Summary:
I've implemented them as target-specific IR intrinsics rather than
using `@llvm.experimental.vector.reduce.add`, on the grounds that the
'experimental' intrinsic doesn't currently have much code generation
benefit, and my replacements encapsulate the sign- or zero-extension
so that you don't expose the illegal MVE vector type (`<4 x i64>`) in
IR.
The machine instructions come in two versions: with and without an
input accumulator. My new IR intrinsics, like the 'experimental' one,
don't take an accumulator parameter: we represent that by just adding
on the input value using an ordinary i32 or i64 add. So if you write
the `vaddvaq` C-language intrinsic with an input accumulator of zero,
it can be optimised to VADDV, and conversely, if you write something
like `x += vaddvq(y)` then that can be combined into VADDVA.
Most of this is achieved in isel lowering, by converting these IR
intrinsics into the existing `ARMISD::VADDV` family of custom SDNode
types. For the difficult case (64-bit accumulators), isel lowering
already implements the optimization of folding an addition into a
VADDLV to make a VADDLVA; so once we've made a VADDLV, our job is
already done, except that I had to introduce a parallel set of ARMISD
nodes for the //predicated// forms of VADDLV.
For the simpler VADDV, we handle the predicated form by just leaving
the IR intrinsic alone and matching it in an ordinary dag pattern.
Reviewers: dmgreen, MarkMurrayARM, miyuki, ostannard
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, danielkiss, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76491
Summary:
These instructions compute multiply+add in integers, with one of the
operands being a splat of a scalar. (VMLA and VMLAS differ in whether
the splat operand is a multiplier or the addend.)
I've represented these in IR using existing standard IR operations for
the unpredicated forms. The predicated forms are done with target-
specific intrinsics, as usual.
When operating on n-bit vector lanes, only the bottom n bits of the
i32 scalar operand are used. So we have to tell that to isel lowering,
to allow it to remove a pointless sign- or zero-extension instruction
on that input register. That's done in `PerformIntrinsicCombine`, but
first I had to enable `PerformIntrinsicCombine` for MVE targets
(previously all the intrinsics it handled were for NEON), and make it
a method of `ARMTargetLowering` so that it can get at
`SimplifyDemandedBits`.
Reviewers: dmgreen, MarkMurrayARM, miyuki, ostannard
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, danielkiss, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76122
The ASRL/LSRL long shifts are generated from 64bit shifts. Once we have
them, it might turn out that enough of the 64bit result was not required
that we can use a smaller shift to perform the same result. As the
smaller shift can in general be folded in more way, such as into add
instructions in one of the test cases here, we can use the demand bit
analysis to prefer the smaller shifts where we can.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75371
Summary:
Instead of generating two i32 instructions for each load or store of a volatile
i64 value (two LDRs or STRs), now emit LDRD/STRD.
These improvements cover architectures implementing ARMv5TE or Thumb-2.
The code generation explicitly deviates from using the register-offset
variant of LDRD/STRD. In this variant, the register allocated to the
register-offset cannot be reused in any of the remaining operands. Such
restriction seems to be non-trivial to implement in LLVM, thus it is
left as a to-do.
Reviewers: dmgreen, efriedma, john.brawn, nickdesaulniers
Reviewed By: efriedma, nickdesaulniers
Subscribers: danielkiss, alanphipps, hans, nathanchance, nickdesaulniers, vvereschaka, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70072
Similar to VADDV and VADDLV that have been added recently, this adds
lowering and patterns for VMLAV, VMLAVA, VMLALV and VMLALVA. They
perform the same roles as the add's, just folding a mul into the same
instruction (and so taking two inputs). As such, they need to be lowered
in the same way as the types are often not legal.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74390
Following on from the extra VADDV lowering, this extends things to
handle VADDLV which allows summing values into a pair of i32 registers,
together treated as a i64. This needs to be done in DAGCombine too as
the types are otherwise illegal, which is a fairly simple addition on
top of the existing code.
There is also a VADDLVA instruction handled here, that adds the incoming
values from the two general purpose registers. As opposed to the
non-long version where we could just add patterns for add(x, VADDV), the
long version needs to handle this early before the i64 has being split
into too many pieces.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74224
On some targets, like SPARC, forming overflow ops is only profitable if
the math result is used: https://godbolt.org/z/DxSmdB
This patch adds a new MathUsed parameter to allow the targets
to make the decision and defaults to only allowing it
if the math result is used. That is the conservative choice.
This patch also updates AArch64ISelLowering, X86ISelLowering,
ARMISelLowering.h, SystemZISelLowering.h to allow forming overflow
ops if the math result is not used. On those targets using the
overflow intrinsic for the overflow check only generates better code.
