The legacy PM allowed you to set a custom inliner threshold via
builder.Inliner = llvm::createFunctionInliningPass(inline_threshold);
This allows the same thing to be done with the new PM optimization pipelines.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D137038
The ArgumentPromotion pass uses Mem2Reg promotion at the end to cutting
down generated `alloca` instructions as well as meaningless `store`s and
this behavior can leave unused (dead) arguments. To eliminate the dead
arguments and therefore let the DeadCodeElimination remove becoming dead
inserted `GEP`s as well as `load`s and `cast`s in the callers, the
DeadArgumentElimination pass should be run after the ArgumentPromotion
one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128830
Alive2 doesn't support verification of optimizations that use inter-procedural analyses.
Right now, clang uses GlobalsAA by default and there's no way to disable it.
This leads to Alive2 producing false positives.
The added flag allows us to skip global analyses altogether.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134139
Similar to OptimizerLastEPCallbacks workaround
added D96320.
Probably NFC as-is, I don't see anything hooked with this callbacks yet,
but I we are looking to move sanitizers.
Reviewed By: aeubanks, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133333
The ArgumentPromotion pass uses Mem2Reg promotion at the end to cutting
down generated `alloca` instructions as well as meaningless `store`s and
this behavior can leave unused (dead) arguments. To eliminate the dead
arguments and therefore let the DeadCodeElimination remove becoming dead
inserted `GEP`s as well as `load`s and `cast`s in the callers, the
DeadArgumentElimination pass should be run after the ArgumentPromotion
one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128830
The commit breaks the compiler when a function is used as a function
parameter (hm... for a function from the standard C library?):
```
static float strtof(char *, char *) {}
void a() { strtof(a, 0); }
```
This reverts commit 879f5118fc.
The ArgumentPromotion pass uses Mem2Reg promotion at the end to cutting
down generated `alloca` instructions as well as meaningless `store`s and
this behavior can leave unused (dead) arguments. To eliminate the dead
arguments and therefore let the DeadCodeElimination remove becoming dead
inserted `GEP`s as well as `load`s and `cast`s in the callers, the
DeadArgumentElimination pass should be run after the ArgumentPromotion
one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128830
The ArgumentPromotion pass uses Mem2Reg promotion at the end to cutting
down generated `alloca` instructions as well as meaningless `store`s and
this behavior can leave unused (dead) arguments. To eliminate the dead
arguments and therefore let the DeadCodeElimination remove becoming dead
inserted `GEP`s as well as `load`s and `cast`s in the callers, the
DeadArgumentElimination pass should be run after the ArgumentPromotion
one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128830
Add the `-enable-post-pgo-loop-rotation` option to enable or disable the loop rotation transformation [1]. With some instrumentations, e.g., function entry coverage [2], loop rotation is not necessary and can lead to some surprise differences in codegen, even for functions where instrumentation is blocked with `noprofile` or `skipprofile`. The default value is `true` so the default behavior does not change.
[1] https://www.llvm.org/docs/LoopTerminology.html#loop-terminology-loop-rotate
[2] https://reviews.llvm.org/D116180
Reviewed By: phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131817
We call tail-call-elim near the beginning of the pipeline,
but that is too early to annotate calls that get added later.
In the motivating case from issue #47852, the missing 'tail'
on memset leads to sub-optimal codegen.
I experimented with removing the early instance of
tail-call-elim instead of just adding another pass, but that
appears to be slightly worse for compile-time:
+0.15% vs. +0.08% time.
"tailcall" shows adding the pass; "tailcall2" shows moving
the pass to later, then adding the original early pass back
(so 1596886802 is functionally equivalent to 180b0439dc ):
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/index.php?config=NewPM-O3&stat=instructions&remote=rotateright
Note that there was an effort to split the tail call functionality
into 2 passes - that could help reduce compile-time if we find
that this change costs more in compile-time than expected based
on the preliminary testing:
D60031
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130374
This patch turns on the flag `-enable-no-rerun-simplification-pipeline`, which means the simplification pipeline will not be rerun on unchanged functions in the CGSCCPass Manager.
Compile time improvement:
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=17457be1c393ff691cca032b04ea1698fedf0301&to=882301ebb893c8ef9f09fe1ea871f7995426fa07&stat=instructions
No meaningful run time regressions observed in the llvm test suite and
in additional internal workloads at this time.
