Some files still contained the old University of Illinois Open Source
Licence header. This patch replaces that with the Apache 2 with LLVM
Exception licence.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107528
Clang diagnostics refer to identifier names in quotes.
This patch makes inline remarks conform to the convention.
New behavior:
```
% clang -O2 -Rpass=inline -Rpass-missed=inline -S a.c
a.c:4:25: remark: 'foo' inlined into 'bar' with (cost=-30, threshold=337) at callsite bar:0:25; [-Rpass=inline]
int bar(int a) { return foo(a); }
^
```
Reviewed By: hoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107791
This is already done within InstCombine:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/MiGE22
...but leaving it out of analysis makes it
harder to avoid infinite loops there.
This is already done within InstCombine:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/MiGE22
...but leaving it out of analysis makes it
harder to avoid infinite loops there.
Teach LV to use masked-store to support interleave-store-group with
gaps (instead of scatters/scalarization).
The symmetric case of using masked-load to support
interleaved-load-group with gaps was introduced a while ago, by
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53668; This patch completes the store-scenario
leftover from D53668, and solves PR50566.
Reviewed by: Ayal Zaks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104750
fix an assertion due to mismatch type for Numerator and CacheLineSize in loop cache analysis pass.
Reviewed By: bmahjour
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107618
1) add some self-diagnosis (when asserts are enabled) to check that all
features have the same nr of entries
2) avoid storing pointers to mutable fields because the proto API
contract doesn't actually guarantee those stay fixed even if no further
mutation of the object occurs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107594
This is recommit of the patch 16ff91ebcc,
reverted in 0c28a7c990 because it had
an error in call of getFastMathFlags (base type should be FPMathOperator
but not Instruction). The original commit message is duplicated below:
Clang has builtin function '__builtin_isnan', which implements C
library function 'isnan'. This function now is implemented entirely in
clang codegen, which expands the function into set of IR operations.
There are three mechanisms by which the expansion can be made.
* The most common mechanism is using an unordered comparison made by
instruction 'fcmp uno'. This simple solution is target-independent
and works well in most cases. It however is not suitable if floating
point exceptions are tracked. Corresponding IEEE 754 operation and C
function must never raise FP exception, even if the argument is a
signaling NaN. Compare instructions usually does not have such
property, they raise 'invalid' exception in such case. So this
mechanism is unsuitable when exception behavior is strict. In
particular it could result in unexpected trapping if argument is SNaN.
* Another solution was implemented in https://reviews.llvm.org/D95948.
It is used in the cases when raising FP exceptions by 'isnan' is not
allowed. This solution implements 'isnan' using integer operations.
It solves the problem of exceptions, but offers one solution for all
targets, however some can do the check in more efficient way.
* Solution implemented by https://reviews.llvm.org/D96568 introduced a
hook 'clang::TargetCodeGenInfo::testFPKind', which injects target
specific code into IR. Now only SystemZ implements this hook and it
generates a call to target specific intrinsic function.
Although these mechanisms allow to implement 'isnan' with enough
efficiency, expanding 'isnan' in clang has drawbacks:
* The operation 'isnan' is hidden behind generic integer operations or
target-specific intrinsics. It complicates analysis and can prevent
some optimizations.
* IR can be created by tools other than clang, in this case treatment
of 'isnan' has to be duplicated in that tool.
Another issue with the current implementation of 'isnan' comes from the
use of options '-ffast-math' or '-fno-honor-nans'. If such option is
specified, 'fcmp uno' may be optimized to 'false'. It is valid
optimization in general, but it results in 'isnan' always returning
'false'. For example, in some libc++ implementations the following code
returns 'false':
std::isnan(std::numeric_limits<float>::quiet_NaN())
The options '-ffast-math' and '-fno-honor-nans' imply that FP operation
operands are never NaNs. This assumption however should not be applied
to the functions that check FP number properties, including 'isnan'. If
such function returns expected result instead of actually making
checks, it becomes useless in many cases. The option '-ffast-math' is
often used for performance critical code, as it can speed up execution
by the expense of manual treatment of corner cases. If 'isnan' returns
assumed result, a user cannot use it in the manual treatment of NaNs
and has to invent replacements, like making the check using integer
operations. There is a discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D18513#387418,
which also expresses the opinion, that limitations imposed by
'-ffast-math' should be applied only to 'math' functions but not to
'tests'.
