Instruction selection can insert nodes into the underlying list after the root
node so iterating will thereby miss it. We should NOT assume that, the root node
is the last element in the DAG nodelist.
Patch by: steven.zhang (Qing Shan Zhang)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47437
llvm-svn: 333415
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
Vectorized loops with abs() returns incorrect results on POWER9. This patch fixes it.
For example the following code returns negative result if input values are negative though it sums up the absolute value of the inputs.
int vpx_satd_c(const int16_t *coeff, int length) {
int satd = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < length; ++i) satd += abs(coeff[i]);
return satd;
}
This problem causes test failures for libvpx.
For vector absolute and vector absolute difference on POWER9, LLVM generates VABSDUW (Vector Absolute Difference Unsigned Word) instruction or variants.
Since these instructions are for unsigned integers, we need adjustment for signed integers.
For abs(sub(a, b)), we generate VABSDUW(a+0x80000000, b+0x80000000). Otherwise, abs(sub(-1, 0)) returns 0xFFFFFFFF(=-1) instead of 1. For abs(a), we generate VABSDUW(a+0x80000000, 0x80000000).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45522
llvm-svn: 330497
Summary:
r327219 added wrappers to std::sort which randomly shuffle the container before sorting.
This will help in uncovering non-determinism caused due to undefined sorting
order of objects having the same key.
To make use of that infrastructure we need to invoke llvm::sort instead of std::sort.
Note: This patch is one of a series of patches to replace *all* std::sort to llvm::sort.
Refer the comments section in D44363 for a list of all the required patches.
Reviewers: hfinkel, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: nemanjai, kbarton, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44870
llvm-svn: 329535
VSX D-form load/store instructions of POWER9 require the offset be a multiple of 16 and a helper`isOffsetMultipleOf` is used to check this.
So far, the helper handles FrameIndex + offset case, but not handling FrameIndex without offset case. Due to this, we are missing opportunities to exploit D-form instructions when accessing an object or array allocated on stack.
For example, x-form store (stxvx) is used for int a[4] = {0}; instead of d-form store (stxv). For larger arrays, D-form instruction is not used when accessing the first 16-byte. Using D-form instructions reduces register pressure as well as instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45079
llvm-svn: 329377
Currently EVT is in the IR layer only because of Function.cpp needing a very small piece of the functionality of EVT::getEVTString(). The rest of EVT is used in codegen making CodeGen a better place for it.
The previous code converted a Type* to EVT and then called getEVTString. This was only expected to handle the primitive types from Type*. Since there only a few primitive types, we can just print them as strings directly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45017
llvm-svn: 328806
This is used by llvm tblgen as well as by LLVM Targets, so the only
common place is Support for now. (maybe we need another target for these
sorts of things - but for now I'm at least making them correct & we can
make them better if/when people have strong feelings)
llvm-svn: 328395
This patch adds new load/store instructions for integer scalar types
which can be used for X-Form when fed by add with an @tls relocation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43315
llvm-svn: 327635
The instruction sequence used to get the address of the PC into a GPR requires
that we clobber the link register. Doing so without having first saved it in
the prologue leaves the function unable to return. Currently, this sequence is
emitted into the entry block. To ensure the prologue is inserted before this
sequence, disable shrink-wrapping.
This fixes PR33547.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43677
llvm-svn: 325972
Work towards the unification of MIR and debug output by printing
`@foo` instead of `<ga:@foo>`.
Also print target flags in the MIR format since most of them are used on
global address operands.
Only debug syntax is affected.
llvm-svn: 320682
The last of the three patches that https://reviews.llvm.org/D40348 was
broken up into.
Canonicalize the materialization of constants so that they are more likely
to be CSE'd regardless of the bit-width of the use. If a constant can be
materialized using PPC::LI, materialize it the same way always.
For example:
li 4, -1
li 4, 255
li 4, 65535
are equivalent if the uses only use the low byte. Canonicalize it to the
first form.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40348
llvm-svn: 320473
This re-commits everything that was pulled in r314244. The transformation
is off by default (patch to enable it to follow). The code is refactored
to have a single entry-point and provide fine-grained control over patterns
that it selects. This patch also fixes the bugs in the original code.
Everything that failed with the original patch has been re-tested with this
patch (with the transformation turned on). So the patch to turn this on is
soon to follow.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38575
llvm-svn: 319434
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format,
always print registers as lowercase.
