Change `NamedMDNode::getOperator()` from returning `MDNode *` to
returning `Value *`. To reduce boilerplate at some call sites, add a
`getOperatorAsMDNode()` for named metadata that's expected to only
return `MDNode` -- for now, that's everything, but debug node named
metadata (such as llvm.dbg.cu and llvm.dbg.sp) will soon change. This
is part of PR21433.
Note that there's a follow-up patch to clang for the API change.
llvm-svn: 221375
Clang -gsplit-dwarf self-host -O0, binary increases by 0.0005%, -O2,
binary increases by 25%.
A large binary inside Google, split-dwarf, -O0, and other internal flags
(GDB index, etc) increases by 1.8%, optimized build is 35%.
The size impact may be somewhat greater in .o files (I haven't measured
that much - since the linked executable -O0 numbers seemed low enough)
due to relocations. These relocations could be removed if we taught the
llvm-symbolizer to handle indexed addressing in the .o file (GDB can't
cope with this just yet, but GDB won't be reading this info anyway).
Also debug_ranges could be shared between .o and .dwo, though ideally
debug_ranges would get a schema that could used index(+offset)
addressing, and move to the .dwo file, then we'd be back to sharing
addresses in the address pool again.
But for now, these sizes seem small enough to go ahead with this.
Verified that no other DW_TAGs are produced into the .o file other than
subprograms and inlined_subroutines.
llvm-svn: 221306
This generalizes the range handling for ranges in both the skeleton and
full unit, laying the foundation for the addition of more ranges (rather
than just the CU's special case) in the skeleton CU with fission+gmlt.
llvm-svn: 221202
So that it may be shared between skeleton/full compile unit, for CU
ranges and other ranges to be added for fission+gmlt.
(at some point we might want some kind of object shared between the
skeleton and full compile units for all those things we only want one of
in that scope, rather than having the full unit always look through to
the skeleton... - alternatively, we might be able to have the skeleton
pointer (or another, separate pointer) point to the skeleton or to the
unit itself in non-fission, so we don't have to special case its
absence)
llvm-svn: 221186
This is one of a few steps to generalize range handling to include the
CU range (thus the CU's range list will be moved into the range list
list, losing track of the base address in the process), which means
generalizing ranges from both the skeleton and full unit under fission.
And... then I can used that generalized support for ranges in
fission+gmlt where there'll be a bunch more ranges in the skeleton.
llvm-svn: 221182
Currently we only need to emit skeleton strings into the CU header and
we do this by explicitly calling "addLocalString". With gmlt-in-fission,
we'll be emitting a bunch of other strings from other codepaths where
it's not statically known that these strings will be local or not.
Introduce a virtual function to indicate whether this unit is a DWO unit
or not (I'm not sure if we have a good term for this, the
opposite/alternative to 'skeleton' unit) and use that to generalize the
string emission logic so that strings can be correctly emitted in both
the skeleton and dwo unit when in split dwarf mode.
And to demonstrate that this works, switch the existing special callers
of addLocalString in the skeleton builder to addString - and they still
work. Yay.
llvm-svn: 221094
This was a compile-unit specific label (unused in type units) and seems
unnecessary anyway when we can more easily directly compute the size of
the compile unit.
llvm-svn: 221067
(part of refactoring to allow subprogram emission in both the skeleton
and main units to enable -gmlt-like data to be included in the skeleton
for live inlined backtracing purposes)
llvm-svn: 220578
While refactoring this code I was confused by both the name I had
introduced (addNonArgumentVariable... but it has all this logic to
handle argument numbering and keep things in order?) and by the
redundancy. Seems when I fixed the misordered inlined argument handling,
I didn't realize it was mostly redundant with the argument ordering code
(which I may've also written, I'm not sure). So let's just rely on the
more general case.
The only oddity in output this produces is that it means when we emit
all the variables for the current function, we don't track when we've
finished the argument variables and are about to start the local
variables and insert DW_AT_unspecified_parameters (for varargs
functions) there. Instead it ends up after the local variables, scopes,
etc. But this isn't invalid and doesn't cause DWARF consumers problems
that I know of... so we'll just go with that because it makes the code
nice & simple.