The example test in `test/Other/no-rerun-function-simplification-pipeline.ll` is a good means to understand the effect of this change:
```
define void @f1(void()* %p) alwaysinline {
call void %p()
ret void
}
define void @f2() #0 {
call void @f1(void()* @f2)
call void @f3()
ret void
}
define void @f3() #0 {
call void @f2()
ret void
}
```
There are two SCCs formed by the ModuleToPostOrderCGSCCAdaptor: (f1) and (f2, f3).
The pass manager runs on the first SCC, leading to running the simplification pipeline (function and loop passes) on f1. With the flag on, after this, the output will have `Running analysis: ShouldNotRunFunctionPassesAnalysis on f1`.
Next, the pass manager runs on the second SCC: (f2, f3). Since f1() was inlined, f2() now calls itself, and also calls f3(), while f3() only calls f2().
So the pass manager for the SCC first runs the Inliner on (f2, f3), then the simplification pipeline on f2.
With the flag on, the output will have `Running analysis: ShouldNotRunFunctionPassesAnalysis on f2`; unless the inliner makes a change, this analysis remains preserved which means there's no reason to rerun the simplification pipeline. With the flag off, there is a second run of the simplification pipeline run on f2.
Next, the same flow occurs for f3. The simplification pipeline is run on f3 a single time with the flag on, along with `ShouldNotRunFunctionPassesAnalysis on f3`, and twice with the flag off.
The reruns occur only on f2 and f3 due to the additional ref edges.
The CGProfilePass needs to be run during FullLTO compilation at link
time to emit the .llvm.call-graph-profile section to the compiled LTO
object file. Currently, it is being run only during the initial
LTO-prelink compilation stage (to produce the bitcode files to be
consumed by the linker) and so the section is not produced.
ThinLTO is not affected because:
- For ThinLTO-prelink compilation the CGProfilePass pass is not run
because ThinLTO-prelink passes are added via
buildThinLTOPreLinkDefaultPipeline. Normal and FullLTO-prelink
passes are both added via buildPerModuleDefaultPipeline which uses
the LTOPreLink parameter to customize its behavior for the
FullLTO-prelink pass differences.
- ThinLTO backend compilation phase adds the CGProfilePass (see:
buildModuleOptimizationPipeline).
Adjust when the pass is run so that the .llvm.call-graph-profile
section is produced correctly for FullLTO.
Fixes#56185 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56185)
Some cl::ZeroOrMore were added to avoid the `may only occur zero or one times!`
error. More were added due to cargo cult. Since the error has been removed,
cl::ZeroOrMore is unneeded.
Also remove cl::init(false) while touching the lines.
All callers pass true.
select-unfold-freeze.ll is now a subset of select.ll so delete it.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126501
CoroCleanup is designed to lowering all the remaining coroutine
intrinsics. It is required to run after CoroSplit only. However, the
position of CoroCleanup now is far too late. The downside here is that
the unlowered coroutine instrincs might blocking other optimizations
too. So it should be a pure win to hoist the position of CoroCleanup.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124360
This change could reduce the time we call `declaresCoroEarlyIntrinsics`.
And it is helpful for future changes.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123925
VectorizerStart extension is module callback in old PM, but is function
callback in new PM. We lack a module extension point between end of
buildModuleSimplificationPipeline and the function optimization
(including vectorizer) pipeline. So this patch adds a new module
extension point before the function optimization pipeline.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122296
CoroSplit lowers various coroutine intrinsics. It's a CGSCC pass and
CGSCC passes don't run on unreachable functions. Normally GlobalDCE will
come along and delete unreachable functions, but we don't run GlobalDCE
under -O0, so an unreachable function with coroutine intrinsics may
never have CoroSplit run on it.
This patch adds GlobalDCE when coroutines intrinsics are present. It
also now runs all coroutine passes conditional when coroutine intrinsics
are present. This should also solve the -O0 regression reported in
D105877 due to LazyCallGraph construction.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/54117
Reviewed By: ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122275
RequireAnalysis<GlobalsAA> doesn't actually recompute GlobalsAA.
GlobalsAA isn't invalidated (unless specifically invalidated) because
it's self-updating via ValueHandles, but can be imprecise during the
self-updates.
Rather than invalidating GlobalsAA, which would invalidate AAManager and
any analyses that use AAManager, create a new pass that recomputes
GlobalsAA.