To overcome these drawbacks, this change introduces a new IR intrinsic
function 'llvm.isnan', which realizes the check as specified by IEEE-754
and C standards in target-agnostic way. During IR transformations it
does not undergo undesirable optimizations. It reaches instruction
selection, where is lowered in target-dependent way. The lowering can
vary depending on options like '-ffast-math' or '-ffp-model' so the
resulting code satisfies requested semantics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104854
Before D45736, getc_unlocked was available by default, but turned off
for non-Cygwin/non-MinGW Windows. D45736 then added 9 more unlocked
functions, which were unavailable by default, but it also:
* left getc_unlocked enabled by default,
* removed the disabling line for Windows, and
* added code to enable getc_unlocked for GNU, Android, and OSX.
For consistency, make getc_unlocked unavailable by default. Maybe this
was the intent of D45736 anyway.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107527
Function exploreDirections() in DependenceAnalysis implements a recursive
algorithm for refining direction vectors. This algorithm has worst-case
complexity of O(3^(n+1)) where n is the number of common loop levels.
In this patch I'm adding a threshold to control the amount of time we
spend in doing MIV tests (which most of the time end up resulting in over
pessimistic direction vectors anyway).
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107159
These functions don't exist in android API levels < 21. A change in
llvm-12 (rG6dbf0cfcf789) caused Oz builds to emit this symbol assuming
it's available and thus is causing link errors. Simply disable it here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107509
Clang has builtin function '__builtin_isnan', which implements C
library function 'isnan'. This function now is implemented entirely in
clang codegen, which expands the function into set of IR operations.
There are three mechanisms by which the expansion can be made.
* The most common mechanism is using an unordered comparison made by
instruction 'fcmp uno'. This simple solution is target-independent
and works well in most cases. It however is not suitable if floating
point exceptions are tracked. Corresponding IEEE 754 operation and C
function must never raise FP exception, even if the argument is a
signaling NaN. Compare instructions usually does not have such
property, they raise 'invalid' exception in such case. So this
mechanism is unsuitable when exception behavior is strict. In
particular it could result in unexpected trapping if argument is SNaN.
* Another solution was implemented in https://reviews.llvm.org/D95948.
It is used in the cases when raising FP exceptions by 'isnan' is not
allowed. This solution implements 'isnan' using integer operations.
It solves the problem of exceptions, but offers one solution for all
targets, however some can do the check in more efficient way.
* Solution implemented by https://reviews.llvm.org/D96568 introduced a
hook 'clang::TargetCodeGenInfo::testFPKind', which injects target
specific code into IR. Now only SystemZ implements this hook and it
generates a call to target specific intrinsic function.
Although these mechanisms allow to implement 'isnan' with enough
efficiency, expanding 'isnan' in clang has drawbacks:
* The operation 'isnan' is hidden behind generic integer operations or
target-specific intrinsics. It complicates analysis and can prevent
some optimizations.
* IR can be created by tools other than clang, in this case treatment
of 'isnan' has to be duplicated in that tool.
Another issue with the current implementation of 'isnan' comes from the
use of options '-ffast-math' or '-fno-honor-nans'. If such option is
specified, 'fcmp uno' may be optimized to 'false'. It is valid
optimization in general, but it results in 'isnan' always returning
'false'. For example, in some libc++ implementations the following code
returns 'false':
std::isnan(std::numeric_limits<float>::quiet_NaN())
The options '-ffast-math' and '-fno-honor-nans' imply that FP operation
operands are never NaNs. This assumption however should not be applied
to the functions that check FP number properties, including 'isnan'. If
such function returns expected result instead of actually making
checks, it becomes useless in many cases. The option '-ffast-math' is
often used for performance critical code, as it can speed up execution
by the expense of manual treatment of corner cases. If 'isnan' returns
assumed result, a user cannot use it in the manual treatment of NaNs
and has to invent replacements, like making the check using integer
operations. There is a discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D18513#387418,
which also expresses the opinion, that limitations imposed by
'-ffast-math' should be applied only to 'math' functions but not to
'tests'.
