All supported compilers have been supporting __is_aggregate for a long
time now, so it's reasonable to remove this workaround.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107833
All supported compilers should support
_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_BUILTIN_IS_CONSTANT_EVALUATED so this can be removed.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107239
This patch fixes the constrains on the __perfect_forward constructor
and its call operators, which were incorrect. In particular, it makes
sure that we closely follow [func.require], which basically says that
we must deliver the bound arguments with the appropriate value category
or make the call ill-formed, but not silently fall back to using a
different value category.
As a fly-by, this patch also:
- Adds types __bind_front_t and __not_fn_t to make the result of
calling bind_front and not_fn more opaque, and improve diagnostics
for users.
- Adds a bunch of tests for bind_front and remove some that are now
redundant.
- Adds some missing _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI annotations.
Immense thanks to @tcanens for raising awareness about this issue, and
providing help with the = delete bits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107199
Switching `__builtin_clzll` to `__libcpp_clz` should work on all
platforms and no longer require MSVC specific code.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107709
@tcanens pointed out the current behavior of the macro breaks the usage
pattern described in http://wg21.link/SD6
```
# if __has_include(<optional>)
# include <optional>
# if __cpp_lib_optional >= 201606
# define have_optional 1
# endif
```
To support this usage pattern the hard errror is removed. Instead the
header includes nothing but the `<version>` header.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107134
Also, improve tests for std::destroy and std::destroy_n so that they
check for array support.
These changes are part of http://wg21.link/p0896 (the One Ranges proposal).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106916
Summary:
Currently, if we pass in the same iterator for begin and end,
the long double version of do_get would throw a runtime error.
However, according to standard (https://eel.is/c++draft/locale.money.get#virtuals-1),
we should set the failbit and eofbit when no more characters are available.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100510
Implement the changes in all language modes.
LWG3506 "Missing allocator-extended constructors for priority_queue"
makes the following changes:
- New allocator-extended constructors for priority_queue.
- New deduction guides targeting those constructors.
LWG3522: "Missing requirement on InputIterator template parameter
for priority_queue constructors". The iterator parameter should be
constrained to actually be an iterator type. `priority_queue{1,2}`
should be SFINAE-friendly ill-formed.
Also, do a drive-by fix in the allocator-extended move constructor:
there's no need to do a `make_heap` after moving from `__q.c` into
our own `c`, because that container was already heapified when it
was part of `__q`. [priqueue.cons.alloc] actually specifies the
behavior and does *not* mention calling `make_heap`. I think this
was just a copy-paste thinko. It dates back to the initial import
of libc++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106824
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106827
The error message for disabled filesystem and locale support is now done
in the same fashion as ranges and format in D106763.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106935
This was missed in 08c766a731
and caused test failures in the buildkite bots:
libcpp_version.pass.cpp:22:1:
error: static_assert failed due to requirement '14000 == libcpp_version'
"_LIBCPP_VERSION doesn't match __libcpp_version
Adds a new CMake option to disable the usage of incomplete headers.
These incomplete headers are not guaranteed to be ABI stable. This
option is intended to be used by vendors so they can avoid their users
from code that's not ready for production usage.
The option is enabled by default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106763
Feedback requested in D106735 applied in Diff 3 seem to have
reverted in Diff 4. This patch fixes that up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106829
See LWG reflector thread of 2021-07-23 titled
'Question on ranges::advance and "past-the-sentinel iterators"'.
Test case heavily based on one graciously provided by Casey Carter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106735
This started as fixing a typo in a ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS directive
which turned out to uncover a few places where we warned about signedness
changes.
As a fly-by fix, this updates the various __advance overloads
for style consistency.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106372
`__function_like` wasn't being exported, so certain properties of the
`ranges` functions weren't being propagated in modules land.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105078
This is a spin-off from D79555 review, that with this patch will be able to use `__libcpp_copysign` instead of adhoc `__copysign_constexpr` helper.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106364
This replaces _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY with _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI. It's
not intended to do for other parts of libc++. This change makes it easy
to search and replace all occurrences of the patches in review.
We've been forgetting to add those to most of the <ranges> review.