(though, let's see what the buildbots have to say about this - *crosses
fingers*)
There will be some cleanup commits to follow to remove the now trivial
wrappers, etc.
llvm-svn: 220527
Variable handling will be sunk into DwarfFile so that abstract variables
and the like can be shared across multiple CUs (to handle cross-CU
inlining, for example).
llvm-svn: 220453
Use the DwarfDebug in one function that previously took it as a
parameter, and lay the foundation for use this for other operations
coming soon.
llvm-svn: 220452
Now that we're sure the only root (non-abstract) scope is the current
function scope, there's no need for isCurrentFunctionScope, the property
can be tested directly instead.
llvm-svn: 220451
Broken parent scope pointers in inlined DIVariables can cause
ensureAbstractVariableIsCreated to insert new abstract scopes, thus
invalidating the iterator in this loop and leading to hard-to-debug
crashes. Useful when manually reducing IR for testcases.
llvm-svn: 219628
This introduces access to the AbstractSPDies map from DwarfDebug so
DwarfCompileUnit can access it. Eventually this'll sink down to
DwarfFile, but it'll still be generically accessible - not much
encapsulation to provide it. (constructInlinedScopeDIE could stay
further up, in DwarfFile to avoid exposing this - but I don't think
that's particularly better)
llvm-svn: 219411
(& add a few accessors/make a couple of things public for this - it's a
bit of a toss-up, but I think I prefer it this way, keeping some more of
the meaty code down in DwarfCompileUnit - if only to make for smaller
implementation files, etc)
I think we could simplify range handling a bit if we removed the range
lists from each unit and just put a single range list on DwarfDebug,
similar to address pooling.
llvm-svn: 219370
It was just calling a bunch of DwarfUnit functions anyway, as can be
seen by the simplification of removing "TheCU" from all the function
calls in the implementation.
llvm-svn: 219103
This requires exposing some of the current function state from
DwarfDebug. I hope there's not too much of that to expose as I go
through all the functions, but it still seems nicer to expose singular
data down to multiple consumers, than have consumers expose raw mapping
data structures up to DwarfDebug for building subprograms.
Part of a series of refactoring to allow subprograms in both the
skeleton and dwo CUs under Fission.
llvm-svn: 219060
In preparation for sinking all the subprogram emission code down from
DwarfDebug into DwarfCompileUnit, this will avoid bloating
DwarfUnit.h/cpp greatly and make concerns a bit more clear/isolated.
(sinking this handling down is part of the work to handle emitting
minimal subprograms for -gmlt-like data into the skeleton CU under
fission)
llvm-svn: 219057
argument of the llvm.dbg.declare/llvm.dbg.value intrinsics.
Previously, DIVariable was a variable-length field that has an optional
reference to a Metadata array consisting of a variable number of
complex address expressions. In the case of OpPiece expressions this is
wasting a lot of storage in IR, because when an aggregate type is, e.g.,
SROA'd into all of its n individual members, the IR will contain n copies
of the DIVariable, all alike, only differing in the complex address
reference at the end.
By making the complex address into an extra argument of the
dbg.value/dbg.declare intrinsics, all of the pieces can reference the
same variable and the complex address expressions can be uniqued across
the CU, too.
Down the road, this will allow us to move other flags, such as
"indirection" out of the DIVariable, too.
The new intrinsics look like this:
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %storage, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %storage, i64 %offset, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
This patch adds a new LLVM-local tag to DIExpressions, so we can detect
and pretty-print DIExpression metadata nodes.
What this patch doesn't do:
This patch does not touch the "Indirect" field in DIVariable; but moving
that into the expression would be a natural next step.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4919
rdar://problem/17994491
Thanks to dblaikie and dexonsmith for reviewing this patch!
Note: I accidentally committed a bogus older version of this patch previously.
llvm-svn: 218787
argument of the llvm.dbg.declare/llvm.dbg.value intrinsics.
Previously, DIVariable was a variable-length field that has an optional
reference to a Metadata array consisting of a variable number of
complex address expressions. In the case of OpPiece expressions this is
wasting a lot of storage in IR, because when an aggregate type is, e.g.,
SROA'd into all of its n individual members, the IR will contain n copies
of the DIVariable, all alike, only differing in the complex address
reference at the end.
By making the complex address into an extra argument of the
dbg.value/dbg.declare intrinsics, all of the pieces can reference the
same variable and the complex address expressions can be uniqued across
the CU, too.
Down the road, this will allow us to move other flags, such as
"indirection" out of the DIVariable, too.
The new intrinsics look like this:
declare void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %storage, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
declare void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata %storage, i64 %offset, metadata %var, metadata %expr)
This patch adds a new LLVM-local tag to DIExpressions, so we can detect
and pretty-print DIExpression metadata nodes.