To overcome these drawbacks, this change introduces a new IR intrinsic
function 'llvm.isnan', which realizes the check as specified by IEEE-754
and C standards in target-agnostic way. During IR transformations it
does not undergo undesirable optimizations. It reaches instruction
selection, where is lowered in target-dependent way. The lowering can
vary depending on options like '-ffast-math' or '-ffp-model' so the
resulting code satisfies requested semantics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104854
I'm not sure this is the best way to approach this,
but the situation is rather not very detectable unless we explicitly call it out when refusing to advise to unroll.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107271
ValueTracking should allow for value ranges that may satisfy
llvm.assume, instead of restricting the ranges only to values that
will always satisfy the condition.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107298
The check for size_t parameter 1 was already here for snprintf_chk,
but it wasn't applied to regular snprintf. This could lead to
mismatching and eventually crashing as shown in:
https://llvm.org/PR50885
If a reduction Phi has a single user which `AND`s the Phi with a type mask,
`lookThroughAnd` will return the user of the Phi and the narrower type represented
by the mask. Currently this is only used for arithmetic reductions, whereas loops
containing logical reductions will create a reduction intrinsic using the widened
type, for example:
for.body:
%phi = phi i32 [ %and, %for.body ], [ 255, %entry ]
%mask = and i32 %phi, 255
%gep = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %ptr, i32 %iv
%load = load i8, i8* %gep
%ext = zext i8 %load to i32
%and = and i32 %mask, %ext
...
^ this will generate an and reduction intrinsic such as the following:
call i32 @llvm.vector.reduce.and.v8i32(<8 x i32>...)
The same example for an add instruction would create an intrinsic of type i8:
call i8 @llvm.vector.reduce.add.v8i8(<8 x i8>...)
This patch changes AddReductionVar to call lookThroughAnd for other integer
reductions, allowing loops similar to the example above with reductions such
as and, or & xor to vectorize.
Reviewed By: david-arm, dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105632
D106850 introduced a simplification for llvm.vscale by looking at the
surrounding function's vscale_range attributes. The call that's being
simplified may not yet have been inserted into the IR. This happens for
example during function cloning.
This patch fixes the issue by checking if the instruction is in a
parent basic block.
We don't allowing inlining for functions with blockaddress with uses other than strictly callbr. This is because if the blockaddress escapes the function via a global variable, inlining may lead to an invalid cross-function reference.
We check against such cases during inlining, however the check can fail for ThinLTO post-link because CFG simplification can incorrectly removes blocks based on wrong block reachability.
When we import a function with blockaddress taken in a global variable but without importing that variable, we won't go through value mapping to reflect the real address-taken-ness of the cloned blocks. For the imported clone, this leads to blocks reachable from indirect branch through global variable being incorrectly treated as unreachable and removed by SimplifyCFG.
Since inlining for such cases shouldn't be allowed in the first place, I'm marking them as ineligible for importing during pre-link to save the problem of missing address-taken-ness of imported clone as well as bad DCE and inlining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106930
We already have an indication (error) if the desired inline advisor
cannot be enabled, but we don't have a positive indication. Added
LLVM_DEBUG messages for the latter.
The Exit instruction passed in for checking if it's an ordered reduction need not be
an FPAdd operation. We need to bail out at that point instead of
assuming it is an FPAdd (and hence has two operands). See added testcase.
It crashes without the patch because the Exit instruction is a phi with
exactly one operand.
This latent bug was exposed by 95346ba which added support for
multi-exit loops for vectorization.
Reviewed-By: kmclaughlin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106843
Users, especially the Attributor, might replace multiple operands at
once. The actual implementation of simplifyWithOpReplaced is able to
handle that just fine, the interface was simply not allowing to replace
more than one operand at a time. This is exposing a more generic
interface without intended changes for existing code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106189
Proposed alternative to D105338.