Fixes#53131.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121167
This PR adds two extension points to the default LTO pipeline in PassBuilder, one at the beginning and one at the end. These two extension points already existed in the old pass manager, the aim is to replicate the same functionality in the new one.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120491
LICM will speculatively hoist code outside of loops. This requires removing information, like alias analysis (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53794), range information (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50550), among others. Prior to https://reviews.llvm.org/D99249 , LICM would only be run after LoopRotate. Running Loop Rotate prior to LICM prevents a instruction hoist from being speculative, if it was conditionally executed by the iteration (as is commonly emitted by clang and other frontends). Adding the additional LICM pass first, however, forces all of these instructions to be considered speculative, even if they are not speculative after LoopRotate. This destroys information, resulting in performance losses for discarding this additional information.
This PR modifies LICM to accept a ``speculative'' parameter which allows LICM to be set to perform information-loss speculative hoists or not. Phase ordering is then modified to not perform the information-losing speculative hoists until after loop rotate is performed, preserving this additional information.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119965
The LTO support for OpenMP offloading allows us to run the OpenMPOpt
pass during the LTO pipeline. This patch introduces an early run of the
Module pass and a late run of the CGSCC pass. These are quick no-ops if
there is no OpenMP in the module.
Depends on D118198
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118611
In D110057 we moved LoopFlatten to a LoopPassManager. This caused a performance
regression for our 64-bit targets (the 32-bit were unaffected), the pass is no
longer triggering for a motivating example. The reason is that the IR is just
very different than expected; we try to match loop statements and particular
uses of induction variables. The easiest is to just move LoopFlatten to a place
in the pipeline where the IR is as expected, which is just before
IndVarSimplify. This means we move it from LPM2 to LPM1, so that it actually
runs just a bit earlier from where it was running before. IndVarSimplify is
responsible for significant rewrites that are difficult to "look through" in
LoopFlatten.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116612
This was reverted because of a performance regression, which is fixed by
D116612 that I will commit directly after this change.
This reverts commit e92d63b467.
This commit caused performance regressions due to differences in the
expected code during loop flattening. Reverting it until the fix is
ready, which hopefully wont take too long.
This reverts commit 86825fc2fb.
In D109958 it was noticed that we could optimise the pipeline and avoid
rerunning LoopSimplify/LCSSA for LoopFlatten by moving it to a LoopPassManager.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110057
This patch uses a similar trick as in D113947 to only run the extra
passes after vectorization on functions where loops have been
vectorized.
The reason for running the 'extra vector passes' is
simplification/unswitching of the runtime checks created by LV, there
should be no need to run them if nothing got vectorized
To do that, a new dummy analysis ShouldRunExtraVectorPasses has been
added. If loops have been vectorized for a function, LV will cache the
analysis. At the moment it uses MadeCFGChanges as proxy for loop
vectorized, which isn't perfect (it could be too aggressive, e.g.
because no runtime checks have been added), but should be good enough
for now.
The extra passes are now managed by a new FunctionPassManager that
runs its passes only if ShouldRunExtraVectorPasses has been cached.
Without this patch, `-extra-vectorizer-passes` has the following
compile-time impact:
NewPM-O3: +4.86%
NewPM-ReleaseThinLTO: +3.56%
NewPM-ReleaseLTO-g: +7.17%
http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=ead3979a92fc33add4710c4510d6906260dcb4ad&to=c292da649e2c6e88a31e702fdc474727d09c72bc&stat=instructions
With this patch, that gets reduced to
NewPM-O3: +1.43%
NewPM-ReleaseThinLTO: +1.00%
NewPM-ReleaseLTO-g: +1.58%
http://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=ead3979a92fc33add4710c4510d6906260dcb4ad&to=e67d86b57810011cf285eb9aa1944781be6096f0&stat=instructions
It is probably still too high to enable by default, but much better.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115052
MergeFunctions (as well as HotColdSplitting an IROutliner) are
incorrectly scheduled under the new pass manager. The code makes
it look like they run towards the end of the module optimization
pipeline (as they should), while in reality the run at the start.
This is because the OptimizePM populated around them is only
scheduled later.
I'm fixing this by moving these three passes until after OptimizePM
to avoid splitting the function pass pipeline. It doesn't seem
important to me that some of the function passes run after these
late module passes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115098
Swap AIC and IC neighbouring in pipeline. This looks more natural and even
almost has no effect for now (three slightly touched tests of test-suite). Also
this could be the first step towards merging AIC (or its part) to -O2 pipeline.