What this patch doesn't do:
This patch does not touch the "Indirect" field in DIVariable; but moving
that into the expression would be a natural next step.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4919
rdar://problem/17994491
Thanks to dblaikie and dexonsmith for reviewing this patch!
llvm-svn: 218778
No functional change. Pre-emptive refactoring before I start pushing
some of this subprogram creation down into DWARFCompileUnit so I can
build different subprograms in the skeleton unit from the dwo unit for
adding -gmlt-like data to the skeleton.
llvm-svn: 218713
r218129 omits DW_TAG_subprograms which have no inlined subroutines when
emitting -gmlt data. This makes -gmlt very low cost for -O0 builds.
Darwin's dsymutil reasonably considers a CU empty if it has no
subprograms (which occurs with the above optimization in -O0 programs
without any force_inline function calls) and drops the line table, CU,
and everything in this situation, making backtraces impossible.
Until dsymutil is modified to account for this, disable this
optimization on Darwin to preserve the desired functionality.
(see r218545, which should be reverted after this patch, for other
discussion/details)
Footnote:
In the long term, it doesn't look like this scheme (of simplified debug
info to describe inlining to enable backtracing) is tenable, it is far
too size inefficient for optimized code (the DW_TAG_inlined_subprograms,
even once compressed, are nearly twice as large as the line table
itself (also compressed)) and we'll be considering things like Cary's
two level line table proposal to encode all this information directly in
the line table.
llvm-svn: 218702
To reduce the size of -gmlt data, skip the subprograms without any
inlined subroutines. Since we've now got the ability to make these
determinations in the backend (funnily enough - we added the flag so we
wouldn't produce ranges under -gmlt, but with this change we use the
flag, but go back to producing ranges under -gmlt).
Instead, just produce CU ranges to inform the consumer which parts of
the code are described by this CU's line table. Tools could inspect the
line table directly to compute the range, but the CU ranges only seem to
be about 0.5% of object/executable size, so I'm not too worried about
teaching llvm-symbolizer that trick just yet - it's certainly a possible
piece of future work.
Update an llvm-symbolizer test just to demonstrate that this schema is
acceptable there (if it wasn't, the compiler-rt tests would catch this,
but good to have an in-llvm-tree test for llvm-symbolizer's behavior
here)
Building the clang binary with -gmlt with this patch reduces the total
size of object files by 5.1% (5.56% without ranges) without compression
and the executable by 4.37% (4.75% without ranges).
llvm-svn: 218129
Summary:
This will allow to request the creation of a forward delacred variable
at is point of use (for imported declarations, this will be
DwarfDebug::constructImportedEntityDIE) rather than having to put the
forward decl in a retention list.
Note that getOrCreateGlobalVariable returns the actual definition DIE when the
routine creates a declaration and a definition DIE. If you agree this is the
right behavior, then I'll have a followup patch that registers the definition
in the DIE map instead of the declaration as it is today (this 'breaks' only
one test, where we test that the imported entity is the declaration). I'm
not sure what's best here, but it's easy enough for a consumer to follow the
DW_AT_specification link to get to the declaration, whereas it takes more
work to find the actual definition from a declaration DIE.
Reviewers: echristo, dblaikie, aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5381
llvm-svn: 218126
And since it /looked/ like the DwarfStrSectionSym was unused, I tried
removing it - but then it turned out that DwarfStringPool was
reconstructing the same label (and expecting it to have already been
emitted) and uses that.
So I kept it around, but wanted to pass it in to users - since it seemed
a bit silly for DwarfStringPool to have it passed in and returned but
itself have no use for it. The only two users don't handle strings in
both .dwo and .o files so they only ever need the one symbol - no need
to keep it (and have an unused symbol) in the DwarfStringPool used for
fission/.dwo.
Refactor a bunch of accelerator table usage to remove duplication so I
didn't have to touch 4-5 callers.
llvm-svn: 217628
So that the two operations in DwarfDebug couldn't get separated (because
I accidentally separated them in some work in progress), put them
together. While we're here, move DwarfUnit::addRange to
DwarfCompileUnit, since it's not relevant to type units.
llvm-svn: 217468
PrevSection/PrevCU are used to detect holes in the address range of a CU
to ensure the DW_AT_ranges does not include those holes. When we see a
function with no debug info, though it may be in the same range as the
prior and subsequent functions, there should be a gap in the CU's
ranges. By setting PrevCU to null in that case, the range would not be
extended to cover the gap.
llvm-svn: 217466
DW_TAG_lexical_scopes inform debuggers about the instruction range for
which a given variable (or imported declaration/module/etc) is valid. If
the scope doesn't itself contain any such entities, it's a waste of
space and should be omitted.
We were correctly doing this for entirely empty leaves, but not for
intermediate nodes.