This is ugly, but short-term I think it's the best way forward: first,
let's formalize the hacks into a coherent model. Then we can consider
extensions of that model (we could have different flavors of volatile
with different rules).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106309
This patch removes RtCheck from RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup to make it
possible to construct RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup objects without a
RuntimePointerChecking object. This should make it easier to
re-use the code to generate runtime checks, e.g. in D102834.
RtCheck was only used to access the pointer info for a given index.
Instead, the start and end expressions can be passed directly.
For code-gen, we also need to know the address space to use. This can
also be explicitly passed at construction.
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105481
This adjusts mayHaveSideEffect() to return true for !willReturn()
instructions. Just like other side-effects, non-willreturn calls
(aka "divergence") cannot be removed and cannot be reordered relative
to other side effects. This fixes a number of bugs where
non-willreturn calls are either incorrectly dropped or moved. In
particular, it also fixes the last open problem in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50511.
I performed a cursory review of all current mayHaveSideEffect()
uses, which convinced me that these are indeed the desired default
semantics. Places that do not want to consider non-willreturn as a
sideeffect generally do not want mayHaveSideEffect() semantics at
all. I identified two such cases, which are addressed by D106591
and D106742. Finally, there is a use in SCEV for which we don't
really have an appropriate API right now -- what it wants is
basically "would this be considered forward progress". I've just
spelled out the previous semantics there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106749
Tests with multiple benchmarks, like Embench [1], showed that the
CallPenalty magic number has the most influence on inlining decisions
when optimizing for size.
On the other hand, there was no good default value for this parameter.
Some benchmarks profited strongly from a reduced call penalty. On
example is the picojpeg benchmark compiled for RISC-V, which got 6%
smaller with a CallPenalty of 10 instead of 12. Other benchmarks
increased in size, like matmult.
This commit makes the compromise of turning the magic number constant of
CallPenalty into a configurable value. This introduces the flag
`--inline-call-penalty`. With that flag users can fine tune the inliner
to their needs.
The CallPenalty constant was also used for loops. This commit replaces
the CallPenalty constant with a new LoopPenalty constant that is now
used instead.
This is a slimmed down version of https://reviews.llvm.org/D30899
[1]: https://github.com/embench/embench-iot
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105976
I have added a new FastMathFlags parameter to getArithmeticReductionCost
to indicate what type of reduction we are performing:
1. Tree-wise. This is the typical fast-math reduction that involves
continually splitting a vector up into halves and adding each
half together until we get a scalar result. This is the default
behaviour for integers, whereas for floating point we only do this
if reassociation is allowed.
2. Ordered. This now allows us to estimate the cost of performing
a strict vector reduction by treating it as a series of scalar
operations in lane order. This is the case when FP reassociation
is not permitted. For scalable vectors this is more difficult
because at compile time we do not know how many lanes there are,
and so we use the worst case maximum vscale value.
I have also fixed getTypeBasedIntrinsicInstrCost to pass in the
FastMathFlags, which meant fixing up some X86 tests where we always
assumed the vector.reduce.fadd/mul intrinsics were 'fast'.
New tests have been added here:
Analysis/CostModel/AArch64/reduce-fadd.ll
Analysis/CostModel/AArch64/sve-intrinsics.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/strict-fadd-cost.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/sve-strict-fadd-cost.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105432
Eli pointed out the issue when reviewing D104140. The max trip count logic makes an assumption that the value of IV changes. When the step is zero, the nowrap fact becomes trivial, and thus there's nothing preventing the loop from being nearly infinite. (The "nearly" part is because mustprogress may disallow an infinite loop while still allowing 999999999 iterations before RHS happens to allow an exit.)
This is very difficult to see in practice. You need a means to produce a loop varying RHS in a mustprogress loop which doesn't allow the loop to be infinite. In most cases, LICM or SCEV are smart enough to remove the loop varying expressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106327
Avoid buffering just to copy the buffered data, in 'development
mode', when logging. Instead, just populate the underlying protobuf.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106592
Constfold constrained variants of operations fadd, fsub, fmul, fdiv,
frem, fma and fmuladd.
