These increases the size of the static tables, but is closer to what we would get if used the autogenerated table directly. This reduces the remaining large deltas between what's in the manual table and what's in the autogenerated table.
llvm-svn: 334915
Not sure any of these matter today because I don't think we ever produce them with IMPLICIT_DEF as an input. But by listing them we don't be suprised in the future.
llvm-svn: 334867
An earlier commit prevented folds from the peephole pass by checking for IMPLICIT_DEF. But later in the pipeline IMPLICIT_DEF just becomes and Undef flag on the input register so we need to check for that case too.
llvm-svn: 334848
I think this covers most of the unmasked vector instructions. We're still missing a lot of the masked instructions.
There are some test changes here because of the new folding support. I don't think these particular cases should be folded because it creates an undef register dependency. I think the changes introduced in r334175 are not handling stack folding. They're only blocking the peephole pass.
llvm-svn: 334800
Summary: Prevent folding of operations with memory loads when one of the sources has undefined register update.
Reviewers: craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mike.dvoretsky, ashlykov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47621
llvm-svn: 334175
Make TII isCopyInstr() return MachineOperands through pointer to pointer
instead via reference.
Patch by Nikola Prica.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47364
llvm-svn: 334105
This is setting up to fix bug 37573 cleanly.
This moves data structures that are technically both used in some way by the
target and the general-purpose outlining algorithm into MachineOutliner.h. In
particular, the `Candidate` class is of importance.
Before, the outliner passed the locations of `Candidates` to the target, which
would then make some decisions about the prospective outlined function. This
change allows us to just pass `Candidates` along to the target. This will allow
the target to discard `Candidates` that would be considered unsafe before cost
calculation. Thus, we will be able to remove the unsafe candidates described in
the bug without resorting to torching the entire prospective function.
Also, as a side-effect, it makes the outliner a bit cleaner.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37573
llvm-svn: 333952
This property is needed in order to follow values movement between
registers. This property is used in TII to implement method that
returns true if simple copy like instruction is recognized, along
with source and destination machine operands.
Patch by Nikola Prica.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45204
llvm-svn: 333093
Counting the number of instructions is both unintuitive and inaccurate.
On AArch64, this only affects the generated remarks and certain rare
pseudo-instructions, but it will have a bigger impact on other targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46921
llvm-svn: 332685
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
Because we create a new kind of debug instruction, DBG_LABEL, we need to
check all passes which use isDebugValue() to check MachineInstr is debug
instruction or not. When expelling debug instructions, we should expel
both DBG_VALUE and DBG_LABEL. So, I create a new function,
isDebugInstr(), in MachineInstr to check whether the MachineInstr is
debug instruction or not.
This patch has no new test case. I have run regression test and there is
no difference in regression test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45342
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331844
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290
llvm-svn: 331272
This patch fixes a bug introduced by revision 330778 (originally reviewed at:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44782), where function isFrameLoadOpcode returned
the wrong number of bytes read for opcodes VMOVSSrm and VMOVSDrm.
This corrects that mistake, and extends the regression test to catch cases where
the dead stores should be removed.
Patch by Jeremy Morse.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46256
llvm-svn: 331252
Favor the 0x1a encoding for register/register move to match gas.
The instructions used RM and MR in their name along with rr/rm/mr at the end. To make more consistent with other instructions remove the RM/MR and use rr/rm/mr/rr_REV.
Hide the _REV encoding from the assembler but leave it for the disassembler.
llvm-svn: 331101
Summary:
Previously the flag intrinsics always used the index instructions even if a mask instruction also exists.
To fix fix this I've created a single ISD node type that returns index, mask, and flags. The SelectionDAG CSE process will merge all flavors of intrinsics with the same inputs to a s ingle node. Then during isel we just have to look at which results are used to know what instruction to generate. If both mask and index are used we'll need to emit two instructions. But for all other cases we can emit a single instruction.
Since I had to do manual isel anyway, I've removed the pseudo instructions and custom inserter code that was working around tablegen limitations with multiple implicit defs.
I've also renamed the recently added sse42.ll test case to sttni.ll since it focuses on that subset of the sse4.2 instructions.
