Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Sherwood 3fd96e1b2e [LoopVectorize] Improve vectorisation of some intrinsics by treating them as uniform
This patch adds more instructions to the Uniforms list, for example certain
intrinsics that are uniform by definition or whose operands are loop invariant.
This list includes:

  1. The intrinsics 'experimental.noalias.scope.decl' and 'sideeffect', which
  are always uniform by definition.
  2. If intrinsics 'lifetime.start', 'lifetime.end' and 'assume' have
  loop invariant input operands then these are also uniform too.

Also, in VPRecipeBuilder::handleReplication we check if an instruction is
uniform based purely on whether or not the instruction lives in the Uniforms
list. However, there are certain cases where calls to some intrinsics can
be effectively treated as uniform too. Therefore, we now also treat the
following cases as uniform for scalable vectors:

  1. If the 'assume' intrinsic's operand is not loop invariant, then we
  are free to treat this as uniform anyway since it's only a performance
  hint. We will get the benefit for the first lane.
  2. When the input pointers for 'lifetime.start' and 'lifetime.end' are loop
  variant then for scalable vectors we assume these still ultimately come
  from the broadcast of an alloca. We do not support scalable vectorisation
  of loops containing alloca instructions, hence the alloca itself would
  be invariant. If the pointer does not come from an alloca then the
  intrinsic itself has no effect.

I have updated the assume test for fixed width, since we now treat it
as uniform:

  Transforms/LoopVectorize/assume.ll

I've also added new scalable vectorisation tests for other intriniscs:

  Transforms/LoopVectorize/scalable-assume.ll
  Transforms/LoopVectorize/scalable-lifetime.ll
  Transforms/LoopVectorize/scalable-noalias-scope-decl.ll

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107284
2021-08-06 10:13:15 +01:00
David Sherwood 43a5c750d1 Revert "[LoopVectorize] Add support for replication of more intrinsics with scalable vectors"
This reverts commit 95800da914.
2021-08-06 09:48:16 +01:00
David Sherwood 95800da914 [LoopVectorize] Add support for replication of more intrinsics with scalable vectors
This patch adds more instructions to the Uniforms list, for example certain
intrinsics that are uniform by definition or whose operands are loop invariant.
This list includes:

  1. The intrinsics 'experimental.noalias.scope.decl' and 'sideeffect', which
  are always uniform by definition.
  2. If intrinsics 'lifetime.start', 'lifetime.end' and 'assume' have
  loop invariant input operands then these are also uniform too.

Also, in VPRecipeBuilder::handleReplication we check if an instruction is
uniform based purely on whether or not the instruction lives in the Uniforms
list. However, there are certain cases where calls to some intrinsics can
be effectively treated as uniform too. Therefore, we now also treat the
following cases as uniform for scalable vectors:

  1. If the 'assume' intrinsic's operand is not loop invariant, then we
  are free to treat this as uniform anyway since it's only a performance
  hint. We will get the benefit for the first lane.
  2. When the input pointers for 'lifetime.start' and 'lifetime.end' are loop
  variant then for scalable vectors we assume these still ultimately come
  from the broadcast of an alloca. We do not support scalable vectorisation
  of loops containing alloca instructions, hence the alloca itself would
  be invariant. If the pointer does not come from an alloca then the
  intrinsic itself has no effect.

I have updated the assume test for fixed width, since we now treat it
as uniform:

  Transforms/LoopVectorize/assume.ll

I've also added new scalable vectorisation tests for other intriniscs:

  Transforms/LoopVectorize/scalable-assume.ll
  Transforms/LoopVectorize/scalable-lifetime.ll
  Transforms/LoopVectorize/scalable-noalias-scope-decl.ll

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107284
2021-08-05 15:17:27 +01:00
David Sherwood 1172a8a763 [NFC] Clean up tests in test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/assume.ll
The tests previously had lots of unnecessary CHECK lines, where
all we really need to check is the presence (or absence) of the
assume intrinsic and the correct input operands.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107157
2021-08-05 14:58:40 +01:00
Florian Hahn 23c2f2e6b2
[LV] Mark increment of main vector loop induction variable as NUW.
This patch marks the induction increment of the main induction variable
of the vector loop as NUW when not folding the tail.

If the tail is not folded, we know that End - Start >= Step (either
statically or through the minimum iteration checks). We also know that both
Start % Step == 0 and End % Step == 0. We exit the vector loop if %IV +
%Step == %End. Hence we must exit the loop before %IV + %Step unsigned
overflows and we can mark the induction increment as NUW.

This should make SCEV return more precise bounds for the created vector
loops, used by later optimizations, like late unrolling.

At the moment quite a few tests still need to be updated, but before
doing so I'd like to get initial feedback to make sure I am not missing
anything.

Note that this could probably be further improved by using information
from the original IV.

Attempt of modeling of the assumption in Alive2:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/H_DL_g

Part of a set of fixes required for PR50412.

Reviewed By: mkazantsev

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103255
2021-06-07 10:47:52 +01:00
Sanjay Patel 7a4abc07dd [LoopVectorize] auto-generate complete checks; NFC
We can't see how much overhead/redundancy is being
created with the partial checks.

To make it smaller and easier to read, I reduced the
vectorization factor because that does not add new
information - it just duplicates things.
2021-04-01 11:55:41 -04:00
Florian Hahn 23c113802e [LV] Allow assume calls in predicated blocks.
The assume intrinsic is intentionally marked as may reading/writing
memory, to avoid passes moving them around. When flattening the CFG
for predicated blocks, we have to drop the assume calls, as they
are control-flow dependent.

There are some cases where we can do better (when control flow is
preserved), but that is follow-up work.

Fixes PR43620.

Reviewers: hsaito, rengolin, dcaballe, Ayal

Reviewed By: Ayal

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68814
2020-01-16 10:11:35 +00:00
Florian Hahn 59ac44b3c1 [LV] Make X86/assume.ll X86 independent (NFC).
The test does not check anything X86 specific. This is a preparation for
the D68814.
2020-01-16 10:01:35 +00:00