The change also sets up some means to support for removal of unused
constrained intrinsics. They are declared as accessing memory to model
interaction with floating point environment, so they were not removed,
as they have side effect. Now constrained intrinsics that have
"fpexcept.ignore" as exception behavior are removed if they have no uses.
As for intrinsics that have exception behavior other than "fpexcept.ignore",
they can be removed if it is known that they do not raise floating point
exceptions. It happens when doing constant folding, attributes of such
intrinsic are changed so that the intrinsic is not claimed as accessing
memory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102673
This patch changes `__kmpc_free_shared` to take an additional argument
corresponding to the associated allocation's size. This makes it easier to
implement the allocator in the runtime.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106496
Make getLatchCmpInst non-static and use it in LoopFlatten as a more
robust way of identifying the compare.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106256
If a reduction Phi has a single user which `AND`s the Phi with a type mask,
`lookThroughAnd` will return the user of the Phi and the narrower type represented
by the mask. Currently this is only used for arithmetic reductions, whereas loops
containing logical reductions will create a reduction intrinsic using the widened
type, for example:
for.body:
%phi = phi i32 [ %and, %for.body ], [ 255, %entry ]
%mask = and i32 %phi, 255
%gep = getelementptr inbounds i8, i8* %ptr, i32 %iv
%load = load i8, i8* %gep
%ext = zext i8 %load to i32
%and = and i32 %mask, %ext
...
^ this will generate an and reduction intrinsic such as the following:
call i32 @llvm.vector.reduce.and.v8i32(<8 x i32>...)
The same example for an add instruction would create an intrinsic of type i8:
call i8 @llvm.vector.reduce.add.v8i8(<8 x i8>...)
This patch changes AddReductionVar to call lookThroughAnd for other integer
reductions, allowing loops similar to the example above with reductions such
as and, or & xor to vectorize.
Reviewed By: david-arm, dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105632
Allow arbitrary strides, and make sure we return the correct result when
the backedge-taken count is zero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106197
Wrap semantics are subtle when combined with multiple exits. This has caused several rounds of confusion during recent reviews, so try to document the subtly distinction between when wrap flags provide <u and <=u facts.
The specific case that triggered this was when inlining a recursive
internal function into itself caused the recursion to go away, allowing
the inliner to mark the function as dead. The inliner marks the SCC as
invalidated but does not provide a new SCC to continue with.
This matches the implementations of ModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor
and CGSCCPassManager.
Fixes PR50363.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106306
It turns out that during training, the time required to parse the
textual protobuf of a training log is about the same as the time it
takes to compile the module generating that log. Using binary protobufs
instead elides that cost almost completely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106157
This fixes the lower and upper bound calculation of a
RuntimeCheckingPtrGroup when it has more than one loop
invariant pointers. Resolves PR50686.
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104148
The current implementation of computeBECount doesn't account for the
possibility that adding "Stride - 1" to Delta might overflow. For almost
all loops, it doesn't, but it's not actually proven anywhere.
To deal with this, use a variety of tricks to try to prove that the
addition doesn't overflow. If the proof is impossible, use an alternate
sequence which never overflows.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105216
D104806 broke some uses of getMinusSCEV() in DependenceAnalysis:
subtraction with different pointer bases returns a SCEVCouldNotCompute.
Make sure we avoid cases involving such subtractions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106099
This is split from D105216, it handles only a subset of the cases in that patch.
Specifically, the issue being fixed is that the code incorrectly assumed that (Start-Stide) < End implied that the backedge was taken at least once. This is not true when e.g. Start = 4, Stride = 2, and End = 3. Note that we often do produce the right backedge taken count despite the flawed reasoning.
The fix chosen here is to use an alternate form of uceil (ceiling of unsigned divide) lowering which is safe when max(RHS,Start) > Start - Stride. (Note that signedness of both max expression and comparison depend on the signedness of the comparison being analyzed, and that overflow in the Start - Stride expression is allowed.) Note that this is weaker than proving the backedge is taken because it allows start - stride < end < start. Some cases which can't be proven safe are sent down the generic path, and we do end up generating less optimal expressions in a few cases.
