Summary:
RPTracker::reset(MI) is a very expensive call when the number of virtual registers is huge.
We observed a long compilation time issue when RPT::reset() is called once for each cluster.
In this work, we call RPT.reset() only at the first seen cluster, and use advance() to get
the register pressure for the later clusters in the same basic block. This could effectively reduce the number
of the expensive calls and thus reduce the compile time.
Reviewers:
rampitec
Fixes:
SWDEV-239161
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D95273
Original patch by @rogfer01.
This patch adds support for insertelt and extractelt operations on
scalable vectors.
Special care must be taken on RV32 when dealing with i64 vectors as
there are no straightforward ways to insert a 64-bit element without a
register of that size. To that end, both are custom-lowered to different
sequences.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: Fraser Cormack <fraser@codeplay.com>
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94615
or claimRV calls in the IR
Background:
This patch makes changes to the front-end and middle-end that are
needed to fix a longstanding problem where llvm breaks ARC's autorelease
optimization (see the link below) by separating calls from the marker
instructions or retainRV/claimRV calls. The backend changes are in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D92569.
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AutomaticReferenceCounting.html#arc-runtime-objc-autoreleasereturnvalue
What this patch does to fix the problem:
- The front-end annotates calls with attribute "clang.arc.rv"="retain"
or "clang.arc.rv"="claim", which indicates the call is implicitly
followed by a marker instruction and a retainRV/claimRV call that
consumes the call result. This is currently done only when the target
is arm64 and the optimization level is higher than -O0.
- ARC optimizer temporarily emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the
annotated calls in the IR and removes the inserted calls after
processing the function.
- ARC contract pass emits retainRV/claimRV calls after the annotated
calls. It doesn't remove the attribute on the call since the backend
needs it to emit the marker instruction. The retainRV/claimRV calls
are emitted late in the pipeline to prevent optimization passes from
transforming the IR in a way that makes it harder for the ARC
middle-end passes to figure out the def-use relationship between the
call and the retainRV/claimRV calls (which is the cause of PR31925).
- The function inliner removes the autoreleaseRV call in the callee that
returns the result if nothing in the callee prevents it from being
paired up with the calls annotated with "clang.arc.rv"="retain/claim"
in the caller. If the call is annotated with "claim", a release call
is inserted since autoreleaseRV+claimRV is equivalent to a release. If
it cannot find an autoreleaseRV call, it tries to transfer the
attributes to a function call in the callee. This is important since
ARC optimizer can remove the autoreleaseRV call returning the callee
result, which makes it impossible to pair it up with the retainRV or
claimRV call in the caller. If that fails, it simply emits a retain
call in the IR if the call is annotated with "retain" and does nothing
if it's annotated with "claim".
- This patch teaches dead argument elimination pass not to change the
return type of a function if any of the calls to the function are
annotated with attribute "clang.arc.rv". This is necessary since the
pass can incorrectly determine nothing in the IR uses the function
return, which can happen since the front-end no longer explicitly
emits retainRV/claimRV calls in the IR, and change its return type to
'void'.
Future work:
- Use the attribute on x86-64.
- Fix the auto upgrader to convert call+retainRV/claimRV pairs into
calls annotated with the attributes.
rdar://71443534
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92808
This makes our i8/i16 codegen more similar to the i32 codegen.
I've also added computeKnownBits support for DIVUW/REMUW so
that we can remove zero extending ANDs from the output. Without
this we end up turning DIVUW/REMUW back into DIVU/REMU via some
isel patterns.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck, luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95322
The unwind info format requires that all adjustments are 8 byte aligned,
and the bottom three bits are masked out. Most Win64 calling conventions
have 32 bytes of shadow stack space for spilling parameters, and I
believe that constructing these fixed stack objects had the side effect
of ensuring an alignment of 8. However, the Intel regcall convention
does not have this shadow space, so when using that convention, it was
possible to make a 4 byte stack frame, which was impossible to describe
with unwind info.
Fixes pr48867
This intrinsic is supposed to have the permute control vector complemented on
little endian systems (as the ABI specifies and GCC implements). With the
current code gen, the result vector is byte-reversed.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95004
As far as I know 32 bits arguments and returns on RV64 are always
sign extended to i64. So I think we should be taking this into
account around libcalls.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95285
We're relying on the source inputs for shuffle combining having already been widened to the root size (otherwise the offset logic falls over) - we're going to be supporting different sized shuffle inputs soon, so we need to explicitly make the minimum widened width the original root size.