Reviewers: chandlerc, RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46202
llvm-svn: 331091
instructions.
These have special permission according to the x86 manual to read
unaligned memory, and this folding is done by ICC and GCC as well.
This corrects one of the issues identified in PR37246.
llvm-svn: 330896
Previously, _any_ store or load instruction was considered to be
operating on a spill if it had a frameindex as an operand, and thus
was fair game for optimisations such as "StackSlotColoring". This
usually works, except on architectures where spills can be partially
restored, for example on X86 where a spilt vector can have a single
component loaded (zeroing the rest of the target register). This can be
mis-interpreted and the zero extension unsoundly eliminated, see
pr30821.
To avoid this, this commit optionally provides the caller to
isLoadFromStackSlot and isStoreToStackSlot with the number of bytes
spilt/loaded by the given instruction. Optimisations can then determine
that a full spill followed by a partial load (or vice versa), for
example, cannot necessarily be commuted.
Patch by Jeremy Morse!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44782
llvm-svn: 330778
This cleans up a number of operations that only claimed te use EFLAGS
due to using DF. But no instructions which we think of us setting EFLAGS
actually modify DF (other than things like popf) and so this needlessly
creates uses of EFLAGS that aren't really there.
In fact, DF is so restrictive it is pretty easy to model. Only STD, CLD,
and the whole-flags writes (WRFLAGS and POPF) need to model this.
I've also somewhat cleaned up some of the flag management instruction
definitions to be in the correct .td file.
Adding this extra register also uncovered a failure to use the correct
datatype to hold X86 registers, and I've corrected that as necessary
here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45154
llvm-svn: 329673
The key idea is to lower COPY nodes populating EFLAGS by scanning the
uses of EFLAGS and introducing dedicated code to preserve the necessary
state in a GPR. In the vast majority of cases, these uses are cmovCC and
jCC instructions. For such cases, we can very easily save and restore
the necessary information by simply inserting a setCC into a GPR where
the original flags are live, and then testing that GPR directly to feed
the cmov or conditional branch.
However, things are a bit more tricky if arithmetic is using the flags.
This patch handles the vast majority of cases that seem to come up in
practice: adc, adcx, adox, rcl, and rcr; all without taking advantage of
partially preserved EFLAGS as LLVM doesn't currently model that at all.
There are a large number of operations that techinaclly observe EFLAGS
currently but shouldn't in this case -- they typically are using DF.
Currently, they will not be handled by this approach. However, I have
never seen this issue come up in practice. It is already pretty rare to
have these patterns come up in practical code with LLVM. I had to resort
to writing MIR tests to cover most of the logic in this pass already.
I suspect even with its current amount of coverage of arithmetic users
of EFLAGS it will be a significant improvement over the current use of
pushf/popf. It will also produce substantially faster code in most of
the common patterns.
This patch also removes all of the old lowering for EFLAGS copies, and
the hack that forced us to use a frame pointer when EFLAGS copies were
found anywhere in a function so that the dynamic stack adjustment wasn't
a problem. None of this is needed as we now lower all of these copies
directly in MI and without require stack adjustments.
Lots of thanks to Reid who came up with several aspects of this
approach, and Craig who helped me work out a couple of things tripping
me up while working on this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45146
llvm-svn: 329657
This commit is similar to r329120, but uses the existing getUsesRedZone() function
in X86MachineFunctionInfo. This teaches the outliner to look at whether or not a
function *truly* uses a redzone instead of just the noredzone attribute on a
function.
Thus, after this commit, it's possible to outline from x86 without using
-mno-red-zone and still get outlining results.
This also adds a new test for the new redzone behaviour.
llvm-svn: 329134
for X86's instruction information. I've now got a second patch under
review that needs these same APIs. This bit is nicely orthogonal and
obvious, so landing it. NFC.
llvm-svn: 328944
This makes the Y position consistent with other instructions.
