In case of a virtual register tied to a phys-def, the register class needs to
be computed. Make sure that this works generally also with fast regalloc by
using TLI.getRegClassFor() whenever possible, and make only the case of
'Untyped' use getMinimalPhysRegClass().
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51699.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109291
Given a select_cc producing a constant and a invertion of the constant
for a comparison more than zero, we can produce an xor with ashr
instead, which produces smaller code. The ashr either sets all bits or
clear all bits depending on if the value is negative. This is then xor'd
with the constant to optionally negate the value.
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/DTFaBZ
This includes a OneUseCheck on the Cmp, which seems to make thinks a
little worse and will be removed in a followup.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109149
Pulled out of D109149, this folds set_cc seteq (ashr X, BW-1), -1 ->
set_cc setlt X, 0 to prevent some regressions later on when folding
select_cc setgt X, -1, C, ~C -> xor (ashr X, BW-1), C
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109214
The temporary object was used as a workaround when the target parser may
change STI. D14346 made the MCSubtargetInfo argument to
createMCAsmParser const, so we no longer need the temporary object.
This allows constructing a MemDesc from a MachineMemoryOperand, a pattern that starts to show up more frequently.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109161
This adds the following combines:
```
x = ... 0 or 1
c = icmp eq x, 1
->
c = x
```
and
```
x = ... 0 or 1
c = icmp ne x, 0
->
c = x
```
When the target's true value for the relevant types is 1.
This showed up in the following situation:
https://godbolt.org/z/M5jKexWTW
SDAG currently supports the `ne` case, but not the `eq` case. This can probably
be further generalized, but I don't feel like thinking that hard right now.
This gives some minor code size improvements across the board on CTMark at
-Os for AArch64. (0.1% for 7zip and pairlocalalign in particular.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109130
This add support for SjLj using Wasm exception handling instructions:
https://github.com/WebAssembly/exception-handling/blob/master/proposals/exception-handling/Exceptions.md
This does not yet support the mixed use of EH and SjLj within a
function. It will be added in a follow-up CL.
This currently passes all SjLj Emscripten tests for wasm0/1/2/3/s,
except for the below:
- `test_longjmp_standalone`: Uses Node
- `test_dlfcn_longjmp`: Uses NodeRAWFS
- `test_longjmp_throw`: Mixes EH and SjLj
- `test_exceptions_longjmp1`: Mixes EH and SjLj
- `test_exceptions_longjmp2`: Mixes EH and SjLj
- `test_exceptions_longjmp3`: Mixes EH and SjLj
Reviewed By: dschuff, tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108960
The semantics of tail predication loops means that the value of LR as an
instruction is executed determines the predicate. In other words:
mov r3, #3
DLSTP lr, r3 // Start tail predication, lr==3
VADD.s32 q0, q1, q2 // Lanes 0,1 and 2 are updated in q0.
mov lr, #1
VADD.s32 q0, q1, q2 // Only first lane is updated.
This means that the value of lr cannot be spilled and re-used in tail
predication regions without potentially altering the behaviour of the
program. More lanes than required could be stored, for example, and in
the case of a gather those lanes might not have been setup, leading to
alignment exceptions.
This patch adds a new lr predicate operand to MVE instructions in order
to keep a reference to the lr that they use as a tail predicate. It will
usually hold the zeroreg meaning not predicated, being set to the LR phi
value in the MVETPAndVPTOptimisationsPass. This will prevent it from
being spilled anywhere that it needs to be used.
A lot of tests needed updating.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107638
Please refer to
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-September/152440.html
(and that whole thread.)
TLDR: the original patch had no prior RFC, yet it had some changes that
really need a proper RFC discussion. It won't be productive to discuss
such an RFC, once it's actually posted, while said patch is already
committed, because that introduces bias towards already-committed stuff,
and the tree is potentially in broken state meanwhile.
While the end result of discussion may lead back to the current design,
it may also not lead to the current design.
