There was a TODO in genericValueTraversal to provide the context
instruction and due to the lack of it users that wanted one just used
something available. Unfortunately, using a fixed instruction is wrong
in the presence of PHIs so we need to update the context instruction
properly.
Reviewed By: uenoku
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76870
This cannot be triggered right now, as far as I know, but it doesn't
make sense to deduce a constant range on arguments of declarations.
Exposed during testing of AAValueSimplify extensions.
Use DL & ABI information for better alignment deduction, e.g., if a type
is accessed and the ABI specifies an alignment requirement for such an
access we can use it. This is based on a patch by @lebedev.ri and
inspired by getBaseAlign in Loads.cpp.
Depends on D76673.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76674
If we have a must-tail call the callee and caller need to have matching
ABIs. Part of that is alignment which we might modify when we deduce
alignment of arguments of either. Since we would need to keep them in
sync, which is not as simple, we simply avoid deducing alignment for
arguments of the must-tail caller or callee.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76673
We create a lot of AbstractAttributes and they live as long as
the Attributor does. It seems reasonable to allocate them via a
BumpPtrAllocator owned by the Attributor.
Reviewed By: baziotis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76589
Make the attributor pass aware of aligned_alloc for converting heap
allocations to stack ones.
Depends on D76971.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76974
Minor update/fixes to comments for the Attributor pass, and dyn_cast -> cast.
Signed-off-by: Uday Bondhugula <uday@polymagelabs.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76972
This patch integrates operand bundle llvm.assumes [0] with the
Attributor. Most IRAttributes will now look at uses of the associated
value and if there are llvm.assume operand bundle uses with the right
tag we will check if they are in the must-be-executed-context (around
the context instruction). Droppable users, which is currently only
llvm::assume, are handled special in some places now as well.
[0] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html
Reviewed By: uenoku
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74888
We special cased must-tail calls all over the place because they cannot
be modified as other calls can be. However, we already centralized the
modification API so we can centralize the handling as well. This
simplifies the code and allows to remove must-tail calls completely.
This patch add mayContainUnboundedCycle helper function which checks whether a function has any cycle which we don't know if it is bounded or not.
Loops with maximum trip count are considered bounded, any other cycle not.
It also contains some fixed tests and some added tests contain bounded and
unbounded loops and non-loop cycles.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, uenoku, baziotis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74691
Resolution for below fixme:
(ii) Check whether the value is captured in the scope using AANoCapture.
FIXME: This is conservative though, it is better to look at CFG and
check only uses possibly executed before this callsite.
Propagates caller argument's noalias attribute to callee.
Reviewed by: jdoerfert, uenoku
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1, uenoku
Subscribers: uenoku, sstefan1, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71617
This patch introduces the propagation of known information based on path exploration.
For example,
```
int u(int c, int *p){
if(c) {
return *p;
} else {
return *p + 1;
}
}
```
An argument `p` is dereferenced whatever c's value is.
For an instruction `CtxI`, we accumulate branch instructions in the must-be-executed-context of `CtxI` and then, we take the conjunction of the successors' known state.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65593
It is possible that an instruction to be changed to unreachable is
in the same block with a terminator that can be constant-folded.
In this case, as of now, the instruction will be changed to
unreachable before the terminator is folded. But, then the
whole BB becomes invalidated and so when we go ahead to fold
the terminator, we trap.
Change the order of these two.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75780
We can look through calls with `returned` argument attributes when we
collect subsuming positions. This allows us to get existing attributes
from more places.
We are often interested in an assumed constant and sometimes it has to
be an integer constant. Before we only looked for the latter, now we can
ask for either.
If we propagate function pointers across function boundaries we can
create new call edges. These need to be represented in the CG if we run
as a CGSCC pass. In the new pass manager that is currently not handled
by the CallGraphUpdater so we need to prevent the situation for now.
We usually will ask for liveness of an argument anyway so we ended up
lazily creating the attribute anyway. However, that is not always the
case and even if it is we should go the eager route here. Various tests
show how this can improve the outcome. One test exposed a problem with
type mismatches between argument and call site argument, a fix is
included. For liveness various more tests were added as well.
If a function pointer is casted into a different type the resulting
expression can be a constant. If so, it can be used multiple times which
cannot be handled by the AbstractCallSite constructor alone. Instead, we
follow the cast expression uses now explicitly during the call site
traversal.
In addition to a single bit per memory locations, e.g., globals and
arguments, we now collect more information about the actual accesses,
e.g., what instruction caused it, was it a read/write/read+write, and
what the underlying base pointer was. Follow up patches will make
explicit use of this.
Reviewed By: uenoku
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73527
While the function return updateImpl did only look at call sites the
manifest method looked at return values. If we don't do this during the
updateImpl we might create new abstract attributes during manifest. This
is a problem when it comes to liveness information.
This caused an error when passes iterated over cached assumptions in the
tracker and assumed them to be `null` or an instruction. I failed to
create a test case so far.
In addition to memory behavior attributes (readonly/writeonly) we now
derive memory location attributes (argmemonly/inaccessiblememonly/...).
The former is part of AAMemoryBehavior and the latter part of
AAMemoryLocation. While they are similar in nature it got messy when
they were put in a single AA. Location attributes for arguments and
floating values will follow later.
Note that both memory attributes kinds can derive readnone. If there are
no accesses AAMemoryBehavior will derive readnone. If there are accesses
but only to stack (=local) locations AAMemoryLocation will derive
readnone.
Reviewed By: uenoku
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73426
Due to the genericValueTraversal we might visit values for which we did
not create an AAValueConstantRange object, e.g., as they are behind a
PHI or select or call with `returned` argument. As a consequence we need
to validate the types as we are about to query AAValueConstantRange for
operands.
We used coarse-grained liveness before, thus we looked if the
instruction was executed, but we did not use fine-grained liveness,
hence if the instruction was needed or could be deleted even if the
surrounding ones are live. This patches introduces this level of
liveness checks together with other liveness queries, e.g., for uses.
For more control we enforce that all liveness queries go through the
Attributor.
Test have been adjusted to reflect the changes or augmented to prevent
deletion of the parts we want to check.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73313
If we have a replacement for a value, via AAValueSimplify, the original
value will lose all its uses. Thus, as long as a value is simplified we
can skip the uses in checkForAllUses, given that these uses are
transitive uses for the simplified version and will therefore affect the
simplified version as necessary.
Since this allowed us to remove calls without side-effects and a known
return value, we need to make sure not to eliminate `musttail` calls.
Those we keep around, or later remove the entire `musttail` call chain.
We relied on wouldInstructionBeTriviallyDead before but that functions
does not take assumed information, especially for calls, into account.
The replacement, AAIsDead::isAssumeSideEffectFree, does.
This change makes AAIsDeadCallSiteReturn more complex as we can have
a dead call or only dead users.
The test have been modified to include a side effect where there was
none in order to keep the coverage.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73311
Luofan Chen