Credit for coming up with the approach goes entirely to Eli. I just split it off, tweaked the comments a bit, and did some additional testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105942
This is split from D105216, but the code is hoisted much earlier into
the path where we can actually get a zero stride flowing through. Some
fairly simple proofs handle the cases which show up in practice. The
only test changes are the cases where we really do need a non-zero
divider to produce the right result.
Recommitting with isLoopInvariant() check.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105921
This is split from D105216, but the code is hoisted much earlier into the path where we can actually get a zero stride flowing through. Some fairly simple proofs handle the cases which show up in practice. The only test changes are the cases where we really do need a non-zero divider to produce the right result.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105921
Split off from D105216 to simplify review. Rewritten with a lambda to be easier to follow. Comments clarified.
Sorry for no test case, this is tricky to exercise with the current structure of the code. It's about to be hit more frequently in a follow up patch, and the change itself is simple.
This is split from D105216 to reduce patch complexity. Original code by Eli with very minor modification by me.
The primary point of this patch is to add the getUDivCeilSCEV routine. I included the two callers with constant arguments as we know those must constant fold even without any of the fancy inference logic.
This is now the same as isIntAttrKind(), so use that instead, as
it does not require manual maintenance. The naming is also more
accurate in that both int and type attributes have an argument,
but this method was only targeting int attributes.
I initially wanted to tighten the AttrBuilder assertion, but we
have some in-tree uses that would violate it.
Rules:
1. SCEVUnknown is a pointer if and only if the LLVM IR value is a
pointer.
2. SCEVPtrToInt is never a pointer.
3. If any other SCEV expression has no pointer operands, the result is
an integer.
4. If a SCEVAddExpr has exactly one pointer operand, the result is a
pointer.
5. If a SCEVAddRecExpr's first operand is a pointer, and it has no other
pointer operands, the result is a pointer.
6. If every operand of a SCEVMinMaxExpr is a pointer, the result is a
pointer.
7. Otherwise, the SCEV expression is invalid.
I'm not sure how useful rule 6 is in practice. If we exclude it, we can
guarantee that ScalarEvolution::getPointerBase always returns a
SCEVUnknown, which might be a helpful property. Anyway, I'll leave that
for a followup.
This is basically mop-up at this point; all the changes with significant
functional effects have landed. Some of the remaining changes could be
split off, but I don't see much point.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105510
In order to mirror the GetElementPtrInst::indices() API.
Wanted to use this in the IRForTarget code, and was surprised to
find that it didn't exist yet.
Currently InstructionSimplify.cpp knows how to simplify floating point
instructions that have a NaN operand. It does not know how to handle the
matching constrained FP intrinsic.
This patch teaches it how to simplify so long as the exception handling
is not "fpexcept.strict".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103169
This reverts commit 5b350183cd (and
also "[NFC][ScalarEvolution] Cleanup howManyLessThans.",
009436e9c1, to make it apply).
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D105216 for discussion on various
miscompilations caused by that commit.
This patch removes the IsPairwiseForm flag from the Reduction Cost TTI
hooks, along with some accompanying code for pattern matching reductions
from trees starting at extract elements. IsPairWise is now assumed to be
false, which was the predominant way that the value was used from both
the Loop and SLP vectorizers. Since the adjustments such as D93860, the
SLP vectorizer has not relied upon this distinction between paiwise and
non-pairwise reductions.
This also removes some code that was detecting reductions trees starting
from extract elements inside the costmodel. This case was
double-counting costs though, adding the individual costs on the
individual instruction _and_ the total cost of the reduction. Removing
it changes the costs in llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/X86/reduction.ll to
not double count. The cost of reduction intrinsics is still tested
through the various tests in
llvm/test/Analysis/CostModel/X86/reduce-xyz.ll.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105484
There was an alias between 'simplifycfg' and 'simplify-cfg' in the
PassRegistry. That was the original reason for this patch, which
effectively removes the alias.