This should have been NFC, but while refactoring the multiclass I noticed that VROUNDPD memory forms were using the register itinerary.
llvm-svn: 328254
At the point the outliner runs, KILLs don't impact anything, but they're still
considered unique instructions. This commit makes them invisible like
DebugValues so that they can still be outlined without impacting outlining
decisions.
llvm-svn: 327760
These tables add 3000 lines to X86InstrInfo.cpp. And if we ever manage to auto generate them they'll be a separate file anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43806
llvm-svn: 326225
hit from IR but creates a minefield for MI passes.
The x86 backend has fairly powerful logic to try and fold loads that
feed register operands to instructions into a memory operand on the
instruction. This is almost always a good thing, but there are specific
relocated loads that are only allowed to appear in specific
instructions. Notably, R_X86_64_GOTTPOFF is only allowed in `movq` and
`addq`. This patch blocks folding of memory operands using this
relocation unless the target is in fact `addq`.
The particular relocation indicates why we simply don't hit this under
normal circumstances. This relocation is only used for TLS, and it gets
used in very specific ways in conjunction with %fs-relative addressing.
The result is that loads using this relocation are essentially never
eligible for folding into an instruction's memory operands. Unless, of
course, you have an MI pass that inserts usage of such a load. I have
exactly such an MI pass and was greeted by truly mysterious miscompiles
where the linker replaced my instruction with a completely garbage byte
sequence. Go team.
This is the only such relocation I'm aware of in x86, but there may be
others that need to be similarly restricted.
Fixes PR36165.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42732
llvm-svn: 324546
If we are saving/restoring k-registers, the default behavior of getMinimalRegisterClass will find the VK64 class with a spill size of 64 bits. This will cause the KMOVQ opcode to be used for save/restore. If we don't have have BWI instructions we need to constrain the class returned to give us VK16 with a 16-bit spill size. We can do this by passing the either v16i1 or v64i1 into getMinimalRegisterClass.
Also add asserts to make sure BWI is enabled anytime we use KMOVD/KMOVQ. These are what caught this bug.
Fixes PR36256
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42989
llvm-svn: 324533
Summary:
It seems it's main effect is to create addition copies when values are inr register that do not support this trick, which increase register pressure and makes the code bigger.
Reviewers: craig.topper, niravd, spatel, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42646
llvm-svn: 323888
Summary:
It seems it's main effect is to create addition copies when values are inr register that do not support this trick, which increase register pressure and makes the code bigger.
The main noteworthy regression I was able to observe was pattern of the type (setcc (trunc (and X, C)), 0) where C is such as it would benefit from the hi register trick. To prevent this, a new pattern is added to materialize such pattern using a 32 bits test. This has the added benefit of working with any constant that is materializable as a 32bits immediate, not just the ones that can leverage the high register trick, as demonstrated by the test case in test-shrink.ll using the constant 2049 .
Reviewers: craig.topper, niravd, spatel, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42646
llvm-svn: 323690
MMX instrutions all start with MMX_ so the 64 isn't needed for disambigutation.
SSE/AVX1 instructions are assumed 128-bit so we don't need to say 128.
AVX2 instructions should use a Y to indicate 256-bits.
llvm-svn: 323402
All other intrinsic instructions put the _Int on the end. This make these instructions consistent and gets the prefix instregexs in the scheduler models to pick them up.
llvm-svn: 323261
I'm not sure there's any way to generate these folding cases especially the movzx ones since even the register form is never emitted by codegen.
I'm just adding them to remove the difference with the autogenerated version of the folding table.
llvm-svn: 323200
1. ReachingDefsAnalysis - Allows to identify for each instruction what is the “closest” reaching def of a certain register. Used by BreakFalseDeps (for clearance calculation) and ExecutionDomainFix (for arbitrating conflicting domains).
2. ExecutionDomainFix - Changes the variant of the instructions in order to minimize domain crossings.
3. BreakFalseDeps - Breaks false dependencies.
4. LoopTraversal - Creatws a traversal order of the basic blocks that is optimal for loops (introduced in revision L293571). Both ExecutionDomainFix and ReachingDefsAnalysis use this to determine the order they will traverse the basic blocks.
This also included the following changes to ExcecutionDepsFix original logic:
1. BreakFalseDeps and ReachingDefsAnalysis logic no longer restricted by a register class.
2. ReachingDefsAnalysis tracks liveness of reg units instead of reg indices into a given reg class.
Additional changes in affected files:
1. X86 and ARM targets now inherit from ExecutionDomainFix instead of ExecutionDepsFix. BreakFalseDeps also was added to the passes they activate.