Therefore i take it upon myself
to revert the tree back to last known good state.
This reverts commit 4c4093e6e3.
This reverts commit 0a2b1ba33a.
This reverts commit d9873711cb.
This reverts commit 791006fb8c.
This reverts commit c22b64ef66.
This reverts commit 72ebcd3198.
This reverts commit 5fa6039a5f.
This reverts commit 9efda541bf.
This reverts commit 94d3ff09cf.
This patch extends D107904's introduction of vector-predicated (VP)
operation legalization to include vector splitting.
When the result of a binary VP operation needs splitting, all of its
operands are split in kind. The two operands and the mask are split as
usual, and the vector-length parameter EVL is "split" such that the low
and high halves each execute the correct number of elements.
Tests have been added to the RISC-V target to show splitting several
scenarios for fixed- and scalable-vector types. Without support for
`umax` (e.g. in the `B` extension) the generated code starts to branch.
Ideally a cost model would prevent their insertion in the first place.
Through these tests many opportunities for better codegen can be seen:
combining known-undef VP operations and for constant-folding operations
on `ISD::VSCALE`, to name but a few.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107957
I believe, the profitability reasoning here is correct
"sub"reg is already located within the 0'th subreg of wider reg,
so if we have suvector insertion at index 0 into undef,
then it's always free do to.
After this, D109065 finally avoids the regression in D108382.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109074
A new LLVM specific TAG DW_TAG_LLVM_annotation is added.
The name is suggested by Paul Robinson ([1]).
Currently, this tag is used to output __attribute__((btf_tag("string")))
annotations in dwarf. The following is an example for a global
variable with two btf_tag attributes:
0x0000002a: DW_TAG_variable
DW_AT_name ("g1")
DW_AT_type (0x00000052 "int")
DW_AT_external (true)
DW_AT_decl_file ("/tmp/home/yhs/work/tests/llvm/btf_tag/t.c")
DW_AT_decl_line (8)
DW_AT_location (DW_OP_addr 0x0)
0x0000003f: DW_TAG_LLVM_annotation
DW_AT_name ("btf_tag")
DW_AT_const_value ("tag1")
0x00000048: DW_TAG_LLVM_annotation
DW_AT_name ("btf_tag")
DW_AT_const_value ("tag2")
0x00000051: NULL
In the future, DW_TAG_LLVM_annotation may encode other type
of non-string const value.
[1] https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-June/151250.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106621
When RA eliminated a dead def it can either immediately delete
the instruction itself or replace it with KILL to defer the
actual removal. If this instruction has a virtual register use
killing the register it will shrink the LI of the use. However,
if the LI covers the instruction and extends beyond it the
shrink will not happen. In fact that is impossible to shrink
such use because of the KILL still using it.
If later the LI of the use will be split at the KILL and the
KILL itself is eliminated after that point the new live segment
ends up at an invalid slot index.
This extremely rare condition was hit after D106408 which has
enabled rematerialization of such instructions. The replacement
with KILL is only done for rematerialized defs which became dead
and such rematerialization did not generally happen before.
The patch deletes an instruction immediately if it is a result
of rematerialization and has such use. An alternative would be
to prohibit a split at a KILL instruction, but it looks like it
is better to split a live range rather then keeping a killed
instruction just in case it can be rematerialized further.
Fixes PR51655.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108951
As noted in the comments in D108227, using G_FPTOSI produces wrong results for
G_ISNAN. Drop the G_FPTOSI and perform the operation on integer types.
Elsewhere in LLVM, a bitcast would be the appropriate choice (as it is in SDAG).
GlobalISel does not distinguish between integer and FP types, so a bitcast would
be meaningless here.
Followup to D99355: SDAG support for vector-predicated load/store/gather/scatter.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105871
Instead of splitting off the fp16 to float conversion and generating
a libcall, we should split the operation into fp16 to float and float
to integer operations. This will allow the float to integer conversion
to go through any custom handling the target has. If the target doesn't
have custom handling then we should come back to ExpandIntRes_FP_TO_SINT/
ExpandIntRes_FP_TO_UINT automatically to create the libcall.