* Only debug printing is affected. It now follows MIR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40417
llvm-svn: 319187
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
This header includes CodeGen headers, and is not, itself, included by
any Target headers, so move it into CodeGen to match the layering of its
implementation.
llvm-svn: 317647
This patch add a support of ISD::ZERO_EXTEND in PPCDAGToDAGISel::tryBitPermutation to increase the opportunity to use rotate-and-mask by reordering ZEXT and ANDI.
Since tryBitPermutation stops analyzing nodes if it hits a ZEXT node while traversing SDNodes, we want to avoid ZEXT between two nodes that can be folded into a rotate-and-mask instruction.
For example, we allow these nodes
t9: i32 = add t7, Constant:i32<1>
t11: i32 = and t9, Constant:i32<255>
t12: i64 = zero_extend t11
t14: i64 = shl t12, Constant:i64<2>
to be folded into a rotate-and-mask instruction.
Such case often happens in array accesses with logical AND operation in the index, e.g. array[i & 0xFF];
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37514
llvm-svn: 314655
In the past while, I've committed a number of patches in the PowerPC back end
aimed at eliminating comparison instructions. However, this causes some failures
in proprietary source and these issues are not observed in SPEC or any open
source packages I've been able to run.
As a result, I'm pulling the entire series and will refactor it to:
- Have a single entry point for easy control
- Have fine-grained control over which patterns we transform
A side-effect of this is that test cases for these patches (and modified by
them) are XFAIL-ed. This is a temporary measure as it is counter-productive
to remove/modify these test cases and then have to modify them again when
the refactored patch is recommitted.
The failure will be investigated in parallel to the refactoring effort and
the recommit will either have a fix for it or will leave this transformation
off by default until the problem is resolved.
llvm-svn: 314244
As mentioned in https://reviews.llvm.org/D33718, this simply adds another
pattern to the compare elimination sequence and is committed without a
differential review.
llvm-svn: 314106
As mentioned in https://reviews.llvm.org/D33718, this simply adds another
pattern to the compare elimination sequence and is committed without a
differential review.
llvm-svn: 314073
As mentioned in https://reviews.llvm.org/D33718, this simply adds another
pattern to the compare elimination sequence and is committed without a
differential revision.
llvm-svn: 314062
As mentioned in https://reviews.llvm.org/D33718, this simply adds another
pattern to the compare elimination sequence and is committed without a
differential revision.
llvm-svn: 314060
As mentioned in https://reviews.llvm.org/D33718, this simply adds another
pattern to the compare elimination sequence and is committed without a
differential revision.
llvm-svn: 314055
This patch re-commits the patch that was pulled out due to a
problem it caused, but with a fix for the problem. The fix
was reviewed separately by Eric Christopher and Hal Finkel.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38054
llvm-svn: 313978
The lxv/stxv instructions require an offset that is 0 % 16. Previously we were
selecting lxv/stxv for loads and stores to the stack where the offset from the
slot was a multiple of 16, but the stack slot was not 16 or more byte aligned.
When the frame gets lowered these transform to r(1|31) + slot + offset.
If slot is not aligned, slot + offset may not be 0 % 16.
Now we require 16 byte or more alignment for select lxv/stxv to stack slots.
Includes a testcase that shows both sufficiently and insufficiently aligned
stack slots.
llvm-svn: 312843
- recommitting after fixing a test failure on MacOS
On PPC64, OR (XOR) with a 32-bit immediate can be done with only two instructions, i.e. ori + oris.
But the current LLVM generates three or four instructions for this purpose (and also it clobbers one GPR).
This patch makes PPC backend generate ori + oris (xori + xoris) for OR (XOR) with a 32-bit immediate.
e.g. (x | 0xFFFFFFFF) should be
ori 3, 3, 65535
oris 3, 3, 65535
but LLVM generates without this patch
li 4, 0
oris 4, 4, 65535
ori 4, 4, 65535
or 3, 3, 4
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34757
llvm-svn: 311538
On PPC64, OR (XOR) with a 32-bit immediate can be done with only two instructions, i.e. ori + oris.
But the current LLVM generates three or four instructions for this purpose (and also it clobbers one GPR).
This patch makes PPC backend generate ori + oris (xori + xoris) for OR (XOR) with a 32-bit immediate.
e.g. (x | 0xFFFFFFFF) should be
ori 3, 3, 65535
oris 3, 3, 65535
but LLVM generates without this patch
li 4, 0
oris 4, 4, 65535
ori 4, 4, 65535
or 3, 3, 4
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34757
llvm-svn: 311526
introduce a miscompile bug.
There appears to be a bug where the generated code to extract the sign
bit doesn't work correctly for 32-bit inputs. I've replied to the
original commit pointing out the problem. I think I see by inspection
(and reading the manual for PPC) how to fix this, but I can't be 100%
confident and I also don't know what the best way to test this is.