We allow insert_subvector lowering of all legal types, so don't always cast to the vXi64/vXf64 shuffle types - this is only necessary for X86ISD::SHUF128/X86ISD::VPERM2X128 patterns later.
This patch adds support for scalable-vector splats in DAGCombiner's
`isConstantOrConstantVector` and `ISD::matchUnaryPredicate` functions,
which enable the SelectionDAG div/rem-by-constant optimizations for
scalable vector types.
It also fixes up one case where the UDIV optimization was generating a
SETCC without first consulting the target for its preferred SETCC result
type.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94501
This adds subtarget features for AES, literal, and compare and branch
instruction fusion for different Cortex CPUs.
Patch by: Cassie Jones.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94457
This adds support for ".attribute arch" for all extensions that are
currently supported by the compiler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94931
This patch adds patterns to teach the AArch64 backend to merge [US]MULL
instructions and adds/subs of half the size into [US]ML[AS]L where we don't use
the top half of the result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95218
For now, we correct the result for sqrt if iteration > 0. This doesn't make
sense as they are not strict relative.
Reviewed By: dmgreen, spatel, RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94480
Reassociating some patterns to generate more fma instructions to
reduce register pressure.
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92071
Frame-base materialization may insert vector instructions before EXEC is initialised.
Fix this by moving lowering of llvm.amdgcn.init.exec later in backend.
Also remove SI_INIT_EXEC_LO pseudo as this is not necessary.
Reviewed By: ruiling
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94645
The patterns that use this really want to know if the operand has at
least 32 sign/zero bits.
This increases opportunities to use W instructions when the original
source used i8/i16. Not sure how much this matters for performance,
but it makes i8/i16 code more consistent with i32.
This avoids being dependent on SimplifyDemandedBits having cleared
those bits.
It could make sense to teach SimplifyDemandedBits to keep all
lower bits 1 in an AND mask when possible. This could be
implemented with slli+srli in the general case rather than
needing to materialize the constant.
We try to do this during DAG combine with SimplifyDemandedBits,
but it fails if there are multiple nodes using the AND. For
example, multiple shifts using the same shift amount.
The only caller of this function is in the LocalStackSlotAllocation
and it creates base register of class returned by the target's
getPointerRegClass(). AMDGPU wants to use a different reg class
here so let materializeFrameBaseRegister to just create and return
whatever it wants.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95268
Similar to our free standing setcc patterns, we can use ADDI to
subtract the immediate from the other operand. Then the cmov
can check if the result is zero or non-zero.
Reviewed By: mundaym
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95169
This adds an initial set of patterns for these instructions. Its
more complicated that I would like for the sh*add.uw instructions
because there is no guaranteed canonicalization for shl/and with
constants.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95106
These instructions use a portion of the encodings for grevi and
gorci. The full encodings are only supported with Zbp. Note,
rev8 has a different encoding between rv32 and rv64.
Zbb is closer to being finalized that Zbp which has motivated
some decisions in this patch.
I'm treating rev8 and orc.b as separate instructions when
either Zbb or Zbp is enabled. This allows us to print to suggest
that either feature needs to be enabled to support these mnemonics.
I had tried to put HasStdExtZbbAndNotZbp on the Zbb instructions,
but that caused a diagnostic that said Zbp is required if neither
feature is enabled. We should really mention Zbb since its closer
to final.
This does require extra isel patterns for the different cases so
that bswap will always print as rev8 in assembly listing since
we can't use an InstAlias.
llvm-objdump disassembling should always pick the rev8 or orc.b
instructions. llvm-mc parsing and printing text will not convert
the grevi/gorci spellings to rev8/gorc.b. We could probably fix
this with a special case in processInstruction in the assembly
parser if it its important.
Reviewed By: asb, frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94944
zext.h uses the same encoding as pack rd, rs, x0 in rv32 and
packw rd, rs, x0 in rv64. Encodings without x0 as the second source
are not valid in Zbb.
I've added two new instructions with these specific encodings with
predicates that enable them when either Zbb or Zbp is enabled.
The pack spelling will only be accepted with Zbp. The disassembler
will use the zext.h instruction when either feature is enabled.
Using the pack spelling will print as pack when llvm-mc is
emitting text. We could fix this with some custom code in
processInstruction if this is important, but I'm not sure it is.
Reviewed By: asb, frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94818
Zext.h will need to come back to Zbb, but that only uses specific
encodings of pack.
Reviewed By: asb, frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94742
Changpeng Fang