Reduces total (not just debug sections) .o file size for a bootstrap
-gmlt LLVM by 22% and bootstrap -gmlt clang executable by 13%. The wins
for a full -g build will be less as a % (and in absolute terms), but
should still be substantial - with some of that win being fewer
relocations, thus more substantiall reducing link times than fewer bytes
alone would have.
llvm-svn: 216861
This makes the emptiness of the scope with regards to variables and
nested scopes is the same as with regards to imported entities. Just
check if we had nothing at all before we build the node.
llvm-svn: 216840
First of many steps to improve lexical scope construction (to omit
trivial lexical scopes - those without any direct variables). To that
end it's easier not to create imported entities directly into the
lexical scope node, but to build them, then add them if necessary.
llvm-svn: 216838
Rushed when I realized I hadn't committed the FreeDeleter for a clang
change I'd committed, and didn't check that I had things lying around in
my client.
Apologies for the noise.
llvm-svn: 216792
Somewhat unnoticed in the original implementation of discriminators, but
it could cause instructions to end up in new, small,
DW_TAG_lexical_blocks due to the use of DILexicalBlock to track
discriminator changes.
Instead, use DILexicalBlockFile which we already use to track file
changes without introducing new scopes, so it works well to track
discriminator changes in the same way.
llvm-svn: 216239
buildLocationLists easier to read.
The previous implementation conflated the merging of individual pieces
and the merging of entire DebugLocEntries.
By splitting this functionality into two separate functions the intention
of the code should be clearer.
llvm-svn: 215383
Due to an unnecessary special case, inlined arguments that happened to
be from the same function as they were inlined into were misclassified
as non-inline arguments and would overwrite the non-inlined arguments.
Assert that we never overwrite a function's arguments, and stop
misclassifying inlined arguments as non-inline arguments to fix this
issue.
Excuse the rather crappy test case - handcrafted IR might do better, or
someone who understands better how to tickle the inliner to create a
recursive inlining situation like this (though it may also be necessary
to tickle the variable in a particular way to cause it to be recorded in
the MMI side table and go down this particular path for location
information).
llvm-svn: 215157
This was coming in weird debug info that had variables (and hence
debug_locs) but was in GMLT mode (because it was missing the 13th field
of the compile_unit metadata) so no ranges were constructed. We should
always have at least one range for any CU with a debug_loc in it -
because the range should cover the debug_loc.
The assertion just ensures that the "!= 1" range case inside the
subsequent loop doesn't get entered for the case where there are no
ranges at all, which should never reach here in the first place.
llvm-svn: 214939
This simplifies construction and usage while making the data structure
smaller. It was a holdover from the days when we didn't have a separate
DebugLocList and all we had was a flat list of DebugLocEntries.
llvm-svn: 214933
Originally reverted in r213432 with flakey failures on an ASan self-host
build. After reduction it seems to be the same issue fixed in r213805
(ArgPromo + DebugInfo: Handle updating debug info over multiple
applications of argument promotion) and r213952 (by having
LiveDebugVariables strip dbg_value intrinsics in functions that are not
described by debug info). Though I cannot explain why this failure was
flakey...
llvm-svn: 214761
variables (for example, by-value struct arguments passed in registers, or
large integer values split across several smaller registers).
On the IR level, this adds a new type of complex address operation OpPiece
to DIVariable that describes size and offset of a variable fragment.
On the DWARF emitter level, all pieces describing the same variable are
collected, sorted and emitted as DWARF expressions using the DW_OP_piece
and DW_OP_bit_piece operators.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3373
rdar://problem/15928306
What this patch doesn't do / Future work:
- This patch only adds the backend machinery to make this work, patches
that change SROA and SelectionDAG's type legalizer to actually create
such debug info will follow. (http://reviews.llvm.org/D2680)
- Making the DIVariable complex expressions into an argument of dbg.value
will reduce the memory footprint of the debug metadata.
- The sorting/uniquing of pieces should be moved into DebugLocEntry,
to facilitate the merging of multi-piece entries.
llvm-svn: 214576
Per feedback on r214111, we are going to use null to represent unspecified
parameter. If the type array is {null}, it means a function that returns void;
If the type array is {null, null}, it means a variadic function that returns
void. In summary if we have more than one element in the type array and the last
element is null, it is a variadic function.
rdar://17628609
llvm-svn: 214189
The enum types array by design contains pointers to MDNodes rather than DIRefs.
Unique them when handling the enum types in DwarfDebug.
rdar://17628609
llvm-svn: 214139
DITypeArray is an array of DITypeRef, at its creation, we will create
DITypeRef (i.e use the identifier if the type node has an identifier).
This is the last patch to unique the type array of a subroutine type.
rdar://17628609
llvm-svn: 214132
This is the second of a series of patches to handle type uniqueing of the
type array for a subroutine type.