Reviewers: nikic, RKSimon, lebedev.ri, spatel
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74722
We already make use of the VADDV vector reduction instruction for cases
where the input and the output start out at the same type. The MVE
instruction however will sum into an i32, so if we are summing a v16i8
into an i32, we can still use the same instructions. In terms of IR,
this looks like a sext of a legal type (v16i8) into a very illegal type
(v16i32) and a vecreduce.add of that into the result. This means we have
to catch the pattern early in a DAG combine, producing a target VADDVs/u
node, where the signedness is now important.
This is the first part, handling VADDV and VADDVA. There are also
VADDVL/VADDVLA instructions, which are interesting because they sum into
a 64bit value. And VMLAV and VMLALV, which are interesting because they
also do a multiply of two values. It may look a little odd in places as
a result.
On it's own this will probably not do very much, as the vectorizer will
not produce this IR yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74218
These can be lowered to code sequences using CMPFP and CMPFPE which then get
selected to VCMP and VCMPE. The implementation isn't fully correct, as the chain
operand isn't handled correctly, but resolving that looks like it would involve
changes around FPSCR-handling instructions and how the FPSCR is modelled.
The fp-intrinsics test was already testing some of this but as the entire test
was being XFAILed it wasn't noticed. Un-XFAIL the test and instead leave the
cases where we aren't generating the right instruction sequences as FIXME.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73194
Summary:
In big-endian MVE, the simple vector load/store instructions (i.e.
both contiguous and non-widening) don't all store the bytes of a
register to memory in the same order: it matters whether you did a
VSTRB.8, VSTRH.16 or VSTRW.32. Put another way, the in-register
formats of different vector types relate to each other in a different
way from the in-memory formats.
So, if you want to 'bitcast' or 'reinterpret' one vector type as
another, you have to carefully specify which you mean: did you want to
reinterpret the //register// format of one type as that of the other,
or the //memory// format?
The ACLE `vreinterpretq` intrinsics are specified to reinterpret the
register format. But I had implemented them as LLVM IR bitcast, which
is specified for all types as a reinterpretation of the memory format.
So a `vreinterpretq` intrinsic, applied to values already in registers,
would code-generate incorrectly if compiled big-endian: instead of
emitting no code, it would emit a `vrev`.
To fix this, I've introduced a new IR intrinsic to perform a
register-format reinterpretation: `@llvm.arm.mve.vreinterpretq`. It's
implemented by a trivial isel pattern that expects the input in an
MQPR register, and just returns it unchanged.
In the clang codegen, I only emit this new intrinsic where it's
actually needed: I prefer a bitcast wherever it will have the right
effect, because LLVM understands bitcasts better. So we still generate
bitcasts in little-endian mode, and even in big-endian when you're
casting between two vector types with the same lane size.
For testing, I've moved all the codegen tests of vreinterpretq out
into their own file, so that they can have a different set of RUN
lines to check both big- and little-endian.
Reviewers: dmgreen, MarkMurrayARM, miyuki, ostannard
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73786
Summary: This is a first step before changing the types to llvm::Align and introduce functions to ease client code.
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: arsenm, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, jrtc27, atanasyan, jsji, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73785
Only PPC seems to be using it, and only checks some simple cases and
doesn't distinguish between FP. Just switch to using LLT to simplify
use from GlobalISel.
Summary:
Instead of generating two i32 instructions for each load or store of a volatile
i64 value (two LDRs or STRs), now emit LDRD/STRD.
These improvements cover architectures implementing ARMv5TE or Thumb-2.
Reviewers: dmgreen, efriedma, john.brawn, nickdesaulniers
Reviewed By: efriedma, nickdesaulniers
Subscribers: nickdesaulniers, vvereschaka, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70072
Summary:
Instead of generating two i32 instructions for each load or store of a volatile
i64 value (two LDRs or STRs), now emit LDRD/STRD.
These improvements cover architectures implementing ARMv5TE or Thumb-2.
Reviewers: dmgreen, efriedma, john.brawn
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70072
Now that we have the intrinsics, we can add VLD2/4 and VST2/4 lowering
for MVE. This works the same way as Neon, recognising the load/shuffles
combination and converting them into intrinsics in a pre-isel pass,
which just calls getMaxSupportedInterleaveFactor, lowerInterleavedLoad
and lowerInterleavedStore.
The main difference to Neon is that we do not have a VLD3 instruction.
Otherwise most of the code works very similarly, with just some minor
differences in the form of the intrinsics to work around. VLD3 is
disabled by making isLegalInterleavedAccessType return false for those
cases.