2. Comments and references to ExecutionDepsFix replaced with ExecutionDomainFix and BreakFalseDeps, as appropriate.
Additional refactoring changes will follow.
This commit is (almost) NFC.
The only functional change is that now BreakFalseDeps will break dependency for all register classes.
Since no additional instructions were added to the list of instructions that have false dependencies, there is no actual change yet.
In a future commit several instructions (and tests) will be added.
This is the first of multiple patches that fix bugzilla https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33869
Most of the patches are intended at refactoring the existent code.
Additional relevant reviews:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D40331https://reviews.llvm.org/D40332https://reviews.llvm.org/D40333https://reviews.llvm.org/D40334
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40330
Change-Id: Icaeb75e014eff96a8f721377783f9a3e6c679275
llvm-svn: 323087
As mentioned on PR35869, (and came up recently on D41517) we don't create a MMX zero register via the PXOR but instead perform a spill to stack from a XMM zero register.
This patch adds support for direct MMX zero vector creation and should make it easier to add better constant vector creation in the future as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41908
llvm-svn: 322525
Add support for custom execution domain fixing and implement support for BLENDPD/BLENDPS/PBLENDD/PBLENDW.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42042
llvm-svn: 322524
This commit does two things. Firstly, it adds a collection of flags which can
be passed along to the target to encode information about the MBB that an
instruction lives in to the outliner.
Second, it adds some of those flags to the AArch64 outliner in order to add
more stack instructions to the list of legal instructions that are handled
by the outliner. The two flags added check if
- There are calls in the MachineBasicBlock containing the instruction
- The link register is available in the entire block
If the link register is available and there are no calls, then a stack
instruction can always be outlined without fixups, regardless of what it is,
since in this case, the outliner will never modify the stack to create a
call or outlined frame.
The motivation for doing this was checking which instructions are most often
missed by the outliner. Instructions like, say
%sp<def> = ADDXri %sp, 32, 0; flags: FrameDestroy
are very common, but cannot be outlined in the case that the outliner might
modify the stack. This commit allows us to outline instructions like this.
llvm-svn: 322048
The instructions that load 64-bits or an xmm register should be TB_NO_REVERSE to avoid the load being widened during unfold. The instructions that load 128-bits need to ensure 128-bit alignment.
llvm-svn: 321956
The memory form of the xmm->xmm version only writes 64-bits. If we use it in the folding tables and its get used for a stack spill, only half the slot will be written. Then a reload may read all 128-bits which will pull in garbage. But without the spill the upper bits of the register would have been zero. By not folding we would preserve the zeros.
llvm-svn: 321950
This matches AVX512 version and is more consistent overall. And improves our scheduler models.
In some cases this adds _Int to instructions that didn't have any Int_ before. It's a side effect of the adjustments made to some of the multiclasses.
llvm-svn: 320325
The patch originally broke Chromium (crbug.com/791714) due to its failing to
specify that the new pseudo instructions clobber EFLAGS. This commit fixes
that.
> Summary: This strengthens the guard and matches MSVC.
>
> Reviewers: hans, etienneb
>
> Subscribers: hiraditya, JDevlieghere, vlad.tsyrklevich, llvm-commits
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40622
llvm-svn: 319824
These command line options are not intended for public use, and often
don't even make sense in the context of a particular tool anyway. About
90% of them are already hidden, but when people add new options they
forget to hide them, so if you were to make a brand new tool today, link
against one of LLVM's libraries, and run tool -help you would get a
bunch of junk that doesn't make sense for the tool you're writing.
This patch hides these options. The real solution is to not have
libraries defining command line options, but that's a much larger effort
and not something I'm prepared to take on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40674
llvm-svn: 319505
As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format,
always print registers as lowercase.
* Only debug printing is affected. It now follows MIR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40417
llvm-svn: 319187
The NewCC variable is calculated outside of the loop that processes jcc/setcc/cmovcc instructions. If we invert it during the loop it can cause an incorrect value to be used by a later iteration. Instead only read it during the loop and use a new variable to store the possibly inverted value.