Currently it seems nearly impossible to get the backend to hit this code
path, but the patch autohr is likely in a better position to craft such
test cases than I am, and based on where the bug is it should be easily
done.
Original commit message for r310346:
"""
[PowerPC] Eliminate compares - add i32 sext/zext handling for SETLE/SETGE
Adds handling for SETLE/SETGE comparisons on i32 values. Furthermore, it
adds the handling for the special case where RHS == 0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34048
"""
llvm-svn: 310809
Adds handling for SETLE/SETGE comparisons on i32 values. Furthermore, it adds
the handling for the special case where RHS == 0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34048
llvm-svn: 310346
Changed method names based on the discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D34986:
getInt64 -> selectI64Imm,
getInt64Count -> selectI64ImmInstrCount.
llvm-svn: 309541
As outlined in the PR, we didn't ensure that displacements for DQ-Form
instructions are multiples of 16. Since the instruction encoding encodes
a quad-word displacement, a sub-16 byte displacement is meaningless and
ends up being encoded incorrectly.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33671.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35007
llvm-svn: 307934
This patch reduces compilation time by avoiding redundant analysis while selecting instructions to create an immediate.
If the instruction count required to create the input number without rotate is 2, we do not need further analysis to find a shorter instruction sequence with rotate; rotate + load constant cannot be done by 1 instruction (i.e. getInt64CountDirectnever return 0).
This patch should not change functionality.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34986
llvm-svn: 307623
PowerPC backend does not pass the current optimization level to SelectionDAGISel and so SelectionDAGISel works with the default optimization level regardless of the current optimization level.
This patch makes the PowerPC backend set the optimization level correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34615
llvm-svn: 306367
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
This patch builds upon https://reviews.llvm.org/rL302810 to add
handling for bitwise logical operations in general purpose registers.
The idea is to keep the values in GPRs as long as possible - only
extracting them to a condition register bit when no further operations
are to be done.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31851
llvm-svn: 304282
This patch is the first in a series of patches to provide code gen for
doing compares in GPRs when the compare result is required in a GPR.
It adds the infrastructure to select GPR sequences for i1->i32 and i1->i64
extensions. This first patch handles equality comparison on i32 operands with
the result sign or zero extended.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31847
llvm-svn: 302810
This patch replaces the separate APInts for KnownZero/KnownOne with a single KnownBits struct. This is similar to what was done to ValueTracking's version recently.
This is largely a mechanical transformation from KnownZero to Known.Zero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32569
llvm-svn: 301620
This will become asan errors once the patch lands that poisons the
memory after free. The x86 change is a hack, but I don't see how to
solve this properly at the moment.
llvm-svn: 300867
Emit clrrdi (extended mnemonic for rldicr) for AND-ing with masks that
clear bits from the right hand size.
Committing on behalf of Hiroshi Inoue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29388
llvm-svn: 296143
1) Explicitly sets mayLoad/mayStore property in the tablegen files on load/store
instructions.
2) Updated the flags on a number of intrinsics indicating that they write
memory.
3) Added SDNPMemOperand flags for some target dependent SDNodes so that they
propagate their memory operand
Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28818
llvm-svn: 293200
Generally, the ISEL is expanded into if-then-else sequence, in some
cases (like when the destination register is the same with the true
or false value register), it may just be expanded into just the if
or else sequence.
llvm-svn: 292154
Generally, the ISEL is expanded into if-then-else sequence, in some
cases (like when the destination register is the same with the true
or false value register), it may just be expanded into just the if
or else sequence.
llvm-svn: 292128
GPRC and GPRC_NOR0 (or the 64bit equivalent) and not just the latter.
GPRC_NOR0 contains ZERO as alternative meaning of r0 and is therefore
not a true subclass of GPRC.
llvm-svn: 285813
This patch corresponds to review:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D25896
It just eliminates the redundant ZExt after a count trailing zeros instruction.
llvm-svn: 285267
https://reviews.llvm.org/D24924
This improves the code generated for a sequence of AND, ANY_EXT, SRL instructions. This is a targetted fix for this special pattern. The pattern is generated by target independet dag combiner and so a more general fix may not be necessary. If we come across other similar cases, some ideas for handling it are discussed on the code review.
llvm-svn: 284983
This is a patch to implement pr30640.
When a 64bit constant has the same hi/lo words, we can use rldimi to copy the low word into high word of the same register.