This avoids generating libcalls on 32-bit X86. These library functions may
not exist in 32-bit libgcc. At least for LLVM, we never generate them when
hardware floating point instructions are available.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108933
When expanding a SMULFIXSAT ISD node (usually originating from
a smul.fix.sat intrinsic) we've applied some optimizations for
the special case when the scale is zero. The idea has been that
it would be cheaper to use an SMULO instruction (if legal) to
perform the multiplication and at the same time detect any overflow.
And in case of overflow we could use some SELECT:s to replace the
result with the saturated min/max value. The only tricky part
is to know if we overflowed on the min or max value, i.e. if the
product is positive or negative. Unfortunately the implementation
has been incorrect as it has looked at the product returned by the
SMULO to determine the sign of the product. In case of overflow that
product is truncated and won't give us the correct sign bit.
This patch is adding an extra XOR of the multiplication operands,
which is used to determine the sign of the non truncated product.
This patch fixes PR51677.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108938
The backend generally uses 64-bit immediates (e.g. what
MachineOperand::getImm() returns), so use that for analyzeCompare()
and optimizeCompareInst() as well. This avoids truncation for
targets that support immediates larger 32-bit. In particular, we
can avoid the bugprone value normalization hack in the AArch64
target.
This is a followup to D108076.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108875
Md5 hashing is expansive. Using a hash map to look up already computed GUID for dwarf names. Saw a 2% build time improvement on an internal large application.
Reviewed By: wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108722
The check for whether a rotate is possible occurs before the
memory legality checks for the integer type. So it's possible we
decide we can use a rotate, but then fail the legality checks. If
that happens we should not fall back to a vector type. This triggers
an assertion in the rotate handling when it finds a vector type
instead of an integer type.
In theory we could use a shufflevector in place of the rotate, but
right now I'd just like to fix the crash.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108839
If we encounter a new debug value, describing the same parameter,
we should stop tracking the parameter's Entry Value. At that point,
in some cases, the Transfer which uses the parameter's Entry Value,
is already emitted. Thanks to the RemoveRedundantDebugValues pass,
many problems with incorrect instruction order and number of DBG_VALUEs
are fixed. However, we still cannot rely on the rule that each new
debug value is set by the previous non-debug instruction in Machine
Basic Block.
When new parameter debug value triggers removal of Backup Entry Value
for the same parameter, do the cleanup of Transfers emitted from Backup
Entry Values. Get the Transfer Instruction which created the new debug
value and search for debug values already emitted from the to-be-deleted
Backup Entry Value and attached to the Transfer Instruction. If found,
delete the Transfer and remove "primary" Entry Value Var Loc from
OpenRanges.
This patch fixes PR47628.
Patch by Nikola Tesic.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106856
This patch emits DW_TAG_namelist and DW_TAG_namelist_item for fortran
namelist variables. DICompositeType is extended to support this fortran
feature.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108553
Without this change only the preferred fusion opcode is tested
when attempting to combine FMA operations.
If both FMA and FMAD are available then FMA ops formed prior to
legalization will not be merged post legalization as FMAD becomes
the preferred fusion opcode.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108619
We can halve the number of mask constants by masking before shl
and after srl.
This can reduce the number of mov immediate or constant
materializations. Or reduce the number of constant pool loads
for X86 vectors.
I think we might be able to do something similar for bswap. I'll
look at it next.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108738
In the combination of addressing modes, when replacing the matched phi nodes,
sometimes the phi node to be replaced has been modified. For example,
there’s matcher set [A, B] and [C, A], which will have cyclic dependency:
A is replaced by B and C will be replaced by A. Because we tried to match new phi node
to another new phi node, we should ignore new phi nodes when mapping new phi node to old one.