We may need some other future adjustments, such as VLD4 take up half the
available registers so should maybe cost more. This patch should get the
basics in though.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69392
AMDGPU needs to know the FP mode for the function to answer this
correctly when this is removed from the subtarget.
AArch64 had to make this more complicated by using this from an IR
hook, so add an IR typed overload.
The Arm backend will usually return false for isFMAFasterThanFMulAndFAdd,
where both the fused VFMA.f32 and a non-fused VMLA.f32 are usually
available for scalar code. For MVE we don't have the non-fused version
though. It makes more sense for isFMAFasterThanFMulAndFAdd to return
true, allowing us to simplify some of the existing ISel patterns.
The tests here are that non of the existing tests failed, and so we are
still selecting VFMA and VFMS. The one test that changed shows we can
now select from fast math flags, as opposed to just relying on the
isFMADLegalForFAddFSub option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69115
Lower the target independent signed saturating intrinsics to qadd8 and qadd16.
This custom lowers them from a sadd_sat, catching the node early before it is
promoted. It also adds a QADD8b and QADD16b node to mean the bottom "lane" of a
qadd8/qadd16, so that we can call demand bits on it to show that it does not
use the upper bits.
Also handles QSUB8 and QSUB16.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68974
llvm-svn: 375402
The adds both VMOVNt and VMOVNb instruction selection from the appropriate
shuffles. We detect shuffle masks of the form:
0, N, 2, N+2, 4, N+4, ...
or
0, N+1, 2, N+3, 4, N+5, ...
ISel will also try the opposite patterns, with inputs reversed. These are
selected to VMOVNt and VMOVNb respectively.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68283
llvm-svn: 374781
Based on the discussion in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-October/135574.html, the
conclusion was reached that the ARM backend should produce vcmp instead
of vcmpe instructions by default, i.e. not be producing an Invalid
Operation exception when either arguments in a floating point compare
are quiet NaNs.
In the future, after constrained floating point intrinsics for floating
point compare have been introduced, vcmpe instructions probably should
be produced for those intrinsics - depending on the exact semantics
they'll be defined to have.
This patch logically consists of the following parts:
- Revert http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=294945&view=rev and
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=294968&view=rev, which
implemented fine-tuning for when to produce vcmpe (i.e. not do it for
equality comparisons). The complexity introduced by those patches
isn't needed anymore if we just always produce vcmp instead. Maybe
these patches need to be reintroduced again once support is needed to
map potential LLVM-IR constrained floating point compare intrinsics to
the ARM instruction set.
- Simply select vcmp, instead of vcmpe, see simple changes in
lib/Target/ARM/ARMInstrVFP.td
- Adapt lots of tests that tested for vcmpe (instead of vcmp). For all
of these test, the intent of what is tested for isn't related to
whether the vcmp should produce an Invalid Operation exception or not.
Fixes PR43374.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68463
llvm-svn: 374025
Replace with the MachineFunction. X86 is the only user, and only uses
it for the function. This removes one obstacle from using this in
GlobalISel. The other is the more tolerable EVT argument.
The X86 use of the function seems questionable to me. It checks hasFP,
before frame lowering.
llvm-svn: 373292
Arm 8.1-M adds a number of related CSEL instructions, including CSINC, CSNEG and CSINV. These choose between two values given the content in CPSR and a condition, performing an increment, negation or inverse of the false value.
This adds some selection for them, either from constant values or patterns. It does not include CSEL directly, which is currently not always making code better. It is still useful, but we will have to check more carefully where it should and shouldn't be used.
Code by Ranjeet Singh and Simon Tatham, with some modifications from me.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66483
llvm-svn: 370739
Push LR register before calling __gnu_mcount_nc as it expects the value of LR register to be the top value of
the stack on ARM32.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65019
llvm-svn: 369147
We don't yet know how to generate these instructions for MVE. And in the case
of VLD3, we don't even have the instruction. For the moment don't tell the
vectoriser that we have VLD4, just to end up serialising the results.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66009
llvm-svn: 369101
This is extremely specific, but saves three instructions when it's
legal. I don't think the code can be usefully generalized.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65351
llvm-svn: 367492
This removes the VCEQ/VCNE/VCGE/VCEQZ/etc nodes, just using two called VCMP and
VCMPZ with an extra operand as the condition code. I believe this will make
some combines simpler, allowing us to just look at these codes and not the
operands. It also helps fill in a missing VCGTUZ MVE selection without adding
extra nodes for it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65072
llvm-svn: 366934
This adds a DeMorgan combine for OR's of compares to turn them into AND's,
helping prevent them from going into and out of gpr registers. It also fills in
the VCLE and VCLT nodes that MVE can select, allowing it to invert more
compares.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65059
llvm-svn: 366920
This adds support code for building and shuffling i1 predicate registers. It
generally uses two basic principles, either converting the predicate into an
scalar (through a PREDICATE_CAST) and doing scalar operations on it there, or
by converting the register to an full vector register and back.