For vector and array types, getElements returns the array of subranges, so it
is a better name than getTypeArray. Even for class, struct and enum types,
getElements returns the members, which can be subprograms.
setArrays can set up to two arrays, the second is the templates.
This commit should have no functionality change.
llvm-svn: 214112
This recommits r208930, r208933, and r208975 (by reverting r209338) and
reverts r209529 (the FIXME to readd this functionality once the tools
were fixed) now that DWP has been fixed to cope with a single section
for all fission type units.
Original commit message:
"Since type units in the dwo file are handled by a debug aware tool,
they don't need to leverage the ELF comdat grouping to implement
deduplication. Avoid creating all the .group sections for these as a
space optimization."
llvm-svn: 213956
Reverted by Eric Christopher (Thanks!) in r212203 after Bob Wilson
reported LTO issues. Duncan Exon Smith and Aditya Nandakumar helped
provide a reduced reproduction, though the failure wasn't too hard to
guess, and even easier with the example to confirm.
The assertion that the subprogram metadata associated with an
llvm::Function matches the scope data referenced by the DbgLocs on the
instructions in that function is not valid under LTO. In LTO, a C++
inline function might exist in multiple CUs and the subprogram metadata
nodes will refer to the same llvm::Function. In this case, depending on
the order of the CUs, the first intance of the subprogram metadata may
not be the one referenced by the instructions in that function and the
assertion will fail.
A test case (test/DebugInfo/cross-cu-linkonce-distinct.ll) is added, the
assertion removed and a comment added to explain this situation.
This was then reverted again in r213581 as it caused PR20367. The root
cause of this was the early exit in LiveDebugVariables meant that
spurious DBG_VALUE intrinsics that referenced dead variables were not
removed, causing an assertion/crash later on. The fix is to have
LiveDebugVariables strip all DBG_VALUE intrinsics in functions without
debug info as they're not needed anyway. Test case added to cover this
situation (that occurs when a debug-having function is inlined into a
nodebug function) in test/DebugInfo/X86/nodebug_with_debug_loc.ll
Original commit message:
If a function isn't actually in a CU's subprogram list in the debug info
metadata, ignore all the DebugLocs and don't try to build scopes, track
variables, etc.
While this is possibly a minor optimization, it's also a correctness fix
for an incoming patch that will add assertions to LexicalScopes and the
debug info verifier to ensure that all scope chains lead to debug info
for the current function.
Fix up a few test cases that had broken/incomplete debug info that could
violate this constraint.
Add a test case where this occurs by design (inlining a
debug-info-having function in an attribute nodebug function - we want
this to work because /if/ the nodebug function is then inlined into a
debug-info-having function, it should be fine (and will work fine - we
just stitch the scopes up as usual), but should the inlining not happen
we need to not assert fail either).
llvm-svn: 213952
Recommits 212776 which was reverted in r212793. This has been committed
and recommitted a few times as I try to test it harder and find/fix more
issues. The most recent revert was due to an asan bot failure which I
can't seem to reproduce locally, though I believe I'm following all the
steps the buildbot does.
So I'm going to recommit this in the hopes of investigating the failure
on the buildbot itself... apologies in advance for the bot noise. If
anyone sees failures with this /please/ provide me with any
reproductions, etc.
llvm-svn: 213391
Found during windows unwinding work. This header is indirectly included through
a chain leading through Support/Win64EH.h. Explicitly include the header. NFC.
llvm-svn: 212955
This reverts commit r212776.
Nope, still seems to be failing on the sanitizer bots... but hey, not
the msan self-host anymore, it's failing in asan now. I'll start looking
there next.
llvm-svn: 212793
Committed in r212205 and reverted in r212226 due to msan self-hosting
failure, I believe I've got that fixed by r212761 to Clang.
Original commit message:
"Originally committed in r211723, reverted in r211724 due to failure
cases found and fixed (ArgumentPromotion: r211872, Inlining: r212065),
committed again in r212085 and reverted again in r212089 after fixing
some other cases, such as debug info subprogram lists not keeping track
of the function they represent (r212128) and then short-circuiting
things like LiveDebugVariables that build LexicalScopes for functions
that might not have full debug info.
And again, I believe the invariant actually holds for some reasonable
amount of code (but I'll keep an eye on the buildbots and see what
happens... ).
Original commit message:
PR20038: DebugInfo: Inlined call sites where the caller has debug info
but the call itself has no debug location.
This situation does bad things when inlined, so I've fixed Clang not to
produce inlinable call sites without locations when the caller has debug
info (in the one case where I could find that this occurred). This
updates the PR20038 test case to be what clang now produces, and readds
the assertion that had to be removed due to this bug.