Reviewed By: skatkov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108635
Emscripten SjLj and (soon-to-be-added) Wasm SjLj transformation share
many steps:
1. Initialize `setjmpTable` and `setjmpTableSize` in the entry BB
2. Handle `setjmp` callsites
3. Handle `longjmp` callsites
4. Cleanup and update SSA
1, 3, and 4 are identical for Emscripten SjLj and Wasm SjLj. Only the
step 2 is different. This CL extracts the current Emscripten SjLj's
longjmp callsites handling into a function. The reason to make this a
separate CL is, without this, the diff tool cannot compare things well
in the presence of moved code and added code in the followup Wasm SjLj
CL, and it ends up mixing them together, making the diff unreadable.
Also fixes some typos and variable names. So far we've been calling the
buffer argument to `setjmp` and `longjmp` `jmpbuf`, but the name used in
the man page for those functions is `env`, so updated them to be
consistent.
Reviewed By: tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108728
The plan was to use `wasm.catch.exn` intrinsic to catch exceptions and
add `wasm.catch.longjmp` intrinsic, that returns two values (setjmp
buffer and return value), later to catch longjmps. But because we
decided not to use multivalue support at the moment, we are going to use
one intrinsic that returns a single value for both exceptions and
longjmps. And even if it's not for that, I now think the naming of
`wasm.catch.exn` is a little weird, because the intrinsic can still take
a tag immediate, which means it can be used for anything, not only
exceptions, as long as that returns a single value.
This partially reverts D107405.
Reviewed By: tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108683
This is another bug exposed by https://llvm.org/PR51612
(and the one that triggered the initial assertion) in the report.
That example was suppressed with:
985b48f183
...but these would still crash because we created nodes
like UADDO without the expected 2 output values.
There are 2 bugs here:
1. We were not checking uses of operand 2 (the false value of the select).
2. We were not checking for multiple uses of nodes that produce >1 result.
Correcting those is enough to avoid the crash in the reduced test based on:
https://llvm.org/PR51612
The additional use check on operand 0 (the condition value of the select)
should not strictly be necessary because we are only replacing one use
with another (whether it makes performance sense to do the transform with
that pattern is not clear). But as noted in the TODO, changing that
uncovers another bug.
Note: there's at least one more bug here - we aren't propagating EVTs
correctly, but I plan to fix that in another patch.
Add support for the GNU C style __attribute__((error(""))) and
__attribute__((warning(""))). These attributes are meant to be put on
declarations of functions whom should not be called.
They are frequently used to provide compile time diagnostics similar to
_Static_assert, but which may rely on non-ICE conditions (ie. relying on
compiler optimizations). This is also similar to diagnose_if function
attribute, but can diagnose after optimizations have been run.
While users may instead simply call undefined functions in such cases to
get a linkage failure from the linker, these provide a much more
ergonomic and actionable diagnostic to users and do so at compile time
rather than at link time. Users instead may be able use inline asm .err
directives.
These are used throughout the Linux kernel in its implementation of
BUILD_BUG and BUILD_BUG_ON macros. These macros generally cannot be
converted to use _Static_assert because many of the parameters are not
ICEs. The Linux kernel still needs to be modified to make use of these
when building with Clang; I have a patch that does so I will send once
this feature is landed.
To do so, we create a new IR level Function attribute, "dontcall" (both
error and warning boil down to one IR Fn Attr). Then, similar to calls
to inline asm, we attach a !srcloc Metadata node to call sites of such
attributed callees.
The backend diagnoses these during instruction selection, while we still
know that a call is a call (vs say a JMP that's a tail call) in an arch
agnostic manner.
The frontend then reconstructs the SourceLocation from that Metadata,
and determines whether to emit an error or warning based on the callee's
attribute.
Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16428
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1173
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106030
InstrRefBasedLDV is marginally slower than VarlocBasedLDV when analysing
optimised code -- however, it's much slower when analysing code compiled
-O0.