Some of the code here is a not super efficient but will hopefully cover most
cases of moving i1 vectors around and can be improved in subsequent patches.
Some code by David Sherwood.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65052
llvm-svn: 366890
This adds the very basics for MVE vector predication, adding integer VCMP and
VSEL instruction support. This is done through predicate registers (MVT::v16i1,
MVT::v8i1, MVT::v4i1), but otherwise using same mechanics as NEON to custom
lower setcc's through ARMISD::VCXX nodes (VCEQ, VCGT, VCEQZ, etc).
An extra VCNE was added, as this can be handled sensibly by MVE's expanded
number of VCMP condition codes. (There are also VCLE and VCLT which are added
later).
VPSEL is also added here, simply selecting on the vselect.
Original code by David Sherwood.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65051
llvm-svn: 366885
While lowering test.set.loop.iterations, it wasn't checked how the
brcond was using the result and so the wls could branch to the loop
preheader instead of not entering it. The same was true for
loop.decrement.reg.
So brcond and br_cc and now lowered manually when using the hwloop
intrinsics. During this we now check whether the result has been
negated and whether we're using SETEQ or SETNE and 0 or 1. We can
then figure out which basic block the WLS and LE should be targeting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64616
llvm-svn: 366809
This adjusts the way that we lower NEON shifts to use a DAG target node, not
via a neon intrinsic. This is useful for handling MVE shifts operations in the
same the way. It also renames some of the immediate shift nodes for
consistency, and moves some of the processing of immediate shifts into
LowerShift allowing it to capture more cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64426
llvm-svn: 366051
This adds some handling for VMOVimm, using the same method that NEON uses. We
create VMOVIMM/VMVNIMM/VMOVFPIMM nodes based on the immediate, and select them
using the now renamed ARMvmovImm/etc. There is also an extra 64bit immediate
mode that I have not yet added here.
Code by David Sherwood
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63884
llvm-svn: 365178
Summary:
This is the backend part of [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42457 | PR42457 ]].
In middle-end, we'd want to prefer the form with two adds - D63992,
but as this diff shows, not every target will prefer that pattern.
Out of 4 targets for which i added tests all seem to be ok with inc-of-add for scalars,
but only X86 prefer that same pattern for vectors.
Here i'm adding a new TLI hook, always defaulting to the inc-of-add,
but adding AArch64,ARM,PowerPC overrides to prefer inc-of-add only for scalars.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, efriedma, t.p.northover, hfinkel
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: nemanjai, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, kbarton, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64090
llvm-svn: 365010
Passing a vector type over the soft-float ABI involves it being split
into four GPRs, so the first thing that has to happen at the start of
the function is to recombine those into a vector register. The ABI
types all vectors as v2f64, so we need to support BUILD_VECTOR for
that type, which I do in this patch by allowing it to be expanded in
terms of INSERT_VECTOR_ELT, and writing an ISel pattern for that in
turn. Similarly, I provide a rule for EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT so that a
returned vector can be marshalled back into GPRs.
While I'm here, I've also added ISD::UNDEF to the list of operations
we turn back on in `setAllExpand`, because I noticed that otherwise it
gets expanded into a BUILD_VECTOR with explicit zero inputs, leading
to pointless machine instructions to zero out a vector register that's
about to have every lane overwritten of in any case.
Reviewers: dmgreen, ostannard
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63937
llvm-svn: 364910
If you compile with `-mattr=+mve` (enabling integer MVE instructions
but not floating-point ones), then the scalar FP //registers// exist
and it's legal to move things in and out of them, load and store them,
but it's not legal to do arithmetic on them.
In D60708, the calls to `addRegisterClass` in ARMISelLowering that
enable use of the scalar FP registers became conditionalised on
`Subtarget->hasFPRegs()` instead of `Subtarget->hasVFP2Base()`, so
that loads, stores and moves of those registers would work. But I
didn't realise that that would also enable all the operations on those
types by default.
Now, if the target doesn't have basic VFP, we follow up those
`addRegisterClass` calls by turning back off all the nontrivial
operations you can perform on f32 and f64. That causes several
knock-on failures, which are fixed by allowing the `VMOVDcc` and
`VMOVScc` instructions to be selected even if all you have is
`HasFPRegs`, and adjusting several checks for 'is this a double in a
single-precision-only world?' to the more general 'is this any FP type
we can't do arithmetic on?'. Between those, the whole of the
`float-ops.ll` and `fp16-instructions.ll` tests can now run in
MVE-without-FP mode and generate correct-looking code.