This patch also replaces all occurrances of 'simplify-cfg'
by 'simplifycfg'. Reason for choosing that form for the name is
that it matches the DEBUG_TYPE for the pass, and the legacy PM name
and also how it is spelled out in other passes such as
'loop-simplifycfg', and in other options such as
'simplifycfg-merge-cond-stores'.
I for some reason the name should be changed to 'simplify-cfg' in
the future, then I think such a renaming should be more widely done
and not only impacting the PassRegistry.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105627
There are two issues with the current implementation of computeBECount:
1. It doesn't account for the possibility that adding "Stride - 1" to
Delta might overflow. For almost all loops, it doesn't, but it's not
actually proven anywhere.
2. It doesn't account for the possibility that Stride is zero. If Delta
is zero, the backedge is never taken; the value of Stride isn't
relevant. To handle this, we have to make sure that the expression
returned by computeBECount evaluates to zero.
To deal with this, add two new checks:
1. Use a variety of tricks to try to prove that the addition doesn't
overflow. If the proof is impossible, use an alternate sequence which
never overflows.
2. Use umax(Stride, 1) to handle the possibility that Stride is zero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105216
Add a function removePointerBase that returns, essentially, S -
getPointerBase(S). Use it in getMinusSCEV instead of actually
subtracting pointers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105503
As part of making ScalarEvolution's handling of pointers consistent, we
want to forbid multiplying a pointer by -1 (or any other value). This
means we can't blindly subtract pointers.
There are a few ways we could deal with this:
1. We could completely forbid subtracting pointers in getMinusSCEV()
2. We could forbid subracting pointers with different pointer bases
(this patch).
3. We could try to ptrtoint pointer operands.
The option in this patch is more friendly to non-integral pointers: code
that works with normal pointers will also work with non-integral
pointers. And it seems like there are very few places that actually
benefit from the third option.
As a minimal patch, the ScalarEvolution implementation of getMinusSCEV
still ends up subtracting pointers if they have the same base. This
should eliminate the shared pointer base, but eventually we'll need to
rewrite it to avoid negating the pointer base. I plan to do this as a
separate step to allow measuring the compile-time impact.
This doesn't cause obvious functional changes in most cases; the one
case that is significantly affected is ICmpZero handling in LSR (which
is the source of almost all the test changes). The resulting changes
seem okay to me, but suggestions welcome. As an alternative, I tried
explicitly ptrtoint'ing the operands, but the result doesn't seem
obviously better.
I deleted the test lsr-undef-in-binop.ll becuase I couldn't figure out
how to repair it to test what it was actually trying to test.
Recommitting with fix to MemoryDepChecker::isDependent.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104806
If any operand of a math op is poison, that takes
precedence over general undef/NaN.
This should not be visible with binary ops because
it requires 2 constant operands to trigger (and if
both operands of a binop are constant, that should
get handled first in ConstantFolding).
As part of making ScalarEvolution's handling of pointers consistent, we
want to forbid multiplying a pointer by -1 (or any other value). This
means we can't blindly subtract pointers.
There are a few ways we could deal with this:
1. We could completely forbid subtracting pointers in getMinusSCEV()
2. We could forbid subracting pointers with different pointer bases
(this patch).
3. We could try to ptrtoint pointer operands.
The option in this patch is more friendly to non-integral pointers: code
that works with normal pointers will also work with non-integral
pointers. And it seems like there are very few places that actually
benefit from the third option.
As a minimal patch, the ScalarEvolution implementation of getMinusSCEV
still ends up subtracting pointers if they have the same base. This
should eliminate the shared pointer base, but eventually we'll need to
rewrite it to avoid negating the pointer base. I plan to do this as a
separate step to allow measuring the compile-time impact.
This doesn't cause obvious functional changes in most cases; the one
case that is significantly affected is ICmpZero handling in LSR (which
is the source of almost all the test changes). The resulting changes
seem okay to me, but suggestions welcome. As an alternative, I tried
explicitly ptrtoint'ing the operands, but the result doesn't seem
obviously better.