I've also beefed up the debug info verifier to help diagnose these
issues in the future, and I hope to add checks to the inliner to just
assert-fail if it encounters this situation. If, in the future, we
decide we have to cope with this situation, the right thing to do is
probably to just remove all the DebugLocs from the inlined
instructions."
llvm-svn: 212776
Reverted by Eric Christopher (Thanks!) in r212203 after Bob Wilson
reported LTO issues. Duncan Exon Smith and Aditya Nandakumar helped
provide a reduced reproduction, though the failure wasn't too hard to
guess, and even easier with the example to confirm.
The assertion that the subprogram metadata associated with an
llvm::Function matches the scope data referenced by the DbgLocs on the
instructions in that function is not valid under LTO. In LTO, a C++
inline function might exist in multiple CUs and the subprogram metadata
nodes will refer to the same llvm::Function. In this case, depending on
the order of the CUs, the first intance of the subprogram metadata may
not be the one referenced by the instructions in that function and the
assertion will fail.
A test case (test/DebugInfo/cross-cu-linkonce-distinct.ll) is added, the
assertion removed and a comment added to explain this situation.
Original commit message:
If a function isn't actually in a CU's subprogram list in the debug info
metadata, ignore all the DebugLocs and don't try to build scopes, track
variables, etc.
While this is possibly a minor optimization, it's also a correctness fix
for an incoming patch that will add assertions to LexicalScopes and the
debug info verifier to ensure that all scope chains lead to debug info
for the current function.
Fix up a few test cases that had broken/incomplete debug info that could
violate this constraint.
Add a test case where this occurs by design (inlining a
debug-info-having function in an attribute nodebug function - we want
this to work because /if/ the nodebug function is then inlined into a
debug-info-having function, it should be fine (and will work fine - we
just stitch the scopes up as usual), but should the inlining not happen
we need to not assert fail either).
llvm-svn: 212649
This reverts commit r212205.
Reverting this again, still seeing crashes when building compiler-rt...
Sorry for the continued noise, not sure why I'm failing to reproduce
this locally.
llvm-svn: 212226
Originally committed in r211723, reverted in r211724 due to failure
cases found and fixed (ArgumentPromotion: r211872, Inlining: r212065),
committed again in r212085 and reverted again in r212089 after fixing
some other cases, such as debug info subprogram lists not keeping track
of the function they represent (r212128) and then short-circuiting
things like LiveDebugVariables that build LexicalScopes for functions
that might not have full debug info.
And again, I believe the invariant actually holds for some reasonable
amount of code (but I'll keep an eye on the buildbots and see what
happens... ).
Original commit message:
PR20038: DebugInfo: Inlined call sites where the caller has debug info
but the call itself has no debug location.
This situation does bad things when inlined, so I've fixed Clang not to
produce inlinable call sites without locations when the caller has debug
info (in the one case where I could find that this occurred). This
updates the PR20038 test case to be what clang now produces, and readds
the assertion that had to be removed due to this bug.
I've also beefed up the debug info verifier to help diagnose these
issues in the future, and I hope to add checks to the inliner to just
assert-fail if it encounters this situation. If, in the future, we
decide we have to cope with this situation, the right thing to do is
probably to just remove all the DebugLocs from the inlined instructions.
llvm-svn: 212205
If a function isn't actually in a CU's subprogram list in the debug info
metadata, ignore all the DebugLocs and don't try to build scopes, track
variables, etc.
While this is possibly a minor optimization, it's also a correctness fix
for an incoming patch that will add assertions to LexicalScopes and the
debug info verifier to ensure that all scope chains lead to debug info
for the current function.
Fix up a few test cases that had broken/incomplete debug info that could
violate this constraint.
Add a test case where this occurs by design (inlining a
debug-info-having function in an attribute nodebug function - we want
this to work because /if/ the nodebug function is then inlined into a
debug-info-having function, it should be fine (and will work fine - we
just stitch the scopes up as usual), but should the inlining not happen
we need to not assert fail either).
llvm-svn: 212203
This reverts commit r212085.
This breaks the sanitizer bot... & I thought I'd tried pretty hard not
to do that. Guess I need to try harder.
llvm-svn: 212089
Originally committed in r211723, reverted in r211724 due to failure
cases found and fixed (ArgumentPromotion: r211872, Inlining: r212065),
and I now believe the invariant actually holds for some reasonable
amount of code (but I'll keep an eye on the buildbots and see what
happens... ).
Original commit message:
PR20038: DebugInfo: Inlined call sites where the caller has debug info
but the call itself has no debug location.