After several changes in AIC (like D108091, D108201, D107766, D109515, D109236)
there've been observed several regressions (like PR52078, PR52253, PR52289)
that were fixed in different passes (see D111330, D112721) by extending their
functionality, but these regressions were exposed since changed AIC prevents IC
from making some of early optimizations.
This is common problem and it should be fixed by just moving AIC after IC
which looks more logically by itself: make aggressive instruction combining
only after failed ordinary one.
Fixes PR52289
Reviewed By: spatel, RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113179
Add an -enable-merge-functions option to allow testing of function
merging as it will actually happen in the optimization pipeline.
Based on that add a test where we currently produce two identical
functions without merging them due to incorrect pass scheduling
under the new pass manager.
The FunctionSimplificationPipeline could effectively reduce the size of .text section when module inliner is enabled.
Reviewed By: kazu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114704
In a CGSCC pass manager, we may visit the same function multiple times
due to SCC mutations. In the inliner pipeline, this results in running
the function simplification pipeline on a function multiple times even
if it hasn't been changed since the last function simplification
pipeline run.
We use a newly introduced analysis to keep track of whether or not a
function has changed since the last time the function simplification
pipeline has run on it. If we see this analysis available for a function
in a CGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor, we skip running the function passes on
the function. The analysis is queried at the end of the function passes
so that it's available after the first time the function simplification
pipeline runs on a function. This is a per-adaptor option so it doesn't
apply to every adaptor.
The goal of this is to improve compile times. However, currently we
can't turn this on by default at least for the higher optimization
levels since the function simplification pipeline is not robust enough
to be idempotent in many cases, resulting in performance regressions if
we stop running the function simplification pipeline on a function
multiple times. We may be able to turn this on for -O1 in the near
future, but turning this on for higher optimization levels would require
more investment in the function simplification pipeline.
Heavily inspired by D98103.
Example compile time improvements with flag turned on:
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=998dc4a5d3491d2ae8cbe742d2e13bc1b0cacc5f&to=5c27c913687d3d5559ef3ab42b5a3d513531d61c&stat=instructions
Reviewed By: asbirlea, nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113947
Previously, any change in any function in an SCC would cause all
analyses for all functions in the SCC to be invalidated. With this
change, we now manually invalidate analyses for functions we modify,
then let the pass manager know that all function analyses should be
preserved since we've already handled function analysis invalidation.
So far this only touches the inliner, argpromotion, function-attrs, and
updateCGAndAnalysisManager(), since they are the most used.
This is part of an effort to investigate running the function
simplification pipeline less on functions we visit multiple times in the
inliner pipeline.
However, this causes major memory regressions especially on larger IR.
To counteract this, turn on the option to eagerly invalidate function
analyses. This invalidates analyses on functions immediately after
they're processed in a module or scc to function adaptor for specific
parts of the pipeline.
Within an SCC, if a pass only modifies one function, other functions in
the SCC do not have their analyses invalidated, so in later function
passes in the SCC pass manager the analyses may still be cached. It is
only after the function passes that the eager invalidation takes effect.
For the default pipelines this makes sense because the inliner pipeline
runs the function simplification pipeline after all other SCC passes
(except CoroSplit which doesn't request any analyses).
Overall this has mostly positive effects on compile time and positive effects on memory usage.
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=7f627596977624730f9298a1b69883af1555765e&to=39e824e0d3ca8a517502f13032dfa67304841c90&stat=instructionshttps://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=7f627596977624730f9298a1b69883af1555765e&to=39e824e0d3ca8a517502f13032dfa67304841c90&stat=max-rss
D113196 shows that we slightly regressed compile times in exchange for
some memory improvements when turning on eager invalidation. D100917
shows that we slightly improved compile times in exchange for major
memory regressions in some cases when invalidating less in SCC passes.
Turning these on at the same time keeps the memory improvements while
keeping compile times neutral/slightly positive.
Reviewed By: asbirlea, nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113304
To be more consistent with other pass struct names.
There are still more passes that don't end with "Pass", but these are the important ones.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112935
Function specialisation was running at all optimisation levels (if enabled on
the command line, it is not on by default). That was an oversight and not
something we want to do. Function specialisation duplicates functions when it
triggers, so the backend is processing more functions/instructions resulting in
compile-time increases, which seems more appropriate with -O3 and inline with
GCC. Please note that since function specialisation is not enabled by default,
this didn't require updating any pass manager tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112129
Arthur Eubanks