To avoid this: don't use instruction referencing for -O0 functions. In the
"pure" case of unoptimised code, this won't really harm the debugging
experience because most variables won't have been promoted off the stack,
so can't go missing. It becomes more complicated when optimised code is
inlined into functions marked optnone; however these are rare, and as -O0
doesn't run many optimisations there should be little damage to the debug
experience as a result.
I've taken the opportunity to refactor testing for instruction-referencing
into a MachineFunction method, which seems the most appropriate place to
put it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108585
For ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, its second operand must be a constant
multiple of the known-minimum vector length of the result type.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107795
Stack slot colouring adds "weight" to slots if a non-dbg-value instruction
refers to it. This, unfortunately, means that DBG_PHI instructions can have
an effect on codegen. The fix is very simple, replace isDebugValue with
isDebugInstr.
The regression test contains a scenario that reproduces this problem; I've
represented both normal-debug mode and instr-ref debug mode instructions
in comment lines prefixed with AAAAAA and BBBBBB, and un-comment them with
sed to test that the two different modes produce the same behaviour.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108627
The sext_inreg_of_load combine did not have the isLegalOrBeforeLegalizer check,
leading to the generation of potentially illegal G_SEXTLOADs when run after legalization.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108626
On some AMDGPU subtargets, copying to and from AGPR registers using another
AGPR register is not possible. A intermediate VGPR register is needed for AGPR
to AGPR copy. This is an issue when machine copy propagation forwards a
COPY $agpr, replacing a COPY $vgpr which results in $agpr = COPY $agpr. It is
removing a cross class copy that may have been optimized by previous passes and
potentially creating an unoptimized cross class copy later on.
To avoid this issue, check CrossCopyRegClass if a different register class will
be needed for the copy. If so then avoid forwarding the copy when the
destination does not match the desired register class and if the original copy
already matches the desired register class.
Issue seen while attempting to optimize another AGPR to AGPR issue:
Live-ins: $agpr0
$vgpr0 = COPY $agpr0
$agpr1 = V_ACCVGPR_WRITE_B32 $vgpr0
$agpr2 = COPY $vgpr0
$agpr3 = COPY $vgpr0
$agpr4 = COPY $vgpr0
After machine-cp:
$vgpr0 = COPY $agpr0
$agpr1 = V_ACCVGPR_WRITE_B32 $vgpr0
$agpr2 = COPY $agpr0
$agpr3 = COPY $agpr0
$agpr4 = COPY $agpr0
Machine-cp propagated COPY $agpr0 to replace $vgpr0 creating 3 AGPR to AGPR
copys. Later this creates a cross-register copy from AGPR->VGPR->AGPR for each
copy when the prior VGPR->AGPR copy was already optimal.
Reviewed By: lkail, rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108011
Currently isReallyTriviallyReMaterializableGeneric() implementation
prevents rematerialization on any virtual register use on the grounds
that is not a trivial rematerialization and that we do not want to
extend liveranges.
It appears that LRE logic does not attempt to extend a liverange of
a source register for rematerialization so that is not an issue.
That is checked in the LiveRangeEdit::allUsesAvailableAt().
The only non-trivial aspect of it is accounting for tied-defs which
normally represent a read-modify-write operation and not rematerializable.
The test for a tied-def situation already exists in the
/CodeGen/AMDGPU/remat-vop.mir,
test_no_remat_v_cvt_f32_i32_sdwa_dst_unused_preserve.
The change has affected ARM/Thumb, Mips, RISCV, and x86. For the targets
where I more or less understand the asm it seems to reduce spilling
(as expected) or be neutral. However, it needs a review by all targets'
specialists.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106408
One of the cases identified in PR45116 - we don't need to limit load combines to ABI alignment, we can use allowsMemoryAccess - which tests using getABITypeAlign, but also checks if a target permits (fast) misaligned memory loads by checking allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses as a fallback.
Sanjay Patel