This situation does bad things when inlined, so I've fixed Clang not to
produce inlinable call sites without locations when the caller has debug
info (in the one case where I could find that this occurred). This
updates the PR20038 test case to be what clang now produces, and readds
the assertion that had to be removed due to this bug.
I've also beefed up the debug info verifier to help diagnose these
issues in the future, and I hope to add checks to the inliner to just
assert-fail if it encounters this situation. If, in the future, we
decide we have to cope with this situation, the right thing to do is
probably to just remove all the DebugLocs from the inlined instructions.
llvm-svn: 212085
Reverting this again, didn't mean to commit it - while r211872 fixes one
of the issues here, there are still others to figure out and address.
This reverts commit r211871.
llvm-svn: 211873
This situation does bad things when inlined, so I've fixed Clang not to
produce inlinable call sites without locations when the caller has debug
info (in the one case where I could find that this occurred). This
updates the PR20038 test case to be what clang now produces, and readds
the assertion that had to be removed due to this bug.
I've also beefed up the debug info verifier to help diagnose these
issues in the future, and I hope to add checks to the inliner to just
assert-fail if it encounters this situation. If, in the future, we
decide we have to cope with this situation, the right thing to do is
probably to just remove all the DebugLocs from the inlined instructions.
llvm-svn: 211723
The address pool was being emitted before location lists. The latter
could add more entries to the pool which would be lost/never emitted.
llvm-svn: 211284
Currently, llvm always emits a DWARF CIE with a version of 1, even when emitting
DWARF 3 or 4, which both support CIE version 3. This patch makes it emit the
newer CIE version when we are emitting DWARF 3 or 4. This will not reduce
compatibility, as we already emit other DWARF3/4 features, and is worth doing as
the DWARF3 spec removed some ambiguities in the interpretation of call frame
information.
It also fixes a minor bug where the "return address" field of the CIE was
encoded as a ULEB128, which is only valid when the CIE version is 3. There are
no test changes for this, because (as far as I can tell) none of the platforms
that we test have a return address register with a DWARF register number >127.
llvm-svn: 211272
I haven't nailed this down entirely, but this is about as small of a
test case as I can seem to construct and adequately demonstrates the
crasher. I'll continue investigating the root cause/fix(es).
llvm-svn: 210993
Now that we handle finding abstract variables at the end of the module,
remove the upfront handling and just ensure the abstract variable is
built when necessary.
In theory we could have a split implementation, where inlined variables
are immediately constructed referencing the abstract definition, and
concrete variables are delayed - but let's go with one solution for now
unless there's a reason not to.
llvm-svn: 210961
Rather than relying on abstract variables looked up at the time the
concrete variable is created, look them up at the end of the module to
ensure they're referenced even if they're created after the concrete
definition. This completes/matches the work done in r209677 to handle
this for the subprograms themselves.
llvm-svn: 210946
This doesn't fix the abstract variable handling yet, but it introduces a
similar delay mechanism as was added for subprograms, causing
DW_AT_location to be reordered to the beginning of the attribute list
for local variables, and fixes all the test fallout for that.
A subsequent commit will remove the abstract variable handling in
DbgVariable and just do the abstract variable lookup at module end to
ensure that abstract variables introduced after their concrete
counterparts are appropriately referenced by the concrete variable.
llvm-svn: 210943
This ensures that member functions, for example, are entered into
pubnames with their fully qualified name, rather than inside the global
namespace.
llvm-svn: 210379
Unused arguments were not being added to the argument list, but instead
treated as arbitrary scope variables. This meant they weren't carefully
added in the original argument order.
In this particular example, though, it turns out the argument is only
/mostly/ unused (well, actually it's entirely used, but in a specific
way). It's a struct that, due to ABI reasons, is decomposed into chunks
(exactly one chunk, since it has one member) and then passed. Since only
one of those chunks is used (SROA, etc, kill the original reconstitution
code) we don't have a location to describe the whole variable.
In this particular case, since the struct consists of just the one int,
once we have partial location information, this should have a location
that describes the entire variable (since the piece is the entirety of
the object).
And at some point we'll need to describe the location of even /entirely/
unused arguments so that they can at least be printed on function entry.
llvm-svn: 210231
Abstract variables within abstract scopes that are entirely optimized
away in their first inlining are omitted because their scope is not
present so the variable is never created. Instead, we should ensure the
scope is created so the variable can be added, even if it's been
optimized away in its first inlining.