To avoid forgetting in the future, I added an item in the pre-commit
checklist.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106287
libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that outdated
and naive tooling (some of which is outside of LLVM's scope) will
suggest users include things such as `<__algorithm/find.h>` instead of
`<algorithm>`, and Hyrum's law suggests that users will eventually begin
to rely on this without the help of tooling. As such, this commit
intends to protect users from themselves, by making it a hard error for
anyone outside of the standard library to include libc++ detail headers.
This is the first of four patches. Patch #2 will solve the problem for
pre-processor `#include`s; patches #3 and #4 will solve the problem for
`<__tree>` and `<__hash_table>` (since I've never touched the test cases
that are failing for these two, I want to split them out into their own
commits to be extra careful). Patch #5 will concern itself with
`<__threading_support>`, which intersects with libcxxabi (which I know
even less about).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105932
* <__algorithm/iter_swap.h>
* <__algorithm/swap_ranges.h>
* <__functional/is_transparent.h>
* <__memory/uses_allocator.h>
* <__ranges/drop_view.h>
* <__ranges/transform_view.h>
* <shared_mutex>
* <span>
Also updates header inclusions that were affected.
**NOTE:** This is a proper subset of D105932. Since the content has
already been LGTM'd, I intend to merge this patch without review,
pending green CI. I decided it would be better to move these changes
into their own commit since the former patch has undergone further
changes and will need yet another light review. In the event any of
that gets rolled back (for whatever reason), the changes in this patch
won't be affected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106040
It turns out that D105040 broke `std::rel_ops`; we actually do need
both a one-template-parameter and a two-template-parameter version of
all the comparison operators, because if we have only the heterogeneous
two-parameter version, then `x > x` is ambiguous:
template<class T, class U> int f(S<T>, S<U>) { return 1; }
template<class T> int f(T, T) { return 2; } // rel_ops
S<int> s; f(s,s); // ambiguous between #1 and #2
Adding the one-template-parameter version fixes the ambiguity:
template<class T, class U> int f(S<T>, S<U>) { return 1; }
template<class T> int f(T, T) { return 2; } // rel_ops
template<class T> int f(S<T>, S<T>) { return 3; }
S<int> s; f(s,s); // #3 beats both #1 and #2
We have the same problem with `reverse_iterator` as with `__wrap_iter`.
But so do libstdc++ and Microsoft, so we're not going to worry about it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105894
This will allow us to use variant in common_iterator. We do this by introducing a new `__light_array` type that variant uses instead of `std::array`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105597
The format library uses `std::monostate`, but not a `std::variant`.
Moving `std::monostate` to its own header allows the format library to
reduce the amount of included code.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105582
Summary:
If we are on c++03 mode for some reason, and __builtin_va_copy is
available, then use it instead of error out on not having va_copy
in 03 mode.
Reviewed by: ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100336
While we can debate on the value of passing by const value, there is no
arguing that it's confusing to do so in some circumstances, such as when
marking a pointer parameter as being const (did you mean a pointer-to-const?).
This commit fixes a few issues along those lines.
The __search helper function was once split into __functional for circular
dependency reasons, however this is not an issue anymore now that we have
finer grained headers.
With the STL containers, I didn't enable move operations in C++03 mode
because that would change the overload resolution for things that today
are copy operations. With iostreams, though, the copy operations aren't
present at all, and so I see no problem with enabling move operations
even in (Clang's greatly extended) C++03 mode.
Clang's C++03 mode does not support delegating constructors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104310
In typeinfo there is a reinterpret_cast between a uintptr_t and size_t. These are two integer types and therefore a reinterpret_cast is not right for this situation. It looks like it may have been copied and pasted from above in the file. An implicit cast works in it's place.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104814
Moves:
* `std::move`, `std::forward`, `std::declval`, and `std::swap` into
`__utility/${FUNCTION_NAME}`.
* `std::swap_ranges` and `std::iter_swap` into
`__algorithm/${FUNCTION_NAME}`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103734
Under the as-if rule, we can directly implement the array overload for
`std::swap`. By removing this circular dependency where `swap` is
implemented in terms of `swap_ranges` and `swap_ranges` is defined in
terms of `swap`, we can split them into their own headers. This will:
* limit the surface area in which Hyrum's law can bite us;
* force users to include the correct headers;
* make finding the definitions trivial (`swap` is a utility;
`swap_ranges` is an algorithm).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104760
* `<type_traits>` depends on `std::forward`, so we replaced it with
`static_cast<T&&>`.