This optimization caused failure of test case bperm.ll because of not optimal heuristic in function SelectAndParts64. It chooses AND or ROTATE to extract bit groups from a register, and OR them together. This optimization lowers the cost of loading 64bit constant mask used in AND method, and causes different code sequence. But actually ROTATE method is better in this test case. The reason is in ROTATE method the final OR operation can be avoided since rldimi can insert the rotated bits into target register directly. So this patch also enhances SelectAndParts64 to prefer ROTATE method when the two methods have same cost and there are multiple bit groups need to be ORed together.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25521
llvm-svn: 284276
When folding an addi into a memory access that can take an immediate offset, we
were implicitly assuming that the existing offset was zero. This was incorrect.
If we're dealing with an addi with a plain constant, we can add it to the
existing offset (assuming that doesn't overflow the immediate, etc.), but if we
have anything else (i.e. something that will become a relocation expression),
we'll go back to requiring the existing immediate offset to be zero (because we
don't know what the requirements on that relocation expression might be - e.g.
maybe it is paired with some addis in some relevant way).
On the other hand, when dealing with a plain addi with a regular constant
immediate, the alignment restrictions (from the TOC base pointer, etc.) are
irrelevant.
I've added the test case from PR30280, which demonstrated the bug, but also
demonstrates a missed optimization opportunity (i.e. we don't need the memory
accesses at all).
Fixes PR30280.
llvm-svn: 280789
When we have an offset into a global, etc. that is accessed relative to the TOC
base pointer, and the offset is larger than the minimum alignment of the global
itself and the TOC base pointer (which is 8-byte aligned), we can still fold
the @toc@ha into the memory access, but we must update the addis instruction's
symbol reference with the offset as the symbol addend. When there is only one
use of the addi to be folded and only one use of the addis that would need its
symbol's offset adjusted, then we can make the adjustment and fold the @toc@l
into the memory access.
llvm-svn: 280545
When applying our address-formation PPC64 peephole, we are reusing the @ha TOC
addis value with the low parts associated with different offsets (i.e.
different effective symbol addends). We were assuming this was okay so long as
the offsets were less than the alignment of the global variable being accessed.
This ignored the fact, however, that the TOC base pointer itself need only be
8-byte aligned. As a result, what we were doing is legal only for offsets less
than 8 regardless of the alignment of the object being accessed.
Fixes PR28727.
llvm-svn: 280441
The logic in this function assumes that the P8 supports fusion of addis/addi,
but it does not. As a result, there is no advantage to restricting our peephole
application, merging addi instructions into dependent memory accesses, even
when the addi has multiple users, regardless of whether or not we're optimizing
for size.
We might need something like this again for the P9; I suspect we'll revisit
this code when we work on P9 tuning.
llvm-svn: 280440
This is a mechanical change of comments in switches like fallthrough,
fall-through, or fall-thru to use the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro instead.
llvm-svn: 278902
Summary: It triggers exponential behavior when the DAG has many branches.
Reviewers: hfinkel, kbarton
Subscribers: iteratee, nemanjai, echristo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23428
llvm-svn: 278548
We convert `Default` to `NotPIC` so that target independent code
can reason about this correctly.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21394
llvm-svn: 273024
This used to be free, copying and moving DebugLocs became expensive
after the metadata rewrite. Passing by reference eliminates a ton of
track/untrack operations. No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 272512
subclasses. These are not passes proper. We don't support registering
them, they can't be constructed with default arguments, and the ID is
actually in a base class.
Only these two targets even had any boiler plate to try to do this, and
it had to be munged out of the INITIALIZE_PASS macros to work. What's
worse, the boiler plate has rotted and the "name" of the pass is
actually the description string now!!! =/ All of this is completely
unnecessary. No other target bothers, and nothing breaks if you don't
initialize them because CodeGen has an entirely separate initialization
path that is somewhat more durable than relying on the implicit
initialization the way the 'opt' tool does for registered passes.
llvm-svn: 271650
- Where we were returning a node before, call ReplaceNode instead.
- Where we would return null to fall back to another selector, rename
the method to try* and return a bool for success.
- Where we were calling SelectNodeTo, just return afterwards.
Part of llvm.org/pr26808.
llvm-svn: 270283
This is a step towards removing the rampant undefined behaviour in
SelectionDAG, which is a part of llvm.org/PR26808.
We rename SelectionDAGISel::Select to SelectImpl and update targets to
match, and then change Select to return void and consolidate the
sketchy behaviour we're trying to get away from there.