I deleted the test lsr-undef-in-binop.ll becuase I couldn't figure out
how to repair it to test what it was actually trying to test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104806
This patch adds a TTI function, isElementTypeLegalForScalableVector, to query
whether it is possible to vectorize a given element type. This is called by
isLegalToVectorizeInstTypesForScalable to reject scalable vectorization if
any of the instruction types in the loop are unsupported, e.g:
int foo(__int128_t* ptr, int N)
#pragma clang loop vectorize_width(4, scalable)
for (int i=0; i<N; ++i)
ptr[i] = ptr[i] + 42;
This example currently crashes if we attempt to vectorize since i128 is not a
supported type for scalable vectorization.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen, david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102253
We already have a fold for variable index with constant vector,
but if we can determine a scalar splat value, then it does not
matter whether that value is constant or not.
We overlooked this fold in D102404 and earlier patches,
but the fixed vector variant is shown in:
https://llvm.org/PR50817
Alive2 agrees on that:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/HpijPC
The same logic applies to scalable vectors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104867
This replaces the current ad-hoc implementation,
by syncing the code from InstCombine's implementation in `InstCombinerImpl::visitUnreachableInst()`,
with one exception that here in SimplifyCFG we are allowed to remove EH instructions.
Effectively, this now allows SimplifyCFG to remove calls (iff they won't throw and will return),
arithmetic/logic operations, etc.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105374
This change yields an additional 2% size reduction on an internal search
binary, and an additional 0.5% size reduction on fuchsia.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104751
This is the cause of the miscompile in:
https://llvm.org/PR50944
The problem has likely existed for some time, but it was made visible with:
5af8bacc94 ( D104661 )
handleOtherCmpSelSimplifications() assumed it can convert select of
constants to bool logic ops, but that does not work with poison.
We had a very similar construct in InstCombine, so the fix here
mimics the fix there.
The bug is in instsimplify, but I'm not sure how to reproduce it outside of
instcombine. The reason this is visible in instcombine is because we have a
hack (FIXME) to bypass simplification of a select when it has an icmp user:
955f125899/llvm/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSelect.cpp (L2632)
So we get to an unusual case where we are trying to simplify an instruction
that has an operand that would have already simplified if we had processed
it in normal order.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105298
Use separate variable for adjusted scale used for GCD computations. This
fixes an issue where we incorrectly determined that all indices are
non-negative and returned noalias because of that.
Follow up to 91fa3565da.
We have analogous rules in instsimplify, etc.., but were missing the same in SCEV. The fold is near trivial, but came up in the context of a larger change.
(V * Scale) % X may not produce the same result for any possible value
of V, e.g. if the multiplication overflows. This means we currently
incorrectly determine NoAlias in some cases.
This patch updates LinearExpression to track whether the expression
has NSW and uses that to adjust the scale used for alias checks.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99424
There's no reason to use the weaker name-only analysis when we
have a function prototype to check (in fact, we probably should
not even have that name-only function exposed for general use,
but removing it requires auditing all of the callers).
The version of getLibFunc that takes a Function argument also
does some prototype checking to make sure the arguments/return
type match the expected signature of a real library call.
This is NFC-intended because the code in MemoryBuiltins does its
own function signature checking. For now, that means there may
be some redundancy in the checking, but that should not be above
the noise for compile-time. Ideally, we can move the checks to
a single location.
There's still a hole in the logic that allows the example in
https://llvm.org/PR50846 to cause a compiler crash.
This patch extends applyLoopGuards to detect a single-cond range check
idiom that InstCombine generates.
It extends applyLoopGuards to detect conditions of the form
(-C1 + X < C2). InstCombine will create this form when combining two
checks of the form (X u< C2 + C1) and (X >=u C1).
In practice, this enables us to correctly compute a tight trip count
bounds for code as in the function below. InstCombine will fold the
minimum iteration check created by LoopRotate with the user check (< 8).
void unsigned_check(short *pred, unsigned width) {
if (width < 8) {
for (int x = 0; x < width; x++)
pred[x] = pred[x] * pred[x];
}
}
As a consequence, LLVM creates dead vector loops for the code above,
e.g. see https://godbolt.org/z/cb8eTcqEThttps://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/SHHW4d
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104741
Usman Nadeem