* `swap`'s return type is confusing, so it's been rearranged to improve
readabilitiy.
C++03 didn't support `explicit` conversion operators;
but Clang's C++03 mode does, as an extension, so we can use it.
This lets us make the conversion explicit in `std::function` (even in '03),
and remove some silly metaprogramming in `std::basic_ios`.
Drive-by improvements to the tests for these operators, in addition
to making sure all these tests also run in `c++03` mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104682
The current implementation of `std::forward_list::swap` uses
`propagate_on_container_move_assignment` for `noexcept` specification.
This patch changes it to use `propagate_on_container_swap`, as it should.
Fixes https://llvm.org/PR50224.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101899
This is a fairly mechanical change, it just moves each algorithm into
its own header. This is intended to be a NFC.
This commit re-applies 7ed7d4ccb8, which was reverted in 692d7166f7
because the Modules build got broken. The modules build has now been
fixed, so we're re-committing this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103583
Attribution note
----------------
I'm only committing this. This commit is a mix of D103583, D103330 and
D104171 authored by:
Co-authored-by: Christopher Di Bella <cjdb@google.com>
Co-authored-by: zoecarver <z.zoelec2@gmail.com>
P1518 does the following in C++23 but we'll just do it in C++17 as well:
- Stop requiring `Alloc` to be an allocator on some container-adaptor deduction guides
- Stop deducing from `Allocator` on some sequence container constructors
- Stop deducing from `Allocator` on some other container constructors (libc++ already did this)
The affected constructors are the "allocator-extended" versions of
constructors where the non-allocator arguments are already sufficient
to deduce the allocator type. For example,
std::pmr::vector<int> v1;
std::vector v2(v1, std::pmr::new_delete_resource());
std::stack s2(v1, std::pmr::new_delete_resource());
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97742
When we removed the allocator<void> specialization, the triviality of
std::allocator<void> changed because the primary template had a
non-trivial default constructor and the specialization didn't
(so std::allocator<void> went from trivial to non-trivial).
This commit fixes that oversight by giving a trivial constructor to
the primary template when instantiated on cv-void.
This was reported in https://llvm.org/PR50299.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104398
A few slipped through the cracks because D104175 and D104170 didn't
concern themselves with newer commits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104414
While the std::allocator<void> specialization was deprecated by
https://wg21.link/p0174#2.2, the *use* of std::allocator<void> by users
was not. The intent was that std::allocator<void> could still be used
in C++17 and C++20, but starting with C++20 (with the removal of the
specialization), std::allocator<void> would use the primary template.
That intent was called out in wg21.link/p0619r4#3.9.
As a result of this patch, _LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX20_REMOVED_ALLOCATOR_MEMBERS
will also not control whether the explicit specialization is provided or
not. It shouldn't matter, since in C++20, one can simply use the primary
template.
Fixes http://llvm.org/PR50299
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104323
This has been broken out of D104170 since it should be merged whether or
not we go ahead with the module map changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104175
https://eel.is/c++draft/atomics.types.operations#23 says: ... the value of failure is order except that a value of `memory_order::acq_rel` shall be replaced by the value `memory_order::acquire` and a value of `memory_order::release` shall be replaced by the value `memory_order::relaxed`.
This failure mapping is only handled for `_LIBCPP_HAS_GCC_ATOMIC_IMP`. We are seeing bad code generation for `compare_exchange_strong(cmp, 1, std::memory_order_acq_rel)` when using libc++ in place of libstdc++: https://godbolt.org/z/v3onrrq4G.
This was caught by tsan tests after D99434, `[TSAN] Honor failure memory orders in AtomicCAS`, but appears to be an issue in non-tsan code.
Reviewed By: ldionne, dvyukov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103846
This started as an attempt to fix a GCC 11 warning of misplaced parentheses.
I then noticed that trying to fix the parentheses warning actually triggered
errors in the tests, showing that we were incorrectly assuming that the
implementation of ranges::advance was using operator+= or operator-=.
This commit fixes that issue and makes the tests easier to follow by
localizing the assertions it makes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103272
Louis Dionne