Fixes PR35399.
llvm-svn: 318934
This is consistent with out normal implementation of scalar instructions.
While there disable load folding for the patterns with IMPLICIT_DEF unless optimizing for size which is also our standard practice.
llvm-svn: 317977
This patch moves the check for opt size and hasPartialRegUpdate into the lower level implementation of foldMemoryOperandImpl to catch the entry point that fast isel uses.
We're still folding undef register instructions in AVX that we should also probably disable, but that's a problem for another patch.
Unfortunately, this requires reordering a bunch of functions which is why the diff is so large. I can do the function reordering separately if we want.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39402
llvm-svn: 317112
Unfortunately, this weakens our ability to do domain fixing when AVX512DQ is not enabled, but it is consistent with our 256-bit behavior.
Maybe we should add custom handling to domain fixing to allow EVEX integer XOR/AND/OR/ANDN to switch to VEX encoded fp instructions if the high registers aren't being used?
llvm-svn: 316978
I have a future patch that wants to make use of the one of the partial functions in one of the earlier memory folding methods and the current ordering prevents that.
llvm-svn: 316883
I believe these were added incorrectly under the belief that the load size was smaller than the input register size, but that's not true.
llvm-svn: 315795
Say you have two identical linkonceodr functions, one in M1 and one in M2.
Say that the outliner outlines A,B,C from one function, and D,E,F from another
function (where letters are instructions). Now those functions are not
identical, and cannot be deduped. Locally to M1 and M2, these outlining
choices would be good-- to the whole program, however, this might not be true!
To mitigate this, this commit makes it so that the outliner sees linkonceodr
functions as unsafe to outline from. It also adds a flag,
-enable-linkonceodr-outlining, which allows the user to specify that they
want to outline from such functions when they know what they're doing.
Changing this handles most code size regressions in the test suite caused by
competing with linker dedupe. It also doesn't have a huge impact on the code
size improvements from the outliner. There are 6 tests that regress > 5% from
outlining WITH linkonceodrs to outlining WITHOUT linkonceodrs. Overall, most
tests either improve or are not impacted.
Not outlined vs outlined without linkonceodrs:
https://hastebin.com/raw/qeguxavuda
Not outlined vs outlined with linkonceodrs:
https://hastebin.com/raw/edepoqoqic
Outlined with linkonceodrs vs outlined without linkonceodrs:
https://hastebin.com/raw/awiqifiheb
Numbers generated using compare.py with -m size.__text. Tests run for AArch64
with -Oz -mllvm -enable-machine-outliner -mno-red-zone.
llvm-svn: 315136
This patch redefines the MOVSS/MOVSD instructions to take VR128 as its second input. This allows the MOVSS/SD->BLEND commute to work without requiring a COPY to be inserted.
This should fix PR33079
Overall this looks to be an improvement in the generated code. I haven't checked the EXPENSIVE_CHECKS build but I'll do that and update with results.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38449
llvm-svn: 314914
Summary:
Intel documentation shows the memory operand as the first operand. But we currently treat it as the second operand. Conceptually the order doesn't matter since it doesn't write memory. We have aliases to parse with the operands in either order and the isel matching is commutable.
For the register®ister form order does matter for the assembly parser. PR22995 was previously filed and fixed by changing the register®ister form from MRMSrcReg to MRMDestReg to match gas. Ideally the memory form should match by using MRMDestMem.
I believe this supercedes D38025 which was trying to switch the register®ister form back to pre-PR22995.
Reviewers: aymanmus, RKSimon, zvi
Reviewed By: aymanmus
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38120
llvm-svn: 314639
This commit allows the outliner to avoid saving and restoring the link register
on AArch64 when it is dead within an entire class of candidates.
This introduces changes to the way the outliner interfaces with the target.
For example, the target now interfaces with the outliner using a
MachineOutlinerInfo struct rather than by using getOutliningCallOverhead and
getOutliningFrameOverhead.
This also improves several comments on the outliner's cost model.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D36721
llvm-svn: 314341
Craig Topper