided not to create the SHT_SYMTAB_SHNDX section as "implicit",
but implement is like a kind of regular section for now.
i.e. tools do not recreate this section or its content, like they do for
symbol table sections, for example. That should allow to write all kind of
possible broken test cases for our needs and keep the output closer to requested.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65446
llvm-svn: 368272
George Rimar