One odd side effect is that I had to relax the check lines in that
test so that they permit test functions like `add_f` to be generated
as tailcalls to software FP library functions, instead of ordinary
calls. Doing that is entirely legal, but the mystery is why this is
the first RUN line that's needed the relaxation: on the usual kind of
non-FP target, no tailcalls ever seem to be generated. Going by the
llc messages, I think `SoftenFloatResult` must be perturbing the code
generation in some way, but that's as much as I can guess.
Reviewers: dmgreen, ostannard
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63938
llvm-svn: 364909
Backend changes to enable WLS/LE low-overhead loops for armv8.1-m:
1) Use TTI to communicate to the HardwareLoop pass that we should try
to generate intrinsics that guard the loop entry, as well as setting
the loop trip count.
2) Lower the BRCOND that uses said intrinsic to an Arm specific node:
ARMWLS.
3) ISelDAGToDAG the node to a new pseudo instruction:
t2WhileLoopStart.
4) Add support in ArmLowOverheadLoops to handle the new pseudo
instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63816
llvm-svn: 364733
MVE adds the lsll, lsrl and asrl instructions, which perform a shift on a 64 bit value separated into two 32 bit registers.
The Expand64BitShift function is modified to accept ISD::SHL, ISD::SRL and ISD::SRA and convert it into the appropriate opcode in ARMISD. An SHL is converted into an lsll, an SRL is converted into an lsrl for the immediate form and a negation and lsll for the register form, and SRA is converted into an asrl.
test/CodeGen/ARM/shift_parts.ll is added to test the logic of emitting these instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63430
llvm-svn: 364654
MVE has instructions to widen as it loads, and narrow as it stores. This adds
the required patterns and legalisation to make them work including specifying
that they are legal, patterns to select them and test changes.
Patch by David Sherwood.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63839
llvm-svn: 364636
This patch adds necessary shuffle vector and buildvector support for ARM MVE.
It essentially adds support for VDUP, VREVs and some VMOVs, which are often
required by other code (like upcoming patches).
This mostly uses the same code from Neon that already generated
NEONvdup/NEONvduplane/NEONvrev's. These have been renamed to ARMvdup/etc and
moved to ARMInstrInfo as they are common to both architectures. Most of the
selection code seems to be applicable to both, but NEON does have some more
instructions making some parts specific.
Most code originally by David Sherwood.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63567
llvm-svn: 364626
This provides the low-level support to start using MVE vector types in
LLVM IR, loading and storing them, passing them to __asm__ statements
containing hand-written MVE vector instructions, and *if* you have the
hard-float ABI turned on, using them as function parameters.
(In the soft-float ABI, vector types are passed in integer registers,
and combining all those 32-bit integers into a q-reg requires support
for selection DAG nodes like insert_vector_elt and build_vector which
aren't implemented yet for MVE. In fact I've also had to add
`arm_aapcs_vfpcc` to a couple of existing tests to avoid that
problem.)
Specifically, this commit adds support for:
* spills, reloads and register moves for MVE vector registers
* ditto for the VPT predication mask that lives in VPR.P0
* make all the MVE vector types legal in ISel, and provide selection
DAG patterns for BITCAST, LOAD and STORE
* make loads and stores of scalar FP types conditional on
`hasFPRegs()` rather than `hasVFP2Base()`. As a result a few
existing tests needed their llc command lines updating to use
`-mattr=-fpregs` as their method of turning off all hardware FP
support.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60708
llvm-svn: 364329
As discussed on D62910, we need to check whether particular types of memory access are allowed, not just their alignment/address-space.
This NFC patch adds a MachineMemOperand::Flags argument to allowsMemoryAccess and allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses, and wires up calls to pass the relevant flags to them.
If people are happy with this approach I can then update X86TargetLowering::allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses to handle misaligned NT load/stores.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63075
llvm-svn: 363179
Summary:
- pr42062
When compiling for MinSize,
ARMTargetLowering::LowerCall decides to indirect
multiple calls to a same function. However,
it disconsiders the limitation that thumb1
indirect calls require the callee to be in a
register from r0 to r3 (llvm limiation).
If all those registers are used by arguments, the
compiler dies with "error: run out of registers
during register allocation".
This patch tells the function
IsEligibleForTailCallOptimization if we intend to
perform indirect calls, as to avoid tail call
optimization.
Reviewers: dmgreen, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62683
llvm-svn: 362366
Simon Tatham