Next, we'll update backends to implement `void Select(...)` instead of
SelectImpl and eventually drop the base Select implementation.
llvm-svn: 268693
This patch removes all weight-related interfaces from BPI and replace
them by probability versions. With this patch, we won't use edge weight
anymore in either IR or MC passes. Edge probabilitiy is a better
representation in terms of CFG update and validation.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15519
llvm-svn: 256263
This branch adds hints for highly biased branches on the PPC architecture. Even
in absence of profiling information, LLVM will mark code reaching unreachable
terminators and other exceptional control flow constructs as highly unlikely to
be reached.
Patch by Tom Jablin!
llvm-svn: 255398
Access to aligned globals gives us a chance to peephole optimize nonzero
offsets. If a struct is 4 byte aligned, then accesses to bytes 0-3 won't
overflow the available displacement. For example:
addis 3, 2, b4v@toc@ha
addi 4, 3, b4v@toc@l
lbz 5, b4v@toc@l(3) ; This is the result of the current peephole
lbz 6, 1(4) ; optimizer
lbz 7, 2(4)
lbz 8, 3(4)
If b4v is 4-byte aligned, we can skip using register 4 because we know
that b4v@toc@l+{1,2,3} won't overflow 32K, and instead generate:
addis 3, 2, b4v@toc@ha
lbz 4, b4v@toc@l(3)
lbz 5, b4v@toc@l+1(3)
lbz 6, b4v@toc@l+2(3)
lbz 7, b4v@toc@l+3(3)
Saving a register and an addition.
Larger alignments allow larger structures/arrays to be optimized.
llvm-svn: 255319
incorrect, as the chosen representative of the weak symbol may not live
with the code in question. Always indirect the access through the TOC
instead.
Patch by Kyle Butt!
llvm-svn: 253708
This revision has introduced an issue that only affects bootstrapped compiler
when it is printing the ASM. It turns out that the new code path taken due to
legalizing a scalar_to_vector of i64 -> v2i64 exposes a missing check in a
micro optimization to change a load followed by a scalar_to_vector into a
load and splat instruction on PPC.
llvm-svn: 251798
PR25157 identifies a bug where a load plus a vector shuffle is
incorrectly converted into an LXVDSX instruction. That optimization
is only valid if the load is of a doubleword, and in the noted case,
it was not. This corrects that problem.
Joint patch with Eric Schweitz, who provided the bugpoint-reduced test
case.
llvm-svn: 250324
PPCISelDAGToDAG has a transformation that generates a rlwimi instruction from
an input pattern that looks like this:
and(or(x, c1), c2)
but the associated logic does not work if there are bits that are 1 in c1 but 0
in c2 (these are normally canonicalized away, but that can't happen if the 'or'
has other users. Make sure we abort the transformation if such bits are
discovered.
Fixes PR24704.
llvm-svn: 246900
XVCMPEQDP is used for VSX v2f64 equality comparisons, but the value type needs
to be v2i64 (as that's the corresponding SETCC type).
Fixes PR24225.
llvm-svn: 245535
SelectionDAG already had begin/end methods for iterating over all
the nodes, but didn't define an iterator_range for us in foreach
loops.
This adds such a method and uses it in some of the eligible places
throughout the backends.
llvm-svn: 242212
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, ted, yaron.keren, rafael, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11028
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241775
From the linker's perspective, an available_externally global is equivalent
to an external declaration (per isDeclarationForLinker()), so it is incorrect
to consider it to be a weak definition.
Also clean up some logic in the dead argument elimination pass and clarify
its comments to better explain how its behavior depends on linkage,
introduce GlobalValue::isStrongDefinitionForLinker() and start using
it throughout the optimizers and backend.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10941
llvm-svn: 241413
When adding little-endian vector support for PowerPC last year, I
inadvertently disabled an optimization that recognizes a load-splat
idiom and generates the lxvdsx instruction. This patch moves the
offending logic so lxvdsx is once again generated.
This pattern is frequently generated by the vectorizer for scalar
loads of an effective constant. Previously the lxvdsx instruction was
wrongly listed as lane-sensitive for the VSX swap optimization (since
both doublewords are identical, swaps are safe). This patch fixes
this as well, so that vectorized code using lxvdsx can now have swaps
removed from the computation.
There is an existing test (@test50) in test/CodeGen/PowerPC/vsx.ll
that checks for the missing optimization. However, vsx.ll was only
being tested for POWER7 with big-endian code generation. I've added
a little-endian RUN statement and expected LE code generation for all
the tests in vsx.ll to give us a bit better VSX coverage, including
what's needed for this patch.
llvm-svn: 241183
Hiroshi Inoue