This fixes the incorrect debug info in missing-abstract-variable.ll
(added in r210143) and passes an asserts self-hosting build, so
hopefully there's not more of these issues left behind... *fingers
crossed*.
llvm-svn: 210221
This was previously committed in r209680 and reverted in r209683 after
it caused sanitizer builds to crash.
The issue seems to be that the DebugLoc associated with dbg.value IR
intrinsics isn't necessarily accurate. Instead, we duplicate the
DIVariables and add an InlinedAt field to them to record their
location.
We were using this InlinedAt field to compute the LexicalScope for the
variable, but not using it in the abstract DbgVariable construction and
mapping. This resulted in a formal parameter to the current concrete
function, correctly having no InlinedAt information, but incorrectly
having a DebugLoc that described an inlined location within the
function... thus an abstract DbgVariable was created for the variable,
but its DIE was never constructed (since the LexicalScope had no such
variable). This DbgVariable was silently ignored (by testing for a
non-null DIE on the abstract DbgVariable).
So, fix this by using the right scoping information when constructing
abstract DbgVariables.
In the long run, I suspect we want to undo the work that added this
second kind of location tracking and fix the places where the DebugLoc
propagation on the dbg.value intrinsic fails. This will shrink debug
info (by not duplicating DIVariables), make it more efficient (by not
having to construct new DIVariable metadata nodes to try to map back to
a single variable), and benefit all instructions.
But perhaps there are insurmountable issues with DebugLoc quality that
I'm unaware of... I just don't know how we can't /just keep the DebugLoc
from the dbg.declare to the dbg.values and never get this wrong/.
Some history context:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=135629http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=137253
llvm-svn: 209984
Use more straightforward way to represent the set of instruction
ranges where the location of a user variable is defined - vector of pairs
of instructions (defining start/end of each range),
instead of a flattened vector of instructions where some instructions
are supposed to start the range, and the rest are supposed to "clobber" it.
Simplify the code which generates actual .debug_loc entries.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 209698
Current implementation of calculateDbgValueHistory already creates the
keys in the expected order (user variables are listed in order of appearance),
and should do so later by contract.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 209690
After much puppetry, here's the major piece of the work to ensure that
even when a concrete definition preceeds all inline definitions, an
abstract definition is still created and referenced from both concrete
and inline definitions.
Variables are still broken in this case (see comment in
dbg-value-inlined-parameter.ll test case) and will be addressed in
follow up work.
llvm-svn: 209677
A further step to correctly emitting concrete out of line definitions
preceeding inlined instances of the same program.
To do this, emission of subprograms must be delayed until required since
we don't know which (abstract only (if there's no out of line
definition), concrete only (if there are no inlined instances), or both)
DIEs are required at the start of the module.
To reduce the test churn in the following commit that actually fixes the
bug, this commit introduces the lazy DIE construction and cleans up test
cases that are impacted by the changes in the resulting DIE ordering.
llvm-svn: 209675
This is a precursor to fixing inlined debug info where the concrete,
out-of-line definition may preceed any inlined usage. To cope with this,
the attributes that may appear on the concrete definition or the
abstract definition are delayed until the end of the module. Then, if an
abstract definition was created, it is referenced (and no other
attributes are added to the out-of-line definition), otherwise the
attributes are added directly to the out-of-line definition.
In a couple of cases this causes not just reordering of attributes, but
reordering of types. When the creation of the attribute is delayed, if
that creation would create a type (such as for a DW_AT_type attribute)
then other top level DIEs may've been constructed during the delay,
causing the referenced type to be created and added after those
intervening DIEs. In the extreme case, in cross-cu-inlining.ll, this
actually causes the DW_TAG_basic_type for "int" to move from one CU to
another.
llvm-svn: 209674
This seems like a simple cleanup/improved consistency, but also helps
lay the foundation to fix the bug mentioned in the test case: concrete
definitions preceeding any inlined usage aren't properly split into
concrete + abstract (because they're not known to need it until it's too
late).
Once we start deferring this choice until later, we won't have the
choice to put concrete definitions for inlined subroutines in a
different scope from concrete definitions for non-inlined subroutines
(since we won't know at time-of-construction which one it'll be). This
change brings those two cases into alignment ahead of that future
chaneg/fix.
llvm-svn: 209547
It's not really a "ScopeDIE", as such - it's the abstract function
definition's DIE. And we usually use "SP" for subprograms, rather than
"Sub".
llvm-svn: 209499
constructSubprogramDIE was already called for every subprogram in every
CU when the module was started - there's no need to call it again at
module finalization.
llvm-svn: 209372
This reverts commit r208930, r208933, and r208975.
It seems not all fission consumers are ready to handle this behavior.
Reverting until tools are brought up to spec.
llvm-svn: 209338
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith