This is a Clang-only change and depends on the existing "musttail"
support already implemented in LLVM.
The [[clang::musttail]] attribute goes on a return statement, not
a function definition. There are several constraints that the user
must follow when using [[clang::musttail]], and these constraints
are verified by Sema.
Tail calls are supported on regular function calls, calls through a
function pointer, member function calls, and even pointer to member.
Future work would be to throw a warning if a users tries to pass
a pointer or reference to a local variable through a musttail call.
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99517
08196e0b2e exposed LowerExpectIntrinsic's
internal implementation detail in the form of
LikelyBranchWeight/UnlikelyBranchWeight options to the outside.
While this isn't incorrect from the results viewpoint,
this is suboptimal from the layering viewpoint,
and causes confusion - should transforms also use those weights,
or should they use something else, D98898?
So go back to status quo by making LikelyBranchWeight/UnlikelyBranchWeight
internal again, and fixing all the code that used it directly,
which currently is only clang codegen, thankfully,
to emit proper @llvm.expect intrinsics instead.
The condition variable is in scope in the loop increment, so we need to
emit the jump destination from wthin the scope of the condition
variable.
For GCC compatibility (and compatibility with real-world 'FOR_EACH'
macros), 'continue' is permitted in a statement expression within the
condition of a for loop, though, so there are two cases here:
* If the for loop has no condition variable, we can emit the jump
destination before emitting the condition.
* If the for loop has a condition variable, we must defer emitting the
jump destination until after emitting the variable. We diagnose a
'continue' appearing in the initializer of the condition variable,
because it would jump past the initializer into the scope of that
variable.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98816
Added basic parsing/sema/serialization support for interop directive.
Support for the 'init' clause.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98558
Initial support for using the OpenMPIRBuilder by clang to generate loops using the OpenMPIRBuilder. This initial support is intentionally limited to:
* Only the worksharing-loop directive.
* Recognizes only the nowait clause.
* No loop nests with more than one loop.
* Untested with templates, exceptions.
* Semantic checking left to the existing infrastructure.
This patch introduces a new AST node, OMPCanonicalLoop, which becomes parent of any loop that has to adheres to the restrictions as specified by the OpenMP standard. These restrictions allow OMPCanonicalLoop to provide the following additional information that depends on base language semantics:
* The distance function: How many loop iterations there will be before entering the loop nest.
* The loop variable function: Conversion from a logical iteration number to the loop variable.
These allow the OpenMPIRBuilder to act solely using logical iteration numbers without needing to be concerned with iterator semantics between calling the distance function and determining what the value of the loop variable ought to be. Any OpenMP logical should be done by the OpenMPIRBuilder such that it can be reused MLIR OpenMP dialect and thus by flang.
The distance and loop variable function are implemented using lambdas (or more exactly: CapturedStmt because lambda implementation is more interviewed with the parser). It is up to the OpenMPIRBuilder how they are called which depends on what is done with the loop. By default, these are emitted as outlined functions but we might think about emitting them inline as the OpenMPRuntime does.
For compatibility with the current OpenMP implementation, even though not necessary for the OpenMPIRBuilder, OMPCanonicalLoop can still be nested within OMPLoopDirectives' CapturedStmt. Although OMPCanonicalLoop's are not currently generated when the OpenMPIRBuilder is not enabled, these can just be skipped when not using the OpenMPIRBuilder in case we don't want to make the AST dependent on the EnableOMPBuilder setting.
Loop nests with more than one loop require support by the OpenMPIRBuilder (D93268). A simple implementation of non-rectangular loop nests would add another lambda function that returns whether a loop iteration of the rectangular overapproximation is also within its non-rectangular subset.
Reviewed By: jdenny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94973
The tile directive is in OpenMP's Technical Report 8 and foreseeably will be part of the upcoming OpenMP 5.1 standard.
This implementation is based on an AST transformation providing a de-sugared loop nest. This makes it simple to forward the de-sugared transformation to loop associated directives taking the tiled loops. In contrast to other loop associated directives, the OMPTileDirective does not use CapturedStmts. Letting loop associated directives consume loops from different capture context would be difficult.
A significant amount of code generation logic is taking place in the Sema class. Eventually, I would prefer if these would move into the CodeGen component such that we could make use of the OpenMPIRBuilder, together with flang. Only expressions converting between the language's iteration variable and the logical iteration space need to take place in the semantic analyzer: Getting the of iterations (e.g. the overload resolution of `std::distance`) and converting the logical iteration number to the iteration variable (e.g. overload resolution of `iteration + .omp.iv`). In clang, only CXXForRangeStmt is also represented by its de-sugared components. However, OpenMP loop are not defined as syntatic sugar. Starting with an AST-based approach allows us to gradually move generated AST statements into CodeGen, instead all at once.
I would also like to refactor `checkOpenMPLoop` into its functionalities in a follow-up. In this patch it is used twice. Once for checking proper nesting and emitting diagnostics, and additionally for deriving the logical iteration space per-loop (instead of for the loop nest).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76342
This is an enhancement to LLVM Source-Based Code Coverage in clang to track how
many times individual branch-generating conditions are taken (evaluate to TRUE)
and not taken (evaluate to FALSE). Individual conditions may comprise larger
boolean expressions using boolean logical operators. This functionality is
very similar to what is supported by GCOV except that it is very closely
anchored to the ASTs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84467
Matrix types in memory are represented as arrays, but accessed through
vector pointers, with the alignment specified on the access operation.
For inline assembly, update pointer arguments to use vector pointers.
Otherwise there will be a mis-match if the matrix is also an
input-argument which is represented as vector.
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91631
D86841 had an error where for statements with no conditional were
required to make progress. This is not true, this patch removes that
line, and adds regression tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91075
Since C++11, the C++ standard has a forward progress guarantee
[intro.progress], so all such functions must have the `mustprogress`
requirement. In addition, from C11 and onwards, loops without a non-zero
constant conditional or no conditional are also required to make
progress (C11 6.8.5p6). This patch implements these attribute deductions
so they can be used by the optimization passes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86841
The attribute has no effect on a do statement since the path of execution
will always include its substatement.
It adds a diagnostic when the attribute is used on an infinite while loop
since the codegen omits the branch here. Since the likelihood attributes
have no effect on a do statement no diagnostic will be issued for
do [[unlikely]] {...} while(0);
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89899
assembly operands."
Earlyclobbers are now excepted from this change (original commit: c78da03).
Review: Ulrich Weigand, Nick Desaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87279
This implements the likelihood attribute for the switch statement. Based on the
discussion in D85091 and D86559 it only handles the attribute when placed on
the case labels or the default labels.
It also marks the likelihood attribute as feature complete. There are more QoI
patches in the pipeline.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89210
Change EmitAsmStmt() to
- Not tie physregs with the "+r" constraint, but instead add the hard
register as an input constraint. This makes "+r" and "=r":"r" look the same
in the output.
Background: Macro intensive user code may contain inline assembly
statements with multiple operands constrained to the same physreg. Such a
case (with the operand constraints "+r" : "r") currently triggers the
TwoAddressInstructionPass assertion against any extra use of a tied
register. Furthermore, TwoAddress will insert a COPY to that physreg even
though isel has already done so (for the non-tied use), which may lead to a
second redundant instruction currently. A simple fix for this is to not
emit tied physreg uses in the first place for the "+r" constraint, which is
what this patch does.
- Give an error on multiple outputs to the same physical register.
This should be reported and this is also what GCC does.
Review: Ulrich Weigand, Aaron Ballman, Jennifer Yu, Craig Topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87279
Bruno De Fraine discovered some issues with D85091. The branch weights
generated for `logical not` and `ternary conditional` were wrong. The
`logical and` and `logical or` differed from the code generated of
`__builtin_predict`.
Adjusted the generated code for the likelihood to match
`__builtin_predict`. The patch is based on Bruno's suggestions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88363
This is the initial part of the implementation of the C++20 likelihood
attributes. It handles the attributes in an if statement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85091
Sometimes we also want to avoid merging inline assembly. This patch add
the nomerge function attribute to inline assembly.
Reviewed By: zequanwu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84225
Prevent IR-gen from emitting consteval declarations
Summary: with this patch instead of emitting calls to consteval function. the IR-gen will emit a store of the already computed result.
Summary: with this patch instead of emitting calls to consteval function. the IR-gen will emit a store of the already computed result.
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76420
Rather than pushing inactive cleanups for the block captures at the
entry of a full expression and activating them during the creation of
the block literal, just call pushLifetimeExtendedDestroy to ensure the
cleanups are popped at the end of the scope enclosing the block
expression.
rdar://problem/63996471
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81624
Summary:
If the variables must be globalized in OpenMP mode (local automatic
variable, GPU compilation mode, the variable may escape its declaration
context by the reference or by the pointer), it should not be considered
as the NRVO candidate. Otherwise, incorrect the return value of the
function might not be updated.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: yaxunl, guansong, sstefan1, cfe-commits, caomhin
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80936
Currently Clang does not respect -fno-unroll-loops during LTO. During
D76916 it was suggested to respect -fno-unroll-loops on a TU basis.
This patch uses the existing llvm.loop.unroll.disable metadata to
disable loop unrolling explicitly for each loop in the TU if
unrolling is disabled. This should ensure that loops from TUs compiled
with -fno-unroll-loops are skipped by the unroller during LTO.
This also means that if a loop from a TU with -fno-unroll-loops
gets inlined into a TU without this option, the loop won't be
unrolled.
Due to the fact that some transforms might drop loop metadata, there
potentially are cases in which we still unroll loops from TUs with
-fno-unroll-loops. I think we should fix those issues rather than
introducing a function attribute to disable loop unrolling during LTO.
Improving the metadata handling will benefit other use cases, like
various loop pragmas, too. And it is an improvement to clang completely
ignoring -fno-unroll-loops during LTO.
If that direction looks good, we can use a similar approach to also
respect -fno-vectorize during LTO, at least for LoopVectorize.
In the future, this might also allow us to remove the UnrollLoops option
LLVM's PassManagerBuilder.
Reviewers: Meinersbur, hfinkel, dexonsmith, tejohnson
Reviewed By: Meinersbur, tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77058
Summary:
Adds the constraints described below to ensure that we
can tie variables of SVE ACLE types to operands in inline-asm:
- y: SVE registers Z0-Z7
- Upl: One of the low eight SVE predicate registers (P0-P7)
- Upa: Full range of SVE predicate registers (P0-P15)
Reviewers: sdesmalen, huntergr, rovka, cameron.mcinally, efriedma, rengolin
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: miyuki, tschuett, rkruppe, psnobl, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75690
Summary:
Clang's "asm goto" feature didn't initially support outputs constraints. That
was the same behavior as gcc's implementation. The decision by gcc not to
support outputs was based on a restriction in their IR regarding terminators.
LLVM doesn't restrict terminators from returning values (e.g. 'invoke'), so
it made sense to support this feature.
Output values are valid only on the 'fallthrough' path. If an output value's used
on an indirect branch, then it's 'poisoned'.
In theory, outputs *could* be valid on the 'indirect' paths, but it's very
difficult to guarantee that the original semantics would be retained. E.g.
because indirect labels could be used as data, we wouldn't be able to split
critical edges in situations where two 'callbr' instructions have the same
indirect label, because the indirect branch's destination would no longer be
the same.
Reviewers: jyknight, nickdesaulniers, hfinkel
Reviewed By: jyknight, nickdesaulniers
Subscribers: MaskRay, rsmith, hiraditya, llvm-commits, cfe-commits, craig.topper, rnk
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69876
Implement protection against the stack clash attack [0] through inline stack
probing.
Probe stack allocation every PAGE_SIZE during frame lowering or dynamic
allocation to make sure the page guard, if any, is touched when touching the
stack, in a similar manner to GCC[1].
This extends the existing `probe-stack' mechanism with a special value `inline-asm'.
Technically the former uses function call before stack allocation while this
patch provides inlined stack probes and chunk allocation.
Only implemented for x86.
[0] https://www.qualys.com/2017/06/19/stack-clash/stack-clash.txt
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00556.html
This a recommit of 39f50da2a3 with proper LiveIn
declaration, better option handling and more portable testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68720
Implement protection against the stack clash attack [0] through inline stack
probing.
Probe stack allocation every PAGE_SIZE during frame lowering or dynamic
allocation to make sure the page guard, if any, is touched when touching the
stack, in a similar manner to GCC[1].
This extends the existing `probe-stack' mechanism with a special value `inline-asm'.
Technically the former uses function call before stack allocation while this
patch provides inlined stack probes and chunk allocation.
Only implemented for x86.
[0] https://www.qualys.com/2017/06/19/stack-clash/stack-clash.txt
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00556.html
This a recommit of 39f50da2a3 with proper LiveIn
declaration, better option handling and more portable testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68720
Implement protection against the stack clash attack [0] through inline stack
probing.
Probe stack allocation every PAGE_SIZE during frame lowering or dynamic
allocation to make sure the page guard, if any, is touched when touching the
stack, in a similar manner to GCC[1].
This extends the existing `probe-stack' mechanism with a special value `inline-asm'.
Technically the former uses function call before stack allocation while this
patch provides inlined stack probes and chunk allocation.
Only implemented for x86.
[0] https://www.qualys.com/2017/06/19/stack-clash/stack-clash.txt
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00556.html
This a recommit of 39f50da2a3 with better option
handling and more portable testing
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68720
Implement protection against the stack clash attack [0] through inline stack
probing.
Probe stack allocation every PAGE_SIZE during frame lowering or dynamic
allocation to make sure the page guard, if any, is touched when touching the
stack, in a similar manner to GCC[1].
This extends the existing `probe-stack' mechanism with a special value `inline-asm'.
Technically the former uses function call before stack allocation while this
patch provides inlined stack probes and chunk allocation.
Only implemented for x86.
[0] https://www.qualys.com/2017/06/19/stack-clash/stack-clash.txt
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00556.html
This a recommit of 39f50da2a3 with correct option
flags set.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68720
This reverts commit 39f50da2a3.
The -fstack-clash-protection is being passed to the linker too, which
is not intended.
Reverting and fixing that in a later commit.
Implement protection against the stack clash attack [0] through inline stack
probing.
Probe stack allocation every PAGE_SIZE during frame lowering or dynamic
allocation to make sure the page guard, if any, is touched when touching the
stack, in a similar manner to GCC[1].
This extends the existing `probe-stack' mechanism with a special value `inline-asm'.
Technically the former uses function call before stack allocation while this
patch provides inlined stack probes and chunk allocation.
Only implemented for x86.
[0] https://www.qualys.com/2017/06/19/stack-clash/stack-clash.txt
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00556.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68720
Joshua Haberman